Skip to main content
Log in

Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships for Docetaxel

  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The population approach has been implemented prospectively inthe clinical development of docetaxel(Taxotere®). Overall 640 patients were evaluablefor the population PK/PD analysis. The PK analysis evidencedsignificant covariates explaining the inter-patientvariability of docetaxel clearance and the PK/PD analysisdemonstrated that the variability in clearance was asignificant predictor of several safety endpoints. In patientswith clinical chemistry suggestive of mild to moderate liverfunction impairment (SGOT and/or SGPT >1.5 × ULNconcomitant with alkaline phosphatase >2.5 × ULN),total body clearance was lowered by an average of 27%.Specific safety analyses demonstrated that these patients areat a significantly higher risk than others for the developmentof severe docetaxel-induced side effects. Population PK/PDdata were fully integrated into the regulatory dossier and inthe labeling of docetaxel worldwide. Population PK/PD modelsare being used to elaborate a simulation model to predict thesurvival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer treatedwith docetaxel.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sheiner LB, Steimer J-L: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling in rational drug development. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40: 67–95, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holford NHG, Kimko HC, Monteleone JPR, Peck CC: Simulation of clinical trials. Ann Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 40: 209–234, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruno R: Integration of population PK/PD in the clinical development and the registration dossier of docetaxel. In: Aarons L, Balant LP, Danhof M, Gex-Fabry M, Gundert-Remy UA, Karlsson MO, Mentré F, Morselli PL, Rombout F, Rowland M, Steimer J-L, Vozeh S (eds) The Population Approach: Measuring and Managing Variability in Response, Concentration and Dose. European Commission, Brussels, 1997, pp 253–262

    Google Scholar 

  4. Temple R: The clinical investigation of drugs for use by the elderly: Food and Drug guidelines. Clin Pharmacol Ther 42: 681–685, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sheiner LB, Benet LZ: Premarketing observational studies of population pharmacokinetics of new drugs. Clin Pharmacol Ther 38: 481–487, 1985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mentré F, Mallet A, Baccar D: Optimal designs in randomeffects regression models. Biometrika 84: 429–442, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  7. Launay-Iliadis MC, Bruno R, Cosson V, Vergniol JC, Oulid-Aissa D, Marty M, Clavel M, Aapro M, Le Bail N, Iliadis A: Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel during Phase I studies using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling and nonparametric maximum-likelihood estimation. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 37: 47–54, 1995

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruno R, Dorr MB, Montay G, Frydman A, This F, Fumoleau P, Kay S, Kavanagh GH, Burris HA, Rigas JR, Bayssas M: Design and prospective implementation of population pharmacokinetic studies during the development of docetaxel (RP 56976), a new anticancer drug (abstract). Clin Pharmacol Ther 55: 161, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bruno R, Hille D, Riva A, Vivier N, ten Bokkel Huinnink WW, van Oosterom AT, Kaye SB, Verweij J, Fossella FV, Valero V, Rigas JR, Seidman AD, Chevalier B, Fumoleau P, Burris HA, Ravdin PM, Sheiner LB: Population pharmacokinetics/ pharmacodynamics of docetaxel in Phase II studies in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol 16: 187–196, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Beal SL, Boeckman AJ, Sheiner LB: NONMEM user's guides. San Francisco:NONMEM Project Group, University of California, San Francisco, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bruno R, Vivier N, Vergniol JC, De Phillips SL, Montay G, Sheiner LB: A population pharmacokinetic model for docetaxel (Taxoterer): Model building and validation. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 24: 153–172, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gurney H: Dose calculation of anticancer drugs: a review of the current practice and introduction of an alternative. J Clin Oncol 14: 2590–2611, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ratain MJ: Body-surface area as a basis for dosing of anticancer agents: Science, myth, or habit? J Clin Oncol 16: 2297–2298, 1998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Urien S, Barré J, Morin C, Paccaly A, Montay G, Tillement JP: Docetaxel serum protein binding with high affinity to alpha1-acid glycoprotein. Invest New Drug 14: 147–151, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chan S, Winterbottom L, Gardner S: Response to dexamethasone in patients with fluid retention after docetaxel. Lancet 347: 1486–1487, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  16. Marre F, Sanderink G-J, de Sousa G, Gaillard C, Martinet M, Rahmani R: Hepatic biotransformation of docetaxel (Taxoterer) in vitro: Involvement of the CYP3A subfamily in humans. Cancer Res 56: 1296–1302, 1996

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruno R, Vivier N, Houver C, Montay G, Riva A: Lack of influence of dexamethasone premedication on docetaxel (Taxoterer) pharmacokinetics (abstract). Ann Oncol 7(Suppl 1): 96, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tanigawara Y, Sasaki Y, Otsu T, Fujii H, Kashimura M, Sasaki T, Okumura K, Tagushi T: Population pharmacokinetics of docetaxel in Japanese patients (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15, 1996

  19. Tanigawara Y: Recent applications of the population pharmacokinetic approach: Premarketing and post-marketing. In: Aarons L, Balant LP, Danhof M, Gex-Fabry M, Gundert-Remy UA, Karlsson MO, Mentré F, Morselli PL, Rombout F, Rowland M, Steimer J-L, Vozeh S (eds) The Population Approach: Measuring and Managing Variability in Response, Concentration and Dose. European Commission, Brussels, 1997, pp 25–37

    Google Scholar 

  20. Karlsson MO, Sheiner LB: The importance of modeling interoccasion variability in population pharmacokinetic analyses. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm 21: 735–750, 1993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruno R, Vivier N, Montay G, Klink-Alakl M, Azli N, Fumoleau P, Marty M: The cycle-to-cycle variability of docetaxel pharmacokinetics assessed by population PK analysis (abstract). Eur J Cancer 35(suppl 4): S194, 1999

    Google Scholar 

  22. Baille P, Bruno R, Schellens JHM, Webster LK, Millward M, Verweij J, Montay G: Optimal sampling strategies for Bayesian estimation of docetaxel (Taxoterer) clearance. Clin Cancer Res 3: 1535–1538, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bruno R, Olivares R, Berille J, Lebras E, Hammershaimb L, Rigas JR: Alpha-1-acid glycoprotein is an independent predictor of efficacy and survival in NSCLC patients treated with docetaxel (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 17: 471a, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  24. Oulid-Aissa D, Bruno R, Lebecq A, Zukiwski A, Sheiner LB, Riva A: Taxotere safety in patients with impaired liver function (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 15: 476, 1996

    Google Scholar 

  25. TaxotererPackage Insert (1996). Food and Drug Administration.

  26. Klink-Alakl M, Riva A, Bruno R, Azli N, Lebecq A: Taxoterer safety profile in patients with liver metastases with or without impaired liver function (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 16: 220a, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  27. Veyrat-Follet C, Bruno R: Building and validation of a simulation model of docetaxel to predict survival in cancer patients (abstract). Clin Pharmacol Ther 67: 163, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bruno R, Veyrat-Follet C: Simulation of survival in patients with NSCLC treated with docetaxel as a tool for dosage optimization (abstract). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 19: 184a, 2000

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bruno, R., Vivier, N., Veyrat-Follet, C. et al. Population Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic Relationships for Docetaxel. Invest New Drugs 19, 163–169 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010687017717

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010687017717

Navigation