Skip to main content
Log in

Enhancement of the Antiinflammatory Effect of Ethyl 4-Biphenylyl Acetate in Ointment by β-Cyclodextrin Derivatives: Increased Absorption and Localized Activation of the Prodrug in Rats

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethyl 4-biphenylyl acetate (EBA) is a prodrug of the antiinflammatory 4-biphenylyl acetic acid (BPAA). The inclusion complexes of EBA with β-cyclodextrin (β-CyD), heptakis(2,6-di-O-methyl)-β-cyclodextrin (DM-β-CyD), and 2-hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin (HP-β-CyD) at a molar ratio of 1:2 (EBA:cyclodextrin) were prepared and used to make hydrophilic antiinflammatory ointments. The in vitro release of EBA from the ointments was enhanced by complexation in the order of β-CyD < DM-β-CyD ≤ HP-β-CyD. The improvement correlated with the improved solubility and not with the decreased diffusibility observed to occur upon the complexation of EBA. In vivo the complexation with cyclodextrin derivatives increased both the release of EBA from the vehicle and its conversion in the underlying tissue to BPAA, but the total of EBA and BPAA in the tissue was decreased. In vitro studies confirmed that the effects of cyclodextrin derivatives on the conversion were exerted indirectly. The combination of the enhanced release and of the enhanced prodrug hydrolysis by esterases in the site where the antiinflammatory action is required resulted in increased therapeutic effects. In the model of carrageenan-induced acute edema in rat paw, the complexation improved the therapeutic effects over those of EBA alone in the order of β-CyD < DM-β-CyD < HP-β-CyD. HP-β-CyD may be a particularly useful cyclodextrin derivative since it improves the topical availability and does not irritate tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. Y. Chan and A. L. W. Po. Int. J. Pharm. 55:1–16 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. W. Bucks. Pharm. Res. 1:148–153 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Pitha. J. Incl. Phenom. 2:477–485 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Szejtli. In V. F. Smolen and L. A. Ball (eds.), Controlled Drug Bioavailability, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1985, pp. 365–420.

    Google Scholar 

  5. K. Uekama and M. Otagiri. CRC Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 3:1–40 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. W. Saenger. In J. L. Atwood, J. E. D. Davies, and D. D. MacNicol (eds.), Inclusion Compounds, Vol. 2, Academic Press, London, 1984, pp. 231–259.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Szejtli. J. Incl. Phenom. 1:135–150 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Pitha, T. Irie, P. B. Sklar, and J. S. Nye. Life Sci. 43:493–502 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Uekama and T. Irie. In D. Duchêne (ed.), Cyclodextrins and Their Industrial Uses, Editions de Santé, Paris, 1987, pp. 393–439.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Yoshida, H., Arima, K. Uekema, and J. Pitha. Int. J. Pharm. 46:217–222 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Arima, H. Adachi, T. Irie, and K. Uekama. Drug Invest. (in press) (1990).

  12. J. Pitha, J. Milecki, H. Fales, L. Pannell, and K. Uekama. Int. J. Pharm. 29:73–82 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  13. H. Arima,, T. Irie, and K. Uekama. Int. J. Pharm. 57:107–115 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. Uekama, K. Masaki, K. Arimori, T. Irie, and F. Hirayama. Yakugaku Zasshi 107:449–456 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. T. Higuchi. J. Pharm. Sci. 50:874–875 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. I. Higuchi. J. Pharm. Sci. 51:802–804 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  17. F. S. Chiccarelli, H. J. Eisner, and G. E. V. Lear. Arzneim.-Forsch./Drug Res. 30:707–715 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. Yamaoka, T. Nakagawa, and T. Uno. J. Pharmacok. Biopharm. 6:547–558 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. A. Winter, E. A. Risley, and G. W. Nuss. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 111:544–547 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  20. H. Okamoto, H. Komatsu, M. Hashida, and H. Sezaki. Int. J. Pharm. 30:35–45 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  21. A. Gerlóczy, S. Antal, and J. Szejtli. In O. Huber and J. Szejtli (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Cyclodextrins, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, 1988, pp. 415–420.

    Google Scholar 

  22. T. Hoshino, K. Ishida, T. Irie, K. Uekama, and T. Ono. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 281:60–65 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  23. K. Ishida, T. Hoshino, T. Irie, and K. Uekama. Xenobio. Metabol. Dispos. 3:377–386 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. J. Martin, S. P. Denyer, and J. Hadgraft. Int. J. Pharm. 39:23–32 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Hadgraft. In H. Bundgaard (ed.), Design of Prodrugs, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1985, pp. 271–289.

    Google Scholar 

  26. D. B. Guzek, A. H. Kennedy, S. C. McNeill, E. Wakshull, and R. O. Potts. Pharm. Res. 6:33–39 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. O. Potts, S. C. McNeill, C. R. Desbonnet, and E. Wakshull. Pharm. Res. 6:119–124 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Ozawa, I. Koyama, S. Murayama, and T. Nadai. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 33:5113–5118 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Mizushima. Drug Deliv. Syst. 2:3–12 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. E. Brewster, J. W. Simpkins, M. S. Hora, W. C. Stern, and N. Bodor. J. Parent. Sci. Tech. 43, 231–240 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arima, H., Adachi, H., Irie, T. et al. Enhancement of the Antiinflammatory Effect of Ethyl 4-Biphenylyl Acetate in Ointment by β-Cyclodextrin Derivatives: Increased Absorption and Localized Activation of the Prodrug in Rats. Pharm Res 7, 1152–1156 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015932325998

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015932325998

Navigation