Abstract
This paper addresses research in the life sciences, responsible for significant national expenditures for scientific investigations funded by both the federal government and industry. Our investigation examines faculty members' involvement with industry in “entrepreneurial” ways that is, involved in translating their research into potentially marketable knowledge or products. First, this study examines whether there are differences in entrepreneurial behaviour between clinical and non-clinical faculty in the life sciences with industry relationships, and, second, to discover any linkage between entrepreneurship and secrecy or productivity in different ways for clinical and non-clinical faculty. The study is based on survey responses of a national sample of 4,000 clinical and non-clinical life sciences faculty in 49 U.S. research universities. The results show non-clinical faculty as more involved at the back end. The more entrepreneurial end of commercialization while clinical faculty are involved at the back end. The more entrepreneurial faculty (non-clinical) are more likely to be secretive about their research. Clinical faculty are less likely to have been denied access to research results or products. Entrepreneurial faculty are not less productive in their faculty roles. This investigation is preliminary in that it addresses one large area of academic research but excludes fields with longer historical relationships with industry.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, M. and K.S. Louis, 1991, ‘The Changing Locus of Control Over Faculty Research: From Self-Regulation to Dispersed Influence’, in J. Smart (ed.), Handbook of Higher Education, Vol. 7, pp. 57–101.
Anderson, M.S., K.S. Louis, and E. Campbell, 1996, ‘Withholding of the Results of Scientific Research: Effects of Relations with Industry and Faculty Productivity’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Memphis.
Bardes, C.L. and J.G. Hayes, 1995, ‘Are the Teachers Teaching?: Measuring the Educational Activities of Clinical Faculty’, Academic Medicine 70 (2), 111—114.
Blumenthal, D., E.G. Campbell, M.S. Anderson, N. Causino, and K.S. Louis, 1997, ‘Withholding Research Results in Academic Lifescience: Evidence from a National Survey of Faculty’, Journal of the American Medical Association 277 (15), 1224—1228.
Blumenthal, D., E.G. Campbell, N. Causino, and K.S. Louis, 1996, ‘Participation of Life-Science Faculty in Research Relationships with Industry’, New England Journal of Medicine 335 (23), 1734—1739.
Blumenthal, D., M. Gluck, K.S. Louis, M.A. Stoto, and D. Wise, 1986, ‘University.Industry Research Relationships in Biotechnology: Implications for the University’, Science 232, 1361—1366.
Campbell, E., 1996, ‘Philanthropy and Self-Interest: Academic-Industry Research Relationships’, University of Minnesota: Unpublished doctoral dissertation.
Demaris, A., 1992, Logit Modeling: Practical Applications, Sage University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07—086. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Etzkowitz, H. and A. Webster, 1998, ‘Entrepreneurial Science: The Second Academic Revolution’, in H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, and P. Healey (eds.), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, Albany: State University of New York Press.
Fairweather, J.S., 1996, Faculty Work and Public Trust: Restoring the Value of Teaching and Public Service in American Academic Life, Needham Heights: Allyn and Bacon Publishers.
Gluck, M.E., D. Blumenthal, and M.A. Stoto, 1987, ‘University.Industry Relationships in the Life Sciences: Implications for Students and Post-doctoral Fellows’, Research Policy 16, 327—336.
Institute of Medicine, 1995, Careers in Clinical Research: Obstacles and Opportunities, Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Jones, R.F. and J.S. Gold, 1998, ‘Faculty Appointment and Tenure Policies in Medical Schools: A 1997 status report’, Academic Medicine 73 (2), 211—219.
Jones, R.F. and S.C. Sanderson, 1996, ‘Clinical revenues Used to Support the Academic Mission of Medical Schools, 1992–93’, Academic Medicine 71 (3), 299—307.
Louis, K.S., D. Blumenthal, M. Gluck, and M. Stoto, 1991, Entrepreneurs in Academe: An Exploration of Behaviors Among Life Scientists', Administrative Science Quarterly 34, 110—131.
Lovejoy, F.H., and M.B. Clark, 1995, ‘A Promotion Ladder for teachers at Harvard Medical School: Experience and Challenges’, Academic Medicine 70 (12), 1079—1086.
Merton, R.K., 1942, ‘Science and Technology in a Democratic Order’, Journal of Legal and Political Sociology 1, 115—126.
Mulkay, M., 1976, ‘Norms and Ideology in Science’, Social Science Information 15 637—656.
Rowan, B. and C.G. Miskel, 1999, ‘Institutional Theory and the Study of Educational Organizations’, in J. Murphy and K.S. Louis (eds.), Handbook of Research on Educational Administration, Second Edition, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishing.
Webster, A., 1998, ‘Strategic Research Alliances: Testing the Collaborative Limits?’, in H. Etzkowitz, A. Webster, and P. Healey (eds.), Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia, Albany, NY: State University of New York, pp. 95—110.
Woolf, V., 1929, A Room of One's Own, San Diego: Harcourt Brace and Company, pp. 9—10.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Louis, K.S., Jones, L.M., Anderson, M.S. et al. Entrepreneurship, Secrecy, and Productivity: A Comparison of Clinical and Non-Clinical Life Sciences Faculty. The Journal of Technology Transfer 26, 233–245 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011106006976
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011106006976