Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-9pm4c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T01:22:24.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Relation of the Substratum to the Metamorphosis of Ophelia Larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Douglas P. Wilson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Experiments with larvae of Ophelia bicornis Savigny have shown that they metamorphose most readily in sand from their natural habitat and with hesitancy or not at all in sands from other sources. Their natural sand consists largely of smooth rounded grains of quartz, very uniform in size; sands of smaller and more angular grains are unfavourable to settlement and metamorphosis. It appears that size and shape of the sand grains, or perhaps, more likely, the sizes and shapes of the interstices among the grains, perceived probably by the tactile sense, is the main stimulus to metamorphosis. Chemical substances dissolving out of the sands do not seem to be responsible for this.

There is a period of time, amounting under favourable conditions to several weeks, during which an Ophelia larva is able to settle and metamorphose as soon as it comes into contact with a substratum suitable for adult life.

The ability of the larvae to distinguish bottom deposits suitable for adult life from those which are unsuitable must be of great advantage to the species in maintaining normal distribution and in conserving larvae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 27 , Issue 3 , November 1948 , pp. 723 - 760
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1948

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, E. J. & Todd, R. A., 1902. The fauna of the Exe Estuary. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. VI, pp. 295–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Day, J. H. & Wilson, D. P., 1934. On the relation of the substratum to the metamorphosis of Scolecolepis fuliginosa (Claparéde). Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XIX, pp. 655–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JÄgersten, G., 1940. Die Abhängigkeit der Metamorphose vom Substrat des Biotops bei Protodrilus. Arkiv f. Zool. (Stockholm), Bd. 32A, No. 17, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Thorson, G., 1946. Reproduction and larval development of Danish marine bottom invertebrates. Medd. Komm. Danmarks Fisk. Havund., Ser. Plankton, Bd. 4, pp. 1–523.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P., 1932. On the Mitraria larva of Owenia fusiformis Delle Chiaje. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., Ser. B, Vol. 221, pp. 231–334.Google Scholar
Wilson, D. P. 1937 The influence of the substratum on the metamorphosis of Notomastus larvae. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXII, pp. 227–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, D. P. 1948. The larval development of Ophelia bicornis Savigny. Journ. Mar. Biol. Assoc., Vol. XXVII, pp. 540–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar