Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:46:56.950Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - The PIMS project: vision, achievements, and scope of the data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Paul W. Farris
Affiliation:
Professor of Business University of Virginia's Darden Graduate School
John U. Farley
Affiliation:
Research Fellow International Business at the Tuck School, Dartmouth College
Paul W. Farris
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Michael J. Moore
Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Get access

Summary

The Profit Impact of Marketing Strategy (PIMS) project, which began in 1972, was one of the most successful and influential partnerships between marketing academics and the private sector. Robert Buzzell, as Executive Director of the Marketing Science Institute, was one of a small group of people who made the PIMS project possible. The program resulted in a unique dataset used to investigate the links among marketing strategy, market structure, and performance. The Marketing Science Institute was a near-perfect organizational platform from which to launch a project that had the ambitious goal of understanding how and why some marketing strategies were more profitable than others. To enable this investigation, PIMS, from the beginning, set a new standard of depth and breadth for panel data collected from operating business units. In this book we have collected a set of original essays that revisit the ideals of the PIMS project. Our purpose is to explore what we learned and, perhaps, what we should or still might learn about researching the connections between marketing strategy and profits.

This does not mean that we are finished with the questions that PIMS helped the field of marketing strategy pose. However, enough time has passed and enough additional evidence has been accumulated that we believe it is appropriate to appraise what was accomplished. Some of the essays will help put the achievement of PIMS into the context of the times (both then and now).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Profit Impact of Marketing Strategy Project
Retrospect and Prospects
, pp. 6 - 27
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buzzell, Robert D., and Bradley T. Gale. 1987. The PIMS Principles: Linking Strategy to Performance. New York: The Free Press
Buzzell, Robert D., Gale, Bradley T., and Sultan, Ralph G. M.. 1975. “Market Share – A Key to Profitability.” Harvard Business Review 53 (January–February): 97–106Google Scholar
Deshpandé, Rohit, and John U. Farley. 1999. “Reliability in Measuring Market Orientation and Financial Performance in Transition Economies.” In Rajeev Batrad, ed. Marketing Issues in Transition Economies, 127–138. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers
Deshpandé, Rohit, and Farley, John U.. 2004. “Organizational Culture, Innovativeness, Market Orientation and Firm Performance: An International Research Odyssey.” International Journal of Research in Marketing 21, 3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deshpandé, Rohit, Farley, John U., and Webster, Frederick E. Jr. 1993. “Corporate Culture, Customer Orientation, and Innovativeness in Japanese Firms: A Quadrad Analysis.” Journal of Marketing 57 (January): 22–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Bruce D. 1976. “The Rule of Three and Four.” Reprinted in Carl W. Stern and George Stalk, Jr., eds. Perspectives on Strategy from the Boston Consulting Group, 31. Boston: John Wiley & Sons (1998)
Jacobson, Robert. 1990. “Unobservable Effects and Business Performance.” Marketing Science 9 (Winter): 74–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Robert, and Aaker, David A.. 1985. “Is Market Share All That It's Cracked Up To Be?,” Journal of Marketing 49 (September): 11–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marshall, Cheri T., and Buzzell, Robert D.. 1990. “PIMS and the FTC Line-of-Business Data: A Comparison.” Strategic Management Journal 11: 269–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Lynn W., Chang, Dae R., and Buzzell, Robert D.. 1983. “Product Quality, Cost Position and Business Performance: A Test of Some Key Hypotheses,” Journal of Marketing 47 (Spring): 26–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rumelt, Richard, and Robin Wensley. 1981. “In Search of the Market Share Effect.” Unpublished working paper, UCLA
Sheth, Jagdish, and Rajendra Sisodia. 2002. The Rule of Three: Surviving and Thriving in Competitive Markets. New York: The Free Press

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×