Elsevier

Toxicology Letters

Volume 212, Issue 2, 20 July 2012, Pages 106-112
Toxicology Letters

Perfluorooctanoic acid affects the activity of the hepatocyte nuclear factor 4 alpha (HNF4α)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.05.007Get rights and content

Abstract

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is an industrial chemical that is a global contaminant of water, soil and foodstuff. Numerous animal studies have revealed that PFOA has embryotoxic and hepatotoxic effects in rodents. On the molecular level, the adverse effects of PFOA have been correlated with the PFOA-mediated activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα), however, the toxicological relevance of this mode of action for humans is under debate.

In this study, a proteomic approach was chosen to screen for molecular targets affected by PFOA in human liver cells. Treatment of the human liver cell line HepG2 with 25 μM PFOA resulted in 51 deregulated proteins in a two-dimensional gel experiment, and 36 of these proteins were identified by mass spectrometry. Network analysis revealed that these proteins are primarily involved in lipid metabolism and cancer. The hepatocyte nuclear factor 4α (HNF4α), but not PPARα, was the key regulator of the network. Indeed, subsequent western blot analysis revealed that the amount of HNF4α as well as of its target HNF1α was downregulated in PFOA-treated HepG2 cells. Moreover, PFOA was shown to inhibit HNF4α-dependent gene transcription. Thus, this study provides first experimental evidence that HNF4α is negatively affected by PFOA.

Highlights

PFOA alters the proteome of HepG2 cells. ► PFOA affects signalling pathways which are associated with lipid metabolism and cancer. ► PFOA inhibits the activity of the nuclear receptor HNF4α. ► PFOA decreases the intracellular amount of HNF4α.

Introduction

Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is the most important member of the class of perfluoroalkyl acids which are used in the production of fluoropolymers and fluoroelastomers. The substance is stable towards thermal or chemical degradation due to the extraordinary stability of the carbonsingle bondfluorine bond. Moreover, no biological system is known to have the capacity to degrade PFOA. Therefore, these substances persist in the environment (Suja et al., 2009). Humans are mainly exposed to PFOA via oral uptake of contaminated drinking water and food. PFOA is readily absorbed and accumulates in blood serum. The substance is not metabolised and possesses a very low elimination rate.

PFOA is toxicologically well characterised (Kudo and Kawashima, 2003, Lau et al., 2006). Chronic exposure of rats with PFOA resulted in an increased incidence of tumours in testis, pancreas and liver (Biegel et al., 2001). On the molecular level, the adverse effects induced by PFOA have been ascribed to the PFOA-mediated activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) which is a ligand-dependent transcription factor. PPARα regulates numerous genes whose products are primarily involved in lipid metabolism and energy homeostasis (Martin et al., 1997, Peters et al., 1998). Mono- and polyunsaturated fatty acids are natural ligands of PPARα. Moreover, chemicals such as PFOA which are structurally related to fatty acids have been shown to activate PPARα (Vanden Heuvel, 1996). However, activation of PPARα is obviously not the only relevant mode of action for PFOA since some PFOA-mediated effects have also been observed in PPARα knockout mice (Wolf et al., 2008). Moreover, recent studies have shown that other nuclear receptors such as constitutive androstan receptor (CAR) or pregnane X receptor (PXR) may be activated by PFOA (Ren et al., 2009, Rosen et al., 2008b). Finally, most of the molecular data have been obtained with rodent models, raising the question to which degree these data are relevant to humans. As an example, PPARα is expressed at high levels in liver of rodents, whereas the expression level of PPARα in human liver is about 10-fold lower compared to mouse liver (Palmer et al., 1998).

This study was conducted in order to elucidate metabolic or signalling pathways that are affected by PFOA in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells as the liver is the primary target organ. For this purpose, we have chosen a hypothesis-free proteomic screening method to examine the effects of PFOA on the molecular level and to gain insights into the mode of action of PFOA in human liver cells.

Section snippets

Cell cultures

The human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line HepG2 and the human embryonic kidney cell line HEK293 were obtained from the European Collection of Cell Cultures (ECACC, Porton Down, UK). HepG2 cells were grown in Roswell Park Memorial Institute medium (RPMI 1640; PAN Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) supplemented with 10% (v/v) foetal calf serum, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were sub-cultured or used for the experiments at a

Cytotoxic effects of PFOA on human liver cells

The human hepatocarcinoma cell line HepG2 is a well-established in vitro model for human hepatocytes (Harris et al., 2004) and was therefore chosen for this in vitro study. Prior to the proteomic approach, it was necessary to examine the level of cytotoxicity of PFOA on HepG2 cells in order to determine the PFOA concentration for the incubation experiments. For this purpose, HepG2 cells were incubated with various concentrations of PFOA and the viability of the cells was determined after 48 h by

Discussion

Long-term exposure of rodents to high concentrations of PFOA causes hepatotoxic effects such as increase liver weight, hypertrophy, vacuolisation and liver necrosis (Kennedy et al., 2004). It is well accepted that these effects can be explained – on the molecular level – by the PFOA-mediated activation of the nuclear receptor PPARα. This transcription factor can be regarded as a fatty acid sensor triggering gene expression of numerous genes being involved in fatty acid and energy metabolism.

Funding

Institutional funding (project 1322-464).

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Christine Meckert and Linda Brandenburger for technical assistance. Prof. G. Ryffel (Institut für Zellbiologie, Universitaetsklinikum Essen) is kindly acknowledged for providing the plasmids for the transactivation assay.

References (36)

  • H. Ren et al.

    Evidence for the involvement of xenobiotic-responsive nuclear receptors in transcriptional effects upon perfluoroalkyl acid exposure in diverse species

    Reproductive Toxicology

    (2009)
  • P.K. Smith et al.

    Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid

    Analytical Biochemistry

    (1985)
  • J.P. Vanden Heuvel

    Perfluorodecanoic acid as a useful pharmacologic tool for the study of peroxisome proliferation

    General Pharmacology

    (1996)
  • L.B. Biegel et al.

    Mechanisms of extrahepatic tumor induction by peroxisome proliferators in male CD rats

    Toxicological Sciences

    (2001)
  • J.A. Bjork et al.

    Structure–activity relationships and human relevance for perfluoroalkyl acid-induced transcriptional activation of peroxisome proliferation in liver cell cultures

    Toxicological Sciences

    (2009)
  • W.S. Chen et al.

    Disruption of the HNF-4 gene, expressed in visceral endoderm, leads to cell death in embryonic ectoderm and impaired gastrulation of mouse embryos

    Genes and Development

    (1994)
  • X. Cheng et al.

    Perfluorocarboxylic acids induce cytochrome P450 enzymes in mouse liver through activation of PPAR-alpha and CAR transcription factors

    Toxicological Sciences

    (2008)
  • A. Gorg et al.

    The current state of two-dimensional electrophoresis with immobilized pH gradients

    Electrophoresis

    (2000)
  • Cited by (46)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text