Skip to main content
Log in

Fractal Analysis of Pharmaceutical Particles by Atomic Force Microscopy

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. Reliable methods are needed to characterize the surface roughness of pharmaceutical solid particles for quality control and for finding the correlation with other properties. In this study, we used fractal analysis to describe the surface roughness.

Methods. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used to obtain three-dimensional surface profiles. The variation method was used to calculate fractal dimensions. We have measured fractal dimensions of four granule samples, four powders, and two freeze-dried powders.

Results. A computer program was written to implement the variation method. The implementation was verified using the model surfaces generated by fractional Brownian motion. The fractal dimensions of most particles and granules were between 2.1 and 2.2, and were independent of the scan size we measured. The freeze-dried samples, however, showed wide variation in the values of fractal dimension, which were dependent on the scan size. As scan size increased, the fractal dimension also increased up to 2.5.

Conclusions. Fractal analysis can be used to describe surface roughness of pharmaceutical particles. The variation method allows calculation of reliable fractal dimensions of surface profiles obtained by AFM. Careful analysis is required for the estimation of fractal dimension, since the estimates are dependent on the algorithm and the digitized model size (i.e., number of data points of the measured surface profile) used. The fractal dimension of pharmaceutical materials is also a function of the observation scale (i.e., the scan size) used in the profile measurement. The multi-fractal features and the scale-dependency of fractal dimension result from the artificial processes controlling the surface morphology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. S. R. Byrn. Solid State Chemistry of Drugs, Academic Press, New York, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. G. Brittain, S. J. Bogdanowich, D. E. Bugay, J. DeVincentis, G. Lewen, and A. W. Newman. Physical characterization of pharmaceutical solids. Pharm. Res. 8:963-973 (1991).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. M. A. Ramadan and R. Tawashi. Effect of surface geometry and morphic features on the flow characteristics of microsphere suspensions. J. Pharm. Sci. 79:929-933 (1990).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. P. D. Nadkarni, D. O. Kildsig, P. A. Kramer, and G. S. Banker. Effect of surface roughness and coating solvent on film adhesion to tablets. J. Pharm. Sci. 64:1554-1557 (1975).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. T. Oshima, Y.-L. Zhang, M. Hirota, M. Suzuki, and T. Nakagawa. The effect of the types of mill on the flowability of ground powders. Adv. Powder Technol. 6:35-45 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. C.-T. Lee and C. C.-K. Chou. Application of fractal geometry in quantitative characterization of aerosol morphology. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 11:436-441 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Thibert, M. Akbarieh, and R. Tawashi. Application of fractal dimension to the study of the surface ruggedness of granular solids and excipients. J. Pharm. Sci. 77:724-726 (1988).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. J. M. Bennett. Recent developments in surface roughness characterization. Meas. Sci. Technol. 3:1119-1127 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  9. R. M. Hall, A. Unsworth, P. Siney, and B. M. Wroblewski. The surface topography of retrieved femoral heads. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med. 7:739-744 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Provder and B. Kunz. Application of profilometry and fractal analysis to the characterization of coatings surface roughness. Prog. Org. Coat. 27:219-226 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. R. Brown and C. H. Scholz. Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces. J. Geophys. Res. 90:12575-12582 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. W. L. Power and T. E. Tullis. Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness. J. Geophys. Res. 96:415-424 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. B. Mandelbrot. Fractals: Form, Chance, and Dimension, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Farin and D. Avnir. Reactive fractal surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 91:5517-5521 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. H. Kaye. Characterizing the structure of fumed pigments using the concepts of fractal geometry. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 8:63-71 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. F. Family, P. Meakin, B. Sapoval, and R. Wool (eds.), Fractal Aspects of Materials, Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Seri-Levy and D. Avnir. Fractal analysis of surface geometry effects on catalytic reactions. Surf. Sci. 248:258-270 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. Avnir, D. Farin, and P. Pfeifer. Surface geometric irregularity of particulate materials: The fractal approach. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 103:112-123 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Y. H. Lee, J. R. Carr, D. J. Barr, and C. J. Haas. The fractal dimension as a measure of the roughness of rock discontinuity profiles. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 27:453-464 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. B. Dubuc, S. W. Zucker, C. Tricot, J. F. Quiniou, and D. Wehbi. Evaluating the fractal dimension of surfaces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. 425:113-127 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  21. B. Dubuc, J. F. Quiniou, C. Roques-Carmes, C. Tricot, and S. W. Zucker. Evaluating the fractal dimension of profiles. Phys. Rev. A. 39:1500-1512 (1989).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. B. Dubuc and S. Dubuc. Error bounds on the estimation of fractal dimension. SIAM J. Number. Anal. 33:602-626 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. S. Ganti and B. Bhushan. Generalized fractal analysis and its applications to engineering surfaces. Wear 180:17-34 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  24. A. Majumdar and B. Bhushan. Role of fractal geometry in roughness characterization and contact mechanics of surfaces. J. Tribol. 112:205-216 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Thibert, B. Dubuc, M. Dufour, and R. Tawashi. Evaluation of the surface roughness of cystine stones using a visible laser diode scattering approach. Scanning Microsc. 7:555-561 (1993).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. M. F. Barnsley, R. L. Devaney, B. B. Mandelbrot, H.-O. Peitgen, D. Saupe, R. F. Voss, Y. Fisher, and M. McGuire. The Science of Fractal Images, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Q. Huang, J. R. Lorch, and R. C. Dubes. Can the fractal dimension of images be measured? Pattern Recognit. 27:339-349 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. Nittmann and H. E. Stanley. Non-deterministic approach to anisotropic growth patterns with continuously tunable morphology: The fractal properties of some real snowflakes. J. Phys. A. 20:L1185-L1191 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. Kertész and T. Vicsek. Diffusion-limited aggregation and regular patterns: Fluctuations versus anisotropy. J. Phys. A. 19:L257-L260 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. C. Sommerer and E. Ott. Particles floating on a moving fluid: A dynamically comprehensible physical fractal. Science 259:335-339 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, T., Park, K. Fractal Analysis of Pharmaceutical Particles by Atomic Force Microscopy. Pharm Res 15, 1222–1232 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011939824353

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011939824353

Navigation