Abstract
Some analysts have criticized Friedrich Hayek's theory of cultural evolution for implying that the rules, customs, norms, and institutions that emerge from the evolutionary process are necessarily efficient or desirable in all cases. This charge is unfounded. The present article defends Hayek versus his critics in two ways: First, it restates Hayek's own objections to the idea that cultural evolution produces optimal outcomes. Second, it shows, through an analogy with biological evolution, that Hayek's theory need not imply any such conclusion. Contrary to a widely held misconception, biological evolution does not produce organisms that are perfectly adapted to their habitats; insofar as cultural evolution shares common features with biological evolution, cultural evolution may be expected to display similar types of suboptimality or mal-adaptation. Insights from the theory of biological evolution also help to illuminate some areas of controversy with regard to Hayek's theory of cultural evolution, including: Hayek's advocacy of gradual change; the question of what selective forces drive the process of cultural evolution; and the alleged conflict between group selectionism and methodological individualism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bradie, M. (1994) “Epistemology from an Evolutionary Point of View.” In: Sober, E. (ed.) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Buchanan, J. M. (1975) The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Cavalli-Sforza, L., and Feldman, M. (1981) Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene. New York: Oxford University Press.
De Vlieghere, M. (1994) “A Reappraisal of Friedrich A. Hayek's Cultural Evolutionism.” Economics and Philosophy10(2): 285-304.
Dillon, L. S. (1978) Evolution: Concepts and Consequences, 2nd ed. St. Louis: The C.V. Mosby Company.
Dodson, E. O., and Dodson, P. (1985) Evolution: Process and Product. Boston: Prindle, Weber & Schmidt.
Eldredge, N. (1985) Unfinished Synthesis: Biological Hierarchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gould, S. J., and Lewontin, R. C. (1994) “The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme.” In: Sober, E. (ed.) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology.
Gray, J. (1989) Liberalisms. London: Routledge.
Hallerod, B. (1992) “Friedrich August von Hayek-Apostle for Freedom?” Sociologisk Forskning29(3): 12-34.
Hayek, F. A. (1960) The Constitution of Liberty. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1988) The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1973) Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 1: Rules and Order. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1976) Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 2: The Mirage of Social Justice. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, F. A. (1979) Law, Legislation and Liberty, vol. 3: The Political Order of a Free People. Chicago, Ill. University of Chicago Press.
Heath, E. (1992) “Rules, Function, and the Invisible Hand: An Interpretation of Hayek's Social Theory.” Philosophy of the Social Sciences22(1): 28-45.
Hodgson, G. M. (1991) “Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution: An Evaluation in the Light of Vanberg's Critique.” Economics and Philosophy7: 67-82.
Kitcher, P. (1994) “Four Ways of ‘Biologizing' Ethics.” In: Sober, E. (ed.) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology.
Kley, R. (1994) Hayek's Social and Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Liebowitz, S. J., and Margolis, S. E. (1991) “The Fable of the Keys.” Journal of Law and Economics33 (April): 1-25.
Rowland, B. M. (1987) Ordered Liberty and the Constitutional Framework: The Political Thought of Friedrich A. Hayek. New York: Greenwood Press.
Smith, J. M. (1994) “Optimization Theory in Evolution.” In: Sober, E. (ed.) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology.
Sober, E. (ed.) (1994) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology, 2nd ed., Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Sober, E. (1994) “Models of Cultural Evolution.” In: Sober, E. (ed.) Conceptual Issues in Evolutionary Biology.
Stebbins, G. L. (1977) Processes of Organic Evolution. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Stiglitz, J. (1991) Whither Socialism?Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Tomlinson, J. (1990) Hayek and the Market. London: Pluto Press.
Vanberg, V. (1986) “Spontaneous Market Order and Social Rules: A Critical Examination of F. A. Hayek's Theory of Cultural Evolution.” Economics and Philosophy2: 75-100.
Voigt, S. “On the Internal Consistency of Hayek's Evolutionary Oriented Constitutional Economics-Some General Remarks.” Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines3(4): 461-76.
Voltaire (F.-M. Arouet) [1947 (1759)] Candide. Translated by John Butt. Penguin Books.
Vromen, J. J. (1995) Economic Evolution: An Enquiry into the Foundations of New Institutional Economics. London: Routledge.
Wesson, R. G. (1991) Beyond Natural Selection. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Whitman, D.G. Hayek contra Pangloss on Evolutionary Systems. Constitutional Political Economy 9, 45–66 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009058615310
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009058615310