Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T15:26:25.163Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An assessment of the gastropod, Littorina littorea, as an indicator of heavy-metal contamination in United Kingdom estuaries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 October 2009

G. W. Bryan ,
W. J. Langston ,
L. G. Hummerstone ,
G. R. Burt  and
Y. B. Ho
G. W. Bryan
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB
W. J. Langston
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB
L. G. Hummerstone
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB
G. R. Burt
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB
Y. B. Ho
Affiliation:
The Laboratory, Marine Biological Association, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Preliminary determinations of heavy metals in winkles Littorina littorea along a concentration gradient in the Fal Estuary suggested that whole body concentrations might be related to those of the water. When animals were transplanted to this heavily contaminated estuary, changes in tissue concentrations of As, Co, Cu and Zn were largely complete after 2 months.

Relations between the winkle and water concentrations may be indirect since its algal diet is thought to be the main source for most heavy metals. Data from a large number of United Kingdom estuaries were used to compare concentrations of 12 metals in L. littorea with those of the brown seaweed Fucus vesiculosus which forms part of its diet. Very significant relations were found for Ag, As, Cd and Pb, suggesting that since concentrations in the seaweed probably reflect those of the surrounding water, so also do those of the winkle. However, concentrations of Ag in the animal also appeared to be influenced by dietary Cu levels. In addition, significant relations between the two species were found for Cu, Fe, Hg and Zn, but the slopes were shallow, perhaps indicating regulation by the winkle. For Cr and Mn relations were not very significant and, for Co and Ni, concentrations in the winkle appeared to be influenced by those of Cu and Zn.

Compared with concentrations in L. littorea, those of L. littoralis from the same site were generally higher whilst in L. saxatilis they were usually of the same order or lower.

In assessing the winkle as an indicator of metal contamination the present results have been combined with those of other workers to produce comparisons between most estuaries in England and Wales. It is concluded that whilst the winkle is a useful indicator for Cd and a few other metals, it is certainly not a perfect indicator organism.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 63 , Issue 2 , May 1983 , pp. 327 - 345
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boyden, C. R., 1977. Effect of size upon metal content of shellfish. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 675–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, G. W., 1982. Brown seaweed, Fucus vesiculosus, and the gastropod, Littorina littoralis, as indicators of trace-metal availability in estuaries. Science of the Total Environment. (In the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, G. W. & Hummerstone, L. G., 1973. Brown seaweed as an indicator of heavy metals in estuaries in south-west England. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 53, 705–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryan, G. W. & Hummerstone, L. G., 1977. Indicators of heavy-metal contamination in the Looe Estuary (Cornwall) with particular regard to silver and lead. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 57, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fretter, V. & Graham, A., 1962. British Prosobranch Molluscs, Their Functioncl Anatomy and Ecology. 755 pp. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Fukai, R. & Broquet, D., 1965. Distribution of chromium in marine organisms. Bulletin de l'lnstitut océanographique, 65 (1336), 19 pp.Google Scholar
Ireland, M. P. & Wootton, R. J., 1977. Distribution of lead, zinc, copper and manganese in the marine gastropods, Thais lapillus and Littorina littorea, around the coast of Wales. Environmental Pollution, 12, 27–41.Google Scholar
Jones, A. M., Jones, Y. & Stewart, W. D. P., 1972. Mercury in marine organisms from the Tay region. Nature, London, 238, 164–165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, L. H., 1979. Heavy metals in the Humber Estuary. Natural Environment Research Cuncil Publications (ser. C), no. 20, 13–16.Google Scholar
Klumpp, D. W., 1980. Accumulation of arsenic from water and food by Littorina littoralis and Nucella lapillus. Marine Biology, 58, 265–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, W. J., 1980. Arsenic in U.K. estuarine sediments and its availability to benthic organisms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 60, 869–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langston, W. J., 1982. The distribution of mercury in British estuarine sediments and its availability to deposit-feeding bivalves. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 62, 667–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leatherland, T. M. & Burton, J. D., 1974. The occurrence of some trace metals in coastal organisms with particular reference to the Solent region. Journal of the Marine Biological ssociation of the United Kingdom, 54, 457–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lobel, P. B., Mogie, P., Wright, D. A. & Wu, B. L., 1982. Metal accumulation in four molluscs. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 13, 170–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manga, N. & Hughes, G., 1981. Heavy metal concentrations in Fucus vesiculosus, Mytilus edulis and Littorina littorea from Carlingford Lough. Irish Naturalists' Journal, 20, 302–304.Google Scholar
Martoja, M., Tue, V. T. & Elkaïm, B., 1980. Bioaccumulation du cuivre chez Littorina littorea (L.) (Gastéropode Prosobranche): signification physiologique et écologique. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 43, 251–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, A. Z. & Nott, J. A., 1980. The association of the blood vessels and the excretory epithelium in the kidney of Littorina littorea (L.) (Mollusca, Gastropoda). Marine Biology Letters, 1, 353–365.Google Scholar
Mason, A. Z. & Nott, J. A., 1981. The role of intracellular biomineralised granules in the regulation and detoxification of metals in gastropods with special reference to the marine prosobranch Littorina littorea. Aquatic Toxicology, 1, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, A. Z. & Simkiss, K., 1983. Interactions between metals and their distribution in tissues of Littorina littorea (L.) collected from clean and polluted sites. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 63 (3). (In the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, H. B., 1937. The biology of Littorina littorea. Part 1. Growth of the shell and tissues, spawning, length of life and mortality. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 21, 721–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nickless, G., Stenner, R. & Terriixe, N., 1972. Distribution of cadmium, lead and zinc in the Bristol Channel. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 3, 188–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portmann, J. E., 1979. Chemical monitoring of residue levels in fish and shellfish landed in England and Wales during 1970–73. Aquatic Environment Monitoring Report. M.A.F.F. Directorate of Fisheries Research, no. 1, 70 pp.Google Scholar
Ray, S., Mcleese, D. W., Metcalfe, C. D., Burridge, L. E. & Waiwood, B. A., 1980. Distribution of cadmium in marine biota in the vicinity of Belledune. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, no. 963, pp. 11–27.Google Scholar
Stenner, R. D. & Nickless, G., 1974. Distribution of some heavy metals in organisms in Hardangerfjord and Skjerstadfjord, Norway. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 3, 279–291.Google Scholar
Topping, G., 1973. Heavy metals in shellfish from Scottish waters. Aquaculture, 1, 379–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wharfe, J. R. & Van Den Broek, W. L. F., 1977. Heavy metals in macroinvertebrates from the lower Medway Estuary, Kent. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 8, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, M. L., 1975. The transfer of 65 Zn and 59 Fe along a Fucus serratus (L.) → Littorina obtusata (L.) food chain. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 55, 538–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar