Abstract
Stakeholder theory is often unable to distinguish those individuals and groups that are stakeholders from those that are not. This problem of stakeholder identity has recently been addressed by linking stakeholder theory to a Rawlsian principle of fairness. To illustrate, the question of stakeholder status for the non-human environment is discussed. This essay criticizes a past attempt to ascribe stakeholder status to the non-human environment, which utilized a broad definition of the term "stakeholder." This paper then demonstrates how, despite the denial of stakeholder status, the environment is nonetheless accounted for on a fairness-based approach through legitimate organizational stakeholders. In addition, since stakeholder theory has never claimed to be a comprehensive ethical scheme, it is argued that sound reasons might exist for managers to consider their organization's impact on the environment that are not stakeholder-related.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baier, A.: 1990, ‘For the Sake of Future Generations’, in Tom Regan (ed.), Earthbound: Introductory Essays in Environmental Ethics (Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Ill.).
Berlin, I.: 1969, ‘Two Concepts of Liberty’, Four Essays on Liberty (Oxford University Press, New York), Reprinted in Sandel, M. J. (ed.): 1984, Liberalism and Its Critics (New York University Press, New York), pp. 15–,36.
Berry, W.: 1993, Sex, Economy, Freedom & Community (Pantheon Books, New York).
Boatright, J. R.: 1994, ‘What's So Special About Shareholders’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 393–408.
The Body Shop: 1996, Annual Report.
Brenner, S. N. and P. Cochran: 1991, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Firm: Implications for Business and Society Research’, Presented at the annual meeting of the International Association of Business and Society, Sundance, UT.
Burton, B. K. and C. P. Dunn: 1996, ‘Feminist Ethics as Moral Grounding for Stakeholder Theory’, Business Ethics Quarterly 6(2), 133–148.
Carroll, A. B.: 1993, Business and Society: Ethics and Stakeholder Management, 2nd ed. (South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH).
Chappell, T.: 1994, The Soul of a Business (Bantam Books, New York).
Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1995, ‘A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 92–117.
Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1994, ‘A Risk-Based Model of Stakeholder Theory’ (University of Toronto Working Paper), p. 9.
Clarkson, M. B. E.: 1991, ‘Defining, Evaluating, and Managing Corporate Social Performance: A Stakeholder Management Model’, in J. E. Post (ed.), Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT), pp. 331–358.
Colburn, T., D. Dumanoski and J. P. Myers: 1996, Our Stolen Future (Dutton, New York).
Donaldson, T.: 1989, The Ethics of International Business (Oxford University Press, New York).
Donaldson, T. and L. E. Preston: 1995, ‘The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications’, Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91.
Eckersley, R.: 1992, Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach (State University of New York Press, Albany).
Evan, W. M. and R. E. Freeman: 1988, ‘A Stakeholder Theory of the Modern Corporation: Kantian Capitalism’, in T. Beauchamp and N. Bowie (eds.), Ethical Theory and Business, 3rd ed. (Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ), pp. 97, 101–,105.
Feinberg, J.: 1980, Rights, Justice and the Bounds of Liberty (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
Freeman, R. E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, The Journal of Behavioral Economics 19(4), 337–359.
Freeman, R. E.: 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach (Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc.).
Freeman, R. E. and W. Evan: 1990, ‘Corporate Governance: A Stakeholder Interpretation’, The Journal of Behavioral Economics 19(4), 337–359.
Goodpaster, K. E.: 1978, ‘On Being Morally Considerable’, The Journal of Philosophy 75, 308–325.
Hart, H. L. A.: 1955, ‘Are There Any Natural Rights?’, Philosophical Review 64 (April).
Hill, C. W. L. and T. M. Jones: 1992, ‘Stakeholderagency Theory’, Journal of Management Studies 29, 131–154.
Jones, T. M.: 1995, ‘Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A Synthesis of Ethics and Economics’, Academy of Management Review 20(2), 404–437.
King, R. J. H.: 1991, ‘Caring about Nature: Feminist Ethics and the Environment’, Hypatia 6(1), 75–89.
Mitchell, R. K, B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood: 1997, ‘Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853–886.
Norton, B. G.: 1994, ‘Environmental Ethics and Weak Anthropocentrism’, Environmental Ethics 6(2), 131–148.
Nozick, R.: 1974, Anarchy State, and Utopia (Basic Books, New York).
Phillips, R. A.: 1997, ‘Stakeholder Theory and a Principle of Fairness’, Business Ethics Quarterly 7(1), 51–66.
Phillips, R. A. and M. P. Bezold: 1996, ‘Organizations as the Object of Stakeholder Activism’, in J. Logsdon and K. Rehbein (eds.), Proceedings of the International Association of Business and Society, pp. 596–601.
Real Goods: 1997, http://www.realgoods.com/whoweare/mission.html.
Regan, T.: 1983, The Case for Animal Rights (University of California Press, Berkeley, CA).
Rolston, H., III: 1994, Conserving Natural Value (Columbia University Press, New York).
Rowley, T. J.: 1997, ‘Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences’, Academy of Management Review 22(4), 887–910.
Sepänmaa, Y.: 1993, The Beauty of Environment, 2nd ed. (Environmental Ethics Books, Denton, TX).
Simmons, A. J.: 1979, Moral Principles and Political Obligations (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
Singer, P.: 1975, Animal Liberation (Review Books, New York).
Singer, P. (ed.): 1985, In Defense of Animals (Basil Blackwell, Oxford).
Starik, M.: 1995, ‘Should Trees Have Managerial Standing? Toward Stakeholder Status for Non-Human Nature’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 207–217.
Stone, C. D.: 1974, Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects (Tioga Publishing Company, Portola Valley, CA).
Taylor, P. W.: 1986, Respect for Nature (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ).
Warren, K. J.: 1990, ‘The Power and the Promise of Ecological Feminism’, Environmental Ethics 12, 125–146.
Westra, L.: 1994, An Environmental Proposal for Ethics: The Principle of Integrity (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham, MD).
Wicks, A. C., D. R. Gilbert, Jr. and R. E. Freeman: 1994, ‘A Feminist Reinterpretation of the Stakeholder Concept’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4), 475–498.
Wood, D. J.: 1990, Business and Society (Scott, Foresman & Co., Glenview, IL).
World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phillips, R.A., Reichart, J. The Environment as a Stakeholder? A Fairness-Based Approach. Journal of Business Ethics 23, 185–197 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006041929249
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006041929249