Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:26:19.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

12 - Surface Energy Fluxes

from Part III - Hydrometeorology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Gordon Bonan
Affiliation:
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
Get access

Summary

Chapter Summary

The energy balance at Earth's land surface requires that the energy gained from net radiation be balanced by the fluxes of sensible and latent heat to the atmosphere and the storage of heat in soil. These energy fluxes are a primary determinant of surface climate. The annual energy balance at the land surface varies geographically in relation to incoming solar radiation and soil water availability. Over land, annual evapotranspiration is highest in the tropics and generally decreases towards the poles. Geographic patterns of evapotranspiration are explained by Budyko's analysis of the control of evapotranspiration by net radiation and precipitation. Energy fluxes vary over the course of a day and throughout the year, also in relation to soil water availability and the diurnal and annual cycles of solar radiation. The various terms in the energy budget (net radiation, sensible heat flux, latent heat flux, and soil heat flux) are illustrated for different climate zones and for various vegetation types. The Penman–Monteith equation illustrates relationships among net radiation, latent heat flux, sensible heat flux, and surface temperature. Soil experiments that alter surface albedo, surface conductance to evapotranspiration, and thermal conductivity illustrate the importance of these properties in regulating surface temperature and energy fluxes.

Surface Energy Budget

The solar and longwave radiation that impinges on Earth's surface heats the surface. The surface reflects some of the incoming solar radiation and also emits outgoing longwave radiation. The remaining radiation is the net radiation at the surface. Net radiation is dissipated in three ways.

Movement of air transports heat in a process known as convection. A common example is the cooling effect of a breeze on a hot summer day. This heat exchange is called sensible heat. Greenhouse microclimates are an example of the warm temperatures that can arise in the absence of convective heat exchange (Avissar and Mahrer 1982; Mahrer et al. 1987; Oke 1987). It is generally thought that greenhouses provide a warm environment to grow plants because glass or other translucent coverings allow solar radiation to penetrate and warm the interior of the greenhouse while longwave radiation emitted by the interior surfaces is trapped within the greenhouse. Although this can happen, the daytime warmth in greenhouses is largely a result of negligible convective heat exchange with the outside environment. The sensible heat from the warm interior surfaces is trapped within the greenhouse, warming the interior air.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Climatology
Concepts and Applications
, pp. 193 - 208
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avissar, R., and Mahrer, Y. (1982). Verification study of a numerical greenhouse microclimate model. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers, 25, 1711–1720.Google Scholar
Baldocchi, D. D., Vogel, C. A., and Hall, B. (1997). Seasonal variation of energy and water vapor exchange rates above and below a boreal jack pine forest canopy. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 28939–28951.Google Scholar
Betts, A. K., and Ball, J. H. (1998). FIFE surface climate and site-average dataset 1987–89. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 55, 1091–1108.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blanken, P. D., Black, T. A., Yang, P. C., et al. (1997). Energy balance and canopy conductance of a boreal aspen forest: Partitioning overstory and understory components. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 28915–28927.Google Scholar
Bonan, G. B., Davis, K. J., Baldocchi, D., Fitzjarrald, D., and Neumann, H. (1997). Comparison of the NCAR LSM1 land surface model with BOREAS aspen and jack pine tower fluxes. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102D, 29065–29075.Google Scholar
Budyko, M. I. (1974). Climate and Life. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Budyko, M. I. (1986). The Evolution of the Biosphere. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, G. S., and Norman, J. M. (1998). An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics, 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., and McVicar, T. R. (2007). On the importance of including vegetation dynamics in Budyko's hydrological model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11, 983–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donohue, R. J., Roderick, M. L., and McVicar, T. R. (2010). Can dynamic vegetation information improve the accuracy of Budyko's hydrological model?Journal of Hydrology, 390, 23–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gash, J. H. C., Nobre, C. A., Roberts, J. M., and Victoria, R. L. (1996). An overview of ABRACOS. In Amazonian Deforestation and Climate, ed. Gash, J. H. C., Nobre, C. A., Roberts, J. M., and Victoria, R. L.. New York: Wiley, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Gates, D. M. (1980). Biophysical Ecology. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentine, P., D'Odorico, P., Lintner, B. R., Sivandran, G., and Salvucci, G. (2012). Interdependence of climate, soil, and vegetation as constrained by the Budyko curve. Geophysical Research Letters, 39, L19404, doi:10.1029/2012GL053492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goulden, M. L, Winston, G. C., McMillan, A. M. S., et al. (2006). An eddy covariance mesonet to measure the effect of forest age on land–atmosphere exchange. Global Change Biology, 12, 2146–2162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, J., LLoyd, J., McIntyre, J., et al. (1995). Fluxes of carbon dioxide and water vapour over an undisturbed tropical forest in south-west Amazonia. Global Change Biology, 1, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grace, J., LLoyd, J., McIntyre, J., et al. (1996). Carbon dioxide flux over Amazonian rain forest in Rondônia. In Amazonian Deforestation and Climate, ed. Gash, J. H. C., Nobre, C. A., Roberts, J. M., and Victoria, R. L.. New York: Wiley, pp. 307–318.Google Scholar
Jackson, R. B., Randerson, J. T., Canadell, J. G., et al. (2008). Protecting climate with forests. Environmental Research Letters, 3, 044006, doi:10.1088/1748–9326/3/4/044006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, R. D., and Mahanama, S. P. P. (2012). Land surface controls on hydroclimatic means and variability. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 13, 1604–1620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koster, R. D., Oki, T., and Suarez, M. J. (1999). The offline validation of land surface models: Assessing success at the annual timescale. Journal of the Meteorological Society of Japan, 77, 257–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, S., Baldocchi, D. D., Xu, L., and Hehn, T. (2007). Inter-annual variability in carbon dioxide exchange of an oak/grass savanna and open grassland in California. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 147, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahrer, Y., Avissar, R., Naot, O., and Katan, J. (1987). Intensified soil solarization with closed greenhouses: Numerical and experimental studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 41, 325–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, S. D., Goulden, M. L., Hutyra, L. R., et al. (2011). Reduced impact logging minimally alters tropical rainforest carbon and energy exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 19431–19435.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milly, P. C. D. (1994). Climate, soil water storage, and the average annual water balance. Water Resources Research, 30, 2143–2156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1965). Evaporation and environment. In The State and Movement of Water in Living Organisms (19th Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology), ed. Fogg, G. E.. New York: Academic Press, pp. 205–234.Google Scholar
Monteith, J. L. (1981). Evaporation and surface temperature. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 107, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteith, J. L., and Unsworth, M. H. (2013). Principles of Environmental Physics, 4th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Oke, T. R. (1987). Boundary Layer Climates, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Oudin, L., Andréassian, V., Lerat, J., and Michel, C. (2008). Has land cover a significant impact on mean annual streamflow? An international assessment using 1508 catchments. Journal of Hydrology, 357, 303–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penman, H. L. (1948). Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 193A, 120–145.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, N. J., Blad, B. L., and Verma, S. B. (1983). Microclimate: The Biological Environment, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Schwalm, C. R., Williams, C. A., Schaefer, K., et al. (2010). A model-data intercomparison of CO2 exchange across North America: results from the North American Carbon Program site synthesis. Journal of Geophysical Research, 115, G00H05, doi:10.1029/2009JG001229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanhill, G. (1965). Observations on the reduction of soil temperature. Agricultural Meteorology, 2, 197–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, C. K., Law, B. E., Irvine, J., et al. (2009). Seasonal hydrology explains interannual and seasonal variation in carbon and water exchange in a semiarid mature ponderosa pine forest in central Oregon. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, G04006, doi:10.1029/2009JG001010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trenberth, K. E., Fasullo, J. T., and Kiehl, J. (2009). Earth's global energy budget. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unland, H. E., Houser, P. R., Shuttleworth, W. J., and Yang, Z.-L. (1996). Surface flux measurement and modeling at a semi-arid Sonoran Desert site. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 82, 119–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbanski, S., Barford, C., Wofsy, S., et al. (2007). Factors controlling CO2 exchange on timescales from hourly to decadal at Harvard Forest. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112, G02020, doi:10.1029/2006JG000293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, K., and Dickinson, R. E. (2012). A review of global terrestrial evapotranspiration: observation, modeling, climatology, and climatic variability. Reviews of Geophysics, 50, RG2005, doi:10.1029/2011RG000373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, C. A., Reichstein, M., Buchmann, N., et al. (2012). Climate and vegetation controls on the surface water balance: synthesis of evapotranspiration measured across a global network of flux towers. Water Resources Research, 48, W06523, doi:10.1029/2011WR011586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., Dawes, W. R., and Walker, G. R. (2001). Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resources Research, 37, 701–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, K., and Jackson, R. B. (2014). Biophysical forcings of land-use changes from potential forestry activities in North America. Ecological Monographs, 84, 329–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Surface Energy Fluxes
  • Gordon Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107339200.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Surface Energy Fluxes
  • Gordon Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107339200.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Surface Energy Fluxes
  • Gordon Bonan, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado
  • Book: Ecological Climatology
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107339200.013
Available formats
×