Abstract
This study investigates whether the claim that environmental attitudes are based on moral reasoning is valid with regard to consumer buying attitudes, as it has been shown to be in other domains of consumer behaviour. It is proposed that two conditions make moral reasoning in the buying situation more likely: environmental concern and the absence of other highly involving characteristics. The paper presents a study of a case with these two characteristics: Danish consumers' choice of environment-friendly packaging. With regard to this case, the evidence supports the claim. A majority of Danish consumers have developed personal norms about choosing environment-friendly packaging and the personal norm is a significant predictor of their (self-reported) propensity to choose environment-friendly packaging in the supermarket (whereas perceived costs have a minor influence on the choice). It is recommended that attempts to promote this and similar behaviour focus on strengthening consumers' intrinsic motivation and on facilitating its transformation into behaviour.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Ackerman, F. (1997). Why do we recycle? Markets, values, and public policy. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Assael, H. (1987). Consumer behavior and marketing action. Boston: Kent.
Bech-Larsen, T. (1996). Danish consumers' attitudes to the functional and environmental characteristics of food packaging. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19, 339-363.
Berger, I. E., & Corbin, R. M. (1992). Perceived consumer effectiveness and faith in others as moderators of environmentally responsible behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 11, 79-89.
Black, J. S., Stern, P. C., & Elworth, J. T. (1985). Personal and contextual influences on household energy adaptations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 3-21.
Blinder, A. S. (1987). Hard heads, soft hearts. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego: Academic Press.
Clee, M., & Wicklund, R. (1980). Consumer behavior and psychological reactance. Journal of Consumer Research, 6, 389-405.
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
Deci, E. L. (1972). Intrinsic motivation, extrinsic reinforcement, and inequity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 22, 113-120.
Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York: Plenum Press.
Deci, E. L., & Flaste, R. (1995). Why we do what we do. Understanding self-motivation. New York: Penguin Books.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
Dunlap, R. E. (1991). Trends in public opinion toward environmental issues: 1965–1990. Society and Natural Resources, 4, 285-312.
Dunlap, R. E., Gallup, G. H., & Gallup, A. M. (1993). Of global concern: Results of the health of the planet survey. Environment, 35(9), 7-39.
Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L., & Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The role of perceived consumer effectiveness in motivating environmentally conscious behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10, 102-117.
Fazio, R. H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In: R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, pp. 204-243. New York: Guilford Press.
Fazio, R.H., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Powell, M. C. (1994). Attitudes, perception, and attention. In: P. R. Niedenthal & S. Kitayama (Eds.), The heart's eye: Emotional influence in perception and attention, pp. 197-216. San Diego: Academic Press.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Frey, B. (1997). Not just for the money. An economic theory of personal motivation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Gaus, G. F. (1994). The limits of homo economicus. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association. New York, September 1–4.
Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on attitude-behavior relationships. A natural experiment with curbside recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27, 699-718.
Heberlein, T. A. (1972). The land ethic realized: Some social psychological explanations for changing environmental attitudes. Journal of Social Issues, 28(4), 79-87.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom (1990). LISREL 7 and PRELIS: User's guide and reference. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Agency.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modelling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.
Mazis, M. B. (1975). Antipollution measures and psychological reactance theory: A field experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 654-660.
Mazis, M. B., Settle, R. B., & Leslie, D. C. (1973). Elimination of phosphate detergents and psychological reactance. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 390-395.
Michael, J. H., & Smith, P. M. (1993). The “green gap” in proenvironmental attitudes and product availability: Parental tradeoffs in diapering decision-making. In: Proceedings of the 1993 Marketing and Public Policy Conference, pp. 109-122. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Miljø-og Energiministeriet (1995). Natur-og miljøpolitisk redegørelse 1995 (A report on the state of the nature and the environment, 1995). Copenhagen: The Ministry of Environment and Energy.
Obermiller, C. (1995). The baby is sick/the baby is well: A test of environmental communication appeals. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 55-70.
Ölander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (1995). Understanding of consumer behaviour as a prerequisite for environmental protection. Journal of Consumer Policy, 18, 317-357.
Peattie, K. (1995). Environmental marketing management: Meeting the green challenge. London: Pitman.
Reich, J. W., & Robertson, J. L. (1979). Reactance and norm appeal in anti-littering messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, 91-101.
Roskos-Ewoldsen, D. R., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the orienting value of attitudes: Attitude accessibility as a determinant of an object's attraction of visual attention. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 198-211.
Schwartz, S. H. (1970). Moral decision making and behavior. In: J. Macauley & L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior, pp. 127-141. New York: Academic Press.
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influence on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221-279.
Smith, N. C. (1990). Morality and the market. Consumer pressure for corporate accountability. London: Routledge.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Black, J. S. (1986). Support for environmental protection: The role of moral norms. Population and Environment, 8, 204-222.
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Ruttan, V. W., Socolow, R. H., & Sweeney, J. L. (Eds.) (1997). Environmentally significant consumption. Research directions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press for the National Research Council.
Stern, P. C., & Kirkpatrick, E. M. (1977). Energy behavior: Conservation without coercion. Environment, 10, 10-15.
Sudman, S., Bradburn, N. M., & Schwarz, N. (1996). Thinking about answers. The application of cognitive processes to survey methodology. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Thøgersen, J. (1994). Monetary incentives and environmental concern. Effects of a differentiated garbage fee. Journal of Consumer Policy, 17, 407-442.
Thøgersen, J. (1996). The demand for environmentally friendly packaging in Germany. Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Centre for Market Surveillance, Research and Strategy for the Food Sector. Working Paper No. 30.
Thøgersen, J. (1998). Knowledge barriers to sustainable consumption. Paper presented at the Nordic Consumer Research Conference, Lillehammer, Norway, 11–14 November.
Thøgersen, J., & Andersen, A. K. (1996). Environmentally friendly consumer behavior: The interplay of moral attitudes, private costs, and facilitating conditions. In: R. P. Hill & C. R. Taylor (Eds.), Marketing and Public Policy Conference proceedings, Vol. 6, pp. 80-96. Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Thøgersen, J., & Bech-Larsen, T. (1993). Emballagens miljøbelastning. En mål-middelanalyse af forbrugernes problemopfattelse og løsningsstrategier (The burden on the environment caused by packaging. An ends-mean analysis of consumers' problem awareness and solution strategies). Paper presented at the Nordic Network Conference, Business Strategy and the Environment, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Tourangeau, R. (1992). Context effects on responses to attitude questions: Attitudes as memory structures. In: N. Schwarz & S. Sudman (Eds.), Context effects in social and psychological research, pp. 35-47. New York: Springer.
Van Vugt, M., Van Lange, P. A. M., Meertens, R. M., & Joireman, J. A. (1996). How a structural solution to a real-world social dilemma failed: A field experiment on the first carpool lane in Europe. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59, 364-374.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thφgersen, J. The Ethical Consumer. Moral Norms and Packaging Choice. Journal of Consumer Policy 22, 439–460 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006225711603
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006225711603