Skip to main content
Log in

Notes on Growth Accounting

  • Published:
Journal of Economic Growth Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Growth accounting breaks down economic growth into components associated with changes in factor inputs and the Solow residual, which reflects technological progress and other elements. After a presentation of the standard model, the analysis considers dual approaches to growth accounting (which considers changes in factor prices rather than quantities), spillover effects and increasing returns, taxes, and multiple types of factor inputs. Later sections place the growth-accounting exercise within the context of two recent strands of endogenous growth theory—varieties-of-products models and quality-ladders models. Within these settings, the Solow residual can be interpreted in terms of measures of the endogenously changing level of technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion, Philippe, and Peter Howitt. (1992). “A Model of Growth Through Creative Destruction, ” Econometrica60, 323–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962). “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing, ” Review of Economic Studies29,155–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, Robert J., and Xavier Sala-i-Martin. (1995). Economic Growth. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresnahan, Tim, and Manuel Trajtenberg. (1995). “General Purpose Technologies: Engines of Growth?” Journal of Econometrics65, 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Laurits R., Dianne Cummings, and DaleW. Jorgenson. (1980). “Economic Growth, 1947–1973: An International Comparison. ” In JohnW. Kendrick and Beatrice Vaccara (eds.), New Developments in Productivity Measurement and Analysis. NBER Conference Report. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, Laurits R., Dale W. Jorgenson, and Lawrence J. Lau. (1973). “Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers. ” Review of Economics and Statistics55, 26–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, David T., and Elhanan Helpman. (1995). “International R&D Spillovers. ” European Economic Review39,859–887.

    Google Scholar 

  • David, Paul A. (1991). “Computer and Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too-Distant Mirror. ” In Technology and Productivity: The Challenge for Economic Policy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, Edward F. (1962). The Sources of Economic Growth in the United States and the Alternatives Before Us. Washington, DC: Committee for Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diewert, W. Erwin. (1976). “Exact and Superlative Index Numbers. ” Journal of Econometrics4, 115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, Avinash K., and Joseph E. Stiglitz. (1977). “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity. ” American Economic Review67(3) (June), 297–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, Chrys, and Dale W. Jorgenson. (1997). “There Is no Silver Bullet: Investment and Growth in the G7. ” Paper, Harvard University, September.

  • Elias, Victor J. (1990). Sources of Growth: A Study of Seven Latin American Economies. San Francisco: ICS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi. (1964). “Research Expenditures, Education, and the Aggregate Agricultural Production Function. ” American Economic Review54, 961–974.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi. (1973). “Research Expenditures and Growth Accounting. ” In B. R. Williams (ed.), Science and Technology in Economic Growth. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi. (1979). “Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth. ” Bell Journal of Economics10, 92–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Zvi. (1997). “The Simon Kuznets Memorial Lecture. ” Paper, Harvard University, October.

  • Grossman, Gene M., and Elhanan Helpman. (1991). Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, Chang-Tai. (1998). “What Explains the Industrial Revolution in East Asia? Evidence from Factor Markets. ” Paper, University of California Berkeley, January.

  • Jorgenson, DaleW., Frank M. Gollop, and Barbara M. Fraumeni. (1987). Productivity andU.S. Economic Growth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson, Dale W., and Zvi Griliches. (1967). “The Explanation of Productivity Change. ” Review of Economic Studies34, 249–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendrick, John W. (1961). Productivity Trends in the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets, Simon. (1961). “Economic Growth and the Contribution of Agriculture: Notes on Measurement. ” International Journal of Agrarian Affairs3, 56–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Robert E., Jr. (1988). “On the Mechanics of Development Planning. ” Journal of Monetary Economics22,3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, Edwin. (1965). “Rates of Return from Industrial R&D. ” American Economic Review55, 310–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasian, Jora R. (1962). “The Economics of Research and Development. ” In Richard R. Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. NBER Special Conference Series. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul M. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth. ” Journal of Political Economy94, 1002–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, Paul M. (1990). “EndogenousTechnological Change. ” Journal ofPolitical Economy98, part II, S71-S102.

  • Solow, Robert M. (1957). “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. ” Review of Economics and Statistics39, 312–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence, Michael. (1976). “Product Selection, Fixed Costs, and Monopolistic Competition. ” Review of Economic Studies43, 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terleckyj, Nestor E. (1958). “Factors Underlying Productivity: Some Empirical Observations. ” Journal of the American Statistical Association, inc., 53, 593.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thörnqvist, Leo. (1936). “The Bank of Finland's Consumption Price Index. ” Bank of Finland Monthly Bulletin, no. 10, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Alwyn. (1995). “The Tyranny of Numbers: Confronting the Statistical Realities of the East Asian Growth Experience. ” Quarterly Journal of Economics110, 641–680.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barro, R.J. Notes on Growth Accounting. Journal of Economic Growth 4, 119–137 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009828704275

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009828704275

Navigation