Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Patient-generated Index (PGI) is a health-related quality of life (HRQoL) measure which asks respondents to nominate the areas of their lives which are most affected by their health condition, so that they can then rate the severity of the effects and weight their relative importance. It is unusual amongst such measures in that it is designed for postal administration. This study assessed the ability of the revised PGI to measure change in HRQoL in a population of 161 people who had previously been identified as having limiting long-term illness. A questionnaire, including a revised version of the PGI and the developmental version of the SF-36, was mailed at two time points (T1 and T2), 4.5 months apart. The PGI was subsequently assessed in terms of practicality, validity, reliability and responsiveness. At T1, 62% of those who felt that they still had a health problem affecting their life completed the PGI correctly. These people were significantly younger and had spent longer in education than the remaining 38%. Only 19 respondents completed the PGI correctly on both occasions, rendering reliability and responsiveness testing inconclusive. The value of the PGI is significantly diminished by the fact that many people cannot complete it correctly. Future development of the instrument is appraised in the context of related measurement methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O'Boyle C, McGee H, Hickey A, O'Malley K, Joyce C. Individual quality of life in patients undergoing hip replacement. The Lancet 1992; 339: 1088-1091.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hickey A, Bury G, O'Boyle C, Bradley F, O'Kelly F, Shannon W. A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV / AIDS. BMJ 1996; 313: 29-33.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ruta D, Garratt A, Leng M, Russell I, McDonald L. A new approach to the measurement of the quality of life: the Patient Generated Index. Med Care 1994; 32(11): 1109-1126.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calman K. Quality of life in cancer patients — a hypothesis. J Med Ethics 1984; 10: 124.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bowling A. Book review of ‘Health Outcomes in Primary and Out-patient Care’ Qual Health Care 1997; 6: 115.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ruta D, Garratt A. Health status to quality of life measurement In: Jenkinson C, ed. Measuring Health and Medical Outcomes London: UCL Press, 1994: 138-159.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Garratt A, Ruta D. Taking a patient centred approach to outcome measurement. In: Hutchison A, McColl E, Christie M, Riccalton C, eds Health Outcome Measures in Primary and Outpatient Care. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Press, 1996: 77-90.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Herd R, Tidman M, Ruta D, Hunter J. Measurement of quality of life in atopic dermatitis: correlation and validation of two different methods. Br J Dermatol 1997; 136: 502-507.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cotton S. The Patient Generated Index: an investigation into the incorrect and non-completion of this measure of quality of life. Unpublished BSc dissertation University of Aberdeen, 1993.

  10. McArthur G. Assessing disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Unpublished BMedSci dissertation University of Aberdeen, 1997.

  11. Charlton J, Wallace M, White I. Long term illness: results from the 1991 census. Populat Trends 1994; 75: 18-25.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fitzpatrick R. Alternative approaches to the assessment of health related quality of life. In: Offner A, ed. In Pursuit of the Quality of Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996: 140-162.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ware J, Snow K, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF36 Health Survey: Manual and Interpretation Guide. Boston: New England Medical Centre, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cohen G, Forbes J, Garraway M. Interpreting self reported limiting long term illness. BMJ 1995; 311: 722-724.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Martin J, Meltzer H, Elliot D. The Prevalence of Disability among Adults. London: HMSO 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bowling A. What things are important in people's lives? A survey of the public's judgements to inform scales of health related quality of life. Soc Sci and Med 1995; 41(10): 1447-1462.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Drummond N. Quality of life for asthma patients: an existential-aesthetic approach. Unpublished PHD thesis, University of Aberdeen, 1997.

  18. Streiner G, Norman R. Health Measurement Scales: a Practical Guide to their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jenkinson C. Evaluating the efficacy of medical treatment: possibilities and limitations. Soc Sci Med 1995; 41(10): 1395-1401.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF36 health survey. BMJ 1996; 312: 1016-1020.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Browne J, O'Boyle C, McGee H et al. Individual quality of life in the healthy elderly. Qual Life Res 1994; 3: 235-244.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Allison P, Locker D, Feine J. Quality of life: a dynamic construct. Soc Sci Med 1997; 45(2): 221-230.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hunt S. The problem of quality of life. Qual Life Res 1997; 6: 205-212.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Swift J. Gulliver's Travels. Middlesex: Penguin Classics, 1985 (first published 1726).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Macduff, C., Russell, E. The problem of measuring change in individual health-related quality of life by postal questionnaire: use of the patient-generated index in a disabled population. Qual Life Res 7, 761–769 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008831209706

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008831209706

Navigation