Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants

  • Published:
Plant Molecular Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Somaclonal variation is manifested as cytological abnormalities, frequent qualitative and quantitative phenotypic mutation, sequence change, and gene activation and silencing. Activation of quiescent transposable elements and retrotransposons indicate that epigenetic changes occur through the culture process. Epigenetic activation of DNA elements further suggests that epigenetic changes may also be involved in cytogenetic instability through modification of heterochromatin, and as a basis of phenotypic variation through the modulation of gene function. The observation that DNA methylation patterns are highly variable among regenerated plants and their progeny provides evidence that DNA modifications are less stable in culture than in seed-grown plants. Future research will determine the relative importance of epigenetic versus sequence or chromosome variation in conditioning somaclonal variation in plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahloowalia, B.S. 1986. Limitations to the use of somaclonal variation in crop improvement. In: J. Semal (Ed.) Somaclonal Variation and Crop Improvement, Martinus Nijhoff, Boston, pp. 14–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnholdt-Schmitt, B. 1995. Physiological aspects of genome variability in tissue culture. II. Growth phase-dependent quantitative variability of repetitive BstN1 fragments of primary cultures of Daucus carota L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 816–823.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnholt-Schmitt, B., Herterich, S. and Neumann, K.H. 1995. Physiological aspects of genome variability in tissue culture. I. Growth phase-dependent differential DNA methylation of the carrot genome (Daucus carota L.) during primary culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 809–815.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, J.A., Masson, P. and Federoff, N. 1988. Molecular mechanisms in the developmental regulation of the maize Suppressormutator transposable element. Genes Dev. 2: 1364–1380.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss, M.W. 1980. Chromosomal variation in plant tissues in culture. Int. Rev. Cytol. Suppl. 11A: 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benzion, G., Phillips, R.L. and Rines, H.W. 1986. Case histories of genetic variability in vitro: oats and maize. In: I.K. Vasil (Ed.) Cell Culture and Somatic Cell Genetics of Plants, Vol. 3, Academic Press, New York, pp. 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bregitzer, P., Halbert, S.E. and Lemaux, P.G. 1998. Somaclonal variation in the progeny of transgenic barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 96: 421–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brettell, R.I.S. and Dennis E.S. 1991. Reactivation of a silent Ac following tissue culture is associated with heritable alterations in its methylation pattern. Mol. Gen. Genet. 229: 365–372.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brettell, R.I.S., Dennis, E.S., Scowcroft, W.R. and Peacock, W.J. 1986. Molecular analysis of a somaclonal variant of alcohol dehydrogenase. Mol. Gen. Genet. 202: 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.T.H., Kyozuka, J., Sukekiyo, Y., Kimura, Y., Shimamoto, K. and Lorz, H. 1990. Molecular changes in protoplast-derived rice plants. Mol. Gen. Genet. 223: 324–328.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.T.H., Gobel, E. and Lorz, H. 1991. RFLP analysis of Zea mays callus cultures and their regenerated plants. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carver, B.F. and Johnson, B.B. 1989. Partitioning of variation derived from tissue culture of winter wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 78: 405–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, V.L. and Walbot, V. 1986. DNA modification of a maize transposable element correlates with loss of activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83: 1761–1771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomet, P.S., Wessler, W. and Dellaporta, S.L. 1987. Inactivation of the maize transposable element Activator (Ac) associated with DNA modification. EMBO J. 6: 295–302.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, P.S., Athma, P. and Peterson, T. 1996. Alleles of the maize P gene with distinct specificities encode Myb-homologous proteins with C-terminal replacements. Plant Cell 8: 1149–1158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Csink, A.K. and Henikoff, S. 1998. Something from nothing: the evolution and utility of satellite repeats. Trends Genet. 14: 200–204.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cubas, P., Vincent, C. and Coen, E. 1999. An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401: 157–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato, F. 1977. Cytogenetics of differentiation in tissue and cell cultures. In: J. Reinert and V.P.S. Bajaj (Eds.) Plant Cell, Tissue, and Organ Culture, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Amato, F. 1985. Cytogenetics of plant cell and tissue culture and their regenerates. CRC Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 3: 73–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahleen, L.S., Stuthman, D.D. and Rines, H.W. 1991. Agronomic trait variation in oat lines derived from tissue culture. Crop Sci. 31: 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, E.S., Brettell, R.I.S. and Peacock, W.J. 1987. A tissue culture induced Adh1 null mutant of maize results from a single base change. Mol. Gen. Genet. 210: 181–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, R.R. 1997. Tissue culture-induced variation and crop improvement. Adv. Agron. 58: 201–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earle, E.B. and Gracen, V.E. 1985. Somaclonal variation in progeny of plants from corn tissue culture. In: R. Henke et al. (Eds.) Progagation of Higher Plants through Tissue Culture, Plenum, New York, pp. 139–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan, E.S., Brettell, R.I.S. and Dennis, E.S. 1993. The role of DNA methylation in the regulation of plant expression. In: J.P. Jost and H.P. Saluz (Eds.) DNAMethylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance, Birkhauser, Basel, pp. 218–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, K. 1983. Sequential occurrence of mutations in a growing rice callus. Theor. Appl. Genet 65: 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groose, R.W. and Bingham, E.T. 1986. An unstable anthocyanin mutation recovered from tissue culture of alfalfa. 1. High frequency of reversion upon reculture. 2. Stable nonrevertants derived from reculture. Plant Cell Rep. 5: 104–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hang, A. and Bregitzer, P. 1993. Chromosomal variations in immature embryo-derived calli from six barley cultivars. J. Hered. 84: 105–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirochika, H., Sugimoto, K., Otsuki, Y., Tsugawa, H. and Kanda, M. 1996. Retrotransposons of rice involved in mutations induced by tissue culture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 7783–7788.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S.S., Phillips, R.L. and Rines, H.W. 1987. Possible role of heterochromatin in chromosome breakage induced by tissue culture in oats (Avena sativa L.). Genome 29: 439–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler, S.M. and Phillips, R.L. 1993a. DNA methylation and tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. 29: 125–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler, S.M. and Phillips, R.L. 1993b. Tissue culture-induced DNA methylation variation in maize. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 8773–8776.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaeppler, S.M., Phillips, R.L. and Olhoft, P. 1998. Molecular basis of heritable tissue culture-induced variation in plants. In: Jain et al. (Ed.) Somaclonal Variation and Induced Mutations in Crop Improvement. Current Plant Science and Biotechnology in Agriculture vol. 32, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp. 465–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kidwell, K.K. and Osborn, T.C. 1993. Variation among alfalfa somaclones in copy number of repeated DNA sequences. Genome 36: 906–912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. 1987. Somaclonal variation: history, method, and meaning. Iowa State J. 61: 393–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. and Scowcroft, W.R. 1981. Somaclonal variation: a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 60: 197–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, P.J. and Scowcroft, W.R. 1983. Somaclonal variation and crop improvement. In: T. Kosuge et al. (Eds.) Genetic Engineering of Plants: An Agricultural Perspective, Plenum, New York, pp. 289–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.L. and Phillips, R.L. 1987a. Genomic rearrangements in maize induced by tissue culture. Genome 29: 122–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.L. and Phillips, R.L. 1987b. Genetic variability in progeny of regenerated maize (Zea mays L.) plants. Genome 29: 344–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.L. and Phillips, R.L. 1988. The chromosomal basis of somaclonal variation. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 413–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.L., Geadelman, J.L. and Phillips, R.L. 1988. Agronomic evaluation of inbred lines derived from tissue cultures of maize. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 841–849.

    Google Scholar 

  • LoSchiavo, F., Pitto, L., Giuliano, G., Torti, G., Nuti-Ronchi, V., Marazatti, D., Vergara, R., Orselli, S. and Terzi, M. 1989. DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiation, hormones, and hypomethylating drugs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 77: 325–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, G., Das, O.P. and Messing, J. 1995. Tissue-specific DNaseIsensitive sites of the maize P gene and their changes upon epimutation. Plant J. 7: 797–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotrigiano, M. and Jagannathan, K. 1988. Paulownia tomentosa 'Somaclonal Snowstorm'. HortScience 23: 226–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matzke, M.A. and Matzke, A.J.M. 1996. Stable epigenetic states in differentiated plant cells: implications for somaclonal variation and gene silencing in transgenic plants. In: Russo et al. (Eds.) Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation, Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, B. 1984. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226: 792–801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messing, J. and Grossniklaus, U. 1999. Genomic imprinting in plants. Res. Probl. Cell Differ. 25: 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft, P.M. 1996. DNA methylation pattern changes induced by maize tissue culture. M.S. thesis, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhoft, P.M. and Phillips, R.L. 1999. Genetic and epigenetic instability in tissue culture and regenerated progenies. In: H.R. Lerner (Ed.) Plant Responses to Environmental Stresses: From Phytohormones to Genome Reorganization, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 111–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oono, K. 1985. Putative homozygous mutants in regenerated plants of rice. Mol. Gen. Genet. 198: 377–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, T.J. 1984. Genetic variation in somatic tissues: method or madness? Adv. Plant Path. 2: 153–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, G.I., Thorpe, C.J. and Chandler, V.L. 1993. Paramutation, an allelic interaction, is associated with a stable and heritable reduction of transcription of the maize b regulatory gene. Genetics 135: 881–894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peschke, V.M. and Phillips, R.L. 1991. Activation of the maize transposable element Suppressor-mutator (Spm) in tissue culture. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 90–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke, V.M. and Phillips, R.L. 1992. Genetic implications of somaclonal variation in plants. Adv. Genet. 30: 41–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke, V.M., Phillips, R.L. and Gengenbach, B.G. 1987. Discovery of transposable element activity among progeny of tissue culture-derived maize plants. Science 238: 804–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peschke, V.M., Phillips, R.L. and Gengenbach, B.G. 1991. Genetic and molecular analysis of tissue culture-derived Ac elements. Theor. Appl. Genet. 82: 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, R.L., Kaeppler, S.M. and Olhoft, P. 1994. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 5222–5226.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Razin, A. and Riggs, A.D. 1993. DNA methylation and embryogenesis. In: J.P. Jost and H.P. Saluz (Eds.) DNAMethylation: Molecular Biology and Biological Significance, Birkhauser, Basel, pp. 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M.M. and Dempsey, E. 1972. On the mechanism of chromatin loss induced by the B chromosome of maize. Genetics 71: 73–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, M.M. and Dempsey, E. 1973. Chromatin elimination induced by the B chromosome of maize. J. Hered. 64: 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, E.J. 1997. DNA methylation and plant development. Trends Genet. 13: 319–323.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selker, E.U. and Stevens, J.N. 1985. DNA methylation at asymetric sites is associated with numerous transition mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 8114–8118.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z.X. and K.L. Zheng. 1990. Somaclonal variation in rice. In: Y.P.S. Bajaj (Ed.) Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 3, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 288–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, N. 1973. Nuclear cytology. In: H.E. Street (Ed.) Plant Tissue and Cell Culture, 2nd ed., Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 177–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veilleux, R.E. and Johnson, A.T. 1998. Somaclonal variation: molecular analysis, transformation interaction, and utilization. Plant Breed. Rev. 16: 229–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolffe, A.P. and Matzke, M.A. 1999. Epigenetics: regulation through repression. Science 286: 481–486.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr, B.E., Williams, M.E., Duncan, R.D. et al. 1987. Somaclonal variation among the progeny of plants regenerated from callus cultures of seven inbred lines of maize. Can. J. Bot. 61: 491–499.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1575 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, USA

    Shawn M. Kaeppler, Heidi F. Kaeppler & Yong Rhee

Authors
  1. Shawn M. Kaeppler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Heidi F. Kaeppler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yong Rhee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaeppler, S.M., Kaeppler, H.F. & Rhee, Y. Epigenetic aspects of somaclonal variation in plants. Plant Mol Biol 43, 179–188 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006423110134

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006423110134

Search

Navigation