Skip to main content
Log in

Neither Hierarchy nor Identity: Knowledge-Governance Mechanisms and the Theory of the Firm

  • Published:
Journal of Management and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Building on existing empirical research on knowledge transfer, sharing and integration in inter-firm and intra-firm relations, it is argued that there is little evidence and theoretical reason for assigning exclusive properties to internal or external organization, as such, in a knowledge-governance respect. A more micro framework is then theoretically developed, in which a portfolio of knowledge-governance mechanisms is evaluated according to two criteria: the cognitive `possibility' to sustain certain types of knowledge interchanges; and the comparative cost of the mechanism where more than one is applicable.

The results of both the empirical and conceptual analyses conducted cast doubts on the possibility of having a `theory of the firm,' based on the deterministic presence/absence of certain attributes and the possession of exclusive properties – no matter if hierarchy or identity – and call for a more `continuous' (rather than `discrete') and `combinative' (rather than mutually exclusive) notion of governance forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arrow K.J.: 1974, The limits of Organization (New York/London: W.W. Norton and Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R.M.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazerman M.H. and R.J. Lewicki (a cura di): 1983, Negotiating in Organizations (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. and K.M. Murphy: 1992, “The Division of Labor, Coordination Costs, and Knowledge”, Quarterly Journal of Economics CVII(4): 1137–1160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.S. and P. Dusguid: 1998: “Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Towards a Unified View of Working, Learning and Innovation”, California Management Review 40(2): 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusco S.: 1999, “Rules of the Game in Industrial Districts”, in A. Grandori (ed.), Inter-Firm Networks: Organization and Industrial Competitiveness (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusoni, S. and A. Prencipe: forthcoming, “Unpacking the Black Box of Modularity: Technologies, Products, and Organizations”, Industrial and Corporate Change.

  • Buckley, P.J. and J. Michie: 1996, Firms, Organizations and Contracts (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. and J. Michie: 1999 “Knowledge Sharing in Organizations: A Field Study”, 16th EGOS Colloquium, Track on ‘Knowledge, Knowing and Organization’, Warwick.

  • Coase, R.: 1937, “The Nature of the Firm”, Economica: 386–405.

  • Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal: 1990, “Absorbtive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conner, K.R. and C.K. Prahalad: 1996 “A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge versus Opportunism”, Organization Science 7(5): 477–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H. and L. Prusak: 1998, Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Laat, P.: 2000, “Property Right or Property Left?: The Protection of Intellectual Property in Software”, 16the EGOS Colloquium, Session ‘Knowledge, Knowing and Organization’, Warwick.

  • Demsetz, H.: 1991, “The Theory of the Firm Revisited”, in O. Williamson and S. Winter (eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution and Development (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dioguardi, G.: 1987, L'impresa nell'era del computer (Milano: Ed. Sole 24 Ore).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyer, H.H.: 1999, “Interorganizational Learning, Barriers to Knowledge Transfers, and Competitive Advantage”, Strategic Management Society Meeting; Orlando, July.

  • Foss, N.J.: 1993, “Theories of the Firm: Contractual and Competence Perspectives”, Evolutionary Economics 3(2): 127–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N.J.: 1996, “More Critical Comments on Knowledge-Based Theories of the Firm”, Organization Science 7(5): 519–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J.R.: 1974, “Organization Design: An Information Processing View”, Interfaces 4: 28–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavetti, G.: 1998, “L'insostenibilità della sostenibilità”, in A. Lipparini (ed.), Competenze organizzative (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A.: 1997, “An Organizational Assessment of Inter-Firm Coordination Modes”, Organization Studies 18(6): 897–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A.: 2001a, Organization and Economic Behavior (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A.: 2001b, “Methodological Options for an Integrated Perspective on Organization”, Human Relations. Special Issue ‘Towards Integrating the Social Sciences’ 51(1): 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandori, A. and M. Neri: 1998, “The Fairness Properties of Networks”, in A. Grandori (ed.), InterFirm Networks: Organization and Industrial Competitiveness (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, R.M.: 1996, “Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm”, Strategic Management Journal (Winter Special Issue) 17: 109–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P.: 1992, “Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination”, International Organization 46(1).

  • Hayek, F. von: 1945, “The Use of Knowledge in Society”, American Economic Review (September) 35: 519–530.

  • Heyligen, F.: 1992, “Marking Thoughts Explicit: Advantages and Drawbacks of Formal Expression”, Submitted to Journal of Applied Psychology.

  • Kogut, B. and U. Zander: 1996, “What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity and Learning”, Organization Science (Sept-Oct) 7(5): 502–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K. and V. Mahnke: 2001, “Knowledge Strategies, Firm Types, and Complementarity in Human-Resource Practices”, Journal of Management and Governance 5(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence P. and J. Lorsch: 1967, Organization and Environment (Harvard Business School).

  • Lipparini, A.: 1998, Competenze organizzative (Bologna: Il Mulino).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipparini, A. and A. Lomi: 1999, “Interorganizational Relations in the Modena Biomedical Industry. A Case Study in Local Economic Development”, in A. Grandori (ed.), Inter-firm Networks Organization and Industrial Competition (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütz, S.: 1997, “Learning Through Intermediaries: The Case of Inter-Firm Research Collaborations ≫”, in M. Ebers (ed.), The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti, S.: 1984, “Le strutture di governo delle transazioni nel processo di internazionalizzazione delle imprese”, Economia e Politica Industriale 41: 65–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgrom, P. and J. Roberts: 1995, “Complementarities and Fit: Strategy, Structure and Organizational Change in Manufacturing”, Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 179–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and F. Corno (eds.): 1999, “Knowledge Creation in Districts”, Journal of Management and Governance, Special Issue (3/4).

  • Noteboom, B.: 1998, “The Dynamic Efficiency of Networks”, in A. Grandori (ed.), Inter-firm Networks Organization and Industrial Competition (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noteboom, B.: 1999, Inter-Firm Alliances (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlean, A.: 1989, “Pour une approche cognitive des conventions, economiques”, Revue Economique 40(2): 241–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1958, Personal Knowledge (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, M.: 1967, The Tacit Dimension (London: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, W.: 1996, “Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry”, Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 152(1): 197–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D.G.: 1983, “Achieving Integrative Agreements”, in M.H. Bazerman and R.J. Lewicki (a cura di), Negotiating in Organizations (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxenian, A.L.: 1990, “Regional Networks and the Resurgence of Silicon Valley”, California Management Review 33(1): 89–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, S.: 1991, “Informal Technology Transfer Between Firms: Cooperation Through Information Trading”, Research Policy 2: 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1945, Administrative Behavior (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1962, “The Architecture of Complexity”, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 106: 467–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A.: 1996, An Empirically Based Microeconomics, Lezioni Raffaele Mattioli (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simonin, B.L.: 1999, “Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances”, Strategic Management Journal 20: 595–623.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suarez-Villa, L. and R. Rama: 1996, “Outsourcing, R&D and the Pattern of Intra-Metropolitan Location: The Electronics Industries of Madrid”, Urban Studies 33(7): 1155–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susman, G.I.: 1976, Autonomy at Work (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeishi, A.: Forthcoming, “Knowledge Partitioning in the Inter-Firm Division of Labor: The Case of Automotive Product Development”, Organization Science. Special Issue ‘Knowledge, Knowing and Organization’.

  • Thompson, J.D.: 1967, Organization in Action (New York: McGraw-Hill).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trist, E.L., G.W. Higgin, H. Murray and A.B. Pollock: 1963, Organizational Choice (Londra: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turati, C.: 1998, Il caso Minnesota Minging and Manufacturing (Università Bocconi).

  • Weick, K.: 1979, “Cognitive Processes in Organizations”, Research in Organizational Behavior 1: 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1975, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1981, “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach”, American Journal of Sociology 87: 548–577.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1991, “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives”, Administrative Science Quarterly (June) 36: 269–296; and in S. Lindenberg and H. Schreuder (eds.), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Organization Studies (Pergamon Press, 1993), pp. 3-37.

  • Williamson, O.E.: 1993, “Transaction Cost Economics and Organization Theory”, Industrial and Corporate Change 2(2): 107–156 (Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenger, T.R. and W.S. Hesterley: 1998, “The Disaggregation of Corporations: Selective Intervention, High Powered Incentives and Molecular Units”, Organization Science 8(3): 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Grandori, A. Neither Hierarchy nor Identity: Knowledge-Governance Mechanisms and the Theory of the Firm. Journal of Management & Governance 5, 381–399 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014055213456

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014055213456

Keywords

Navigation