Editorial
Semantic Web and Web 2.0

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2007.12.002Get rights and content

Section snippets

Discussion papers

Much to our surprise, while we expected debates to emerge among the discussion papers, our authors were united in their belief that the social-semantic web is likely to become a major application area of Semantic Web technology. As Tom Gruber explains in our first paper, Web 2.0 brings massive amounts of user-generated content and a proven recipe of humans and machines working together in synergy. However, he argues that Web 2.0 stops at what he calls “collected intelligence,” the mere pooling

Technology papers

While Bojars et al. are mostly concerned with the external representation of contextual metadata, our first more focused technology paper, Iyad Rahwan's “Mass Argumentation and the Semantic Web,” goes deeper in exploring how to impose a layer of semantics on discussions themselves. More precisely, Rahwan describes a formal representation of generic argument structures. Although primitive ways of connecting arguments in the social space already exist (e.g. through the use of tags, links and

System papers

The next two papers, by Ankolekar et al. and Heath and Motta, open our collection of system-oriented articles. They have been placed together because they share a common use case of semantic reviewing. Reviewing is a natural fit for work on the boundary of the Semantic Web and Web 2.0, as it requires handling both structured and unstructured information (minimally: the reviews and data about the objects being reviewed) and it also has a strong social dimension. In parallel, both papers start by

Conclusion

These ten papers provide a comprehensive overview of the best current thinking on the social-semantic web, in its vision, technology, and systems manifestations. We are excited by the prospects of this new evolution of the web, and we look forward to its further development.

References (0)

Cited by (36)

  • Semantic knowledge network inference across a range of stakeholders and communities of practice

    2018, Environmental Modelling and Software
    Citation Excerpt :

    New knowledge is generated and required not simply in the form of unprocessed information availability, but as deliberate and functional response to the needs of our social complexity of interactions. The semantic web (Greaves and Mika, 2008) for example does not itself generates new fundamental knowledge, but rather alters its availability and accessibility to wider social audiences, reorganizes it in new and highly functional ways or semantic categorizations, and enhances our ability to perform more and more complex cognitive and socially critical tasks at both the individual and the collective social levels. In a sense, semantic social knowledge representation encodes and categorizes a world of semantically important objects that belong to the past, present and future alike: the past, through the historical collective evolution of norms, aspirations and beliefs; the present, through values and attitudes; the future through expectations and visions that individuals and local societies hold and pursue.

  • SocialBROKER: A collaborative social space for gathering semantically-enhanced financial information

    2012, Expert Systems with Applications
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, what Web 2.0 and the Semantic Web have in common is that they both address the fundamental concept of socially shared meaning (Greaves & Mika, 2008). World-leading researchers agree that the combination of the best ideas from the Social Web and Semantic Web can result in more powerful applications (Greaves & Mika, 2008; Gruber, 2008; Hendler & Berners-Lee, 2010; Hendler & Golbeck, 2008; Mika, 2007). This combination can give rise to a new evolution of the Web named the social-semantic Web: “in a social-semantic web, certain formally representable parts of human meaning can be encoded and reasoned about via the tools of the semantic web, but can also be curated and maintained via the social, community-oriented techniques of Web 2.0” (Greaves & Mika, 2008).

  • Adaptive Low-level Storage of Very Large Knowledge Graphs

    2020, The Web Conference 2020 - Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, WWW 2020
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text