Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of Co-Therapy Teams on Client Outcomes and Therapist Training in Marriage and Family Therapy

  • Published:
Contemporary Family Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study of 33 student therapists, 402 client systems, and three supervisors tested the efficacy of using student co-therapy teams as an aspect of clinical training in a marriage and family therapy program. This study utilizes both quantitative and qualitative methodology. Two research questions were addressed: “Do different pairings of co-therapists affect client outcomes?” and “Is co-therapy a viable option for a training program?” The results indicate that client outcomes using co-therapy are at least as effective as treatment using one therapist and in some circumstances produce more positive outcomes for both clients and student therapists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baruth, L. G., & Huber, C. H. (1991). An introduction to marital theory and therapy. Prospect Heights, IL: Wavelength Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Steps to an ecology of mind. San Francisco: Chandler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, L. R., & Benjamin, R. (1994). A group for partners and parents of MPD clients part I: Process and format. Dissociation, 7, 35–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, H. S., Babineau, R., & Schwartz, A. J. (1980). Supervisor-trainee cotherapy as a method for individual psychotherapy training. Psychiatry, 43, 138–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. A., & Gauron, E. F. (1981). Potential hazards of the co-therapy relationship. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 18, 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, G. W., & Barnard, C. P. (1999). Procedures in marriage and family therapy. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Luca, R., Boyes, D. A., Furer, P., Grayston, A. D., & Hiebert-Murphy, D. (1992). Group treatment for child sexual abuse. Canadian Psychology, 33, 168–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1987). Problem-Solving Therapy (Second Ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1996). Learning and teaching therapy. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannum, J. W. (1980). Some cotherapy techniques with families. Family Process, 19, 161–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, S., Gafni, S., & Laub, B. (1994). Cotherapy with individuals, families, and groups. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, T. (1982). The use of co-working (co-therapy) as a training method. Journal of Family Therapy, 4, 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoPiccolo, J., Heiman, J. R., Hogan, D. R., & Roberts, C. W. (1985). Effectiveness of single therapists versus cotherapy teams in sex therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 287–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., Johnson, V. E., & Kolodny, R. C. (1988). Sex and human loving. New York: Little, Brown, and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, A. Y., & Whitaker, C. (1978). The family crucible: The intense experience of family therapy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H. (1989). Health and stress profile. Minneapolis, MN: Life Innovations, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., Fournier, D., & Druckman, J. (1987). PREPARE ENRICH counselor's manual (Rev. ed.). Minneapolis, MN: REPARE/ENRICH, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., McCubbin, H. I., Barnes, H., Larsen, A., Muxen, M., & Wilson, M. (1982). Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. H., & Stewart, K. L. (1990). Multisystems assessments of health and stress (MASH) model and the Health and Stress Profile (HSP). Technical report available from Life Innovations, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzoli, M. S., Boscolo, L., Cecchin, G., & Prata, G. (1990). Paradox and counterparadox: A new model in the therapy of the family in schizophrenic transaction. Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, A., & Russell, L. (1980). Uses and abuses of co-therapy. In J. G. Howells (Ed.), Advances in Family Psychiatry, Volume II (pp. 401–410). New York: International Universities Press, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager, C. J. (1968). An overview of family therapy. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 18, 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selvini, M., & Palazzoli, M. S. (1991). Team consultation: an indispensable tool for the progress of knowledge. Ways of fostering and promoting its creative potential. Journal of Family Therapy, 13, 31–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J., & Fine, M. (1997). Gender and supervision: Evolving debates. In T. C. Todd & C. L. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor (pp. 72–82). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hendrix, C.C., Fournier, D.G. & Briggs, K. Impact of Co-Therapy Teams on Client Outcomes and Therapist Training in Marriage and Family Therapy. Contemporary Family Therapy 23, 63–82 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007824216363

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007824216363

Navigation