Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T06:34:23.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Influence of environment and heredity on the shape of lactation curves in Sahiwal cows

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2009

M. K. Rao  and
D. Sundaresan
M. K. Rao
Affiliation:
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, India
D. Sundaresan
Affiliation:
National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The shape of the lactation curve of Sahiwal cows was estimated by fitting a gamma function to 2034 lactations made by 681 cows at two farms in Indo-Gangetic plains of Northern India. The persistency of lactation yield was estimated by three methods: P1, the coefficient of variation among weekly yields; P2, ratio of lactation yield to peak yield, and P3, from the gamma function.

The gamma function fitted to the weekly yields explained 75·9% of the variation. A least-squares analysis of different traits associated with lactation curve shape indicated significant influence of parity, period and season of calving on the lactation curve. The lactation yield, peak yield and daily yield up to the peak were highest for winter calvers, while persistency was highest for monsoon calvers. The milk yield traits showed an increase up to the second or third lactation, while the persistency decreased from the first to eighth lactation with increase in parity order. The lactation curve was also more flat in the first lactation than later. The lactation yield and persistency increased with increase in age at calving independent of parity order. The lactation yield, peak yield, persistency and daily yield up to the peak were positively correlated with service period, lactation length and calving interval.

The heritability and repeatability estimates of different traits, genetic and phenotypic correlations of lactation milk yield with different persistency measures indicated that P2 is a better measure of persistency. The peak yield could be used as a criterion of selection in early lactation to bring about improvement in lactation yield and persistency.

Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Agricultural Science , Volume 92 , Issue 2 , April 1979 , pp. 393 - 401
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anakawiang, J. (1963). Persistency of lactation. M.Sc. dissertation submitted to Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.Google Scholar
Asker, A. A., El-Itriby, A. A. & Fahmy, S. K. (1959). Persistency of lactation in cattle in Egypt. Tropical Agriculture, Trinidad 36, 189–198.Google Scholar
Balaine, D. S., Gill, G. S. & Acharya, R. M. (1970). Effectiveness of the components of lactation in selecting for milk production in Hariana cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 53, 1064–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branton, C., Rios, G., Evans, D. L., Farthing, B. R. & Koonce, K. L. (1974). Genotype-climatic and other interaction effects for productive response in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 57, 833–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chauhan, R. S., Bhatnagar, D. S. & Misra, R. R. (1976). Effect of parity and season on the peak record and days to attain peak yield in Zebu cattle. Indian Veterinary Journal 53, 1–5.Google Scholar
Gravert, H. O. & Baptist, R. (1976). Breeding for persistency of milk yield. Livestock Production Science 3, 27–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, R. R. & Hillers, J. K. (1973). Factors affecting persistency of daily milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 56, 674.Google Scholar
Harvey, W. R. (1975). Least-squares analysis of data with unequal subclass numbers. United States Department of Agriculture, U.S.A.: Agricultural Research Service H–4.Google Scholar
Johansson, I. & Hansson, A. (1940). Causes of variation in milk and butterfat yield of dairy cows. K. Landtbr. Akad. Handl. (Stockh.) 79, No. 61/2, 127 pp. (cited from Animal Breeding Abstracts 10, 19).Google Scholar
Kellog, D. W., Urquhart, N. S. & Ortiga, A. J. (1976). Use of gamma curve to estimate lactation curve of Holstein cows. Proceedings of 71st Annual Meeting, American Dairy Science Association, North Caroline State University, Releigh, North Caroline, p. 140.Google Scholar
Madsen, O. (1975). A comparison of some suggested measures of persistency of milk yield in dairy cows. Animal Production 20, 191–197.Google Scholar
Mahadevan, P. (1951). The effect of environment and heredity on lactation. II. Persistency of lactation. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 41, 89–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronningen, K. (1967). Phenotypic and genetic parameters for characters related to milk production in cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica 17, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, P. N. & Kumar, S. (1960). Persistency of milk yield in Sahiwal cows. Indian Journal of Dairy Science 13, 45–60.Google Scholar
Sharma, R. C. (1972). Inheritance of persistency index and relationship of production traits to persistency index in Sahiwal, Red Sindhi and Brown Swiss crossbred cows. M.Sc. dissertation submitted to Panjab University, Chandigarh, India.Google Scholar
Sikka, L. C. (1950). A study of lactation as affected by heredity and environment. Journal of Dairy Research 17, 231–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. W. & Legates, J. E. (1962). Factors affecting persistency and its importance in 305 days lactation production. Journal of Dairy Science 45, 676.Google Scholar
Wood, P. D. P. (1969). Factors affecting the shape of the lactation curve in cattle. Animal Production 11, 307–316.Google Scholar
Wood, P. D. P. (1970). A note on the repeatability of parameters of the lactation curve in cattle. Animal Protection 12, 535–538.Google Scholar