Original article
Excitability of the lower-limb area of the motor cortex in Parkinson's diseaseExcitabilité des aires motrices corticales des membres inférieurs dans la maladie de Parkinson

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2010.04.002Get rights and content

Summary

Objective

The excitability of the lower-limb area of the motor cortex was investigated in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) and in control subjects. Our results were compared to literature data assessing upper-limb cortical area. We analysed the effect of dopaminergic substitution therapy (DST).

Methods

Motor evoked potential (MEP) were assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in 24 PD patients with (ON) and without (OFF) DST, and nine age-matched controls.

Results

Resting motor threshold (RMT), active motor threshold (AMT), cortical silent period (CSP), MEP amplitude and area did not differ significantly between groups and medication states. A paired-pulse TMS study revealed normal short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) but impaired intracortical facilitation (ICF) in PD OFF, partially normalized under DST. Post-hoc analysis uncovered two opposite effects of DST on MEP amplitude, separating the population in two groups. The paired-pulse study confirmed this division, showing that both groups exhibited distinct intracortical functioning, which was differently influenced by DST.

Conclusions

The lower-limb motor cortical areas of PD patients essentially exhibited an ICF reduction whereas in upper-limb areas, literature data demonstrated impairment of both SICI and ICF. Our data revealed two groups of patients showing different excitability states and opposite responses to DST.

Significance

The defective ICF in lower-limb areas could play a key role in the pathophysiology of gait disorders in PD. The fact that two cortical excitability states are inversely influenced by DST may reflect different conditions of denervation and compensatory mechanisms progression.

Résumé

But de l’étude

Étudier l’excitabilité des aires motrices corticales des membres inférieurs dans la maladie de Parkinson (MP). Les résultats ont été comparés aux données de la littérature existant à propos des aires corticales des membres supérieurs. Nous avons également analysé l’effet du traitement dopaminergique.

Patients et méthodes

Les potentiels évoqués moteurs (PEM) par stimulation magnétique transcrânienne furent recueillis chez 24 patients parkinsoniens, sous traitement (ON) et sans traitement (OFF), ainsi que chez neuf sujets témoin.

Résultats

Le seuil d’excitabilité au repos et sous activation, la période de silence central, l’aire et l’amplitude des PEM n’étaient pas modifiés par la pathologie ou le traitement. Le double choc révéla une inhibition intracorticale (ICI) normale et une facilitation intracorticale (FIC) diminuée chez les parkinsoniens OFF, mais partiellement normalisée en ON. L’analyse post-hoc dégagea deux effets opposés du traitement sur l’amplitude des PEM, séparant les patients en deux groupes. Le double choc confirma cette dichotomie, révélant un fonctionnement des réseaux intracorticaux et des réponses au traitement totalement opposés.

Conclusions

Les aires motrices corticales des membres inférieurs des patients parkinsoniens étudiés présentent principalement une FIC diminuée alors que, selon la littérature, les aires motrices corticales des membres supérieurs présentent une altération à la fois de la FIC et de l’ICI. Nos données révèlent l’existence de deux groupes de patients présentant un fonctionnement intracortical et une dopasensibilité différents.

Pertinence

Les anomalies de FIC pourraient être impliquées dans la physiopathologie des troubles de la marche dans la MP. Les sous-groupes mis en évidence sont probablement le reflet de différents stades d’avancement de la dénervation dopaminergique et de développement de processus compensatoires.

Introduction

According to physiological modelling [1] and due to its interposition between altered basal ganglia networks and the intact corticospinal tract [13], the motor cortex is functionally involved in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD). Imaging studies have highlighted hypoactivity in the supplementary motor area (SMA) and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [35], [41], [19], and hyperactivity in the primary motor cortex (M1), lateral premotor cortex, cerebellum, parietal and occipital lobes [17], [43].

Cortical areas have also been investigated using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). Despite some discrepancies, TMS data in PD disclosed an imbalance of cortical excitability towards a state of reduced inhibition, inducing a cortico-motoneuronal hyperexcitability [10]. In this regard, observations of a reduced resting motor threshold (RMT) [9], decreased cortical silent period (CSP), enhanced amplitude of the motor evoked potential (MEP) with target muscle at rest [20], and impaired short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) [37], [33] are particularly relevant. Facilitatory intracortical processes were also found to malfunction, as PD patients exhibited both a reduced MEP amplitude during voluntary contraction [48] and an impaired intracortical facilitation (ICF) [4]. Antiparkinsonian treatments including dopaminergic substitution therapy (DST), subthalamic nucleus stimulation, and repetitive TMS tend to normalize these electrophysiological abnormalities [10], [22]. DST mainly acts on inhibitory processes, lengthening the CSP duration [37], [34] and restoring the SICI [33]. Imaging studies confirmed this by showing the reduction of primary motor cortex hyperactivity under DST [19].

Most of these studies investigated the upper-limb motor cortical area. According to a few TMS studies exploring leg muscles of normal subjects, upper- and lower-limb cortical motor areas seem to share similar intracortical mechanisms [12]. However, imaging data indicated that their cortical activation patterns are quite different [31], [26], [42]. Indeed, hands are most of the time required for volitional or visuo-guided movements whereas lower limbs are rather implied in automatic and self-generated movements. Therefore, it is likely that these two kinds of movement differently recruit the central nervous system [29], [18], [3]. PD primarily affects automatic movements [28] and, particularly, the gait pattern, with a reduction of walking speed and amplitude of leg movements, giving rise to the characteristic small and shuffling steps, sometimes with freezing [5]. Only one single-pulse TMS study explored a proximal lower-limb muscle in PD patients and found similar abnormalities as those described with hand muscles [46]. In our study, we completed the investigation with a paired-pulse study of lower-limb cortical motor areas. We chose to explore the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, owing to its key role in gait [13], [11].

Section snippets

Subjects

This study was carried out on 24 PD patients (three women, 62 ± 7 years) and nine control subjects (four women, 60 ± 4 years). All the patients were candidates for deep brain stimulation and were therefore very doparesponsive (see Table 1 for clinical details). Their clinical examination was performed in the early morning by the same expert in movement disorders after an overnight DST withdrawal (OFF condition). Their usual DST including L-Dopa and short-acting dopaminergic agonists (no long

TMS of lower limbs

RMT and AMT did not differ between groups (PD OFF, PD ON and controls). In each group, AMT was significantly smaller than RMT (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

MEP amplitudes did not differ significantly between groups at rest nor during 20% contraction of the TA. The facilitating effect of the volitional contraction on MEP amplitude and area was significant (p < 0.05), whatever the group. There were no significant between-group differences in the mean CSP duration.

With the paired-pulse paradigm (Fig. 1),

Discussion

Our study demonstrates that, in PD patients, an impairment of ICF may occur in cortical areas of distal lower-limb muscles while SICI seemed to be preserved. This is at odds with studies investigating upper-limb areas, which demonstrated a deficit of inhibitory phenomenon [10].

In keeping with the literature, paired-pulse paradigms appeared to be the most sensitive tool to highlight cortical abnormalities in PD [15], [21] but these were not used in the single previous study on lower limb in PD

Conflicts of interest

None to be declare.

References (49)

  • J.P. Lefaucheur

    Motor cortex dysfunction revealed by cortical excitability studies in Parkinson's disease: influence of antiparkinsonian treatment and cortical stimulation

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2005)
  • J.P. Lefaucheur et al.

    Improvement of motor performance and modulation of cortical excitability by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in Parkinson's disease

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2004)
  • R.N. Lemon et al.

    Direct and indirect pathways for corticospinal control of upper limb motoneurons in the primate

    Prog Brain Res

    (2004)
  • J.S. Lou et al.

    Levodopa normalizes exercise related cortico-motoneuron excitability abnormalities in Parkinson's disease

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2003)
  • F. Mauguière et al.

    Apomorphine-induced relief of the akinetic-rigid syndrome and early median nerve somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) in Parkinson's disease

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1993)
  • I. Miyai et al.

    Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study

    Neuro-image

    (2001)
  • P.M. Rossini et al.

    Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee

    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol

    (1994)
  • C. Sahyoun et al.

    Towards an understanding of gait control: brain activation during the anticipation, preparation and execution of foot movements

    Neuro-image

    (2004)
  • F. Tremblay et al.

    Corticomotor excitability of the lower limb motor representation: a comparative study in Parkinson's disease and healthy controls

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2002)
  • J. Valls-Solé et al.

    Neurophysiological correlate of clinical signs in Parkinson's disease

    Clin Neurophysiol

    (2002)
  • M. Bares et al.

    Intracortical inhibition and facilitation are impaired in patients with early Parkinson's disease: a paired TMS study

    Eur J Neurol

    (2003)
  • T.A. Boonstra et al.

    Gait disorders and balance disturbances in Parkinson's disease: clinical update and pathophysiology

    Curr Opin Neurol

    (2008)
  • B. Brouwer et al.

    Corticospinal projections to lower limb motoneurons in man

    Exp Brain Res

    (1992)
  • Brown P. Bad oscillations in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm 2006;(Suppl....
  • Cited by (21)

    • Transcranial magnetic stimulation and gait disturbances in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review

      2020, Neurophysiologie Clinique
      Citation Excerpt :

      The search strategy described above yielded 26 articles, of which 6 were TMS studies devoted to the measurement of motor cortical reactivity and plasticity in patients with PD and gait disturbances, and 20 addressed the therapeutic application of rTMS techniques to ameliorate gait function in PD patients. Vacherot et al. investigated the excitability of the lower-limb area of the motor cortex in 24 PD patients and 9 control subjects [54]. RMT, AMT, CSP and MEP amplitude did not differ significantly between groups and medication states.

    • Are studies of motor cortex plasticity relevant in human patients with Parkinson's disease?

      2016, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, there are several opposing reports in the literature suggesting that the effects may not be a clear as was once thought. Thus, Morgante et al. (2006), Barbin et al. (2013) and Vacherot et al. (2010) found no change in the duration of the CSP. Similarly, recent work suggests that changes in SICI are mostly due to a low threshold superimposed facilitation that is more prominent in PD than normal (MacKinnon et al., 2005; Ni et al., 2013).

    • A new neurometric dissection of the area-under-curve-associated jiggle of the motor evoked potential induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

      2015, Physiology and Behavior
      Citation Excerpt :

      The sample sizes from all of the selected studies were chosen by convenience, power calculation was never considered. The software used to do the statistical analysis was known in seven papers [52,53,59,62–65]. The details of the statistical categories [67,68] showed that eight groups used t-test, five did contingency tables, ten teams did a collection of analysis of variance models, and one group [66] did simple linear regression.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text