Skip to main content
Log in

Response of shoot growth and transpiration to soil drying in sugarcane

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between plant-available water (PAW) and shoot extension and transpiration is required to model crop response to water stress, and has not been previously defined for sugarcane (Saccharum spp. (L.)). We subjected sugarcane plants at the 5–6 leaf stage to a continuous drying cycle in large (42 L) pots to determine the threshold fraction of plant available water (PAWt) at which plants slowed shoot extension and transpiration relative to plants watered daily. Transpiration rate was measured as the daily mass loss from the pots and shoot extension as the height increase from ground level to the tip of the youngest actively expanding leaf. Three experiments were conducted with cultivar Q115 covering a range of soil types (and hence PAW) and rates of soil drying. To compare the response with sugarcane, sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench s.lat.), a species that has been well characterized for the relationship between PAW and transpiration and shoot extension, was grown in two additional experiments. For the same species, response curves and PAWt for either shoot extension or transpiration were very similar for the different experiments. This similarity occurred despite there being different soils, different environmental conditions, different PAW, different times taken for the pots to dry down, and hence different rates of stress development. In sugarcane, there was almost no threshold in PAWt (0.92) for shoot extension and a very small threshold in PAWt for transpiration (0.85), while in sorghum PAWt for sorghum shoot extension (0.54) and plant transpiration (0.47) were consistent with those published previously. The present data extend previous reports that sugarcane stalk extension is very sensitive to water stress, and we discuss several factors that could provide the physiological basis for the sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball-Coelho B, Sampaio E V S B, Tiessen H and Stewart, J W B 1992 Root dynamics in plant and ratoon crops of sugar cane. Plant Soil 142, 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowing D J G, Davies W J and Jones H G 1990 A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Malus x domestica Borkh. J. Exp. Bot. 41, 1535–1540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer G L and Muchow R C 1990 Quantifying climatic risk to sorghum in Australia’s semiarid tropics and subtropics: model development and simulation. In Climatic Risk in Crop Production: Models and Management for the Semiarid Tropics and Subtropics. Eds. R C Muchow and J A Bellamy. pp 205–232. CAB International, Wallingford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield P M, Wright G C and Tapsall W R 1989 An accurate and mobile weighing device for large pots. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 29, 867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill J N S 1966 Availability of soil water to sugarcane in Natal. Proc. S. Afr. Sugar Tech. Assoc. 39, 276–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson J C 1968 Available soil water and sugarcane growth and transpiration. Proc. Inter. Soc. Sugarcane Technol. 13, 484–498.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inman-Bamber N G and de Jager J M 1986a The reaction of two varieties of sugarcane to water stress. Field Crops Res. 14, 15–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inman-Bamber N G and de Jager J M 1986b Effect of water stress on growth, leaf resistance and canopy temperature in field-grown sugarcane. Proc. S. Afr. Sugar Tech. Assoc. 60, 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell R 1996 The Australian Soil Classification. CSIRO, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson M B 1993 Are plant hormones involved in rot to shoot communication? Adv. Bot. Res. 19, 103–187.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffries R A 1993 Responses of potato to drought. I. Expansion of individual leaves and osmotic adjustment. Ann. Appl. Biol. 122, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C A 1980 A preview of evapotranspiration studies in irrigated sugarcane in Hawaii. Hawaiian Planter’s Rec. 59, 195–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston G and Ham G J 1975 Water requirements and irrigation scheduling of sugar cane in Queensland. Proc. Qld Soc. Sugar Cane Tech. 42, 57–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler P H, Moore P H, Jones C A, Dela Cruz A and Maretzki A 1982 Response of drip-irrigated sugarcane to drought stress. Agron. J. 74, 906–911.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilley J M and Fukai S 1994 Effect of timing and severity of water deficit on four diverse rice cultivars. II. Physiological response to soil water deficit. Field Crops Res. 37, 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer F C and Grantz D A 1990 Stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane: stomatal adjustment to water transport capacity. Plant Cell Environ. 13, 383–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinzer F C, Grantz D A and Smit B 1991 Root signals mediate coordination of stomatal and hydraulic conductance in growing sugarcane. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 18, 329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreshet S, Huang B and Huck M G 1996 Water permeability of roots. In Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp 659–678. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muchow R C and Sinclair T R 1991 Water deficit effects on maize yields modeled under current and ‘greenhouse’ climates. Agron. J. 83,1052–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J B 1988 Root signals control leaf expansion in wheat seedlings growing in drying soil. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15, 687–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff L F, Ritchie J T and Cassel D K 1983 Field measured limits of soil water availability as related to laboratory-measured properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47, 770–775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray J D and Sinclair T R 1997 Stomatal closure of maize hybrids in response to drying soil. Crop Sci. 37, 803–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J T 1981 Water dynamics in the soil-plant-atmosphere system. Plant Soil 58, 81–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts J, Nayamuth R A, Batchelor C H and Soopramanien G C 1990 Plant-water relations of sugar-cane (Saccharum officinarum L.) under a range of irrigated treatments. Agric. Water Manag. 17, 95–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal W D, Arkin F G, Shouse P J and Jordan W R 1987 Water deficit effects on transpiration and lea growth. Agron. J. 79, 1019–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadras V O and Milroy S P 1996 Soil-water thresholds for the response of leaf expansion and gas exchange, A review. Field Crops Res. 47, 253–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saliendra N Z and Meinzer F C 1992 Genotypic, developmental and drought-induced differences in root hydraulic conductance of contrasting sugarcane cultivars. J Exp. Bot. 43, 1209–1217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, T R 1986 Water and nitrogen limitations in soybean grain production. I. Model development. Field Crops Res. 15, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R and Ludlow M M 1986 Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 13, 329–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair T R, Muchow R C, Ludlow M M, Leach G J, Lawn R J and Foale M A 1987 Field and model analyses of the effect of water deficits on carbon and nitrogen accumulation by soybean, cowpea and black gram. Field Crops Res. 17, 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noordwijk M and Brouwer G 1991 Review of quantitative root length data in agriculture. In Plant Roots and Their Environment. Eds B L McMichael and H Persson. pp 515–525. Elsevier, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisz R, Kaminski J and Smilowitz Z 1994 Water deficit effects on potato leaf growth and transpiration: utilizing fraction extractable soil water for comparison with other crops. Am. Potato J. 71, 829–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright G C and Smith R C G 1983 Differences between two grain sorghum genotypes in adaptation to stress. II: Root water uptake and water use. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 34, 627–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nable, R.O., Robertson, M.J. & Berthelsen, S. Response of shoot growth and transpiration to soil drying in sugarcane. Plant Soil 207, 59–65 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004469417374

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004469417374

Navigation