Abstract
The emergence and the use of the so-called Management Sciences Methodologies has been one of the major recent developments in the field of Management Practice. The issues of the cultural dimensions of a particular country and its relevance in managerial practices have attracted substantial attention over recent years. This paper attempts to compare the usage of management sciences methods from the Hard and Soft spectrum in two countries that have quite distinctive managerial and cultural traditions: the UK and Spain. It reports on the results of a mail questionnaire administered to MBA graduates working in management consultancy in both countries.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackoff, R. (1981). Creating the Corporate Future, Wiley, New York.
Barnes, M. J. (1987). Creative modeling of planning processes—A role for SSM. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 38, 1197.
Brocklesby, J. (1995). Using SSM to identify competence requirements in HRM, Int. J. Manpower 16, 70.
Checkland, P. B. (1972). Systemic, not systematic. J. Syst. Eng. 3, Lancaster, UK.
Checkland, P. B. (1979). The shape of the Systems Movement. J. Appl. Systems Anal. 6.
Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Wiley, New York.
Checkland, P. B. (1987). The application of systems thinking in real-world problem situation: The emergence of SSM, In: Jackson, M. C., and Key, P. (eds.), New Directions in Management Sciences, Gower, Aldershot, pp. 87–96.
Checkland, P. B. (1989). Soft systems methodology. In Rosenhead, J. (eds.), Rational Analysis for a Problematical World, Wiley, London, pp. 71–100.
Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Systems Approach, Dell, New York.
Clark, D. et al. (1995). Strategic level MS/OR tool usage in the UK: and empirical survey. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 46, 1041–1051.
d'Iribarne (1991). The usefulness of an ethnographic approach to international comparisons of the functioning of organizations, EGOS colloquium, Vienna, July 15–17.
Eden, C. et al. (1983). Messing About Problems, Pergamon, Oxford.
Ehie, I. C. et al. (1994). OR utilization in Nigeria: A sample survey. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 45, 31–37.
Flood, R., and Jackson, M. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, New York.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture Consequences, Sage, London.
Hofstede, G. (1994). Cultures and Organizations, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Jackson, M. (1992). Systems Methodology for the Management Sciences, Plenum Press, New York.
Jackson, M. et al. (1991). Systems Thinking in Europe, Plenum Press, New York.
Ledington, P. et al. (1997). Soft OR and management practice: A study of the adoption of SSM. J. Operat. Res. Soc., 48, 229–240.
Lessem, R., and Neubaurer, F. (1994). European Management Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York.
Macadam, R. D., and Packham, R. G. (1989). A case study in the use of SSM restructuring and academic organisation to facilitate education of systems agriculturists. Agricultural Systems 30, 352–367.
Macadam, R. D. et al. (1990). The use of SSM to improve the adoption by Australian cotton growers of the siratac computer-based crop management system. Agricultural Systems 34, 1–14.
Macadam, R. D. et al. (1995). A case study in development planing using a systems learning approach—Generating a Master plan for the livestock sector in Nepal. Agricultural Systems 49, 299–323.
Mingers, J., and Taylor, S. (1992). The use of soft systems metrology in practice. J. Operat. Res. 43, 321–332.
Reid, J. I. et al. (1999). An application of SSM in the on-farm labour situation in the New Zealand dairy industry. Systems Res. Behav. Sci. 16, 341–350.
Stray, S., et al. (1994). Statistics in management education. Brit. J. Manag. 5, 73–82.
Which MBA? (1998). 10th edition., George Bickerstaffe, The Economist Intelligence Unit.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Paucar-Caceres, A. Use of Systems Methodologies in the UK and Spain: A Sample Survey. Systemic Practice and Action Research 13, 515–542 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009545531718
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009545531718