Skip to main content
Log in

Managing Complexity—The Path Toward Intelligent Organizations

  • Published:
Systemic Practice and Action Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coping with complexity is at the heart of management and leadership in the turbulent environments faced by the organizations and societies of our day. The systems approach provides transdisciplinary theories and tools for dealing with this challenge more effectively than efforts merely based on disciplinary insights or pragmatic recipes. In this paper, a concept of "intelligent organizations" is introduced. A framework for the design of intelligent organizations is proposed that links three organizational cybernetic models: the Model for Systemic Control, the Viable System Model, and the Team Syntegrity model.2 The proposition is that a combined use of these models, guided by the integrative conceptual framework, enables a more effective response to complex situations than merely pragmatic approaches to "integrative management." Provisional empirical evidence gathered from applied research indicates that the proposed framework is capable of enhancing such superior potential for effective response. As such, it promises to meet the specific needs of the new types of organizations that have already begun to emerge in the knowledge societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1994). The Democratic Corporation, Oxford Unviersity Press, New York/Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, R. C. (1998). Mid-course Correction. Toward a Sustainable Enterprise: The Interface Model, Chelsea Green Publishing, White River Junction, VT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, Ch. and Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. R. (1965). Design for a Brain, Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. (1981). Analysis of the system to be modeled. In Conant, R., (ed.), Mechanisms of Intelligence. Ross Ashby's Writings on Cybernetics, Intersystems Publications, Seaside, CA, pp. 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavelas, A. (1952). Communication patterns in problem groups. In Cybernetics: Transactions of the Eighth Conference, New York: Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1962). Towards the cybernetic factory. Reprinted in: Harnden, R. and Leonard, A., (eds.), (1994). How Many Grapes Went into the Wine. Stafford Beer on the Art and Science of Holistic Management, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1979). The Heart of Enterprise, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1981). Brain of the Firm, 2nd edition, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organizations, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1989). National Government: Disseminated Regulation in Real Time, or ‘How to Run a Country’. In Espejo, R. and Harnden, R., (eds.), The Viable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer's VSM, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 333–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1994). Beyond Dispute. The Invention of Team Syntegrity, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleicher, K. (1996). Das Konzept. Integriertes Management, 4th edition, Campus, Frankfurt/New York (first edition 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlzon, Jan (1987). Moments of Truth, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conant, R. C., and Ashby, W. R. (1981). Every good regulator of a system must be a model of that system. In Conant, R. (ed.), Mechanisms of Intelligence. Ashby's Writings on Cybernetics, Intersystems Publications, Seaside, CA., pp. 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal, T. E., and Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate Cultures. The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner, D. (1997). The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, Peter F. (1977). Management: Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices, Harper's College Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1980). Managing in Turbulent Times, Heinemann, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1999). Drucker on financial services. Innovate or die. The Economist, September 25th, pp. 27–34.

  • Ellis, J., (1999). Customers desert to digital market. International Herald Tribune, April 1, p. 6.

  • Espejo, R. (1989). The Viable system model revisited. In Espejo, R. and Harnden, R. (eds.), theViable System Model: Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer's VSM, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 77–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, R., and Harnden, R., eds. (1989). The Viable System Model. Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer's VSM, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, R., Schuhmann, W., Schwaninger, M., and Bilello, U. (1996). Organizational Transformation and Learning. A Cybernetic Approach to Management, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, R., and Schwaninger, M., eds. (1993). Organizational Fitness—Corporate Effectiveness through Management Cybernetics, Campus Frankfurt/New York.

  • Espejo, R., and Schwaninger, M., eds. (1998). To Be and Not to Be, That is the System. A Tribute to Stafford Beer, CD-ROM, Carl-Auer-Systeme-Verlag, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espejo, R., and Watt, J. (1988). Information management, organization and managerial effectiveness. J Oper Res Soc, 39, 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1968). The Active Society. A Theory of Societal and Political Processes, Collier, MacMillan, London/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, J. W. (1985). Industrial Dynamics, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 11th printing (originally published 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R., Buckminster, X. X., and Applewhite, E. J. (1982). Synergetics: Explorations in the Geometry of Thinking, Macmillan/Collier, New York/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gälweiler, A. (1990). Strategische Unternehmensführung, 2nd edition, Campus, Frankfurt/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. L., ed. (1987). The Oxford Companion to the Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jalali, A. (1994). Reverberating networks. Modelling information propagation in syntegration by spectral analysis. In Beer, S. (ed.), Beyond Dispute. The Invention of Team Syntegrity, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 263–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jantsch, E., and Waddington, C. H., (eds.) (1976). Evolution and Consciousness: Human Systems in Transition Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, W. Ch./Mauborgne, R. (1999). Creating new market space. Harvard Business Review, January-February, Vol. 77, Issue 1.

  • Kotter, J. /Heskett, J. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krieg, W. (1985). Management-und Unternehmungsentwicklung-Bausteine eines integrierten Ansatzes. In Siegwart, H., Probst, xx, and Gilbert J. B. (eds.), Integriertes Management, Haupt, Bern/Stuttgart, pp. 261–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, A. (1989). Application of the VSM to commercial broadcasting in the United States. In Espejo, R. and Harnden, R., (eds.), The Viable System Model, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp. 176–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, A. (1994). Team syntegrity: Planning for action in the next century. In Brady, B. and Peeno, L., (eds.), Proceedings, Conference of the International Society for the Systems Sciences, Louisville, Kentucky, pp. 1065–1072.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. and Gill, A. eds. (1997). Multimethodology. The Theory and Practice of Combining Management Science Methodologies, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitroff, I. I. (1983). Stakeholders of the Organizational Mind, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., and Whipp, R. (1993). Managing Change for Competitive Success, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, A. (1992). Weltbilder—Wissen und Glauben: Die systemische Sicht. In Weltbilder—Wissen und Glauben, Aulavorträge, Nr. 55, St. Gallen, Hochschule St. Gallen, pp. 3–27.

  • Reither, F. (1997) Komplexitätsmanagement. Denken und Handeln in komplexen Situationen, Gerling Akademie Verlag, Munich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, Th. (1999). Marktorientiertes Management komplexer Projekte im Handel, Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational Culture and Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco/London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (1988). Anwendung der integralen Unternehmungsentwicklung. Beurteilung von Konzept und Methodik anhand einer Pilotstudie, Haupt, Bern/Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (1989). Integrale Unternehmungsplanung, Campus, Frankfurt/New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (1993). A Concept of Organizational Fitness. In Espejo, R., and Schwaninger, M. (eds.), Organizational Fitness—Corporate Effectiveness through Management Cybernetics, Campus, Frankfurt/New York: Campus, pp. 39–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (1995). Enabling Systemic Management, Working Paper, Institute of Management at the University of St. Gallen (published as part of Espejo et al., 1996).

  • Schwaninger, M. (1996). Structures for Intelligent Organizations, Discussion Paper, Institute of Management, University of St. Gallen, No. 20.

  • Schwaninger, M. (1997a). Global Transdisciplinary Research Co-operation: Thirty Cyberneticians Online. Kybernetes, 26, pp. 459–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (1997b). The dynamics of environmental responsibility in management. In Barlas, Y., Dikat, V. G., and Polat, S., (eds.), 15th International System Dynamics Conference, Proceedings, Bogaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M. (1998). Anatol Rapoport, ISSS-International Society for the Systems Sciences, homepage, “luminaries” section—http://www.isss.org/lumrapo.

  • Schwaninger, M. (1999). Self-organization and self-reference in the cognition of organizations. In Braitenberg, V., and Radermacher, F.-J., (eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to a New Understanding of Cognition and Consciousness, Universitaets-Verlag, Ulm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaninger, M., Hechenblaickner, P., Krafft, A., and Steiner, S. (1995). Research Report on the “Kingview Syntegration,” July 17–20, Toronto, Canada, and St. Gallen, University of St. Gallen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1992). The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, Century Business, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J. (1987). Intelligence. In Gregory, R. L., (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Mind, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York, pp. 375–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, H. (1984). Management. Campus, Bern/Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, H., and Krieg, W. (1972). St. Galler Management-Modell, Haupt, Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willemsen, M. H. (1992). Die Schweizerische Eidgenossenschaft als lebensfähiges System. Kybernetische Analyse des schweizerischen politischen Systems, Dissertation Nr. 1314, Hochschule St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schwaninger, M. Managing Complexity—The Path Toward Intelligent Organizations. Systemic Practice and Action Research 13, 207–241 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009546721353

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009546721353

Navigation