Skip to main content
Log in

Soil microarthropod contribution to forest ecosystem processes: the importance of observational scale

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Investigations of the role of microarthropods (Acari and Collembola) in organic matter decomposition and nutrient cycling have shown that they may contribute to primary productivity in nutrient poor conditions. The potential of microarthropods to affect other ecosystem properties, such as above ground plant diversity or succession, lags somewhat. In this contribution we demonstrate: (1) that the effect on the mobilization of nutrients promoted by microarthropods must be measured at the microhabitat scale appropriate to the scale of the faunal activity, and (2) that small changes in the structure of microarthropod assemblages can have significant effects on the local mobilization of nutrients. In the first of two experiments we measured the nutrients leaching from field mesocosms containing litter and mineral soil, with and without fauna. After eight months, the C:N ratios of the litter differed significantly indicating that the fauna were effective in altering the decomposition rate. However, the patterns of release over time and the concentration of the measured nutrients differed little between the two sets of mesocosms. In a second experiment microarthropod assemblages, which differed only slightly, were introduced into laboratory microcosms and the nutrient fluxes were measured over a ten week period. Significant differences were detected in the concentration of nitrogen, K and Mg leached and in CO2 evolved. We suggest that when the potential influence of microarthropods on ecosystem properties is being assessed, specific knowledge of the relevant details of interactions at the smallest scale must be considered. These details can be incorporated or dismissed when interactions on the next level of the ecological hierarchy are examined. Using such analysis we suggest that the creation of soil nutrient hot-spots by microarthropods may have implications for maintaining plant species of lowered competitive ability in a given system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aber J D and Melillo J M 1980 Litter decomposition: measuring the relative contributions of organic matter and nitrogen to forest soils. Can. J. Bot. 58, 416-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J M 1978 Inter-and Intra-habitat relationships between woodland cryptostigmata species diversity and the diversity of soil and litter microhabitats. Oecologia 32, 341-348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J M 1987 Interaction between invertebrates and microorganisms, noise or necessity for soil processes? In Ecology of microbial communities. Eds. M Fletcher, T R G Gray, J G Jones, The society for general Microbiology Symposium 41. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J M 1988 Spatiotemporal effects of invertebrates on soil processes. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6, 216-227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J M 1994 Soil organisms as engineers: microsite modulation of macroscale processes. In Linking Species and Ecosystems. Eds. C G Jones and J H Lawton. Chapman and Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J M and Ineson P 1982 Interactions bewteen soil arthropods and microorganisms in carbon, nitrogen and mineral element fluxes from decomposing leaf litter. In Nitrogen as an Ecological Factor. Eds. J A Lee, S McNeill and I H Rorison. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • André H M, Noti M-I and LeBrun P 1994 The soil fauna: the other last biotic frontier. Biodiv. Conser. 3, 45-56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asikidis M D and Stamou G P 1991 Spatial and temporal patterns of an evergreensclerophyllous formation (Hortaitus, Greece). Pedobiologia 35, 53-63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson D 1991 Plant Root Growth — An Ecological Perspective. Special Publications Series of the British Ecological Society, No. 10. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beare M H, Coleman D C, Crossley D A Jr. Hendrix P F and Odum E P 1995 A hierarchical approach to evaluating the significance of soil biodiversity to biogeochemical cycling. Plant Soil 170, 5-22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellido A and Cancela de Foncesa J P 1988 Spatiotemporal organisation of the oribatid mite community in a littoral turf of the Kerguelea Archipelago, Indian Ocean. Pedobiologia 31, 239-246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blair J M, Crossley D A Jr and Callaham, L C 1992 Effects of litter quality and microarthropods on N dynamics and retention of exogenous 15 N in decomposing litter. Biol. Fertil. Soils 12, 241-252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulfin M and Ryan M 1968 John F Kennedy Park, Slievecoiltia, Co Wexford. Soil Survey Bulletin No. 18. An Foras Taluntais, Ireland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B D and Grime J P 1989 A comparitive study of plant responsiveness to the duration of episodes of mineral nutrient enrichment. New Phytol. 112, 261-267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B D, Grime J P and Mackey J M L 1991 A trade-off between scale and precision in resource foraging. Occologia 87, 532-538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chancy A L and Marbach F P 1962 Modified reagents for the determination of urea and ammonia. Clin. Chem. 8, 130-132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman D C, Anderson R V, Cole C V, Eliott E T, Woods L and Campion M K 1978 Trophic interactions in soils as they effect energy and nutrient dynamics. JV Flows of metabolic and biomass carbon. Microb. Ecol. 4, 373-380.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman D C, Odum E P and Crossley D A Jr 1992 Soil biology, soil ecology, and global change. Biol. Fert. Soils 14, 104-111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coûteaux M-M and Sallih Z 1994 Fate of inorganic 15 N in the profile of different coniferous forests. Biol. Fertil. Soils 17, 101-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coûteaux M-M, Monrozier L J and Bottner P 1996 Increased atmospheric CO2: chemical changes in decomposing sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa) leaf litter incubated in microcosms under increasing food web complexity. Oikos 76, 553-563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faber J H and Verhoef H A 1991 Functional differences between closely related soil arthropods with respect to decomposition and nitrogen mobilization in a pine forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 15-23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foote D 1995 Patterns of diversity in island soil fauna: detecting functional redundancy. In Islands: Biological Diversity and Ecosystem Function. Eds. P M Vitousek, L L Loope and H Anderson H. pp 57-71. Ecological Studies, Vol. 115. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freund R J, Littell R C and Spector PC 1986 SAS Systems for Linear Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime J P 1994 The role of plasticity in exploiting environmental heterogeneity. In Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity by Plants: Ecophysiological Processes Above-and Belowground. Eds. M M Caldwell and R W Pearcy. pp 1-21. Academic Press, San Diego.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand D I and Taylor C C 1987 Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Repeated Measures — A Practical Approach for Behavioural Scientists. Chapman and Hall, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon R D G and Anderson I M 1979 The effects of collembolan grazing on microbial activity in decomposing litter. Oecologia 38, 93-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneghan L and Bolger T 1996 Effects of component of ‘acid’ rain on soil microarthropods contribution to ecosystem function. J. App. Ecol. 33, 1329-1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heneghan L, Coleman D C, Zou X, Crossley D A Jr and Haines B L Soil microarthropod contributions to decomposition dynamics: tropical and temperate comparisons of a single substrate (Quercus prinus L.). Ecology. (In press).

  • Holling C 5 1992 Cross-scale morphologies, geometry and dynamics of ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 62, 447-502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt H W, Coleman D C, Ingham E R, Elliott E T, Moore J C, Rose S, Reid C P P and Morley C R 1987 The detrital foodweb in a shortgrass prairie. Biol. Fertil. Soils 3, 57-68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huston M A and DeAngelis D L 1994 Competition and coexistence: the effects of resource transport and supply rates. Am. Nat. 144, 954-977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings M J and Wijesinghe D K 1997 Patchy habitats, division of labour and growth dividends in clonal plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 12, 390-394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ineson P 1992 Forest soil biology, impossible challenges or open market? In Responses of Forest Ecosystems to Environmental Changes. Eds. A Teller, P Mathy, J N R Jeffers. pp 165-175. Elsevier Applied Science, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ineson P, Leonard M A and Anderson J M 1982 Effects of Collembolan grazing upon N and cation leaching from decomposing leaf litter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 610-605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C 1988 Philosophical tools: potential contributions to ecology. Oikos 51, 97-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lussenhop J 1992 Mechanisms of microarthropod-microbial interactions in the soil. Adv. Ecol. Res. 23, 1-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luxton M 1975 Studies on the oribatid mites of a Danish beechwood soil. II Biomass, colorimetry and respirometry. Pedobiologia 15, 161-200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore I C, Walter D E and Hunt H W 1988 Arthropod regulation of micro-and mesobiota in below-ground detrital food webs. Ann. Rev. Ent. 33, 419-439.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen H and Luxton M 1982 A comparitive analysis of soil fauna populations and their role in decomposition processes. Oikos 39, 287-388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt T R 1984 The role of microarthropods in decomposition and mineralization processes. Ann. Rev. Ent. 29, 25-46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seastedt T R and Crossley D A Jr 1983 Nutrients in forest litter treated with naphthalene and simulated throughfall: a field microcosm study. Soil Biol. Biochem. 15, 159-165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Setälä H, Tyynismaa M, Martikainen E and Huhta, V 1991 Mineralization of C, N and P in relation to decomposer community structure in coniferous forest soil. Pedobiologia 32, 285-296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siepel H and Maaskamp F 1994 Mites of different feeding guilds affect decomposition of organic matter. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1389-1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilman D and Cowan M L 1989 Growth of old field herbs on a nitrogen gradient. Funct. Ecol. 3, 425-438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torne von E 1990 Assessing feeding activities of soil living animals. 1. Bait lamina test. Pedobiologia 34, 89-101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Usher M B 1978 Aggregation responses to soil arthropods in relation to the soil environment. In The Role of Terrestrial and Aquatic Organisms in Decomposition Processes Eds. J M Anderson and A Macfadyen. pp 61-94. Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vedder B, Kampichler C, Bachmann G, Bruckner A and Kandeler F 1996 Impact of faunal comlexity on microbial biomass and N turnover in field microcosms from a spruce forest soil. Biol. Fertil. Soils 22, 22-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef H A and Brussaard L 1990 Decomposition and nitrogen mineralization in natural and agroecosystems: the contribution of soil animals. Biogeochemistry 11, 175-211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallwork I A 1976 The Distribution and Diversity of Soil Fauna. Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heneghan, L., Bolger, T. Soil microarthropod contribution to forest ecosystem processes: the importance of observational scale. Plant and Soil 205, 113–124 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004374912571

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004374912571

Navigation