Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them
- Section 2 Developmental Perspectives of the International Psychology of Women
- Section 3 Cognitive and Social Factors
- 10 Sex, Gender, and Intelligence
- 11 At the Crossroads of Women’s Experience
- 12 Gender and Personality Research in Psychology
- 13 Selfhood and Self-Construal
- 14 Cultural Influences on Body Image and Body Esteem
- 15 The Not So Subtle and Status Quo Maintaining Nature of Everyday Sexism
- 16 A Gendered Light on Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Forgiveness
- 17 The Impact of Gender and Culture in Consumer Behavior
- 18 Evolutionary Roots of Women’s Aggression
- Section 4 Work and Family Issues
- Section 5 Inequality and Social Justice
- Section 6 Health and Well-Being
- Epilogue Some Final Thoughts and Take-Home Messages
- Index
- References
16 - A Gendered Light on Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Forgiveness
from Section 3 - Cognitive and Social Factors
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 July 2020
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Section 1 The Underpinnings of Sex and Gender and How to Study Them
- Section 2 Developmental Perspectives of the International Psychology of Women
- Section 3 Cognitive and Social Factors
- 10 Sex, Gender, and Intelligence
- 11 At the Crossroads of Women’s Experience
- 12 Gender and Personality Research in Psychology
- 13 Selfhood and Self-Construal
- 14 Cultural Influences on Body Image and Body Esteem
- 15 The Not So Subtle and Status Quo Maintaining Nature of Everyday Sexism
- 16 A Gendered Light on Empathy, Prosocial Behavior, and Forgiveness
- 17 The Impact of Gender and Culture in Consumer Behavior
- 18 Evolutionary Roots of Women’s Aggression
- Section 4 Work and Family Issues
- Section 5 Inequality and Social Justice
- Section 6 Health and Well-Being
- Epilogue Some Final Thoughts and Take-Home Messages
- Index
- References
Summary
We discuss the role of gender in the empathic processes involved in prosocial behavior and the resolution of interpersonal and intergroup conflict. After defining empathy and addressing several theoretical issues, we discuss Gilligan's Ethic of Care, assessments of empathy and their relation to prosocial behavior, and gender and forgiveness in children's and adults' interpersonal relations. Finally, we discuss empathy in the resolution of intergroup and social conflicts, highlighting women's role conflict resolution.We conclude that girls and females evidence more empathy across a wide variety of measures, including behavioral measures, and that gender differences in empathic processes have a major impact on how women and men resolve moral dilemmas, how they behave in prosocial contexts, and how they react to and resolve interpersonal and intergroup conflict.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of the International Psychology of Women , pp. 221 - 243Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Suggested Readings
Rachel Karniol is Professor of Social Development in the School of Psychological Sciences at Tel Aviv University. She was born in Israel to Holocaust survivors from Hungary and Transylvania. Hungarian was her first language, Hebrew was her second language, and English became her third language after arriving in Canada in 6th grade. After completing her PhD at the University of Waterloo, Canada, she taught at the University of Toronto. During sabbaticals she also taught at Princeton University, Carnegie Mellon University, Tufts University, and University of Florida. Her expertise is at the crossroads of social and developmental psychology, with a focus on the process of understanding other people, empathy, moral development, and gender. Her research has appeared in Psychological Review, Psychological Bulletin, Annual Review of Psychology, Developmental Review, and Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Her book Social development as preference management: How infants, children, and parents get what they want from each other was published by Cambridge University Press (2010). Karniol’s husband, who was a Professor of Aerospace Engineering at the Technion in Haifa, Israel, is also the child of Holocaust survivors and was born in Poland. They raised their two children as Hebrew–English bilingual.
Sabina Čehajić-Clancy is an Associate Professor of Social and Political Psychology at the Sarajevo School of Science and Technology. She holds a PhD in Social Psychology from Sussex University and is affiliated with Stanford University as a former Fulbright Scholar. Čehajić-Clancy is an expert in the area of intergroup reconciliation, for which she has received many dissertation and career awards. Her research integrates theories on intergroup relations, emotion regulation, and moral disengagement, combining the experimental lab studies with field experiments. She has published articles in Psychological Inquiry, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, and Political Psychology, two books, and numerous contributions to edited volumes or encyclopedias. She also serves on editorial boards for Political Psychology and the European Journal of Social Psychology. Her research has been funded by prestigious research councils, among them the Economic and Social Research Council and the British Academy. In addition to her research excellence, she has over fifteen years of experience in working as a consultant for USAID, UN agencies, and other more grassroots-based NGOs in the area of education, peace building, and reconciliation. Her work has also received wide national and international coverage. Website: cehajicsabina.wixsite.com/clancy
Čehajić, S., Brown, R., & Gonzalez, R. (2009). What do I care? Perception of ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 715–729.Google Scholar
Meyers, M. W., Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self-other overlap: Different motives for helping. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 224–234. doi:10.1007/s11031–013-9377-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palomares, N. A. (2008). Explaining gender-based language use: Effects of gender identity salience on references to emotion and tentative language in intra- and intergroup contexts. Human Communication Research, 34, 263–286.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. K., David, B., & Reynolds, K. J. (2004). Who cares? The effect of gender and context on the self and moral reasoning. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 246–255.Google Scholar
Williams, A., O’Driscoll, K., & Moore, C. (2014). The influence of empathic concern on prosocial behavior in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 425–468. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neurosience, 15, 675–680. doi:10.1038/nn.3085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
References
Albiero, P., Matricardi, G., Speltri, D., & Toso, T. (2009). The assessment of empathy in adolescence: A contribution to the Italian validation of the “Basic Empathy Scale.” Journal of Adolescence, 32, 393–408. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2008.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angerer, S., Glätzle-Rützler, D., Lergetporer, P. & Sutter, M. (2014). Donations, risk attitudes and time preferences: A study on altruism in primary school children. Institute for Labor Economics (IZA) DP No. 8020. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
Aoláin, F. N., Haynes, D. F., & Cahn, N. (2011). On the frontlines: Gender, war, and the post-conflict process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1423–1440. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.Google Scholar
Aradhye, C., Vonk, J., & Arida, D. (2015). Adults’ responsiveness to children’s facial expressions. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 135, 56–71. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.02.006CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Atkinson, A. B., Backus, P. G., & Mickelwright, J. (2012). Charitable bequests and wealth at death. Institute of Labor Econonics (IZA) DP, #7014. Bonn: Institute for the Study of Labor.Google Scholar
Auerhahn, N. C., & Laub, D. (2018). Against forgiving: The encounter that cannot happen between Holocaust survivors and perpetrators. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 87, 39–72. doi:10.1080/00332828.2018.1430401Google Scholar
Auyeung, B., Allison, C., Wheelwright, S., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2012). Development of the adolescent empathy and systemizing quotients. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 2225–2235. doi:10.1007/s10803-012-1454-7Google Scholar
Auyeung, B., Wheelwright, S., Allison, C., Atkinson, M., Samarawickrema, N., & Baron-Cohen, S. (2009). The children’s Empathy Quotient and Systemizing Quotient: Sex differences in typical development and in autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39, 1509–1521. doi:10.1007/s10803-009-0772-xGoogle Scholar
Babchuk, W. A., Hames, R. B., & Thompson, R. A. (1985). Sex differences in the recognition of infant facial expressions of emotion: The primary caretaker hypothesis. Ethology & Sociobiology, 6, 89–101. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(85)90002-0Google Scholar
Baillargeon, R. H., Morisset, A., Keenan, K. , Normand, C. L., Jeyaganth, S., Boivin, M., & Tremblay, R. E. (2011) The development of prosocial behaviors in young children: A prospective population-based cohort study. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 172(3), 221–251. doi:10.1080/00221325.2010.533719Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(3), 193–209. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0303_3Google Scholar
Barnett, M. A., Howard, J. A., King, L. M., & Dino, G. A. (198l). Helping behavior and the transfer of empathy. Journal of Social Psychology, 115, 125–132.Google Scholar
Barnett, M. A., King, L. M., & Howard, J. A. (1979). Inducing affect about self or other: Effects on generosity in children. Developmental Psychology, 15, 164–167.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2001) Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34, 174–183.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: Male and female brains and the truth about autism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S. (2005). The empathizing system: A revision of the 1994 model of the mind reading system. In Ellis, B. J. & Bjorklund, D. F. (Eds.), Origins of the social mind: Evolutionary psychology and child development (pp. 468–492). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Jolliffe, T., Mortimore, C., & Robertson, M. (1997). Another advanced test of theory of mind: Evidence from very high functioning adults with autism or Asperger syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 813–822.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Richler, J., Bisarya, D., Gurunathan, N., & Wheelwright, S. (2003). The systemizing quotient: An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism, and normal sex differences. In Frith, U. & Hill, E. (Eds.), Autism: Mind and brain (pp. 161–186). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S., 2004. The empathy quotient (EQ): An investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. doi:10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00Google Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test Revised Version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1987). Prosocial motivation: Is it ever truly altruistic? In Berkowitz, L. (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 20, pp. 65–122). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60412-8Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (1998). Altruism and prosocial behavior. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T., & Gardner, G. L. (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vols. 1–2, pp. 282–316). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2009). Two forms of perspective taking: Imagining how another feels and imagining how you would feel. In Markman, K. D., Klein, W. M. P., & Suhr, J. A. (Eds.), Handbook of imagination and mental simulation (pp. 267–279). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D. (2016). Empathy and altruism. In Leary, M. R. & Brown, K. R. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of hypo-egoic phenomena (pp. 161–174.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Batson, C. D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P. A. (1987). Distress and empathy: Two qualitatively distinct vicarious emotions with different emotional consequences. Journal of Personality, 55, 19–39.Google Scholar
Baumrind, D. (1986). Sex differences in moral reasoning: Response to Walker’s (1984) conclusion that there are none. Child Development, 57, 511–521. doi:10.2307/1130606Google Scholar
Beissert, H. M., & Hasselhorn, M. (2016). Individual differences in moral development: Does intelligence really affect children’s moral reasoning and moral emotions? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1961. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01961Google Scholar
Bekkers, R., & Ottoni-Wilhelm, M. (2016). Principle of care and giving to help people in need. European Journal of Personality, 30, 240–257. doi:10.1002/per.2057Google Scholar
Bem, S. L. (1984) Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 179–226.Google Scholar
Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016–1023.Google Scholar
Bengtsson, H. (2003). Children’s cognitive appraisal of others’ distressful and positive experiences. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 27(5), 457–466. doi:10.1080/01650250344000073Google Scholar
Bengtsson, H., & Arvidsson, A. (2011). The impact of developing social perspective-taking skills on emotionality in middle and late childhood. Social Development, 20, 353–375. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2010.00587.xGoogle Scholar
Berry, M. E. (2018) War, women, and power: From violence to mobilization in Rwanda and Bosnia-Herzegovina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bird, G., & Viding, E. (2014). The self to other model of empathy: Providing a new framework for understanding empathy impairments in psychopathy, autism, and alexithymia. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 520–532. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.021Google Scholar
Bluhm, R., Jacobson, A. J., & Maiborm, H. L (2012). Neurofeminism: Issues at the intersection of feminist theory and cognitive science. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bohl, V., & van den Bos, W. (2012). Toward an integrative account of social cognition: Marrying theory of mind and interactionism to study the interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 processes. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, #274. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00274Google Scholar
Boyatzis, C. J., Chazan, E., & Ting, C. Z. (1993). Preschool children’s decoding of facial emotions. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 154, 375–382.Google Scholar
Brabec, C. M., Geller, J. D., & Ross, M. J. (2012). An exploration of relationships among measures of social cognition, decision making, and emotional intelligence. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34(8), 887–894. doi:10.1080/13803395.2012.698599Google Scholar
Braza, F., Azurmendi, A., Munoz, M., Carreras, M. R., Braza, P., Garcia, A., … Aın, J. R. (2009). Social cognitive predictors of peer acceptance at age 5 and the moderating effects of gender. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27, 703–716. doi:10.1348/026151008X360666Google Scholar
Brehm, S. S., Powell, L. K, & Coke, J. S. (1984. The effects of empathic instructions upon donating behavior: Sex differences in young children. Sex Roles, 10, 405–416. doi:10.1007/BF00287557Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1999). The nature of prejudice: Ingroup love or outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55, 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. (2000). Social identity theory: Past achievements, current problems and future challenges. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(6), 745–778.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. & Čehajić, S. (2008). Dealing with the past and facing the future: Mediators of collective guilt and shame in Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 669–684.Google Scholar
Brownell, C. A., Svetlova, M., Anderson, R., Nichols, R., & Drummond, J. (2012). Socialization of early prosocial behavior: Parents’ talk about emotions is associated with sharing and helping in toddlers. Infancy, 18, 91–118. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7078.2012.00125.xGoogle Scholar
Bryant, B. K. (1982) An index of empathy for children and adolescents. Child Development, 53, 413–425. doi:10.2307/1128984Google Scholar
Cameron, C. D., & Payne, B. K. (2011). Escaping affect: How motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1–15. doi:10.1037/a0021643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, R., Elgar, K., Kuntsi, J., Akers, R., Terstegge, J., Coleman, M., & Skuse, D. (2002). The classification of “fear” from faces is associated with face recognition skill in women. Neuropsychologia, 40, 575–584.Google Scholar
Canli, T., Desmond, J. E., Zhao, Z., & Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Sex differences in the neural basis of emotional memories. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 6(99), 10,789–10,794. doi:10.1073/pnas.162356599Google Scholar
Capek, M. E. S. (2005). Documenting women’s giving: Biases, barriers, and benefits. In Clift, E. (Ed.), Women, philanthropy, and social change: Visions for a just society (pp. 29–60). Medford, MA: Tufts University Press.Google Scholar
Carlo, G., Knight, G. P., Eisenberg, N., & Rotenberg, K. J. (1991). Cognitive processes and prosocial behaviors among children: The role of affective attributions and reconciliations. Developmental Psychology, 27(3), 456–461. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.3.456Google Scholar
Carlo, G., Roesch, S. C., & Melby, J. (1998). The multiplicative relations of parenting and temperament to prosocial and antisocial behaviors in adolescence. Journal of Early Adolescence, 18(3), 266–290. doi:10.1177/0272431698018003003Google Scholar
Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691. doi:10.1037/a0032297CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Castano, E., Yzerbyt, V., Paladino, M.-P., & Sacchi, S. (2002). I belong, therefore, I exist: Ingroup identification, ingroup entitativity, and ingroup bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2), 135–143. doi:10.1177/0146167202282001Google Scholar
Čavojová, V., Sirota, M., & Belovičová, Z. (2012). Slovak validation of the Basic Empathy Scale in preadolescents. Studia Psychologica, 54, 195–208.Google Scholar
Čehajić, S. (2010). Victimhood as an obstacle towards reconciliation. Regional CNA (Center for Non-Violent Action) Conference “Neighbors and not Enemies” held in Sarajevo. April 23–25.Google Scholar
Čehajić, S., & Brown, R. (2008). Not in my name: A social psychological study of antecedents and consequences of acknowledgment of ingroup atrocities. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 3(2), 195–212.Google Scholar
Čehajić, S., & Brown, R. (2010). Silencing the past: Effects of intergroup contact on acknowledgement of in-group responsibility. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1, 190–196. doi:10.1177/1948550609359088Google Scholar
Čehajić, S., Brown, R., & Castano, E. (2008). Forgive and forget? Antecedents and consequences of intergroup forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Political Psychology, 29, 351–367. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00634.xGoogle Scholar
Čehajić, S., Brown, R., & Gonzalez, R. (2009). What do I care? Perception of ingroup responsibility and dehumanization as predictors of empathy felt for the victim group. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12, 715–729.Google Scholar
Čehajić-Clancy, S., Goldenberg, A., Halperin, E., & Gross, J. (2016). Social-psychological interventions for intergroup reconciliation: An emotion regulation perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 27, 73–88.Google Scholar
Chandler, M. J., & Helm, D. (1984). Developmental changes in the contribution of shared experience to social-role taking competence. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 7, 145–156.Google Scholar
Chapman, E., Baron-Cohen, S., Auyeung, B., Knickmeyer, R., Taylor, K., & Hackett, G. (2006). Fetal testosterone and empathy: Evidence from the empathy quotient (EQ) and the “reading the mind in the eyes” test. Social Neuroscience, 1, 135–148. doi:10.1080/17470910600992239Google Scholar
Chazan, N. (1992). Israeli women and peace activism. In Swirski, B. & Safir, M. (Eds.), Calling the equality bluff (pp. 152–163). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Christensen, R. K., Nesbit, R., & Agypt, B. (2016). To give or not to give: Employee responses to workplace giving campaigns over time. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 45, 1258–1275. doi:10.1177/0899764015619704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christov-Moore, L., & Iacobon,i M. (2016). Self–other resonance, its control and prosocial inclinations: Brain–behavior relationships. Human Brain Mapping, 37, 1544–1558. doi:10.1002/hbm.23119Google Scholar
Christov-Moore, L., Simpson, E. A, Coudé, G., Grigaityte, K., Iacoboni, M., & Ferrari, P. F. (2014). Empathy: Gender effects in brain and behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 46, 604–627. doi:/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Schaller, M., Houlihan, D., Arps, K., Fultz, J., & Beaman, A. L. (1987). Empathy-based helping: Is it selflessly or selfishly motivated? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 749–758. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.749Google Scholar
Cockburn, C. (1998). The space between us: Negotiating gender and national identities in conflict. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Coie, J. D., & Dorval, B. (1973). Sex differences in the intellectual structure of social interaction skills. Developmental Psychology, 8, 261–267.Google Scholar
Conejero, S., Etxbarria, L., & Montero, L. (2014). Gender differences in emotions, forgiveness, and tolerance in relation to political violence. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, e9, 1–15. doi:10.1017/sjp.2014.9Google Scholar
Coutrot, A., Binetti, N., Harrison, C., Mareschal, I., & Johnston, A. (2016). Face exploration dynamics differentiate men and women. Journal of Vision, 16(14), 1–19. doi:10.1167/16.14.16Google Scholar
Croson, R., & Buchan, N. (1999). Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games. American Economic Review, 89, 386–391.Google Scholar
D’Ambrosio, F., Olivier, M., Didon, D., & Besche, C. (2009). The Basic Empathy Scale: A French validation of a measure of empathy in youth. Personality and Individual Differences, 46, 160–165. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.09.020Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983a). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983b). Empathic concern and the Muscular Dystrophy Telethon: Empathy as a multidimensional construct. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 9, 223–229.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1983c). The effects of dispositional empathy on emotional reactions and helping: A multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality, 51, 166–184.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H. (1996). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Davis, M. H., Conklin, L., Smith, A., & Luce, C. (1996). Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(4), 713–726. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.713Google Scholar
Decety, J,, & Ickes, W. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Jackson, P.,L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 54–58. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.xGoogle Scholar
Decety, J., & Lamm, C. (2006). Empathy and intersubjetivity. In Cacioppo, J. T. & Berntsen, G. G. (Eds.), Handbook of neuroscience for the behavioral sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 940–957). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Decety, J., & Moriguchi, Y. (2007). The empathic brain and its dysfunction in psychiatric populations: Implications for intervention across different clinical conditions. BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 1, 22. doi:10.1186/1751-0759-1-22Google Scholar
Declerck, C. H., & Bogaert, S. (2008). Social value orientation: Related to empathy and the ability to read the mind in the eyes. Journal of Social Psychology, 148(6), 711–726. doi:10.3200/SOCP.148.6.711-726Google Scholar
del Barrio, V.. Aluja, A., & García, L. F. (2004). Bryant’s empathy index for children and adolescents: Psychometric properties in the Spanish language. Psychological Reports, 95, 257–262.Google Scholar
Denham, S. A., Neal, K., Wilson, B. J., Pockering, S., & Boyatzis, C. J. (2005). Emotional development and forgiveness in children: Emerging evidence. In Worthington, E. L. Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 127–142). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Wied, M., Branje, J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2007). Empathy and conflict resolution in friendship relations among adolescents. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 48–55. doi:10.1002/ab.20166Google Scholar
de Wied, M., Maas, C., van Goozen, S., Vermande, M., Engels., R., Meeus, W., … Goudena, P. (2007). Bryant’s Empathy Index: A closer examination of its internal structure, European Journal of Personality Assessment, 23, 99–104. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.2.Google Scholar
Dimberg, U., & Lundquist, L.-O. (1990). Gender differences in facial reactions to facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 30, 151–159. doi:10.1016/0301-0511(90)90024-QGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J. A., & Moore, F. (1990). The development of perspective taking: Understanding differences in information and weighting. Child Development, 61, 1502–1513. doi:10.2307/1130759Google Scholar
Doherty, R. W., Orimoto, L., Singelis, T. M., Hatfield, E., & Hebb, J. (1995). Emotional contagion: Gender and occupational differences. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19, 355–371. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1995.tb00080.xGoogle Scholar
Drolet, A. L., & Morris, M. W. (2000). Rapport in conflict resolution: Accounting for how face-to-face contact fosters mutual cooperation in mixed-motive conflicts. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 26–50.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990). Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents’ socialization of gender differences. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 183–201. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.xGoogle Scholar
Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men? Evidence from dictator experiments. Economic Journal, 108, 726–735.Google Scholar
Einolf, C. J., (2011). Gender differences in the correlates of volunteering and charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 1092–1112. doi:10.1177/0899764010385949Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. (1986). Altruistic emotion, cognition, and behavior. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Carlo, C., Murphy, B., & Van Court, P. (1995). Prosocial development in late adolescence: A longitudintal study. Child Development, 66, 1179–1197.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Cumberland, A., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., & Shepard, S. A. (2005). Age changes in prosocial responding and moral reasoning in adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 15(3), 235–260. doi:10.1111/j.l532-7795.2005.00095.xGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Bustamante, D., Mathy, R. M., Miller, P. A., & Lindholm, E. (1988a). Differentiation of vicariously induced emotional reactions in children. Developmental Psychology, 24(2), 237–246. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.24.2.237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Murphy, B., Karbon, M., Smith, M., & Maszk, P. (1996). The relations of children’s dispositional empathy-related responding to their emotionality, regulation, and social functioning. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 195–209. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.195Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I. K., Murphy, B. C., Shepard, S. A., Cumberland, A., & Carlo, G. (1999). Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 70, 1360–1372.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94, 100–131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Schaller, M., Fabes, R. A., Fultz, J., Shell, R., & Shea, C. L. (1989). The role of sympathy and altruistic personality traits in helping: A reexamination. Journal of Personality, 57, 41–67.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Miller, P. A., Shell, R., McNalley, S., & Shea, C. (1991). Prosocial development in adolescence: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 27, 849–857.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Schaller, M., Miller, P. A. Fultz, J., Fabes, R. A., & Shell, R. (1988b). Gender-related traits and helping in a nonemergency situation. Sex Roles, 19, 605–618.Google Scholar
El-Bushra, J. (2007). Feminism, gender and women’s peace activism. Development and Change, 38, 131–147. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00406.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endendijk, J. J., Groenveld, M. G., van Berkel, S. R., Hallers-Haalboom, E. T., Mesman, J., & Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J. (2013). Gender stereotypes in the family context: Mothers, fathers, and siblings. Sex Roles, 68, 570–590. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0265-4Google Scholar
Enright, R. D., & the Human Development Study Group. (1991). The moral development of forgiveness. In Kurtines, W. & Gerwitz, J. (Eds.), Handbook of moral behavior and development (pp. 123–152). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Epley, N,, Keysar, B,, Van Boven, L,, & Gilovich, T. (2004). Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 327–339.Google Scholar
Erdle, S., Sansom, M., Cole, M.,R., & Neapy, N. (1992). Sex differences in personality correlates of helping behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 931–936.Google Scholar
Evaldsson, A.-C. (2007). Accounting for friendship: Moral ordering and category membership in preadolescent girls’ relational talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 40, 377–404. doi:10.1080/08351810701471377Google Scholar
Farver, J. A. M., & Brandstetter, W. H. (1994). Preschoolers’ prosocial responses to their peers’ distress. Developental Psychology, 30, 334–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2005). ’Til lack of forgiveness doth us part: Forgiveness in marriage. In Worthington, E. L. (Ed.), Handbook of forgiveness (pp. 207–226). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fincham, F. D., Hall, J. H., & Beach, S. R. H. (2006). Forgiveness in marriage: Current status and future directions. Family Relations, 55(4), 415–427. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3729.2005.callf.x-i1Google Scholar
Fine, J. G., Semrud-Clikeman, M., & Zhu, D. C. (2009). Gender differences in BOLD activation to face photographs and video vignettes. Behavioural Brain Research, 201, 137–146. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2009.02.009Google Scholar
Friesdorf, R., Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2015). Gender differences in rsponses to moral dilemmas: A process dissociation analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 696–713. doi:10.1177/0146167215575731Google Scholar
Gaertner, S., & Dovidio, J. F. (2014). Reducing intergroup bias: The common ingroup identity model. New York: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Magee, J. C., Inesi, M. E., & Gruenfeld, D. H. (2006). Power and perspectives not taken. Psychological Science, 17, 1068–1074. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01824.xGoogle Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., Ku, G., & Wang, C. S. (2005). Perspective-taking and self–other overlap: Fostering social bonds and facilitating social coordination. Group Process and Intergroup Relations, 8, 109–124.Google Scholar
Galinsky, A. D., & Moskowitz, G. B. (2000). Perspective-taking: Decreasing stereotype expression, stereotype accessibility, and in-group favoritism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 708–724.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2005). “Being like me”: Self–other identity, mirror neurons, and empathy. In Hurley, S. & Chater, N. (Eds.), Perspective on imitation: From neuroscience to social science, Vol. 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals (pp. 101–119). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Garaigordobil, M. (2009). A comparative analysis of empathy in childhood and adolescence: Gender differences and associated socio-emotional variables. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 9, 217–235.Google Scholar
Gardner, M. R., Sorhus, I., Edmonds, C. J., & Potts, R. (2012). Sex differences in components of imagined perspective transformation. Acta Psychologica, 40, 1–6. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.02.002Google Scholar
Geng, Y., Xia, D., & Qin, B. (2012). The Basic Empathy Scale: A Chinese validation of a measure of empathy in adolescents. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 43, 499–510. doi:10.1007/s10578–011-0278-6Google Scholar
George, D., Carroll, P., Kersnick, R., & Calderon, K. (1998). Gender-related patterns of helping among friends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 685–704.Google Scholar
Gianmarco, E. A., & Vernon, P. A. (2014). Vengeance and the Dark Triad: The role of empathy and perspective taking in trait forgivingness. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 23–29. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.010Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C. (1995). Hearing the difference: Theorizing connection. Hypatia, 10, 120–127.Google Scholar
Gilligan, C., & Attanucci, J. (1988). Two moral orientations: Gender differences and similarities. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 34, 223–237.Google Scholar
Gini, G., Albiero, P., Benelli, B., & Altoe, G. (2007). Does empathy predict adolescents’ bullying and defending behavior? Aggressive Behavior, 33, 467–476. doi:10.1002/ab.20204Google Scholar
Girbau, D. (2001). Children’s referential communication failure: The ambiguity and abbreviation of message. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 20, 81–89. doi:10.1177/0261927X01020001004Google Scholar
Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2002). Remorse, forgiveness, and rehumanization: Stories from South Africa. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 42(1), 7-32. doi:10.1177/0022167802421002Google Scholar
Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2008). Empathetic repair after mass trauma: When vengeance is arrested. European Journal of Social Theory, 11, 331–350. doi:10.1177/13684310080092566Google Scholar
Gobodo-Madikizela, P. (2011). Intersubjectivity and embodiment: Exploring the role of the maternal in the language of forgiveness and reconciliation. Signs, 36, 541–550.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gordon, K. C., Baucom, D. H., & Snyder, D. K. (2000). The use of forgiveness in marital therapy. In M. E. McCullough, K. I. Pargament, & C. E. Thoresen (Eds.), Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 203–227). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, G. M., Bulman-Fleming, M. B., & Ngo, C. (2004). A signal-detection analysis of sex differences in the perception of emotional faces. Brain and Cognition, 54, 248–250. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.029Google Scholar
Gronholm, P. C., Flynn, M., Edmonds, C. J., & Gardner, M. R. (2012). Empathic and non-empathic routes to visuospatial perspective-taking. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 494–500. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2011.12.004Google Scholar
Grusec, J. E., & Redler, E. (1980). Attribution, reinforcement, and altruism: A developmental analysis. Developmental Psychology, 16(5), 525–534. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.16.5.525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gubler, J., Halperin, E., & Hirschberger, G. (2015). Humanizing the outgroup in contexts of protracted intergroup conflict. Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2(1), 36–46.Google Scholar
Guillem, F., & Mograss, M. (2005). Gender differences in memory processing: Evidence from event-related potentials to faces. Brain and Cognition, 57(1), 84–92. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.026Google Scholar
Güth, W., Schmidt, C., & Sutter, M. (2007). Bargaining outside the lab – a newspaper experiment of a three-person ultimatum game. Economic Journal, 117(518), 449–469. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0297.2007.02025.xGoogle Scholar
Haan, E. R., & Garrett, M. K. (2017). Preschoolers’ moral judgments of environmental harm and the influence of perspective taking. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 11–19.Google Scholar
Haan, N. (1985). With regard to Walker (1984) on Sex “Differences” in Moral Reasoning. (Mimeograph.) University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Human Development.Google Scholar
Haeri, M., & Puechguirbal, N. (2010). From helplessness to agency: Examining the plurality of women’s experiences in armed conflict. International Review of the Red Cross, 92, #877.Google Scholar
Hall, J. K., Hutton, S. B., & Morgan, M. J. (2010). Sex differences in scanning faces: Does attention to the eyes explain female superiority in facial expression recognition? Cognition and Emotion, 24, 629–637. doi:10.1080/02699930902906882Google Scholar
Halpern, J. & Weinstein, H. M. (2004). Rehumanizing the other: Empathy and reconciliation. Human Rights Quarterly, 26, 561–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, E., van Anders, S. M., & Mullin, L. I. (2006). A female advantage in the recognition of emotional facial expressions: Test of an evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution & Human Behavior, 27, 401–416. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2006.05.002Google Scholar
Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 207–215. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9034-9Google Scholar
Heal, J. (1998). Co-cognition and off-line simulation: Two ways of understanding the simulation approach. Mind and Language, 14, 477–498.Google Scholar
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Held, V. (2014). The ethics of care as normative guidance: Comment on Gilligan. Journal of Social Philosophy, 45, 107–115.Google Scholar
Helms, E. (2013). Innocence and victimhood: Gender, nation, and women's activism in post-war Bosnia-Herzegovina. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Herlitz, A., & Lovén, J. (2013). Sex differences and the own-gender bias in face recognition: A meta-analytic review. Visual Cognition, 21, 1306–1336. doi:10.1080/13506285.2013.823140Google Scholar
Herman, J. L. (2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11, 571–602. doi:10.1177/1077801205274450Google Scholar
Hinnant, J. B., & O’Brien, M. (2007). Cognitive and emotional control and perspective taking and their relations to empathy in 5-year-old children. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 168, 301–322. doi:10.3200/GNTP.168.3.301-322Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, M. L., & Levine, L. E. (1976). Early sex differences in empathy. Developmental Psychology, 12, 557–558.Google Scholar
Holmgren, R. A., Eisenberg, N., & Fabes, R. A. (1998). The relations of children’s situational empathy-related emotions to dispositional prosocial behavior. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 22, 169–193.Google Scholar
Holstein, C. S. (1976). Irreversible, stepwise sequence in the development of moral judgment: A longitudinal study of males and females. Child Development, 47, 51–61.Google Scholar
Horgan, T. G., & Smith, J. L. (2006). Interpersonal reasons for interpersonal perceptions: Gender-incongruent purpose goals and nonverbal judgment accuracy. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 127–140. doi:10.1007/s10919-006-0012-4Google Scholar
Hui, E. K. P., & Chau, T. S. (2009). The impact of a forgiveness intervention with Hong Kong Chinese children hurt in interpersonal relationships. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37, 141–156. doi:10.1080/03069880902728572Google Scholar
Hundhammer, T., & Mussweiler, T. (2012). How sex puts you in gendered shoes: Sexuality-priming leads to gender-based self-perception and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 176–193. doi:10.1037/a0028121Google Scholar
Iacoboni, M. (2009). Imitation, empathy, and mirror neurons. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 653–670. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163604Google Scholar
Ibáñez, A, Huepe, D., Gempp, R., Gutiérrez, V., Rivera-Rei, A., & Toledo, M. I. (2013). Empathy, sex and fluid intelligence as predictors of theory of mind. Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 616–621. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.11.022Google Scholar
Ickes, W. (1993). Empathic accuracy. Journal of Personality, 61(4), 587–610. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1993.tb00783.xGoogle Scholar
Ickes, W., Stinson, L., Bissonnette, V., & Garcia, S. (1990). Naturalistic social cognition: Empathic accuracy in mixed-sex dyads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 730–742. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.4.730Google Scholar
Ickes, W., Buysse, A., Pham, H., Rivers, K., Erikson, J.R., Hancock, M., … Gesn, P. R. (2000a). On the difficulty of distinguishing perceivers: A social relations analysis of empathic accuracy data. Personal Relationships, 7, 219–234.Google Scholar
Ickes, W., Gesn, P. R., & Graham, T. (2000b). Gender differences in empathic accuracy: Differential ability or differential motivation? Personal Relationships, 7, 95–109.Google Scholar
Israelashvili, J. (2016). From similarity to empathy: Two dimensions of self–other similarity are involved in the process of empathy. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Israelashvili, M., & Karniol, R. (2018). Testing alternative models of dispositional empathy: The Affect-to-Cognition (ACM) versus the Cognition-to-Affect (CAM) Model. Personality & Individual Differences, 121, 161–169.Google Scholar
Jaffee, S., & Hyde, J. S. (2000). Gender differences in moral orientation: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 703–726.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. L. (1977). Role taking and referential communication abilities in first- and third-grade children. Human Communication Research, 3, 135–145. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1977.tb00512.xGoogle Scholar
Johnson, H. D., Wernli, M. A., & LaVoie, J. C. (2013). Situational, interpersonal, and intrapersonal characteristic associations with adolescent conflict forgiveness. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 174, 291–315. doi:10.1080/00221325.2012.670672Google Scholar
Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589–611.Google Scholar
Juujärvi, S., Myyry, L., & Pesso, K. (2010). Does care reasoning make a difference? Relations between care, justice and dispositional empathy. Journal of Moral Education, 39(4), 469–489. doi:10.1080/03057240.2010.521381Google Scholar
Karniol, R. (1990). Reading people’s minds: A transformation rule model for predicting others’ thoughts and feelings. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 211–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karniol, R. (2003). Egocentrism versus protocentrism: The status of self in social prediction. Psychological Review, 110, 564–580.Google Scholar
Karniol, R. (2010). Social development as preference management: How infants, children and parents get what they want from one another. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Karniol, R., Gabay, R., Ochion, Y., & Harari, Y. (1998). Is gender or gender-role orientation a better predictor of empathy in adolescence? Sex Roles, 39, 45–60.Google Scholar
Karniol, R., Grosz, E., & Schorr, I. (2003). Caring, gender role orientation, and volunteering. Sex Roles, 49, 11–19. doi:10.1023/A:1023953401662Google Scholar
Karylowski, J. J., & Mrozinski, B. (2018). On using what we know about ourselves in thinking about others: Not so fast. Self and Identity, 17(4), 382–393. doi:10.1080/15298868.2017.1414716Google Scholar
Keysers, C., & Fadiga, L. (2008). The mirror neuron system: New frontiers. Social Neuroscience, 3, 193–198. doi:10.1080/17470910802408513Google Scholar
Kienbaum, J. (2014). The development of sympathy from 5 to 7 years: Increase, decline, or stability? A longitudinal study. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, #468.Google Scholar
Kimmes, J. G., & Durtschi, J. A. (2016). Forgiveness in romantic relationships: The roles of attachment, empathy, and attributions. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 42, 645–658. doi:10.1111/jmft.12171Google Scholar
Kirkland, R. A., Peterson, E., Baker, C. A., Miller, S., & Poulos, S. (2013). Meta-analysis reveals adult female superiority in “Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test.” North American Journal of Psychology, 15, 121–146.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Hodges, S. D. (1999). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Poster presented at the annual convention of the American Psychological Society, Denver.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., & Hodges, S. D. (2001). Gender differences, motivation, and empathic accuracy: When it pays to understand. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 720–730. doi:10.1177/0146167201276007Google Scholar
Knight, G. P., Johnson, L. G., Carlo, G., & Eisenberg, N. (1994). A multiplicative model of the dispositional antecedents of a prosocial behavior: Predicting more of the people more of the time. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 178–183. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.1.178Google Scholar
Koch, K., Pauly, K., Kellermann, T., Seiferth, N. Y., Reske, M., Backes, V., … Habel, U. (2007). Gender differences in the cognitive control of emotion: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2744–2754. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.04.012Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In Goslin, D. A. (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Kohlberg, L., & Kramer, R. (1969). Continuities and discontinuities in childhood and adult moral development. Human Development, 12, 93–120.Google Scholar
Konstam, V., Holmes, W., & Levine, B. (2003). Empathy, selfism, and coping as elements of the psychology of forgiveness: A preliminary study. Counseling and Values, 47,172–183.Google Scholar
Kraus, M. W., Côté, S., & Keltner, D. (2010). Social class, contextualism, and empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 21, 1716–1723.Google Scholar
Krauss, R. M., & Glucksberg, S. (1969). The development of communication: Competence as a function of age. Child Development, 40(1), 255–266. doi:10.2307/1127172Google Scholar
Kyratzis, A., & Guo, J. (2001). Preschool girls’ and boys’ verbal conflict strategies in the United States and China. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 45–74. doi:10.1207/S15327973RLSI3401_3Google Scholar
Lam, C. B., Solmeyer, A. R., & McHale, S. M. (2012). Sibling relationships and empathy across the transition to adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41, 1657–1670. doi:10.1007/s10964-012-9781-8Google Scholar
Lamm, C., Nusbaum, H. C., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2007). What are you feeling? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the modulation of sensory and affective responses during empathy for pain. PLoS One, 2(12), e1292, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001292Google Scholar
Langdale, C. J. (1983). Moral orientations and moral development: The analysis of care and justice reasoning across different dilemmas in females and males from childhood through adulthood. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44(6-B), 1988.Google Scholar
Laub, D., & Auerhahn, N. C. (1989). Failed empathy a central theme in the survivor’s holocaust experience. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 6(4), 377–400. doi:10.1037/0736-9735.6.4.377Google Scholar
Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2009). Gender roles and empathic accuracy: The role of communion in reading minds. Sex Roles, 60, 387–398. doi:10.1007/s11199-008-9544-xGoogle Scholar
Laursen, B., & Collins, W. A. (1994). Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 197–209. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.197Google Scholar
Lawrence, E. J., Shaw, P., Baker, D., Baron-Cohen, S., & David, A. S. (2004). Measuring empathy: Reliability and validity of the Empathy Quotient. Psychological Medicine, 34, 911–924.Google Scholar
Lawrence, K., Campbell, R., & Skuse, D. (2015). Age, gender, and puberty influence the development of facial emotion recognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, #761. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00761Google Scholar
Lee, T. M. C., Liu, H.-L., Hoosain, R., Liao, W.-T., Wu, C.-T., Yuen, K. S. L., … Gao, J.-H. (2002). Gender differences in neural correlates of recognition of happy and sad faces in humans assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience Letters, 333, 13–16. doi:10.1016/S0304-3940(02)00965-5Google Scholar
Lee, Y.-K., & Chang, C.-T. (2007). Who gives what to charity? Characteristics affecting donation behavior. Social Behavior and Personality, 35, 1173–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, R. & Eisenberg, N. (1987). Gender and age differences in empathy and sympathy. In Eisenberg, N. & Strayer, J. (Eds.), Empathy and its development (pp. 19–217). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, A. M. (1994). ToMM, ToBy, and Agency: Core architecture and domain specificity. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 119–148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leslie, L. M., Snyder, M., & Glomb, T. M., (2013). Who gives? Multilevel effects of gender and ethnicity on workplace charitable giving. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98, 49–62. doi:10.1037/a002Google Scholar
Lever, J. (1976). Sex differences in the games children play. Social Problems, 23, 479–488.Google Scholar
Leyens, J. P., Paladino, P. M., Rodriguez, R. T., Vaes, J., Demoulin, S., Rodriguez, A. P., & Gaunt, R. (2000). The emotional side of prejudice: The role of secondary emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 186–197.Google Scholar
Light, S. N., Coan, J. A., Zahn-Waxler, C., Frye, C., Goldsmith, H. H., & Davidson, R. J. (2009). Empathy is associated with dynamic change in prefrontal brain electrical activity during positive emotion in children. Child Development, 80, 1210–1231. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01326.x.Google Scholar
Litvak-Miller, W., McDougall, D., & Romney, D. M. (1997). The structure of empathy during middle childhood and its relationship to prosocial behavior. Genetic, Social & General Psychology Monographs, 123, 303–324.Google Scholar
Lovén, J., Herlitz, A., & Rehnman, J. (2011). Women’s own-gender bias in face recognition memory: The role of attention at encoding. Experimental Psychology, 58, 333–340. doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000100Google Scholar
Lucas-Molina, B., de Albéniz Iturriaga, A. P., Giménez-Dasí, M., & Seoane, G. M. (2016). Bryant’s Empathy Index: Structure and measurement invariance across gender in a sample of primary school-aged children. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 19, e44, 1–8. doi:10.1027/1015-5759.23.2Google Scholar
Lukič, J. (2011). Protected by friendship and caring: Women and peace in the former Yugoslav countries. Signs, 36, 532–541.Google Scholar
Luo, P., Wang, J., Huang, S., Xie, M., Deng, L., Fang, J., … Zheng, X. (2015). Gender differences in affective sharing and self–other distinction during empathic neural responses to others’ sadness. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 9, 312–322.Google Scholar
Lyons, N. (1983). Two perspectives: On self, relationship, and morality. Harvard Educational Review, 53, 125–145.Google Scholar
MacEvoy, J. P., & Asher, S. R. (2012). When friends disappoint: Boys’ and girls’ responses to transgressions of friendship expectations. Child Development, 83, 104–119. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01685.xGoogle Scholar
Macrae, C. N., Bodenhausen, G. V., Milne, A. B., Thorn, T. M. J., & Castelli, L. (1997). On the activation of social stereotypes: The moderating role of processing objectives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 471–489.Google Scholar
Macrae, C. N., Mitchell, J. P., & Pendry, L. F. (2002). What’s in a forename? Cue familiarity and stereotypical thinking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 186–193. doi:10.1006/jesp.2001.1496Google Scholar
Magen, E., & Konasewich, P. A. (2011). Women support providers are more susceptible than men to emotional contagion following brief supportive interactions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 611–616. doi:10.1177/0361684311423912Google Scholar
Main, A., Zhou, Q., Liew, J., & Lee, C. (2017). Prosocial tendencies among Chinese American children in immigrant families: Links to cultural and socio-demographic factors and psychological adjustment. Social Development, 26, 165–184. doi:10.1111/sode.12182Google Scholar
Malti, T., Gasser, L., & Gutzwiller-Helfenfinger, E. (2010). Children’s interpretive understanding, moral judgments, and emotion attributions: Relations to social behaviour. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 275–292. doi:10.1348/026151009X403838Google Scholar
Malti, T., Gummerum, M., Keller, M., & Buchmann, M. (2009). Children’s moral motivation, sympathy, and prosocial behavior. Child Development, 80, 442–460.Google Scholar
Maner, J. K., Luce, C. L., Neuberg, S. L., Cialdini, R. B., Brown, S., & Sagarin, B. J. (2002). The effects of perspective taking on motivations for helping: Still no evidence for altruism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1601–1610. doi:10.1177/014616702237586Google Scholar
Markstrom, C. A., Huey, E., Stiles, B. M., & Krause, A. L. (2010). Frameworks of caring and helping in adolescence: Are empathy, religiosity, and spirituality related constructs? Youth & Society, 42, 59–80. doi:10.1177/0044118X09333644Google Scholar
Martin, D., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). A face with a cue: exploring the inevitability of person categorization. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 806–816. doi:10.1002/ejsp.445Google Scholar
Mayberry, M. L., & Espelage, D. L. (2007). Associations among empathy, social competence, & reactive/proactive aggression subtypes. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36, 787–798. doi:10.1007/s10964-006-9113-yGoogle Scholar
Mazar, N., Amir, O., & Ariely, D. (2008). The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research, 45, 633–644.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, W. H. B., Forster, D. E., Philippe, J., & McCullough, M. E. (2018). Digital altruists: Resolving key questions about the empathy-altruism hypothesis in an internet sample. Emotion, 18, 493–503. doi:10.1037/emo00003Google Scholar
McCall, C., & Dasgupta, N. (2007). The malleability of men’s gender self-concept. Self and Identity, 6, 173–188, doi:10.1080/15298860601115328Google Scholar
McCullough, M., Worthington, E., & Rachal, K. (1997). Interpersonal forgiving in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 321–336.Google Scholar
McGrath, M. P., & Zook, J. N. (2011). Maternal control of girls versus boys: Relations to empathy and persuasive style with peers. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 20, 57–65. doi:10.1007/s10826-010-9377-4Google Scholar
McManis, M. H., Bradley, M. M., Berg, W. K., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotional reactions in children: Verbal, physiological, and behavioral responses to affective pictures. Psychophysiology, 38, 222–231.Google Scholar
Mehrabian, A., & Epstein, N. (1972). A measure of emotional empathy. Journal of Personality, 40, 525–543.Google Scholar
Mellström, C., & Johannesson, M. (2008). Crowding out in blood donation? Was Titmuss right? Journal of the European Economic Association, 6, 845–863.Google Scholar
Mercadillo, R. E., Dias, J. L., Pascaye, E. H., & Barrios, F. A. (2011). Perception of suffering and compassion experience: Brain gender disparities. Brain and Cognition, 6, 5–14. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2011.03.019Google Scholar
Mesch, D. J., Brown, M. S., Moore, Z. I., & Hayat, A. D. (2011). Gender differences in charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16, 342–355. doi:10.1002/nvsm.432Google Scholar
Mesch, D. J., Rooney, P. M., Steinberg, K. S., & Denton, B., (2006). The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35, 565–587.Google Scholar
Meyers, M. W., Laurent, S. M., & Hodges, S. D. (2014). Perspective taking instructions and self–other overlap: Different motives for helping. Motivation and Emotion, 38, 224–234. doi:10.1007/s11031–013-9377-yGoogle Scholar
Midlarsky, E., Jones, S. F., & Corley, R. P. (2005). Personality correlates of heroic rescue during the Holocaust. Journal of Personality, 73, 907–934.Google Scholar
Miller, A. J., Worthington, E. L. Jr., & McDaniel, M. A. (2008). Gender and forgiveness: A meta-analytic review and research agenda. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27, 843–876. doi:10.1521/jscp.2008.27.8.843Google Scholar
Miller, P. A., Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., & Shell, R. (1996). Relations of moral reasoning and vicarious emotion to young children’s prosocial behavior toward peers and adults. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 210–219. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.2.210Google Scholar
Moeschberger, S. L., Dixon, D. N, Niens, U., & Cairns, E. (2005). Forgiveness in Northern Ireland: A Model for peace in the midst of the ‘Troubles’. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11(2), 199–214. doi:10.1207/s15327949pac1102_5Google Scholar
Mohr, C., Rowe, A. C., & Blanke, O. (2010). The influence of sex and empathy on putting oneself in the shoes of others. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 277–291. doi:10.1348/000712609X457450Google Scholar
Monroe, K. R., & Epperson, C. (1994). But what else could I do? Choice, identity, and cognitive-perceptual theory. Political Psychology, 15, 201–226.Google Scholar
Montirosso, R., Peverelli, M., Frigerio, E., Crespi, M., & Borgatti, R. (2010). The development of dynamic facial expression recognition at different intensities in 4- to 18-year-olds. Social Development, 19, 71–92. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9507.2008.00527.xGoogle Scholar
Moore, M., & Beazley, S. (1996). Split family life. In M. Moore, J. Sixsmith, & K. Knowles (Eds.), Children’s reflections on family life (pp. 66–80). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, B. C., & Eisenberg, N. (2002). An integrative examination of peer conflict: Children’s reported goals, emotions, and behaviors. Social Development, 11, 534–557.Google Scholar
Nelson, J., & Aboud, E. (1985). The resolution of social conflict between friends. Child Development, 56, 1009–1017.Google Scholar
Nelson, N. L., & Russell, J. A. (2011). Putting motion in emotion: Do dynamic presentations increase preschoolers’ recognition of emotion? Cognitive Development, 26, 248–259. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2011.06.001Google Scholar
Newcombe, N. (1989). The development of spatial perspective taking. In Reese, H. W. (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (pp. 203–247). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nichols, S. R., Svetlova, M., & Brownell, C. A. (2009). The role of social understanding and empathic disposition in young children’s responsiveness to distress in parents and peers. Cognition, Brain, Behavior, 13, 449–478.Google Scholar
Niec, L. N., & Russ, S. W. (2002). Children's internal representations, empathy and fantasy play: A validity study of the SCORS-Q. Psychological Assessment, 14(3), 331–338. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.14.3.331Google Scholar
Noddings, N. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Noddings, N. (2010). Maternal factor: Two paths to morality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Noor, M., Brown, R. J., & Prentice, G. (2008). Precursors and mediators of intergroup reconciliation in Northern Ireland: A new model. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 481–489.Google Scholar
Oberman, L. M., Hubbard, E. M., McCleery, J. P., Altschuler, E. L., Ramachandran, V. S., & Pineda, J. A. (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 190–198.Google Scholar
Oudraat de Jonge, C. (2013). NSCR 1325: Conundrums and opportunties. International Interactons, 39(4) 612–619.Google Scholar
Paleari, F. G., Regalia, C., & Fincham, F. D. (2009). Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: The Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS). Psychological Assessment, 21, 194–209.Google Scholar
Palomares, N. A. (2008). Explaining gender-based language use: Effects of gender identity salience on references to emotion and tentative language in intra- and intergroup contexts. Human Communication Research, 34, 263–286.Google Scholar
Paquette, J. A., & Underwood, M. K. (1999). Gender differences in young adolescents’ experiences of peer victimization: Social and physical aggression. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 45(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
Pearson, A., Ropar, D., & Hamilton, A. F.. de C. (2013). A review of visual perspective taking in autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, Article 652. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00652Google Scholar
Perner, J., & Wimmer, H. (1985). “John thinks that Mary thinks that …” Attribution of second-order beliefs by 5- to 1O-year-old children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 39, 437–471.Google Scholar
Piper, G., & Schnepf, S. V. (2008). Gender differences in charitable giving in Great Britain. Voluntas, 19, 103–124. doi:10.1007/s11266-008-9057-9Google Scholar
Porter, E. (2007). Peacebuilding: Women in international perspective. London: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Pratt, M. W., Skoe, E. E., & Arnold, M. L. (2004). Care reasoning development and family socialization patterns in later adolescence: A longitudinaI analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 28(2), 139–147.Google Scholar
Preti, A., Vellante, M., & Petretto, D. R. (2017). The psychometric properties of the “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test: An item response theory (IRT) analysis. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 22, 233–253. doi:10.1080/13546805.2017.1300091Google Scholar
Rehnman, J., & Herlitz, A. (2006). Higher face recognition ability in girls: Magnified by own-sex and own-ethnicity bias. Memory, 14(3), 289–296. doi:10.1080/09658210500233581Google Scholar
Reid, C., Davis, H., Horlin, C., Anderson, M., Baugman, N., & Campbell, C. (2013). The Kids’ Empathic Development Scale (KEDS): A multi-dimensional measure of empathy in primary school-aged children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 31, 231–256.Google Scholar
Reniers, R. L. E. P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N. M., & Völlm, B. A. (2011). The QCAE: A questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 84–95. doi:10.1080/00223891.2010.528484Google Scholar
Reynolds, S. J., & Cerani, T. L. (2007). The effects of moral judgment and moral identity on moral behavior: An empirical examination of the moral individual. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 1610–1624. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.Google Scholar
Ridinger, G., & McBride, M. (2015). Money affects Theory of Mind differently by gender. PLoS One, 10, e0143973. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143973Google Scholar
Roeyers, H., Buysse, A., Ponnet, K., & Pichal, B. (2001). Advancing advanced mind-reading tests: Empathic accuracy in adults with a pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 271–278.Google Scholar
Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (1999). Children’s goals and strategies in response to conflicts within a friendship. Developmental Psychology, 35, 69–79. doi:10.2307/1130112Google Scholar
Rose, A. J., & Asher, S. R. (2004). Children’s strategies and goals in response to help-giving and help-seeking tasks within a friendship. Child Development, 75(3), 749–763. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00704.xGoogle Scholar
Rose, A. J., & Rudolph, K. D. (2006). A review of sex differences in peer relationship processes: Potential trade-offs for the emotional and behavioral development of girls and boys. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 98–131. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.98Google Scholar
Ross, H. S., Recchia, H. E., & Carpendale, J. L. M. (2005). Making sense of divergent interpretations of conflict and developing an interpretive understanding of mind. Journal of Cognition and Development, 6, 571–592.Google Scholar
Roth-Hanania, R., Davidov, M., & Zahn-Waxler, C. (2011). Empathy development from 8 to 16 months: Early signs of concern for others. Infant Behavior & Development, 4, 447–458. doi:10.1016/j.infbeh.2011.04.007Google Scholar
Rowe, J. O., Halling, S., Davies, E., Leifer, M., Powers, D., & van Bronkhorst, J. (1989). The psychology of forgiving another. In R. S. Valle & S. Halling (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology. Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
Royzman, E., Cassidy, K. W., & Baron, J. (2003). “I know, you know”: Epistemic egocentrism in children and adults. Review of General Psychology, 7, 38–65.Google Scholar
Rueckert, L., & Naybar, N. (2008). Gender differences in empathy: The role of the right hemisphere. Brain and Cognition, 6, 162–167. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2008.01.002Google Scholar
Rusbult, C. E., Verette, J., Whitney, G. A., Slovik, L. F., & Lipku, I. (1991). Accommodation processes in close relationships: Theory and preliminary empirical evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 53–78.Google Scholar
Russell, T. A., Tchanturia, K., Rahman, K. Q., & Schmidt, U. (2007). Sex differences in theory of mind: A male advantage on Happé’s cartoon task. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1554–1564. doi:10.1080/02699930601117096Google Scholar
Ryan, M. K., David, B., & Reynolds, K. J. (2004). Who cares? The effect of gender and context on the self and moral reasoning. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28, 246–255.Google Scholar
Sandstrom, M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2003). Sociometric status and children's peer experiences: Use of the daily diary method. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49(4), 427–452. doi:10.1353/mpq.2003.0025Google Scholar
Sasson, N. J., Pinkham, A. E., Richard, J., Hughett, P., Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2010). Controlling for response biases clarifies sex and age differences in facial affect recognition. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34, 207–221. doi:10.1007/s10919-010-0092-zGoogle Scholar
Schmid, P. C., Mast, M. S., Bombari, D., Mast, F. W., & Lobmaier, J. S. (2011). How mood states affect information processing during facial emotion recognition: An eye tracking study. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 70, 223–231. doi:10.1024/1421-0185/a000060Google Scholar
Schmithorst, V. J., & Holland, K. (2007). Sex differences in the development of neuro-anatomical functional connectivity underlying intelligence found using Bayesian connectivity analysis. NeuroImage, 35, 406–419. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.046Google Scholar
Schulte-Rüther, M., Markowitsch, H. J., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Piefke, M. (2008). Gender differences in brain networks supporting empathy. NeuroImage, 42, 393–403. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.180Google Scholar
Schumann, K., Zaki, J., & Dweck, C. S. (2014). Addressing the empathy deficit: Beliefs about the malleability of empathy predict effortful responses when empathy is challenging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 475–493. doi:10.1037/a0036Google Scholar
Selman, R. L. (1980). The growth of interpersonal understanding. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Senneker, P., & Hendrick, C. (1983). Androgyny and helping behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 916–925.Google Scholar
Shadmi, E. (2000). Between resistance and compliance, feminism, and nationalism: Women in Black in Israel. Women’s Studies International Forum, 2, 23–34. PII S0277–5395(99)00087-4Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2011). The neural basis for empathy. Neuroscientist, 17, 18–24. doi:10.1177/1073858410379268Google Scholar
Sharoni, S. (1996). Gender and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict: The politics of women’s resistance. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Sheldon, A. (1990). Pickle fights: Gendered talk in preschool disputes. Discourse Processes, 13, 5–31.Google Scholar
Sherman, G. D., Lerner, J. S., Renshon, J., Ma-Kellams, C., & Joel, S. (2015). Perceiving others’ feelings: The importance of personality and social structure. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6, 559–569.Google Scholar
Sherman, L. W., Strang, H., Angel, C., Woods, D., Barnes, G. C., Bennett, S., & Inkpen, N. (2005). Effects of face-to-face restorative justice on victims of crime in four randomized, controlled trials. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 367–395.Google Scholar
Shnabel, N., Halabi, S., & Noor, M. (2013). Overcoming competitive victimhood and facilitating forgiveness through re-categorization into a common victim or perpetrator identity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 867–877.Google Scholar
Shnabel, N., & Nadler, A. (2008). A needs-based model of reconciliation: Satisfying the differential emotional needs of victim and perpetrator as a key to promoting reconciliation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 116–132. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.116.Google Scholar
Sierksma, J., Thijs, J., & Verkuyten, M. (2014). Children’s intergroup helping: The role of empathy and peer group norms. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 369–383. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.06.002Google Scholar
Singer, T. (2006). The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: Review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 855–863, doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.011Google Scholar
Singer, T., & Lamm, C. (2009). The social neuroscience of empathy. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1156, 81–96.Google Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O’Doherty, J. P., Stephan, K. E., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2006). Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature, 439(7075), 466–469. doi:10.1038/nature04271Google Scholar
Skoe, E. E. A. (2010). The relationship between empathy-related constructs and care-based moral development in young adulthood. Journal of Moral Education, 39(2), 191–211. doi:10.1080/03057241003754930Google Scholar
Skoe, E. E. A. (2014). Measuring care-based moral development: The Ethic of Care Interview. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(3), 95–104. doi:10.1037/h0100594Google Scholar
Smith, R. L., & Rose, A. J. (2011). The “cost of caring” in youths’ friendships: Considering associations among social perspective taking, co-rumination, and empathetic distress. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1792–1803. doi:10.1037/a002S803.Google Scholar
Sonnby-Borgström, M., Jönsson, P., & Svensson, O. (2008). Gender differences in facial imitation and verbally reported emotional contagion from spontaneous to emotionally regulated processing levels. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 49, 111–122. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00626.xGoogle Scholar
Sørenson, B. R. Women and post-conflict reconstrucions: Issues and sources. Geneva: Diane Publishing.Google Scholar
Storch, E. A., Brassard, M. R., & Masia-Warner, C. L. (2003). The relationship of peer victimization to social anxiety and loneliness in adolescence. Child Study Journal, 33(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
Strang, H., Sherman, L., Angel, C. M., Woods, D. J., Bennett, S., Newbury-Birch, D., & Inkpen, N. (2006). Victim evaluations of face-to-face restorative justice conferences: A quasi-experimental analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 281–306.Google Scholar
Svirsky, G. (2000). The impact of Women in Black in Israel. In Waller, M. R. & Rycenga, J. (Eds.), Frontline feminisms: Women, war, and resistance (pp. 235–245). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Swickert, R., Robertson, S., & Baird, D. (2016). Age moderates the mediational role of empathy in the association between gender and forgiveness. Current Psychology, 35, 354–360. doi:10.1007/s12144-014-9300-zGoogle Scholar
Tahmasebi-Birgani, V. (2010). Green Women of Iran: The role of the women’s movement during and after Iran’s presidential election of 2009. Constellations, 17, 78–86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8675.2009.00576.xGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245Google Scholar
Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., Tausch, N., Maio, G., & Kenworthy, J. (2007). The impact of intergroup emotions on forgiveness in Northern Ireland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10, 119–136. doi:10.1177/1368430207071345Google Scholar
Tarampi, M. R., Heydari, N., & Hegarty, M. (2016). A tale of two types of perspective taking: Sex differences in spatial ability. Psychological Science, 27, 1507–1516. doi:10.1177/0956797616667459Google Scholar
Tello, F. P. H., Delgado Egido, B., Carrasco Ortiz, M. A., & del Barrio Gándara, M. V. (2013). Interpersonal Reactivity Index: Analysis of invariance and gender differences in Spanish youths. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 44, 320–333. doi:10.1007/s10578-012-0327-9Google Scholar
Thomas, G., & Maio, G. R. (2008). Man, I feel like a woman: When and how gender-role motivation helps mind-reading. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1165–1179. doi:10.1037/a001Google Scholar
Tomova, L., von Dawans, B., Heinrichs, M., Silani, G., & Lamm, C. (2014). Is stress affecting our ability to tune into others? Evidence for gender differences in the effects of stress on self–other distinction. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 43, 95–104.Google Scholar
Tonin, M., & Vlassopoulos, M. (2010). Disentangling the sources of pro-socially motivated effort: A field experiment. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 1086–1092. doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.08.011Google Scholar
Topcu, C., & Erdur-Baker, O. (2012). Affective and cognitive empathy as mediators of gender differences in cyber and traditional bullying. School Psychology International, 33, 550–561. doi:10.1177/0143034312446882Google Scholar
Unger, L. S., & Thumuluri, L. K. (1997). Trait empathy and continuous helping: The case of voluntarism. Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 785–800.Google Scholar
Updegraff, K. A., Helms, H. M., McHale, S. M., Crouter, A. C., Thayer, S. M., & Sales, L. H. (2004). Who’s the boss? Patterns of perceived control in adolescents’ friendships. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 403–420.Google Scholar
Van der Graaff, J., Branje, S., de Wied, M., Hawk, S., Van Lier, P., & Meeus, W. (2014). Perspective taking and empathic concern in adolescence: Gender differences in developmental changes. Developmental Psychology, 50, 881–888. doi:10.1037/a0034325Google Scholar
Van der Graaff, J., Carlo, G., Crocetti, E., Koot, H. M., & Branje, S. (2018). Prosocial behavior in adolescence: Gender differences in development and links with empathy. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 1086–1099. doi:10.1007/s10964-017-0786-1Google Scholar
van der Meulen, A., Roerig, S., de Ruyter, D., Van Lier, P., & Krabbendam, L. (2017). A comparison of children’s ability to read children’s and adults’ mental states in an adaptation of the Reading the Mind in the Eyes task. Frontiers in Psychology, 26, #554. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00594Google Scholar
van der Meulen, M., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Crone, E. A. (2016). Neural correlates of prosocial behavior: Compensating social exclusion in a four player Cyberball game. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e015904.Google Scholar
Vikan, A., Camino, C., & Biaggio, A. (2005). Note on a cross-cultural test of Gilligan’s ethic of care. Journal of Moral Education, 34, 107–111. doi:10.1080/03057240500051105Google Scholar
von Horn, A., Bäckman, L., Davidsson, T., & Hansen, S. (2010). Empathizing, systemizing and finger length ratio in a Swedish sample. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51, 31–37. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00725.xGoogle Scholar
Vossen, H. G. M., Piotrowski, J. T., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2015). Development of the Adolescent Measure of Empathy and Sympathy (AMES). Personality and Individual Differences, 74, 66–71. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.09.040Google Scholar
Walker, L. J. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development, 55, 677–691.Google Scholar
Walker, S. (2005). Gender differences in the relationship between young children’s peer-related social competence and individual differences in theory of mind. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166, 297–312.Google Scholar
Wark, G. R., & Krebs, D. L. (1997). Sources of variation in moral judgment: Toward a model of real-life morality. Journal of Adult Development, 4(3), 163–178.Google Scholar
Westlund, K., Horowitz, L., Jansson, L., & Ljungberg, T. (2008). Age effects and gender differences on post-conflict reconciliation in preschool children. Behaviour, 145, 1525–1556.Google Scholar
Williams, A., O’Driscoll, K., & Moore, C. (2014). The influence of empathic concern on prosocial behavior in children. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 425–468. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00425Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.Google Scholar
Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Ross, W. T. Jr. (2009). Donation behavior toward ingroups and outgroups: The role of gender and moral identity. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 199–214. doi:10.1086/596720Google Scholar
Wohl, M. J. A., & Branscombe, N. R. (2005). Forgiveness and collective guilt assignment to historical perpetrator groups depend on level of social category inclusiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 288–303. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.288Google Scholar
Worthington, E. L. (1998). An empathy-humility-commitment model of forgiveness applied within family dyads. Journal of Family Therapy, 20(1), 59–76. doi:10.1111/1467-6427.00068Google Scholar
Yao, S., Zhao, W., Geng, Y., Chen, Y., Zhao, Z., Ma, X., … Kendrick, K. M. (2018). Oxytocin facilitates approach behavior to positive social stimuli via decreasing anterior insula activity. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology, 21(10), 918–925. doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyy068Google Scholar
Yao, S.-Y., Bull, R., Khng, K. H., & Rahim, A. (2017). Psychometric properties of the NEPSY-II affect recognition subtest in a preschool sample: A Rasch modeling approach. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32, 63–80. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1343865Google Scholar
Yonker, J. E., Eriksson, E., Nilsson, L.-G., & Herlitz, A. (2003). Sex differences in episodic memory: Minimal influence of estradiol. Brain and Cognition, 52, 231–238. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00074-5Google Scholar
Yuval-Davis, N. (1993). Gender and nation. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 16, 621–632. doi:10.1080/01419870.1993.9993800Google Scholar
Yzerbyt, V. Y., Castano, E., Leyens, J.-P., & Paladino, M. P. (2000). The primacy of the ingroup: The interplay of identification, entitativity and overexclusion. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 11, pp. 257–295). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Zaki, J., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: Progress, pitfalls and promise. Nature Neurosience, 15, 675–680. doi:10.1038/nn.3085Google Scholar
Zebel, S., Doosje, B., & Spears, R. (2009). How perspective-taking helps and hinders group-based guilt as a function of group identification. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 12(1), 61–78. doi:10.1177/1368430208098777Google Scholar