Elsevier

Journal of Voice

Volume 32, Issue 6, November 2018, Pages 729-733
Journal of Voice

Effects of Voice Therapy on Laryngeal Motor Units During Phonation in Chronic Superior Laryngeal Nerve Paresis Dysphonia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2017.08.026Get rights and content

Summary

Objectives

Injury to the superior laryngeal nerve can result in dysphonia, and in particular, loss of vocal range. It can be an especially difficult problem to address with either voice therapy or surgical intervention. Some clinicians and scientists suggest that combining vocal exercises with adjunctive neuromuscular electrical stimulation may enhance the positive effects of voice therapy for superior laryngeal nerve paresis (SLNP). However, the effects of voice therapy without neuromuscular electrical stimulation are unknown. The purpose of this retrospective study was to demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of voice therapy for rehabilitating chronic SLNP dysphonia in two subjects, using interspike interval (ISI) variability of laryngeal motor units by laryngeal electromyography (LEMG).

Methods

Both patients underwent LEMG and were diagnosed with having 70% recruitment of the cricothyroid muscle, and 70% recruitment of the cricothyroid and thyroarytenoid muscles, respectively. Both patients received voice therapy for 3 months. Grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain (GRBAS) scale, stroboscopic examination, aerodynamic assessment, acoustic analysis, and Voice Handicap Index-10 were performed before and after voice therapy. Mean ISI variability during steady phonation was also assessed.

Results

After voice therapy, both patients showed improvement in vocal assessments by acoustic, aerodynamic, GRBAS, and Voice Handicap Index-10 analysis. LEMG indicated shortened ISIs in both cases.

Conclusions

This study suggests that voice therapy for chronic SLNP dysphonia can be useful for improving SLNP and voice quality.

Introduction

Injury to the superior laryngeal nerve (SLN) can result in dysphonia, and in particular, reduced fundamental frequency range and a reduction in the highest obtainable fundamental frequency.1, 2

The SLN innervates the cricothyroid (CT) muscle, which mainly controls the longitudinal tension of the vocal folds and voice pitch.3 Superior laryngeal nerve paresis (SLNP) is difficult to diagnose because of a lack of consistent laryngeal findings, and its effects on voice likely extend beyond simple pitch elevation control.4 The prevalence of SLN injury and dysfunction is unknown as many cases go undiagnosed, and little has been written about SLNP in regard to its specific effects on voice.5 This is particularly important as alterations in singing voice by SLNP can be a serious detriment to professional singers.2

SLNP can be a difficult problem to address with either voice therapy (VT) or surgical intervention. A wide variety of treatment options have been previously reported, ranging from steroids for acute potential viral-related injury, VT, and a variety of surgical procedures.4 Although not commonly performed, several small case series by Shaw et al6 and Nasseri and Maragos2 have described surgical treatment for SLN injury using a “muscle-nerve-muscle” pedicle with a nerve cable graft.7 VT is the prescribed treatment for long-standing isolated SLN paralysis, although the actual improvements in voice appear to be quite variable. This type of therapy has been reported to target the building of CT muscle strength through activities such as glissando maneuvers.8 Alternatively, adjunctive neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) is a well-known modality in the field of orthopedics and physical medicine,9 and some clinicians and scientists have suggested that combining vocal exercises with NMES may enhance the positive effects of VT for SLNP.1 The combined approach of physical therapy and NMES has been reported to enhance treatment outcomes in sports medicine10, 11 and in stroke rehabilitation.12 However, the effects of VT without NMES are unknown.

The purpose of this retrospective study was to demonstrate the clinical effectiveness of VT for rehabilitating chronic SLNP dysphonia in two subjects, by assessing the changes in motor unit firing rate on laryngeal electromyography (LEMG).

Section snippets

LEMG

We used a Neuropack MEB 2200 with 30 mm × 0.45 mm NM-121T needle electrodes (all from Nihon Kohden Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Both CT and thyroarytenoid (TA) muscles were tested. Needle placement and position were confirmed with standard percutaneous LEMG techniques.13, 14, 15 Placement into the TA muscles was confirmed by the presence of recruitment during phonation and silence during passive and active inspiration. TA muscle activity was evaluated both during speech and during sustained

Case 1

A 66-year-old female non-singer homemaker presented with an 18-month history of dysphonia. She had no history of vocal abuse, and no memory of having a cold around the time she first noticed her dysphonia. Her main complaint was occasional voice change during speech with lowered pitch. Vocal assessments and stroboscopic examination demonstrated a contraction of pitch range and vocal fold vibratory phase asymmetry (Table 1). Her total score on the Voice Handicap Index (VHI)-10 was 15 out of 40.

Vocal assessments

Results from the aerodynamic vocal assessments pre- and post VT are summarized in Table 1. Case 1 showed an improvement in her pitch range, intensity, jitter, shimmer, and VHI-10. Case 2 showed an improvement in maximum phonation time (MPT), pitch range, intensity, jitter, shimmer, and VHI-10. Stroboscopic examinations showed more periodic and greater vocal fold vibration compared with initial assessment in both cases.

Case 1

Before VT, the patient was assessed as having 70% recruitment of the left CT;

Discussion

Results from the current case studies identified several changes in voice production, voice quality parameters, LEMG, and mean ISIs following VT for SLNP dysphonia. Although several reports have described the effects of VT without NMES for functional voice disorders, it was unknown if VT without NMES is effective for patients with dysphonia with chronic SLNP.

Electrical stimulation therapy (ES) is a well-known modality in the field of orthopedics and physical medicine.9 The combined approach of

Conclusions

The current study demonstrated the objective effectiveness of VT for rehabilitating chronic SLNP dysphonia in two subjects, using ISI variability of laryngeal motor units by LEMG. VFE-based stimulation training may result in improved paralyzed laryngeal musculature in chronic SLNP dysphonia.

References (34)

  • I. Sanders et al.

    The innervation of the human larynx

    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (1993)
  • M.I. Orestes et al.

    Superior laryngeal nerve injury: effects, clinical findings, prognosis, and management options

    Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2014)
  • H.K. El-Kashlan et al.

    Selective cricothyroid muscle reinnervation by muscle-nerve-muscle neurotization

    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg

    (2001)
  • J. Low et al.

    Electrotherapy Explained

    (2000)
  • N.A. Maffiuletti et al.

    Effect of combined electrostimulation and plyometric training on vertical jump height

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2002)
  • P. Valli et al.

    Effect of low intensity electrical stimulation on quadriceps muscle voluntary maximal strength

    J Sports Med Phys Fitness

    (2002)
  • J. Chae et al.

    Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia

    Top Stroke Rehabil

    (2008)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Exploring the Clinical Characteristics of Superior Laryngeal Nerve Injury

      2022, Journal of Voice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Injuries of the EBSLN may result in hoarseness, weak voice, fatigue of voice, narrowing of voice range, etc.,1 and injuries of the IBSLN can lead to swallowing sensory function decline, resulting in deglutition, choking, aspiration, dysphagia, and so on.2 Since the recovery and prognosis of SLN injuries are poor, early diagnosis and speech therapy are of great significance to the rehabilitation of voice.3 Due to the difficulty of identification and lack of a specific diagnosis summary, SLN injury has attracted little attention.

    • Physiological Effects of Voice Therapy for Aged Vocal Fold Atrophy Revealed by EMG Study

      2021, Journal of Voice
      Citation Excerpt :

      VFE and PhoRTE are designed to strengthen and rebalance the laryngeal musculature,22,23 and they are likely a type of resistance training, though this assumption has not been empirically validated. We have reported the effect of VFE for chronic superior laryngeal nerve paresis in 2 cases, showing that the improvement of vocal function accompanied by improved muscular activity on EMG assessment.24 The purpose of the current study was to examine the physiological effect of voice therapy on aged vocal fold atrophy using vocal assessments and laryngeal electromyography (LEMG), which can clarify any changes occurring in respiratory support and muscular activity.

    • Voice change after thyroidectomy without vocal cord paralysis: Analysis of 2,297 thyroidectomy patients

      2020, Surgery (United States)
      Citation Excerpt :

      Voice therapy is targeted at building cricothyroid muscle strength using activities such as glissando maneuvers.41 Kaneko et al42 also reported the effects of voice therapy in chronic SLN paresis dysphonia and proved the usefulness of voice therapy in SLN paresis patients using acoustic analysis; the grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, and strain scale; and laryngeal EMG. Early voice therapy is a treatment option that helps to restore the voice after complications, including a low-pitched voice, especially in those who have risk factors for a persistent low-pitched voice based on our results.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This article won the David W. Brewer Award for Best Poster at the Voice Foundation's 45th Annual Symposium, 2016.

    View full text