Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A micromanipulation method to measure the mechanical properties of single tomato suspension cells

  • Published:
Biotechnology Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A micromanipulation method has been developed to measure the force required to burst single tomato cells (Lycopersicon esculentum vf36) taken from suspension cultures. The method works by compressing a cell between parallel surfaces whilst measuring the force being imposed on the cell, and its deformation. The mean bursting force for two-week-old cells was 3.6 mN (standard error 0.1 mN), at a compression speed of 23 μm s−1. Usually force-deformation curves showed a single bursting event, but sometimes multiple bursts were observed, implying cells could reseal after failure. If cells were deformed without bursting, and then held, they showed a relaxation of the force. This was attributed to water loss, although wall relaxation was also a possibility. The half time of this relaxation was between 1–10 s. Tests on protoplasts gave bursting forces 1000 fold lower than intact cells, and cells treated with Triton to disrupt the membranes and destroy turgor collapsed with no bursting. As expected, both turgor and the presence of a wall were essential to maintaining cell strength.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carpita NC (1985) Tensile strength of cell walls of living cells. Plant Physiol. 79: 485-488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrispeel MJ, Maurel C (1994) Aquaporins: the molecular basis of facilitated water movement through living plant cells? Plant Physiol. 105: 9-13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove DJ (1999) Relaxation in a high-stress environment: the molecular bases of extensible cell walls and cell enlargement. Plant Cell 9: 1031-1041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry SC (1995) Polysaccharide-modifying enzymes in the plant cell wall. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 46: 497-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gahan PB (1984) Plant Histochemistry and Cytochemistry: An Introduction. Experimental Botany 18. London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamiya N, Tazawa M, Takata T (1963) The relation of turgor pressure to cell volume in Nitella with special reference to the mechanical properties of the wall. Protoplasma 57: 501-521

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamura Y, Hoson T, Kamisaka S, Yamamoto R (1995) Formulation of pre-extension in a practical stress-relaxation measurement of the plant cell wall. Biorheology 32: 611-620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashmoushy H, Zhang Z, Thomas CR (1998) Micromanipulation measurements of the mechanical properties of baker's yeast cells. Biotechnol. Tech. 12: 925-929.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond PS, Metraux JP, Taiz L (1980) Cell expansion patterns and directionality of wall mechanical properties in Nitella. Plant Physiol. 65: 211-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiu C, Zhang Z, Thomas CR (1999) A novel technique for the study of bacterial cell mechanical properties. Biotechnol. Tech. 13: 707-713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AE, Zhang Z, Thomas CR (2000a) Wall material properties of yeast cells: Part I. Cell measurements and compression experiments. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55: 2031-2041.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith AE, Zhang Z, Thomas CR (2000b) Wall material properties of yeast cells: Part II. Analysis. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55: 2043-2053.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CR, Zhang Z, Cowen C (2000) Review: micromanipulation measurements of biological materials. Biotechnol. Lett. 22: 531-537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Titel C, Woehlecke H, Afifi I, Ehwald R (1997) Dynamics of limiting wall porosity in plant cell suspension cultures. Planta 203: 320-326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomos D (2000) The plant pressure probe. Biotechnol. Lett. 22: 437-442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomos D, Pritchard J (1994) Biophysical and biochemical control of cell expansion in roots and leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 45: 1721-1731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribuolot M-B, Pritchard J, Tomos D (1995) Stimulation and inhibition of pine root growth by osmotic stress. New Phytol. 130: 169-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Ferenczi MA, Lush AC, Thomas CR (1991) A novel micromanipulation technique for measuring the bursting strength of single mammalian cells. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 36: 208-210.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B30 1LN, UK

    Jenny Blewett & Colin Thomas

  2. Unilever Research Colworth, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedford, MK44 1LQ, UK

    Kathleen Burrows

Authors
  1. Jenny Blewett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kathleen Burrows
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Colin Thomas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Blewett, J., Burrows, K. & Thomas, C. A micromanipulation method to measure the mechanical properties of single tomato suspension cells. Biotechnology Letters 22, 1877–1883 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005635125829

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005635125829

Search

Navigation