Skip to main content
Log in

Towards an Austrian Theory of the Firm

  • Published:
The Review of Austrian Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Amendola, M. and J.-L. Gaffard. (1988). The Innovative Choice: An Economic Analysis of the Dynamics of Technology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amendola, M. and J.-L. Gaffard. (1992). “Towards An Out-Ouf Equilibrium Theory of the Firm,” Metroeconomica 43(1/2).

  • Alchian, A.A. (1950). “Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory,” Journal of Political Economy 58, 211–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettke, P. and D.L. Prychitko (eds.) (1994). The Market Process, Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Edward Elgar.

  • Böhm-Bawerk, E. (1959, 1889). Positive Theory of Capital. Libertarian Press.

  • Boudreaux, D. (1994). “Schumpeter and Kirzner on Competition and Equilibrium.” In P.J. Boettke and D.L. Prychitko (eds.), The Market Process, Essays in Contemporary Austrian Economics. Hants: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casson, M. (1982). The Entrepreneur. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curie, M. and I. Steedman. (1990). Wrestling with Time. Manchester University Press.

  • Davies, J.E. and F.S. Lee. (1988). “A Post-Keynesian Appraisal of the Contestability Criterion,” Journal of Post-Keynesian Economics 11(1), Fall.

  • Dulbecco, P. (1998). “Inter-Firm Cooperative Agreements.” In R. Arena and C. Longhi (eds.), Markets and Organization. Springer.

  • Edelman, G. (1989). Neural Darwinism, the Theory of Neural Group Selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, N. (1996a). “Capabilities and the Theory of the Firm,” Revue d'Economie Industrielle n 77, 2eme Trimestre.

  • Foss, N. (1996b). “The Alternatives Theories of Knight and Coase, and the Modern Theory of the Firm,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 18, Spring.

  • Foss, N. (1996c). Austrian and Post-Marshallian Economics: The Bridging Work of George Richardson. DRUID Working Paper No. 96–94.

  • Garrouste, P. (1994). “Menger and Hayek on Institutions: Continuity and Discontinuities,” Journal of the History of Economic Thought 16(2), Fall.

  • Gigerenzer, G. (1996). “Rationality: Why Social Context Matters.” In P.B. Baltes and U.M. Staudinger (eds.), Interactive Minds, Life-Span Perspectives on the Social Foundation of Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1931). Prices and Production. London: George Routledge & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1976, 1937). “Economics and knowledge.” In F.A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1939). Profits, Interest and Investment. London: George Routledge & Sons, reprinted 1969 and 1975 by Augustus M. Kelley Publishers, Clifton New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1941). The Pure Theory of Capital. Londres: Routdledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1976, 1945). “The Use of Knowledge in Society.” In F.A. Hayek, Individualism and Economic Order. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1976, 1946). “The Meaning of Competition.” In F.A. Hayek (ed.), Individualism and Economic Order. London and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 2nd edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1952). Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. London: Routledge & Kegan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1967). Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F.A. (1978). New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. Routledge and Kegan.

  • Hayek, F.A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1935). “Wages and Interest: The Dynamic Problem,” The Economic Journal.

  • Hicks, J. (1939). Value and Capital. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1982, 1954). “The Process of Imperfect Competition.” In J. Hicks (ed.), Collected Essays on Economic Theory. Oxford: B. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1970). “A Neo-Austrian Growth Theory,” The Economic Journal, June.

  • Hicks, J. (1973). Capital and Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. (1985). Methods of Dynamic Economics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz, S. (1994). “Subjectivism.” In P.J. Boettke (ed.), The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics. Hants: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ioannides, S. (1992). The Market, Competition and Democracy, A Critique of Neo-Austrian Economics. Edward Elgar.

  • Jaffè, W. (1976). “Menger, Jevons, Walras de-homogenised,” Economic Inquiry 14(4), December.

  • Kaldor, N. (1933). “A classificatory note on the determinateness of equilibrium,” Review of Economic Studies.

  • Kirzner, I. (1966). An Essay on Capital. New York: Augustus M. Kelley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1973). Competition and Entrepreneurship. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1985). Discovery and the Capitalist Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1992). The Meaning of Market Process, Essays in the Development of Modern Austrian Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner, I. (1997). “Entrepreneurial Discovery and the Competitive Market Process: An Austrian Approach,” Journal of Economic Literature XXXv(1), March.

  • Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit. Reprint 1971, Chicago: The Chicago University Press.

  • Lachmann, L. (1978, 1956). Capital and its Structure. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and McNell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. (1977). Capital, Expectations, and the Market Process, Essays on the Theory of the Market Economy, edited with an introduction by Walter E. Grinder, Sheed Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachmann, L. (1986). The Market as an Economic Process. Basil Blackwell.

  • Langlois, R. (1984). “Internal Organization in a Dynamic Context: Some Theoretical Considerations.” In M. Jussawalla and H. Ebenfield (eds.), Communication and Information Economics: New Perspectives. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, R. (1992). “Transaction-Cost Economics in Real Time,” Industrial and Corporate Change 1(1).

  • Langlois, R. (1993). Capabilities and Coherence in Firms and Markets. Mimeo, Department of Economics, The University of Connecticut, August.

  • Langlois, R. (1994). Do Firms Plan?, Paper for the Conference “Frontiëres de la firme,” Universite Lumiëre-Lyon 2, January 28, 1994, Lyon, France.

  • Langlois, R. and M. Cosgel. (1993). “Frank Knight on Risk, Uncertainty, and the Firm: A New Interpretation,” Economic Inquiry 31.

  • Langlois, R. and N. Foss. (1996). “Capabilities and Governance: The Rebirth of Production in the Theory of Economic Organization.” Unpublished working paper.

  • Langlois, R. and P. Garrouste. (1997). “Cognition, Redundancy and Learning in Organizations,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 4.

  • Langlois, R. and P. Robertson. (1995). Firms, Markets and Economic Change, A dynamic Theory of Business Instituions. Routledge.

  • Lazonick, W. (1991). Business Organization and the Myth of the Market Economy. Cambridge University Press.

  • Leijonhufvud, A. (1986). Capitalism and the Factory System. In R. Langlois (ed.), Economics as a Process, Essays in the New Institutional Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. (1989). The Minds and Methods of Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. (1991). Equilibrium and Evolution, An Exploration of Connecting Principles in Economics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loasby, B. (1993). The Organisation of Industry, Mimeo, Department of Economics, University of Striling.

  • Loasby, B. (1994). “Organisational Capabilities and Interfirm Relations,” Metroeconomica 45, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmgren, H.B. (1961). “Information, Expectations and the Theory of the Firm,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 75.

  • Menger, C. (1976, 1950, 1871). Principles of Economics. New York: New York University Press; Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morishima, M. (1976). The Economic Theory of Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, P. (1984). “On the Nature and Theory of Economic Organization: The Role of the Firm Reconsidered,” History of Political Economy 16, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mises, L. (1949). Human Action, a Treatise on Economics. Yale University Press.

  • O'Driscoll, G.P. Jr. (1977). Economics as a Coordination Problem: The Contribution of Friedrich Hayek. Kansas City: Sheed Andrews and Mc. Meelk Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Driscoll, G.P. Jr. and M.J. Rizzo. (1996). The Economics of Time and Ignorance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Driscoll, G.P. Jr. and M.J. Rizzo. (1990). “Subjectivism, Uncertainty, and Rules.” In S. Littlechild (ed.), Austrian Economics, Vol. 1, Hants: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. (1981). Prices and Quantities: A Macroeconomic Analysis. Basil Blackwell.

  • Penrose, E. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravix, J.L. (1994). Production, institutions et organisation de l'industrie, Une contribution ‡ la mèthode Èconomique, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nice-Sophia Antipolis.

  • Richardson, G. (1990). Information and Investment. Clarendon Press, 2nd edition.

  • Richardson, G. (1972). “The Organisation of Industry,” The Economic Journal, September.

  • Robinson, J. (1962). Essays in the Theory of Economic Growth. St. Martin's.

  • Rothbard, M. (1994). “Book Review” (of Austrian Economics: Tensions and New Directions), Southern Economic Journal, October.

  • Salermo, J. (1993). “Mises and Hayek Dehomogenized,” Review of Austrian Economics 6(2).

  • Skousen, M. (1990). The Structure of Production, New York and London: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen, E.F. (1992). Prices & Knowledge, A Market-Process Perspective. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. (1994). Rules and Choice in Economics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieser, F. (1927). Social Economics. Reprint 1967, New York: Augustus M.Kelley.

  • Witt, U. (1987). “How Transaction Rights Are Shaped to Channel Innovativeness,” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 143.

  • Witt, U. (1998). “Cognition, Entrepreneurial Conceptions, and the Nature of the Firm Reconsidered,” International Society for New Institutional Economics Conference, Paris, September.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dulbecco, P., Garrouste, P. Towards an Austrian Theory of the Firm. The Review of Austrian Economics 12, 43–64 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007761326292

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007761326292

Keywords

Navigation