Basic ScienceEffect of the intervertebral disc on vertebral bone strength prediction: a finite-element study
Introduction
Osteoporotic vertebral fractures (OVFs) are one of the most common complications of osteoporosis and are associated with an increased risk of subsequent fractures, loss of daily abilities, and high mortality, especially in the aging population. Currently, the gold standard for diagnosis of osteoporosis is bone mineral density (BMD) assessment via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry [1]. However, it is inherently limited by the acquisition of two-dimensional projections, leading to blindsiding of important structural knowledge that could be used to identify patients with impending fractures. In addition, majority of fractures occur in patients classified in the osteopenia category than in the osteoporotic category, which evidently shows that BMD should be cautiously treated as primary factor in the calculation of fracture risk [2]. Since dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry is not capable of providing three-dimensional (3D) data of the spine and the association of BMD to OVFs is still inconclusive, it is of paramount importance to extract more holistic information, related to the early diagnosis and prediction of impending OVFs. Due to such challenges involved in diagnosing fractures before they occur, patient-specific nonlinear finite element (FE) analyses have shown potential in predicting bone strength noninvasively [3], enabling the possibility of early intervention.
Although FE analyses have recently been widely established in the prediction of bone strength and consequently fractures, challenges remain in the modeling of the spine. This is because the human spine is structurally complex, unlike long bones. Consequently, many FE studies have focused on modeling of vertebral bodies in isolation in the prediction of various biomechanical properties [4], [5], [6], [7]. For example, a study conducted by Buckley et al. showed that quantitative computed tomography-based FE-predicted strength measures correlated significantly with experimentally measured strength and was better predictive of compressive strength than BMD [4]. These studies demonstrated that FE-predicted stiffness and strength were predictive of experimental parameters and could act as a possible diagnostic tool for the evaluation of biomechanical and fracture properties of bone.
Since intervertebral discs (IVDs) also influence the load applied to the spine, FE models of isolated vertebral bodies alone provides limited information on vertebral strength. FE analysis incorporating the IVDs could be critical in predicting vertebral strength and impending fractures of the spine.
A recent study by Groenen et al. evaluated failure behavior in functional spinal units (FSUs), which consists of three vertebral bodies and two interspersed IVDs [8]. However, their study found that only stiffness, and not failure load, had significant correlations with experimentally measured failure load. Therefore, the objectives of our study were (1) to compare FE-predicted failure load of FSUs with experimentally measured failure load of FSUs and (2) to compare this correlation with those of FE-predicted failure load and BMD of the single central vertebra with experimentally measured failure load of FSUs.
Section snippets
Specimens
Ten thoracic FSUs consisting of a central vertebra, the adjacent IVDs, and the upper and lower halves of the adjacent vertebrae were harvested from formalin-fixed human donors. The adjacent vertebrae were dissected with a bandsaw at half of the vertebral height. The ligaments, IVDs, and posterior elements were kept intact. The surrounding muscle and fat tissue were completed removed. The costovertebral joints were kept intact by dissecting the costae distally of the costovertebral joints. All
Results
Mean and standard deviation (SD) of donor information, MDCT-derived BMD of the single central vertebrae, experimentally measured failure load of the FSUs, and FE-predicted failure loads of the FSUs and single central vertebrae are presented in Table 2. Compared with experimentally measured failure load values (3658±802 N), FE-predicted failure load values were 7% higher (3900±722 N) for the FSUs and 52% higher (5546±1202 N) for the single central vertebrae. All FSU specimens exhibited
Discussion
In this study, FE-predicted failure load of the FSUs best predicted experimentally measured failure load (R2=0.93), while BMD of the single central vertebra as the clinical gold standard (R²=0.66) and FEM of the single central vertebra (nonsignificant correlation) were limited in predicting experimentally measured failure load. These findings demonstrate the importance to include the IVDs and its biomechanical properties into MDCT-based fracture risk predictions.
This is one of the first
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) Startup research Grant (SRG EPD 2015093 (KS) and by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - Project 432290010 (to TB and JSK).
References (39)
Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk
Lancet
(2002)- et al.
Beyond Dxa: advances in clinical applications of new bone imaging technology
Endocr Pract
(2016) - et al.
Locations of bone tissue at high risk of initial failure during compressive loading of the human vertebral body
Bone
(2007) - et al.
Finite element models predict in vitro vertebral body compressive strength better than quantitative computed tomography
Bone
(2003) Predicting the compressive mechanical behavior of bone
J Biomech
(1994)Improved prediction of proximal femoral fracture load using nonlinear finite element models
Med Eng Phys
(2001)- et al.
Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load
Med Eng Phys
(2003) - et al.
The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone
J Biomech
(1994) - et al.
Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone
Med Eng Phys
(1995) - et al.
Correlation of thoracic and lumbar vertebral failure loads with in situ vs. ex situ dual energy X-ray absorptiometry
J Biomech
(2001)
Finite element analysis predicts experimental failure patterns in vertebral bodies loaded via intervertebral discs up to large deformation
Med Eng Phys
Finite element analyses of human vertebral bodies embedded in polymethylmethalcrylate or loaded via the hyperelastic intervertebral disc models provide equivalent predictions of experimental strength
J Biomech
An accurate finite element model of the cervical spine under quasi-static loading
J Biomech
An accurate validation of a computational model of a human lumbosacral segment
J Biomech
Finite element model of a lumbar spinal motion segment to predict circadian variation in stature
Comput Structures
Simulated influence of osteoporosis and disc degeneration on the load transfer in a lumbar functional spinal unit
J Biomech
Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength
Bone
Noninvasive prediction of vertebral body compressive strength using nonlinear finite element method and an image based technique
Physica Medica
Nonlinear stress analysis of the whole lumbar spine in torsion–mechanics of facet articulation
J Biomech
Cited by (0)
FDA device/drug status: Not applicable.
Author disclosures: DPA: Nothing to disclose. TB: Nothing to disclose. JSK: Nothing to Disclose. KS: Nothing to disclose.