Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Outcomes of Requests for Summary Judgments in Federal Sexual Harassment Cases: Policy Capturing Revisited

  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study we employ a policy-capturing approach to identify those variables that appear to have a significant influence on the outcomes of defense requests for summary judgments in federal sexual harassment (SH) cases. The purpose of the study is to extend studies performed by D. E. Terpstra and D. D. Baker (1988, 1992) in light of evolving legislation and case law and address the criticisms of policy-capturing studies by M. V. Roehling (1993). Results of the analysis indicate that those variables that most influence case outcomes are: whether the plaintiff had witnesses, the severity and frequency of the SH, and Federal Circuit Court jurisdiction. Finally, the study also shows that past criticisms of this method may be addressed with modifications to data collection and coding techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Anderson, T. (1998). Supreme Court clarifies harassment claims. Security Management, 42(8), 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, D. D., Terpstra, D. E., & Cutler, B. D. (1990). Perceptions of sexual harassment: A reexamination of gender differences. Journal of Psychology, 124, 409–416.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, A., Pitterman, Y., & Yitzhaki, R. (1995). An empirical test of the role of power differential in originating sexual harassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 497–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingham, S., & Burleson, B. (1989). Multiple effects of messages with multiple goals: Some perceived outcomes of responses to sexual harassment. Human Communication Research, 16, 184–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blancero, D. (1995). Non-union grievance systems: System characteristics and fairness perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 38,84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, S. D., & Sulsky, L. M. (1997). Attributions of blame and forgiveness in romantic relationships: A policy-capturing study. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12(1), 19–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, L., & Perot, A. R. (1991). Reporting sexual harassment: Exploring a predictive model. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 31–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlington Industries, Inc. v. Ellerth, S. Ct. 97–569 (1998) [on-line]. Available: http://laws. findlaw.com/US/000/97–569.html

  • Cable, D. M., & Judge, T. A. (1994). Pay preference and job search decisions: A person-organization fit perspective. Personnel Psychology, 47, 317–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Code of Federal Regulations. (1998). Chapter XIV—Equal Employment Opportunity Commission part 1601—Procedural regulations (Title 29,Vol. 4, Parts 900 to 1899).U.S.Government Printing Office via GPO Access [on-line]. Available: http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgibin/ get-cfr.cgi?TITLE =29 & PART = 1601 & SECTION D 21 & TYPE = TEXT

  • Crosby, L., & LeMay, S. A. (1998). Empirical determination of shipper requirements for motor carrier services: SERVQUAL, direct questioning, and policy capturing methods. Journal of Business Logistics, 19(1), 139–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. P., & Joseph, J. (1994). Variation in compensation decisions by managers: An empirical investigation. Journal of Psychology, 128(1), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande, S. P., & Schoderbek, P. P. (1993). Pay-allocations by managers: A policy-capturing approach. Human Relations, 46, 465–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J., & Martocchio, J. (1998). Employees' perceptions of the distributive justice of pay raise decisions: A policy capturing approach. Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 41–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2001). Sexual harassment charges: EEOC & FEPAs combined: FY 1992-FY 2000 [on-line]. Available: http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/ harass.html

  • Faley, R. H., Knapp, D. E., Kustis, G. A., & DuBois, C. L. Z. (1995). Severity of sexual harassment: A multidimensional approach to classification. In C. DuBois (Chair), Sexual harassment: Results from public-sector, private-sector, and military data. Symposium presented at the Tenth Annual Conference of the Society of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL.

  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, S. Ct. 97–282 (1998) [on-line]. Available: http://laws.findlaw. com/US/000/97–282.html

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578–589.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L.F., Gelfand, M. J.,& Drasgow, F. (1996). Measuring sexual harassment:Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Psychology, 17, 425–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Ormerod, A. J. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S. L., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., Ormerod, M., & Weitzman, L. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Accounting Office. (1993). Naval Academy: Gender and racial disparities (Document No. GAO/NSIAD–93–54). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior,7, 164–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, G. (1998, March 13). Lawyers to lay out details of Paula Jones lawsuit. Reuters[online]. Available: http://www.infobeat.com

  • Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71, 309–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graves, L. M., & Karren, R. J. (1992). Interviewer decision processes and effectiveness: An experimental policy-capturing investigation. Personnel Psychology, 45, 313–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbrecht, D. (1991, October 28). Bush may have won more than a new justice. Businessweek, 34–35.

  • Harrison, P. D., Ryan, J. M., & Moore, P. S. (1996). College students' self-insight and common implicit theories in rating of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 775–782.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. S., & Remland, M. S. (1992). Sources of variability in perceptions of and responses to sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 27, 121–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, D. E., & Kustis, G. A. (2001). Same-sex sexual harassment: A legal review with implications for organizational policy. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 12, 105–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, K. S.,& Wong, C. S. (1998). Relative importance of referents on pay satisfaction:Areview and test of a new policy-capturing approach. Journal of Occupational & Organizational Psychology, 71(1), 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler-Bishop, S., Seidler-Feller, D., & Opaluch, R. E. (1982). Sexual harassment in the workplace as a function of initiator's status. The case of airline personnel. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 137–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martocchio, J. J., & Judge, T. A. (1994). A policy-capturing approach to individuals' decisions to be absent. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 358–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. Vinson, S. Ct. 477 U.S. 57 (1986).

  • Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., et al., S. Ct. 96–568, LEXIS 1599 (1998).

  • Pablo, A. L. (1994). Determinants of acquisition integration level: A decision-making perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 803–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packwood may run for the Oregon statehouse. (1998, April 9). Reuters [on-line]. Available: http://www.infobeat.com

  • Pargament, K. I., Sullivan, M. S., Balzer, W. K.,& Van Haitsma, K. S. (1995). The many meanings of religiousness: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Personality, 63, 953–983.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roehling, M. V. (1993). “Extracting” policy from judicial opinions: The dangers of policy capturing in a field setting. Personnel Psychology, 46, 477–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. M.,& Aquino, K. (1993). Fairness and implied contract obligations in job terminations: The role of remedies, social accounts, and procedural justice. Human Performance, 6(2), 135–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterwhite v. Smith, 744 F.2d 1380, 1381 LEXIS 17842 (9th Cir. 1984).

  • Spaeth, H. J. (1985). Supreme court disposition of federal circuit court decisions. Judicature, 68, 245–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tommasi, G.W., Williams, K. B.,& Nordstrom, C. R. (1998). Letters of recommendation:What information captures HR professionals' attention? Journal of Business and Psychology, 13, 5–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1988). Outcomes of sexual harassment charges. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 185–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1992). Outcomes of federal court decisions on sexual harassment. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 180–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the Federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1988). Sexual harassment in the Federal government: An update. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1995). Sexual harassment in the Federal workplace, 1994. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1999). About the U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board [on-line]. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville Ekstrom Library Government Publications. Available: http://www.louisville.edu/library/ekstrom/govpubs/ federal/agencies/merit/merit.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, J. M., & Bolino, M. C. (1997). Explaining U.S. courts of appeals decisions involving performance appraisal: Accuracy, fairness, and validation. Personnel Psychology, 50, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W., & Dubois, S. L. (1998). Evolution and sex differences in preferences for short-term mates: Results from a policy capturing study. Evolution and Human Behavior, 19(3), 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, J. (1998, March 4). Prosecution pummels U.S. Army's ex-top soldier. Reuters [on-line]. Available: http://www.infobeat.com

  • York, K. M. (1989). Defining sexual harassment in workplaces: A policy capturing approach. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 830–850.

    Google Scholar 

  • York, K. M. (1992). A policy capturing analysis of federal district and appellate court sexual harassment cases. Employee Responsibilities & Rights Journal, 5(2), 173–184.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cleveland State University, Ohio;

    Deborah Erdos Knapp & Brian P. Heshizer

Authors
  1. Deborah Erdos Knapp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Brian P. Heshizer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deborah Erdos Knapp.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Knapp, D.E., Heshizer, B.P. Outcomes of Requests for Summary Judgments in Federal Sexual Harassment Cases: Policy Capturing Revisited. Sex Roles 44, 109–128 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010972718542

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010972718542

Keywords

Search

Navigation