Skip to main content
Log in

Weed species diversity and community composition in cropping practices at two intensity levels – a six-year experiment

  • Published:
Plant Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Alternative cropping practices can be expected to increase the diversity and change the species composition of weed communities. In a six-year field experiment we compared species diversity and species composition in the weed community of cereal fields cultivated by conventional and by low-input cropping methods. In the conventional cropping both mineral fertilizers and herbicides were applied but in the low-input cropping the fertlizer was manure and herbicides were avoided altogether. The level of nitrogen fertilization was higher in conventional cropping. A five-year crop rotation comprising rye, oat-pea, barley and two-year grasslands was used in both cropping methods. We found that the species pool was larger (42 vs 35 species) and the average number of species higher (20.2 vs 13.1 species) in low-input than in conventional cropping. This was the case both in the data pooled across crops and in each crop separately. Herbicides affected species diversity and species composition more than did nitrogen fertilization. Species susceptible to the herbicides applied declined in abundance, which resulted in more skewed dominance patterns in the communities of conventional fields than in those of low-input fields. The crop affected the species composition of weed communities more than did the cropping method. Our results suggest that weed species diversity could be promoted by using low-intensity cropping practices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Albrecht, H. 1995. Changes in the arable weed flora of Germany during the last five decades. Proceedings of the 9th EWRS (European Weed Research Society) Symposium, Budapest, pp. 41–48.

  • Altieri, M. A. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 74: 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A. & Rosset, P. 1996. Agroecology and the conversion of large-scale conventional systems to sustainable management. Int. J. Environ. Studies 50: 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, T. N. & Milberg, P. 1998. Weed flora and the relative importance of site, crop, crop rotation, and nitrogen. Weed Science 46: 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, C., Stryhn, H. & Streibig, J. C. 1996. Decline of the flora in Danish arable fields. J. Appl. Ecol. 33: 619–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, G. H. 1966. A comparison of some cluster seeking techniques. Stanford Research Institute, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, S. B. 1989. Rethinking crop genetic resource conservation. Cons. Biol. 3: 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancellor, R. J. 1979. The long-term effects of herbicides on weed populations. Ann. Appl. Biol. 91: 141–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer, J. 1976. Siebenjährige Untersuchungen über den Einfluss von Herbiziden auf die Unkrautflora in einer konzenrtierten Getreidefruchtfolge. NDP DDR 30: 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derksen, D. A., Thomas, A. G., Lafond, G. P., Loeppky, H. A. & Swanton, C. J. 1995. Impact of post-emergence herbicides on weed community diversity within conservation-tillage systems. Weed Res. 35: 311–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg, H., Weber, H. E., Düll, R., Wirth, V., Werner, W. & Paulißen, D. 1991. Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica 18: 1–248 (in German).

    Google Scholar 

  • Erviö, L-R. & Salonen, J. 1987. Changes in the weed population of spring cereals in Finland. Ann. Agric. Fenniae 26: 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fryer, J. D. & Chancellor, R. J. 1970. Evidence of changing weed populations in arable land. Proceedings of the 10th British Weed Control Conference, pp. 958–964. British Crop Protection Council, Brighton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, H. & Streibig, J. C. 1982. Changing patterns of weed distribution as a result of herbicide use and other agronomic factors. pp. 57–79. In: Lebaron, H. M. & Gressel, J. (eds), Herbicide resistance in plants. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hämet-Ahti, L., Suominen, J., Ulvinen, T. & Uotila, P. 1998. Retkeilykasvio (Field Flora of Finland). Finnish Museum of Natural History, Botanical Museum, Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume, L. 1984. Long-term effects of 2,4-D application on plants. I. Effects on the weed community in a wheat crop. Can. J. Bot. 65: 2530–2536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongman, R. H. G., ter Braak, C. J. F. & van Tongeren, O. F. R. 1995. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, E. G. 1984. Structural changes of weed communities and populations. Vegetatio 58: 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, E. G. 1988. Changes in the structure of weed communities affected by agro-chemicals - what role does nitrogen play? Ecol. Bull. 39: 71–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahn, E. G. & Helmecke, K. 1979. Effects of herbicide treatment on the structure and functioning of agro-ecosystems II. Structural changes in the plant community after the application of herbicides over several years. Agro-Ecosystems 5: 159–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G. & Swift, M. J. 1997. Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277: 504–509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powles, S. B., Preston, C., Bryan, I. B. & Jutsum, A. R. 1997. Herbicide resistance: impact and management. Adv. Agron. 58: 57–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyšek, P. & Lepš, J. 1991. Response of a weed community to nitrogen fertilization: a multivariate analysis. J. Veg. Sci. 2: 237–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, J. & Ascard, J. 1995. Weed control in organic farming systems. pp. 49–67. In: Glen, D. M., Greaves, M. P. & Anderson, H. M. (eds), Ecology and integrated farming systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schellhorn, N. A. & Sork, V. L. 1997. The impact of weed diversity on insect population dynamics and crop yield in collards, Brassica oleraceae (Brassicaceae). Oecologia 111: 233–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, F. C., Légère, A., Simard, R. R., Angers, D. A., Pageau, D. & Lafond, J. 1997. Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Sci. 45: 798–806.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanton, C. J., Shrestha, A., Roy, R. C., Ball-Coelho, B. R. & Knezevic, S. Z. 1999. Effect of tillage systems, N, and cover crop on the composition of weed flora. Weed Sci. 47: 454–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D. & Pacala, S. 1993. The maintenance of species richness in plant communities. pp. 13–25. In: Ricklefs, R. E. & Schluter, D. (eds), Species diversity in ecological communities. University of Chigaco Press, Chigaco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valpasvuo-Jaatinen, P. V., Rekolainen, S. & Latostenmaa, H. 1997. Finnish agriculture and its sustainability: environmental impacts. Ambio 26: 448–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, P. 1991. Europe's endangered arable weeds. Shell Agriculture 10: 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. D. & Tilman, D. 1991. Components of plant competition along an experimental gradient of nitrogen availability. Ecology 72: 1050–1065.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hyvönen, T., Salonen, J. Weed species diversity and community composition in cropping practices at two intensity levels – a six-year experiment. Plant Ecology 159, 73–81 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015580722191

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015580722191

Navigation