The contribution of subsistence to global human cranial variation
Introduction
Modern human geographic cranial diversity is well documented (Howells, 1973, Lahr, 1996), but the mechanisms underlying it remain unclear (Lieberman, 2008). Although masticatory stress is generally accepted as a major driver of regional human cranial variation (Carlson and Van Gerven, 1977, Hylander, 1977a, Paschetta et al., 2010), the influence of subsistence on global cranial morphological variation is a matter of debate (Lieberman, 2011, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2011a). Regional studies comparing agriculturalists with non-agriculturalists have found that this dietary difference affects the shape, size and positioning of the masticatory muscle attachments, mandible, zygomatic bone, neurocranium and the dental arch (Carlson and Van Gerven, 1977, Hylander, 1977a, Hylander, 1977b, Varrela, 1992, Larsen, 1995, González-José et al., 2005, Sardi et al., 2006, Pinhasi et al., 2008, Paschetta et al., 2010). On a global scale, however, such diet-related variation has only been confirmed for the mandible (von Cramon-Taubadel, 2011a). This is unexpected, as modern humans inhabit many different ecosystems where the types of food available, and consequently the strains posed on the cranium during mastication, can differ significantly. The possible influence of subsistence strategy on the pattern of global cranial variation therefore remains unclear.
Studies investigating the effects of diet on modern human cranial variation have mainly focused on differences between agriculturalists and hunter-gatherers. Nevertheless, dietary adaptations have been documented throughout the hominin fossil record. Diet is considered an important driver of cranial variation among early hominins (e.g., Teaford and Ungar, 2000), while the inclusion of meat in the diet likely marked an important step in human evolution (e.g., Stanford and Bunn, 2001). Among Pleistocene Homo, Neanderthals are often considered to have relied heavily on meat from medium and large size terrestrial mammals on the basis of both isotopic and zooarchaeological data (e.g., Hockett and Haws, 2005, Bocherens, 2009, Richards and Trinkaus, 2009; but see Henry et al., 2010), while modern humans might have had a more flexible subsistence strategy (e.g., Stiner, 2001, Hockett and Haws, 2005, Richards and Trinkaus, 2009). Food types have therefore been important throughout human evolution both in terms of the strain they posed on the cranium as well as the nutritional value they added. In order to understand possible effects of diet on the evolution of modern human cranial diversity it is thus important to study the relationship between cranial shape and detailed differences in diets, testing not only for effects of agriculture, but also for effects of animal- versus plant-based food intake.
Here we study a sample of 15 worldwide populations of Homo sapiens with different subsistence strategies. In addition to testing for correlations between diet and shape of particular cranial regions (upper dental arch, masseter and temporalis muscle, general cranium), we discuss overlap in effects of diet, climate and population history on global human cranial variation as well as the functionality of observed diet-related cranial variation.
Central to the hypothesis that subsistence strategy affects global human cranial shape is the notion that differences in subsistence patterns result in different diets and therewith in different food types consumed. Diets including tougher and harder food items are generally thought to require more masticatory effort to break them down compared with tender and soft agricultural products that have a high component of processed grains (Carlson, 1976, Carlson and Van Gerven, 1979, Kohyama et al., 2004). With a more mechanically demanding diet, cranial adaptations are expected that enhance the production and dissipation of high bite forces (Hylander, 1972). The size of the masticatory muscles and the three-dimensional arrangement of those muscles are particularly relevant in this respect (e.g., Wroe et al., 2010). Proposed adaptations for the generation of high bite forces, needed for processing more mechanically resistant food items, include a more anterior positioning of the masticatory muscles (temporalis and masseter) and posterior position of the dental arch to enhance the mechanical advantage of the chewing muscles (Hylander, 1977a, Lieberman, 2011), as well as overall enlarged masticatory muscles, traceable on the cranium by enlarged attachment sites on the zygomatic arch (masseter) and lateral side of the cranium (temporalis), and a larger cross-section of the infratemporal fossa (temporalis) (Weijs and Hillen, 1984, Weijs and Hillen, 1986, Demes and Creel, 1988). Dissipation of masticatory stress and reduction of bending moments occurs via enlarged vertical facial dimensions (Hylander, 1977a), flaring of the cheekbones and thicker alveolar processes (Lieberman, 2011).
Changes in diet are also shown to relate to changes in cranial size (Sardi et al., 2006, Perez et al., 2011), where less demanding diets correlate with smaller sized crania. In Nubian populations with a soft, agricultural diet, the size of the face decreased relative to total cranium size (Carlson and Van Gerven, 1977). Perez et al. (2011) found that in South American populations, the effect of diet on size is larger than the effect of diet on facial and neurocranial shape variation. Size differences are thus to be expected between groups with different subsistence patterns.
Importantly, not only adaptation, but also cranial plasticity might play an important role in diet-related shape variation. Studies on non-human mammals have indicated cranial shape changes induced by differences in food types during rearing (e.g., Lieberman et al., 2004, Menegaz et al., 2010, Ravosa et al., 2010). Human cranial regions under masticatory stress (zygotemporal and palatomaxilla) show higher variability than regions less affected by mastication (basicranium, upper face, vault), which might indicate higher plasticity in the masticatory regions of the cranium (von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009a). Nevertheless, the masticatory regions have been found to be equally reliable for inferring population history patterns (von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009a). Although environmental plasticity and adaptation to diet can be difficult to disentangle (O'Higgins et al., 2006), it has been shown in humans that typical diet related morphology of the mandible can already be traced in children before they start on their adult foods (Fukase and Suwa, 2008) and that population differentiation in craniofacial shape is already detectable at an early ontogenetic stage (e.g., Viðarsdóttir et al., 2002, Viðarsdóttir and Cobb, 2004, Gonzalez et al., 2010).
Beyond such considerations relating cranial shape to masticatory behaviour, there is clear evidence that population history has a significant influence on global patterning of cranial morphology (e.g., Relethford, 1994, Roseman, 2004, Roseman and Weaver, 2004, Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, Harvati and Weaver, 2006b, Hubbe et al., 2009, Smith, 2009, Smith, 2011, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2011b). Regions of the human cranium have been found to preserve the signal of population history to varying extents, also depending on how the cranium is divided into separately studied compartments (von Cramon-Taubadel, 2014). Overall cranial shape reflects population history, and specifically the regions of the basicranium and the temporal bone shape show a very clear correlation with neutral genetic data (Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, Harvati and Weaver, 2006b, Smith, 2009, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009a, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009b). The vault shows varying results, depending on the populations studied and the landmarks included, being either strongly (Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, Harvati and Weaver, 2006b, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009b) or weakly (Smith, 2009) related to neutral genetic distances. The mandible, maxilla, zygomatic bone and occipital bone are generally considered to perform less well as indicators of past population history (Smith, 2009, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009b, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2014), which might be related to the fact that these parts of the cranium are involved in shaping overall facial morphology and/or relate to muscle attachment sites (masseter, temporalis and nuchal muscles) (von Cramon-Taubadel, 2014). The overall face and especially the region around the nasal opening shows stronger influences from climate (Roseman and Weaver, 2004, Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, Harvati and Weaver, 2006b, Hubbe et al., 2009, Noback et al., 2011). Although neutral evolution thus plays an important role in human variation (Relethford, 1994), part of craniofacial variation remains unexplained (Roseman and Weaver, 2004, Smith, 2009, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009b, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2014). Furthermore, observed population differences in cranial shape and size are too large to be caused by genetic drift alone (Perez and Monteiro, 2009, Perez et al., 2011).
In addition to population history, climate also plays an important role in cranial diversity. A relationship has been found between climatic factors and morphology of the face in general (Roseman, 2004, Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, Hubbe et al., 2009), the mid-face (Evteev et al., 2014), nasal aperture and cavity (e.g., Wolpoff, 1968, Noback et al., 2011), sinus volume (Shea, 1977; but see Rae et al., 2003, Butaric et al., 2010) and cranial size (Beals et al., 1984, Harvati and Weaver, 2006a), suggesting adaptive selection. This selection signal is strongly influenced by populations from extremely cold regions (Roseman, 2004, Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, Harvati and Weaver, 2006b, Hubbe et al., 2009). The latter observation is important, as Arctic populations are also linked with extreme dietary adaptations (Hylander, 1972). Global studies specifically focussed on effects of climate versus population history on cranial variation have generally not included factors of subsistence differences (e.g., Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, von Cramon-Taubadel, 2009b, Betti et al., 2010).
In order to detect diet-related cranial variation it is essential to correct for the effects of population history/genetic drift to prevent overestimating the effects of natural selection (Betti et al., 2010). As there is a very strong correlation between genetic and geographic distances (Manica et al., 2005, Ramachandran et al., 2005, Romero et al., 2008), geographic distance (when measured along land migration routes) can be used as a proxy for population history (Lawson Handley et al., 2007, Hubbe et al., 2009, Betti et al., 2010).
Corrections for effects of climate are also needed in the detection of diet-related cranial shape (e.g., von Cramon-Taubadel, 2011a). Diet, however, is expected to be highly dependent on climate. With increased latitudes, plant eating declines in hunter-gatherer populations (Cordain et al., 2000). The total amount of fishing, on the contrary, increases with higher latitudes (Cordain et al., 2000). This increase in animal foods towards the higher latitudes is especially problematic as climatic adaptations of the cranium are also expected for colder regions (e.g., Davies, 1932, Beals et al., 1984, Roseman, 2004, Harvati and Weaver, 2006a, Hubbe et al., 2009). Hylander (1977a) tackled the climate versus diet debate by making clear predictions about expected diet-related changes. This approach, combined with careful interpretation of the effects of climate and population history in correlation analyses, is necessary to study global diet-related shape variation.
We focus on three hypotheses: (1) there is a global effect of diet on cranial shape and size, (2) the observed diet-related cranial variation will be consistent with regional studies on masticatory adaptations, and (3) climate and population history influence the relationship between diet and cranial shape.
Regarding the first hypothesis, we predict (1a) significant correlations between measures of diet and datasets representing global variation in cranial shape and size. However, we also expect that the different regions of the cranium will be differentially affected by diet. The strains that are generated during chewing or paramasticatory behaviour are highest at the tooth row, the alveolar process, the attachment sites of the masticatory muscles and the palate, and decrease away with increased distance from the tooth row (Lieberman, 2011). Studies on non-human primates showed increased effects of high masticatory strains in the lower face, especially the occlusal plane. The middle and upper face were less affected (Hylander et al., 1991, Hylander et al., 1992). Finite element analyses on the human cranium showed highest strain directly above the point of load application (the alveolar/dental arcade) (Gross et al., 2001, Witzel and Preuschoft, 2002). We therefore predict that (1b) the strongest correlation between diet and shape will be found in the dental arch, (1c) the second strongest diet–shape correlation will be found in the temporalis and masseter muscle attachment sites (as well as the zygomatic bone), and (1d) that the lowest diet–shape correlation will be found in the general cranial shape. Regarding diet–size correlations, we expect (1e) to see strongest correlations between diet and size of the masticatory muscle attachments, as one important way of increasing masticatory power is by increasing muscle size (e.g., Hylander, 2006), as well as (1f) correlations between diet and size of the upper dental arch, as one way of resisting high masticatory loads is an increase in alveolar size (e.g., Lieberman, 2011).
Regarding the second hypothesis, the shape changes related to subsistence, we expect to see (2a) cranial morphology that enhances the generation and dissipation of high bite forces in populations with subsistence patterns (hunting, fishing, gathering) that include masticatorily demanding food items. We expect that diet-related shape variation on a global scale will follow trends observed in regional studies: (2b) the masseter muscle will show a more anterior positioning and a relatively larger attachment site; (2c) the temporalis muscle will show a more anterior positioning and will be thicker and larger, resulting in a larger cross-section of the infratemporal fossa and a higher and/or longer attachment site, (2d) the upper dental arch will show a relatively more posterior positioning as well as a more robust alveolar process. We furthermore predict (2e) that the relative positioning of the muscles and dentition is important in the context of dietary adaptation.
Last, considering the closely linked geographic patterns of population history, climate and subsistence patterns, we predict (3a) that correcting for climate and geographic distance will severely lower the correlation between cranial shape and diet. We also expect (3b) to see overlap between the explanatory variables in the percentage of cranial variation they explain.
In this study, we will first investigate possible correlations of cranial shape with diet using Mantel tests. We then correct for the effects of climate and population history by partial Mantel tests. We visualize the global diet-related functional shape changes of the human cranium using partial least squares analysis and surface warping. We discuss the possible overlap of dietary shape effects and those of population history and climate. Finally, we discuss implications of our results for understanding pre-Holocene human evolution.
Section snippets
Population samples
Crania were selected from osteological collections at museums and universities in Europe and the USA (Table 1), and were subsequently scanned with (micro) Computed Tomography (CT) scanners. All crania were selected by MN, except for the samples from Mongolians, Ipiutak and pre-Khoi San, which were selected as CT scans from a larger sample of CT scans obtained from Dr. Bruno Frohlich (National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC) and Dr. Frederick E. Grine (Stony Brook University, New
Error test
Results are presented in Table 3. The deviations and percentage of errors were similar to those published by Singleton (2002). The individual landmark with the highest error in one repeat (2.19 mm) was inion, a type 3 landmark, resulting in an error of just over 5% (5.045%). We decided to keep this landmark within the analysis as it was a single measurement mistake that caused this maximum error of only slightly over 5% and because inion is important for capturing overall cranial length and
Hypothesis 1. Global effects of diet on cranial shape and size
The first prediction (1a) regarding a global effect of diet on cranial shape and size variation is supported. Significant correlations were found between subsistence strategy and cranial shape and size, suggesting a global effect of diet on cranial morphology. The shape correlations were moderate (absolute values of 0.21–0.50), but comparable to the effect of subsistence found by von Cramon-Taubadel (2011a).
After correction for climate and population history, the signal became more localized,
Conclusions
Our study found significant correlations between diet and cranial shape in our worldwide sample of modern human populations. Of the specific data subsets, the temporalis muscle and general cranial shape showed the strongest and most consistent correlations with diet. Furthermore, our results suggest that the percentage of plant- versus animal-based foods has a greater effect on global cranial shape variation than the difference between agricultural and non-agricultural subsistence, suggesting
Acknowledgements
We thank all curators and museum staff for their kind help and for giving access to collections and databases: Niels Lynnerup, Marit Zimmermann (Laboratory of Biological Anthropology, University of Copenhagen); Maria Teschler-Nicola, Ronald Mühl (Naturhistorisches Museum Wien, Vienna); George Crothers, Nancy O'Malley (William S. Webb collection, Lexington), Ian Tattersall, Gisselle Garcia-Pack (American Museum of Natural History, New York); Philippe Mennecier, Alain Froment, Aurelie Fort,
References (132)
Ontogenetic integration of the hominoid face
J. Hum. Evol.
(2005)- et al.
Modern human origins: continuity, replacement, and masticatory robusticity in Australasia
J. Hum. Evol.
(2011) Stone Age man's dentition: With reference to anatomically correct occlusion, the etiology of malocclusion, and a technique for its treatment
Am. J. Orthod.
(1954)- et al.
Human dispersal across diverse environments of Asia during the Upper Pleistocene
Quat. Int.
(2013) - et al.
Cranial integration in Homo: singular warps analysis of the midsagittal plane in ontogeny and evolution
J. Hum. Evol.
(2003) - et al.
Plant-animal subsistence ratios and macronutrient energy estimations in worldwide hunter-gatherer diets
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.
(2000) - et al.
Bite force, diet, and cranial morphology of fossil hominids
J. Hum. Evol.
(1988) - et al.
Evolution of middle-late Pleistocene human cranio-facial form: A 3-D approach
J. Hum. Evol.
(2010) - et al.
Nutritional ecology and the human demography of Neandertal extinction
Quat. Int.
(2005) - et al.
Biometric design of complete dentures related to residual ridge resorption
J. Prosthet. Dent.
(1996)
Effects of sample hardness on human chewing force: a model study using silicone rubber
Arch. Oral Biol.
Effects of food processing on masticatory strain and craniofacial growth in a retrognathic face
J. Hum. Evol.
Shaping the human face
Int. Congr. Ser.
Cranial adaptation to a high attrition diet in Japanese macaques
Int. J. Primatol.
Post-Pleistocene facial reduction, biomechanics and selection against morphologically complex teeth: a rejoinder to Macchiarelli and Bondioli
Hum. Evol.
Relationship of cranial robusticity to cranial form, geography and climate in Homo sapiens
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Ultrasound image of human masseter muscle related to bite force, electromyography, facial morphology, and occlusal factors
Eur. J. Oral Sci.
Hierarchical nature of morphological integration and modularity in the human posterior face
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Brain size, cranial morphology, climate, and time machines
Curr. Anthropol.
The relative role of drift and selection in shaping the human skull
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol
Neanderthal dietary habits: review of the isotopic evidence
Least squares and latent variables
Multivar. Behav. Res.
Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data. Geometry and Biology
Measuring “dose” and “response” with multivariate data using partial least squares techniques
Commun. Stat. Theory
Osteometrie
A preliminary 3D computed tomography study of the human maxillary sinus and nasal cavity
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Dental reduction in post-Pleistocene Nubia
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Temporal variation in prehistoric Nubian crania
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Masticatory function and post-Pleistocene evolution in Nubia
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Diffusion, biological determinism, and biocultural adaptation in the Nubian corridor
Am. Anthropol.
Changes in contour of the maxillary alveolar process under immediate dentures. A longitudinal clinical and x-ray cephalo-metric study covering 5 years
Acta Odontol. Scand.
A re-survey of the morphology of the nose in relation to climate
J. R. Anthropol. Inst. G.
Extreme climate, rather than population history, explains mid-facial morphology of northern asians
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Cranial allometry, phylogeography, and systematics of large-bodied papionins (Primates: Cercopithecinae) inferred from geometric morphometric analysis of landmark data
Anat. Rec. A
Genome sequence of a 45,000-year-old modern human from western Siberia
Nature
Growth-related changes in prehistoric Jomon and modern Japanese mandibles with emphasis on cortical bone distribution
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Rapid, global demographic expansions after the origins of agriculture
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
On robust partial least squares (PLS) methods
J. Chemometr.
Ontogeny of robusticity of craniofacial traits in modern humans: A study of South American populations
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Functional-cranial approach to the influence of economic strategy on skull morphology
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
A corrected ethnographic atlas
World Cultures
Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the facial skeleton on simulated occlusal loading
J. Oral Rehabil.
Relationships between the size and spatial morphology of human masseter and medial pterygoid muscles, the craniofacial skeleton, and jaw biomechanics
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Human cranial anatomy and the differential preservation of population history and climate signatures
Anat. Rec. A
Reliability of cranial morphology in reconstructing Neanderthal phylogeny
mtDNA variation in Inuit populations of Greenland and Canada: Migration history and population structure
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Microfossils in calculus demonstrate consumption of plants and cooked foods in Neanderthal diets (Shanidar III, Iraq; Spy I and II, Belgium)
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
A prehistory of the north: human settlement of the higher latitudes
Functional and morphological correlates of mandibular symphyseal form in a living human sample
Am. J. Phys. Anthropol.
Cranial Variation in Man: A Study by Multivariate Analysis of Patterns of Difference Among Recent Human Populations
Cited by (51)
Biosocial complexity and the skull
2023, Behaviour in our Bones: How Human Behaviour Influences Skeletal MorphologyDifferences in masticatory loads impact facial bone surface remodeling in an archaeological sample of South American individuals
2021, Journal of Archaeological Science: ReportsCitation Excerpt :Finally, due the extensive work required by the techniques used, a small sample size was employed. However, our results are in agreement with a number of studies whose results strongly suggest that large masticatory forces can significantly model the shape of the human skull (Carlson and van Gerven, 1977; von Cramon-Taubadel, 2011; Noback and Harvati, 2015; Paschetta et al., 2016; Sella-Tunis et al., 2018; Eyquem et al., 2019; Toro-Ibacache et al., 2019). As a conclusion, our results show a relationship between mechanical bone response to masticatory loading and bone remodeling activity, which can ultimately shape cranial morphology.
Demonstrating the empirical effect of population specificity of anthropological standards in a contemporary Australian population
2024, International Journal of Legal MedicineFactors influencing cranial variation between prehistoric Japanese forager populations
2024, Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences