Comparison of proximal humeral bone stresses between stemless, short stem, and standard stem length: a finite element analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.11.011Get rights and content

Background

The stem lengths of humeral components used in shoulder arthroplasty vary; however, the literature on these devices is limited. This finite element study investigates the effect of humeral component length on stresses in the proximal humerus.

Methods

Intact and 3 reconstructed (standard length, short, and stemless implants) finite element models were created from shoulder computed tomography scan data (N = 5). Loading was simulated at varying abduction angles (15°, 45°, and 75°). The average bone stress (represented as a percentage of intact values) was reported at 8 transverse slices. In addition, the overall average change in cortical and trabecular bone stresses was quantified.

Results

Cortical bone stresses in the most proximal slice for the standard (58% ± 12%) and short (78% ± 10%) stem models were significantly reduced compared with the intact (100%) and stemless (101% ± 6%) models (P = .005). These reductions persisted in the second cortical slice for the standard stem compared with the intact, stemless, and short models (P = .025). Interestingly, stresses in the trabecular bone within these proximal slices were significantly elevated when stemless implants were used compared with all other implants (P < .001), regardless of abduction angle.

Conclusion

Reducing stem length produced humeral stresses that more closely matched the intact stress distribution in proximal cortical bone. Opposing trends presented in the proximal trabecular bone, probably because of differences in load transfer when shorter stems are used. Accordingly, the results suggest that implant stem length is 1 variable that can be modified in an attempt to better mimic intact bone stresses during humeral component insertion, provided stem fixation is adequate.

Section snippets

Methods

Preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were acquired from 5 subjects (3 women and 2 men, 70 ± 6 years) who later underwent TSA. CT images, in DICOM format, were processed using Mimics (Materialise, Leuven, Belgium) to form a 3-dimensional solid model of the proximal humerus. Separate 3-dimensional models of the cortical and trabecular bones were created using a combination of automatic threshold-based segmentation and manual identification of trabecular/cortical bone boundaries. Under the

Results

Considering the average stress in cortical bone slices, it was found that only the 2 most proximal slices (slices I and II) presented with significant differences (Fig. 4). Within slice I, the stemless implant caused significantly higher cortical bone stresses than both the short (22% ± 11% change; P = .005) and standard stem designs (43% ± 13% change; P = .005), although all were still typically less than the bone stresses produced in the intact model. In addition, significant reductions in

Discussion

Significant differences in bone stresses were identified in the proximal humerus in comparing the standard length, short stem, and stemless implants. These differences are thoughtto arise because of changes in the load transfer patterns between the implants and bone. In the intact humerus, the load is directly borne by the subchondral bone and is transferred distally through and around the trabecular bone by a hard peripheral cortical shell. However, in the reconstructed humerus, the load is

Conclusion

This work quantifies stress changes in the proximal humerus after reconstruction with stemless, short, and standard length humeral implants using identical mesh multiple-specimen finite element modeling techniques. Variations in stem length were quantified for 3 abduction angles, and the overall average change in stress in the total cortical and trabecular bone regions was determined. As hypothesized, reductions in stem length resulted in cortical stresses that better mimicked the intact

Disclaimer

George S. Athwal is a consultant for DePuy-Synthes and Tornier Inc. In addition, he has received research support from Tornier, DePuy-Synthes, and Exactech for research related to the subject of this article. No company had any input into the study design, protocol, testing, data analysis, or manuscript preparation. All the other authors, their immediate families, and any research foundation with which they are affiliated have not received any financial payments or other benefits from any

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Jakub Szmit for his dedication in data analysis.

References (40)

  • J. Nagels et al.

    Stress shielding and bone resorption in shoulder arthroplasty

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (2003)
  • J.Y. Rho et al.

    Young's modulus of trabecular and cortical bone material: ultrasonic and microtensile measurements

    J Biomech

    (1993)
  • A. Rohlmann et al.

    Effects of stem design and material properties on stresses in hip endoprostheses

    J Biomed Eng

    (1987)
  • E. Schileo et al.

    Subject-specific finite element models can accurately predict strain levels in long bones

    J Biomech

    (2007)
  • J.C. Sluimer et al.

    Comparison of two hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stems: clinical, functional, and bone densitometry evaluation of patients randomized to a regular or modified hydroxyapatite-coated stem aimed at proximal fixation

    J Arthroplasty

    (2006)
  • F. Taddei et al.

    Subject-specific finite element models of long bones: an in vitro evaluation of the overall accuracy

    J Biomech

    (2006)
  • K.E. Tanner et al.

    Is stem length important in uncemented endoprostheses?

    Med Eng Phys

    (1995)
  • M.E. Torchia et al.

    Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis: long-term results

    J Shoulder Elbow Surg

    (1997)
  • T. Ambacher

    Options and limits of stemless shoulder prostheses

    Orthopade

    (2013)
  • R.L. Austman et al.

    Bone stresses before and after insertion of two commercially available distal ulnar implants using finite element analysis

    J Orthop Res

    (2011)
  • Cited by (105)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Institutional Review Board approval was granted by Lawson Health Research Institute (Health Sciences REB No. 105912, Approval No. R-15-057).

    View full text