Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Entrepreneurship and Uncertainty: Innovation and Competition among the Many

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Schumpeter stressed innovation and Knight uncertainty as preconditions for entrepreneurship and productivity growth. Schumpeter emphasized entry in his early work but came to consider incumbent innovation the dominant mode in his later work. Modern growth theory emphasizes dissemination of knowledge to explain progress in the steady state. The paper analyzes the effects of entry, market structures and uncertainty on the incidence and diffusion of innovation. The insertion of Knightian uncertainty in Schumpeter's model can explain why innovators are numerous and arrive unexpectedly. Uncertainty spurs diffusion and improves the utilization of human capital. Combining the ideas of Schumpeter and Knight also elucidates several stylized facts of entrepreneurship, such as small entry size; low chances of survival and high growth rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B. Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size’, Review of Economics and Statistics 56, 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghion, Philippe and Peter Howitt, 1992, ‘A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction’, Econometrica 60(2), 323–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, Kenneth J., 1962, ‘Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention’, in Nelson (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, pp. 609–625.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, David B., 1995, Innovation and Industry Evolution, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, John R., 1995, The Dynamics of Industrial Competition; a North-American Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, T. and H. Varian, 1985, ‘When are Nash Equilibria Independent of the Distribution of Agents Characteristics’, Review of Economic Studies 52, 715–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, Maria, 1991, Schumpeterian Puzzles; Technological Competition and Economic Evolution, New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, Maria, 1996, ‘Economic Evolution and Transformation of the Economic Order’, in Ernst Helmstädter and Mark Perlman (eds.), Behavioral Norms, Technological Progress and Economic Dynamics; Studies in Schumpeterian Economics, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press, pp. 355–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, Maria and Bart Hendrix, 1998, ‘Two Worlds of Venture Capital: What happened to Dutch and U.S. Early Stage Investment’, Small Business Economics 10(4), 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David S. and Linda S. Leighton, 1989, ‘Some Empirical Aspects of Entrepreneurship’, American Economic Review 79, 519–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, Jan, 1994, ‘Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates’, Journal of Economic Literature 32(3), 1147–1175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, Jan, 1995, Convergence or Divergence; The Impact of Technology, Discusion Paper NUPI, Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman, 1991, Innovation and Growth in the Global Economy, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Gene M. and Elhanan Helpman, 1993.Endogeneous Innovation in the Theory of Economic Growth, NBER working paper 4527.

  • Hébert Robert F. and Albert N. Link, 1982, The Entrepreneur; Mainstream Views and Radical Critiques, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, John, David Sawers and Richard Stillerman, 1958, The Sources of Invention, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank H., 1921, Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, Frank H., 1935, ‘Professor Hayek and the Theory of Investment’, The Economic Journal 45.

  • Levine, Ross, 1997, ‘Financial Developments and Economic Growth: Views and Agenda’, Journal of Economic Literature 35(2), 688–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, Robert E., 1988, ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’, Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mankiw, N., 1995, ‘The Growth of Nations’, Brookings Papers on Economics 1, 275–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers, Stewart C., 1977, ‘Determinants of Corporate Borrowing’, Journal of Financial Economics, 147–175.

  • Porter, Michael E., 1980, Competitive Strategy; Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors, New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1990, Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M., 1999, The Innovation Lottery, paper presented at EARIE Conference in Turino, September 1999.

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1974, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, fourth edition, London: Unwin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1978. The Theory of Economic Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1982, Business Cycles; A Theoretical, Historical and Statistical Analysis of Capitalist Process, Philadelphia, Porcupine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A., 1974, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, fourth edition, London: Unwin University Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shy, Oz, 1995, Industrial Organization; Theory and Applications, Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solow, R., 1956, ‘A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics 70, 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brouwer, M. Entrepreneurship and Uncertainty: Innovation and Competition among the Many. Small Business Economics 15, 149–160 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008147829791

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008147829791

Keywords

Navigation