Review
Proteomics of seed development, desiccation tolerance, germination and vigor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2014.11.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Changes in the seed proteome have been studied mainly using 2D-PAGE.

  • In general, it is not possible to identify a single most important protein.

  • Proteins involved in defense against ROS are important for all seed processes.

  • Proteins of the cytoskeleton and glycolysis are also important.

  • The next omics frontier will be post-translational modifications of proteins.

Abstract

Proteomics, the large-scale study of the total complement of proteins in a given sample, has been applied to all aspects of seed biology mainly using model species such as Arabidopsis or important agricultural crops such as corn and rice. Proteins extracted from the sample have typically been separated and quantified by 2-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry to identify the proteins in the gel spots. In this way, qualitative and quantitative changes in the proteome during seed development, desiccation tolerance, germination, dormancy release, vigor alteration and responses to environmental factors have all been studied. Many proteins or biological processes potentially important for each seed process have been highlighted by these studies, which greatly expands our knowledge of seed biology. Proteins that have been identified to be particularly important for at least two of the seed processes are involved in detoxification of reactive oxygen species, the cytoskeleton, glycolysis, protein biosynthesis, post-translational modifications, methionine metabolism, and late embryogenesis-abundant (LEA) proteins. It will be useful for molecular biologists and molecular plant breeders to identify and study genes encoding particularly interesting target proteins with the aim to improve the yield, stress tolerance or other critical properties of our crop species.

Introduction

Almost all plant cultivation in agriculture and horticulture is based on seeds. The vast majority of our domesticated plants are propagated via seeds and seeds provide most of our caloric intake either directly as food or indirectly as feed for our domestic animals. To feed the ever-growing human population we need to increase the productivity of our crop species by exploiting their full genetic potential in plant breeding. This requires that we understand the fundamental processes taking place in the seeds during their development, storage, germination and growth. An excellent overview of all aspects of seed biology is found in Bewley et al. (2013).

Seed development. The seed develops from a single fertilized zygote into an embryo and endosperm in association with the surrounding maternal tissues. Most seeds contain large quantities of nutrient reserves, mainly carbohydrates, oils, and/or proteins, which are biosynthesized and deposited during seed development. These reserves are not only important for seed germination and seedling growth, but are also vital components of human and animal diets. Their production in crops is the basis of agriculture. Before reaching maturity, the seed develops other important properties, including desiccation tolerance, germination/dormancy and vigor (Bewley et al., 2013).

Seed desiccation tolerance. Considered only in terms of tolerance of, or sensitivity to, desiccation, seeds can be categorized as orthodox or recalcitrant (Berjak and Pammenter, 2008). The orthodox seed acquires desiccation tolerance during seed development approximately halfway through development. This trait ensures that the seeds passes unharmed through maturation drying and retains viability in the dry state for long periods of time (up to hundreds of years in some case) under natural or artificial conditions (Kermode and Finch-Savage, 2002). In contrast, the recalcitrant seed is desiccation sensitive and can not survive drying during ex situ conservation (Berjak and Pammenter, 2008). This creates a serious problem in the conservation of recalcitrant species. Many species with recalcitrant seeds are economically important, such as avocado, mango, lychee, cocoa, coffee, citrus, and rubber.

Seed germination. Seed germination is the most critical phase in the seed plant life cycle. It determines when the plant enters natural or agricultural ecosystems. Cultivation of most crop species is dependent on seed germination. Seeds of most species acquire the ability to germinate during development. This is important for crop production, because it ensures that the untreated seed quickly germinates after sowing. However, in a few species, such as maize, wheat and rice, it can result in precocious germination, which typically occurs when developing seeds with a low degree of dormancy experience rainfall or humid conditions (Bewley et al., 2013). Precocious germination can decrease the grain quality and cause great economic losses. In some species, seeds are dormant at the end of development. Seed dormancy is defined as the failure of an intact viable seed to complete germination under favorable conditions (Bewley, 1997). It is an adaptive strategy for seed to survive under adverse natural conditions, but it also creates an obstacle for agricultural production, where rapid germination and growth are required.

Seed vigor. Seed deterioration occurs always during storage of orthodox seeds, resulting in the gradually loss of vigor and even death. For crop species, preventing or minimizing the loss of vigor during storage is critical for the production in the subsequent seasons. Seed longevity is dependent on storage temperature and moisture (Walters et al., 2005). Seed priming, imbibing seeds in water or chemicals, such as PEG, for a period of times followed by dehydration, is utilized commercially to increase seed vigor (Heydecker et al., 1973, McDonald, 2000).

Seed proteomics. The great biological and economic importance of seeds has led to a vast number of studies of all the above aspects of seed biology. One type of study is proteomics, the study of all the expressed proteins. Since proteins are responsible for most metabolic processes in the seed, in addition to being important structural components in the cytoskeleton, membranes, the cell wall, etc., it makes excellent sense to describe the proteome of a seed, a seed tissue, a specific cell type or a subcellular compartment. However, proteomics are also a powerful tool for detecting changes in the protein composition in response to developmental or environmental stimuli, so-called differential proteomics. In other words, proteomics can be used analytically rather than descriptively to identify proteins associated with, and therefore probably important for, specific processes and specific responses. This will be the focus in the present review – qualitative and quantitative changes in the seed proteome during the life cycle of the seed.

We will start by giving a very brief overview of the methods used to study seed proteomics. We will then review the proteomics of seed development, desiccation tolerance, germination and dormancy release and vigor. Finally, we will attempt to give some perspectives.

The seed proteome can be analyzed like any other proteome using the standard general procedure of protein extraction, separation and identification. The sampling is, as always, the basis for obtaining meaningful results. As discussed by Miernyk (2014) this is not a trivial point: The seed part to be analyzed needs to be considered carefully in relation to the question asked. It is also essential to ensure the physiological (developmental stage) and genetic uniformity of the seeds sampled.

The dynamic range for protein amount may be as high as 1010–1012 whereas the dynamic range for the analytical methods are much lower perhaps only 103–104 (Hortin and Sviridov, 2010, Miernyk, 2014). It can therefore be an advantage to remove the superabundant storage proteins during protein extraction or during the early stages of separation in order to improve the chances of detecting lower-abundance proteins (Miernyk and Hajduch, 2011).

Gel-based methods for separation – particularly two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (2D-PAGE) – have dominated and will probably continue to dominate because, in addition to being reasonably quantitative, they provide a lot of information about the proteins not provided by the gel-free shotgun methods, such as changes in protein size, pI, and post-translational modifications (PTMs) (Rogowska-Wrzesinska et al., 2013). This is always useful information, and particularly so for species where the genome has not yet been fully sequenced.

Mass spectrometer-based methods for protein identification have dominated completely in recent years also in seed proteomics, but the methods have been extensively reviewed recently (e.g. Pan et al., 2009, Walther and Mann, 2010, Bantscheff et al., 2012, Rogers and Overall, 2013) and since they are essentially independent of species (except for the question of access to a full genome sequence), they will not be reviewed here.

Although 2D-PAGE is reasonably quantitative, a note of caution is in order concerning the way it is routinely used. The standard procedure is to extract all proteins from a series of samples, for instance a time series during seed development. The same fixed amount of protein (typically 100–500 μg protein) from each sample is then separated by 2D-PAGE and, when the gels are stained typically using Coomassie Brilliant Blue or silver nitrate, the total staining on all the gels is very similar. A total of 500–1000 discrete spots are typically discernable, where each spots normally represents one dominant unique protein. When a change in the number of pixels in a given spot is observed between different samples, it is then concluded that the amount of that protein has changed. Contrariwise, if no significant change in the number of pixels in a given spot is observed between different samples, it is concluded that the amount of that protein has not changed. Both of these conclusions can actually be wrong!

The problem is that the standard procedure for sampling and loading outlined above ensures that the number of pixels in a spot represents not the absolute amount of protein in the sample, but the fraction of the sample protein contributed by that protein.

To appreciate this point, let us consider two extreme cases in seed biology:

  • (1)

    The composition of the proteome changes strongly, e.g. due to biosynthesis of storage proteins. This happens during the reserve deposition stage. Let us assume that the storage proteins go from constituting 10% of the total protein in the seed to 40% between two samples, while all the rest of the proteins in the seed are present in unchanged amounts. This means that the non-storage proteins will make up 90% in the first sample, but only 60% in the second. As a result all their spots will therefore decrease in size to 60%/90% = 0.67 of their original size (a decrease by a factor 1.5). The relative amounts of the non-storage proteins have changed, in spite of the fact that there was no change in the absolute amounts of those proteins!

  • (2)

    The total amount of protein per seed changes strongly between samples, e.g. due to general growth and protein biosynthesis. This might happen during the early stages of seed development. In this case the amount of many of the proteins increase similarly, but on the gel their spot size will remain unchanged. Their relative amounts are constant, but their absolute amounts are not.

The way to avoid such misinterpretations is to quantify the total amount of protein extracted per unit sample (per seed, per leaf, etc) and to take major shifts in protein pattern into account when interpreting spot volume changes. Similar words of caution are also relevant for non-gel-based proteomic methods such as iTRAQ, where several samples are labeled separately and then mixed before MS analysis. If the same amount of protein from each sample is mixed, it corresponds precisely to comparing several 2D-gels with the same loading.

Section snippets

Proteomic studies of seed development

Seed development can be divided into three sequential, temporal phases: histodifferentiation, reserve deposition and maturation drying (Kermode and Finch-Savage, 2002, Black et al., 2006, Bewley et al., 2013). During the histodifferentiation stage, the fertilized egg cells undergoes rapid cell division and develops into different seed tissues; thereafter, little cell division occurs and cell expansion and deposition of seed reserves (normally proteins, along with lipids or carbohydrates) occurs

Desiccation tolerance

Desiccation tolerance refers to the ability of an organism to endure loss of all or almost all of its cellular water without irreversible damage (Leprince and Buitink, 2010). This phenomenon is widely observed in the plant kingdom, including ferns, mosses, pollen and seeds of higher plants and resurrection plants (Hoekstra et al., 2001, Oliver et al., 2005). In higher plant, only orthodox seeds are desiccation tolerant. This property gives the orthodox seeds the ability to survive under extreme

Seed germination versus seedling growth

Germination begins with water uptake by the seed (imbibition) and ends with the emergence of the embryonic axis, usually the radicle, through the structures surrounding it (Bewley et al., 2013). This is known as “germination sensu stricto” (simply called “germination” in the following) and does not include seedling growth. During germination and seedling growth, the fresh weight follows a tri-phasic curve (Fig. 2). In phase I there is a rapid increase in fresh weight caused by water uptake.

Seed vigor

The definition of seed vigor adopted by the Association of Seed Analysts (AOSA) states: “Seed vigor comprises those seed properties that determine the potential for rapid, uniform emergence, and development of normal seedlings under a wide range of field conditions” (Black et al., 2006). Seed vigor is therefore central to the successful propagation of agricultural crops. However, this very complex property obviously depends on a wide range of biochemical and molecular variables making it

Perspectives

In the proteomic studies discussed in the previous sections it has generally been assumed that, when an increase in the abundance of a given protein correlates with e.g. an increase in vigor or some other beneficial trait, it is an indication that the process in which the protein is involved is important for that process; and vice versa for proteins decreasing in abundance. Although that need not be the case, the proteomic studies have identified many proteins that are potentially important for

Contributions

Abstract, Introduction, Seed germination and dormancy and Perspectives were written by IMM, Seed development was written by WQW and SJL, Seed desiccation tolerance was written by WQW, Seed vigor was written by SQS, while IMM, SQS and WQW revised the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Support Program (2012BAC01B05) and by National Science Foundation of China (31171624). IMM was supported by a Chinese Academy of Sciences Visiting Professorship for senior international scientists.

References (147)

  • T. Ketelaar

    The actin cytoskeleton in root hairs: all is fine at the tip

    Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.

    (2013)
  • J. Lee et al.

    A label-free quantitative shotgun proteomics analysis of rice grain development

    Proteome Sci.

    (2011)
  • O. Leprince et al.

    Desiccation tolerance: from genomics to the field

    Plant Sci.

    (2010)
  • X.J. Li et al.

    Abscisic acid pretreatment enhances salt tolerance of rice seedlings: proteomic evidence

    BBA Proteins Proteomics

    (2010)
  • H. Liu et al.

    Proteomic analysis of the seed development in Jatropha curcas: from carbon flux to the lipid accumulation

    J. Proteomics

    (2013)
  • U. Mayer et al.

    Microtubule cytoskeleton: a track record

    Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.

    (2002)
  • J.A. Miernyk et al.

    Proteomic analysis of the testa from developing soybean seeds

    J. Proteomics

    (2013)
  • I.M. Møller et al.

    ROS signalling – specificity is required

    Trends Plant Sci.

    (2010)
  • I.M. Møller et al.

    Protein carbonylation and metal-catalyzed protein oxidation in a cellular perspective

    J. Proteomics

    (2011)
  • F.C.S. Nogueira et al.

    Proteomic profile of the nucellus of castor bean (Ricinus communis L.) seeds during development

    J. Proteomics

    (2012)
  • H. Nonogaki et al.

    Germination – still a mystery

    Plant Sci.

    (2010)
  • G.K. Agrawal et al.

    In-depth investigation of the soybean seed filling proteome and comparison with a parallel study of rapeseed

    Plant Physiol.

    (2008)
  • D.K. Allen et al.

    The role of light in soybean seed filling metabolism

    Plant J.

    (2009)
  • E. Arc et al.

    Reboot the system thanks to protein post-translational modifications and proteome diversity: how quiescent seeds restart their metabolism to prepare seedling establishment

    Proteomics

    (2011)
  • E. Arc et al.

    Cold stratification and exogenous nitrates entail similar functional proteome adjustments during Arabidopsis seed dormancy release

    J. Proteome Res.

    (2012)
  • R.C. Augustine et al.

    Actin depolymerizing factor is essential for viability in plants, and its phosphoregulation is important for tip growth

    Plant J.

    (2008)
  • X.G. Bai et al.

    Nitric oxide enhances desiccation tolerance of recalcitrant Antiaris toxicaria seeds via protein S-nitrosylation and carbonylation

    PLoS One

    (2011)
  • C. Bailly

    Active oxygen species and antioxidants in seed biology

    Seed Sci. Res.

    (2004)
  • M. Bantscheff et al.

    Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: critical review update from 2007 to the present

    Anal. Bioanal. Chem.

    (2012)
  • M. Battaglia et al.

    The enigmatic LEA proteins and other hydrophilins

    Plant Physiol.

    (2008)
  • P. Berjak et al.

    From avicennia to zizania: seed recalcitrance in perspective

    Ann. Bot.

    (2008)
  • Bewley

    Seed germination and dormancy

    Plant Cell

    (1997)
  • J.D. Bewley et al.

    Seeds – Physiology of Development, Germination and Dormancy

    (2013)
  • M. Black et al.

    The Encyclopedia of Seeds. Science, Technology and Uses

    (2006)
  • B.C. Bønsager et al.

    Spatio-temporal changes in germination and radical elongation of barley seeds tracked by proteome analysis of dissected embryo, aleurone layer, and endosperm tissues

    Proteomics

    (2007)
  • L. Borisjuk et al.

    Seed architecture shapes embryo metabolism in oilseed rape

    Plant Cell

    (2013)
  • L. Borisjuk et al.

    The oxygen status of the developing seed

    New. Phytol.

    (2009)
  • R.S. Boston et al.

    Increased expression of the maize immunoglobulin binding-protein homolog B-70 in 3 zein regulatory mutants

    Plant Cell

    (1991)
  • J. Boudet et al.

    Comparative analysis of the heat stable proteome of radicles of Medicago truncatula seeds during germination identifies late embryogenesis abundant proteins associated with desiccation tolerance

    Plant Physiol.

    (2006)
  • T. Bruggink et al.

    Induction of desiccation tolerance in germinated seeds

    Seed Sci. Res.

    (1995)
  • J. Catusse et al.

    Proteomics reveals potential biomarkers of seed vigor in sugarbeet

    Proteomics

    (2011)
  • E. Châtelain et al.

    Temporal profiling of the heat-stable proteome during late maturation of Medicago truncatula seeds identifies a restricted subset of late embryogenesis abundant proteins associated with longevity

    Plant Cell Environ.

    (2012)
  • E. Châtelain et al.

    Evidence for participation of the methionine sulfoxide reductase repair system in plant seed longevity

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2013)
  • Q. Chen et al.

    Proteomic profiling and redox status alteration of recalcitrant tea (Camellia sinensis) seed in response to desiccation

    Planta

    (2011)
  • K. Chibani et al.

    Proteomic analysis of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis

    Plant Physiol.

    (2006)
  • P. Chu et al.

    Proteomic and functional analyses of Nelumbo nucifera annexins, involved in seed thermotolerance and germination vigor

    Planta

    (2012)
  • A.C. Cuming

    LEA proteins

  • S. Dam et al.

    The proteome of seed development in the model legume Lotus japonicus

    Plant Physiol

    (2009)
  • J. Delahaie et al.

    LEA polypeptide profiling of recalcitrant and orthodox legume seeds reveals ABI3-regulated LEA protein abundance linked to desiccation tolerance

    J. Exp. Bot.

    (2013)
  • Z.Y. Deng et al.

    Use of proteomics to understand seed development in rice

    Proteomics

    (2013)
  • Cited by (118)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text