Dissipation of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole in a soil amended with anaerobically digested cattle manure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120769Get rights and content

Highlights

  • SMX dissipation in a digestate-amended soil was evaluated in microcosm experiments.

  • SMX at a high concentration in soil halved in a few days.

  • SMX presence affected the natural microbial community structure and activity.

  • The antibiotic promoted the intI1 gene spread among the soil bacteria populations.

  • Anaerobically digested cattle manure can act as a source of antibiotics, ARB and ARGs.

Abstract

The application of anaerobically digested cattle manure on agricultural land for both improving its quality and recycling a farm waste is an increasingly frequent practice in line with the circular economy. However, knowledge on the potential risk of spreading antibiotic resistance through this specific practice is quite scarce. The antibiotic sulfamethoxazole (SMX) is one of the most heavily prescribed in veterinary medicine. In this study, SMX dissipation and the possible effects on natural microorganisms were investigated in a soil amended with an anaerobically digested cattle manure produced from a biogas plant inside a livestock farm. Microcosm experiments were performed using amended soil treated with SMX (20 mg/kg soil). During the experimental time (61 days), soil samples were analysed for SMX and N4-acetylsulfamethoxazole, microbial abundance, activity and structure. Furthermore, the prevalence of the intI1 gene was also determined. The overall results showed that, although there was an initial negative effect on microbial abundance, SMX halved in about 7 days in the digestate-amended soil. The intI1 gene found in both the digestate and amended soil suggested that the use of anaerobically digested cattle manure as fertilizer can be a source of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARBs) and genes (ARGs) in agroecosystems.

Introduction

The extensive use and disposal of antibiotics raise concerns about their occurrence in different environmental matrices [1,2]. In particular, the use of veterinary antibiotics in livestock farming worldwide is expected to increase during the coming years by more than 60% [3]. These compounds are excreted unaltered or as metabolites by the organisms treated and can reach soil and water ecosystems.

Anaerobic digestion of farm waste, including livestock manure, is currently a promising technique for producing biogas, leading to a liquid and solid digestate used in agriculture [4,5] as a good alternative to inorganic fertilizers [6]. As well as energy production, an advantage of anaerobic digestion is the absence (or the significant reduction) of pathogens in the digestate [7] and a complete recycling of the waste. This environmental friendly practice, used in organic farming, does not exclude the likelihood of introducing antibiotics to soil [8]. Consequently, it is very important to assess the potential risk of spreading antibiotic resistance through the application of anaerobically digested cattle manure on agricultural land. Once in the environment, antibiotics can affect natural microbial populations and ecosystem functions [9]. Moreover, depending on their physico-chemical characteristics, antibiotics can be adsorbed to soil [10], transported to surface or groundwaters by leaching and runoff [11,12], up-taken by plants [13,14] or degraded [15,16]. The selection and diffusion of resistant microbial strains and mobile genetic elements can also occur [2,17]. For all these reasons, antibiotics are environmentally considered emerging pseudo-persistent organic pollutants (pseudo-POPs), due to their continual introduction into the environment [18].

Sulfamethoxazole (SMX) is one of the most highly prescribed and consumed antibiotics in human and veterinary medicines and among the most widespread sulfonamides in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. It has also been placed on the top ten list of high priority pharmaceuticals identified in an European assessment of pharmaceuticals and personal care products [19]. Once administered, SMX is not completely metabolized; approximately 43% is transformed to N4-acetyl-sulfamethoxazole (Ac-SMX) and only 15% to other transformation products [20,21]. Consequently, both SMX and its acetylate metabolite (Ac-SMX) can be expected to be found as environmental contaminants. SMX is a polar molecule with a low soil adsorption coefficient [22] and some studies report it as a biodegradable compound with higher degradation rates in soil than in water [23,24]. SMX degradation depends on soil texture, organic carbon content, depth, temperature, presence/absence of light (as it is a photosensitive molecule) and the presence of microbial populations resistant to its effect and able to degrade it [25]. In recent literature, half-lives of SMX have been reported from 4 to 13 days in soil [[26], [27], [28]]. However, some studies suggest that sulfonamides can be more persistent in the environment than in laboratory controlled studies [29]. Some laboratory experiments have found that the application of exogenous organic matter (EOM), such as manure in soil, can stimulate antibiotic biodegradation [27,30], while others have pointed out the inhibition of antibiotic mineralization [31].

The bacterial target of sulfonamides is the enzyme dihydropteroate synthase (DHPS), which is involved in the bacterial folic acid pathway [32]. Sulfonamide resistance is associated with a spontaneous mutation in the dhps (folP) gene or the acquisition of plasmid-borne sul genes (sul1, sul2, sul3) [32,33]. The spread of sul1 genes by horizontal gene transfer occurs rapidly due to their linkage to class 1 integrons (intI1), which are often embedded in DNA mobile elements, such as plasmids and transposons. Class 1 integrons (intI1) have been identified as a primary source of antimicrobial resistance genes and serve as a potential pool of resistance genes in a variety of bacterial species [34]. The intI1 gene has been proposed as a molecular marker for antibiotic resistance in the environment [35].

In this study, SMX dissipation in a soil (containing the natural microbial community) amended with an anaerobically digested cattle manure (digestate) and treated with the SMX antibiotic at a concentration of 20 mg/kg was evaluated. At the same time, the possible antibiotic effects on the microbial community in terms of microbial abundance, community structure (Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria and Fungi) and dehydrogenase activity were investigated. Finally, the prevalence of a molecular marker, the intI1 gene, was determined.

Section snippets

Chemical and reagents

Methanol, ammonium acetate, hydrochloric acid (37%) ethyl acetate, ammonia and acetonitrile were obtained from VWR (Radnor, PA, USA). Water was purified (18 MΩ/cm quality) with a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). A PHM 240 Model pH-meter (Radiometer, Copenhagen, Denmark) with a combination glass electrode was used for the pH adjustment of the mobile phase.

Sulfamethoxazole (SMX, purity 99%) and N4-acetylsulfamethoxazole (Ac-SMX) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany)

Soil and anaerobically digested cattle manure characterization

The results of the preliminary characterization of the anaerobically digested cattle manure (digestate), unamended soil and digestate-amended soil (D-soil) are reported in Table 1. No residual SMX concentration (<LOD) was found in the digestate, while a significant amount of the metabolite, N4-acetylsulfamethoxazole (Ac-SMX), was detected (6 mg/kg). Moreover, a high intI1 prevalence and microbial abundance were found in the digestate and D-soil. On the contrary, in the unamended soil neither

Discussion

The SMX concentration used in this work, although higher than those expected in a real EOM amended soil, was an effective one for assessing any detrimental effects due to adding antibiotics on the microbial community [30,50,51].

The preliminary analyses showed that the digestate introduced both intI1, a genetic element involved in antibiotic resistance, and the antibiotic metabolite Ac-SMX into the soil, (see Table 1, D-soil condition). The degradation of the antibiotic SMX in cattle manure

Conclusions

In this study, the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole, added at a high concentration (20 mg/kg) in a soil amended with anaerobically digested cattle manure, displayed only an initial detrimental effect on microbial abundance. At the same time, it promoted a prompt increase in the prevalence of intI1. Sulfamethoxazole concentration rapidly decreased in the digestate-amended soil and this was associated with an increase in microbial abundance, suggesting that resistant microbial populations may have a

References (61)

  • A. Spielmeyer

    Occurrence and fate of antibiotics in manure during manure treatments: a short review

    Sustain. Chem. Pharm.

    (2018)
  • J. Chen et al.

    Overview of sulfonamide biodegradation and the relevant pathways and microorganisms

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2018)
  • R. Gothwal et al.

    Antibiotic pollution in the environment: a review

    Clean (Weinh)

    (2015)
  • P. Grenni et al.

    Ecological effects of antibiotics on natural ecosystems: a review

    Microchem. J.

    (2018)
  • J.B. Holm-Nielsen et al.

    The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2009)
  • H. Jin et al.

    Distribution of sulfonamides in liquid and solid anaerobic digestates: effects of hydraulic retention time and swine manure to rice straw ratio

    Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng.

    (2017)
  • A. Barra Caracciolo et al.

    Changes in microbial community structure and functioning of a semiarid soil due to the use of anaerobic digestate derived composts and rosemary plants

    Geoderma

    (2015)
  • O. Franco-Hernández et al.

    Dynamics of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in soil amended with irradiated, pasteurized and limed biosolids

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2003)
  • A. Goulas et al.

    Development of a soft extraction method for sulfamethoxazole and transformation products from agricultural soils: effects of organic matter co-extraction on the environmental availability assessment

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • D.W. Cleary et al.

    Long-term antibiotic exposure in soil is associated with changes in microbial community structure and prevalence of class 1 integrons

    FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.

    (2016)
  • M. Rabølle et al.

    Sorption and mobility of metronidazole, olaquindox, oxytetracycline and tylosin in soil

    Chemosphere

    (2000)
  • P.A. Blackwell et al.

    Effects of agricultural conditions on the leaching behaviour of veterinary antibiotics in soils

    Chemosphere

    (2009)
  • A.B.A. Boxall et al.

    The sorption and transport of a sulphonamide antibiotic in soil systems

    Toxicol. Lett.

    (2002)
  • H. Dolliver et al.

    Sulfamethazine uptake by plants from manure-amended soil

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2007)
  • K. Kumar et al.

    Antibiotic uptake by plants from soil fertilized with animal manure

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2005)
  • R. Kreuzig et al.

    Investigations on the fate of sulfadiazine in manured soil: laboratory experiments and test plot studies

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • E. Topp et al.

    Accelerated biodegradation of veterinary antibiotics in agricultural soil following long-term exposure, and isolation of a sulfamethazine-degrading sp

    J. Environ. Qual.

    (2013)
  • Veiko Voolaid et al.

    Bacterial diversity and antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment plant influents and effluents

    Antimicrob. Resist. Wastewater Treat. Process

    (2017)
  • J. Ma et al.

    Antibiotic contamination: a global environment issue

    J. Bioremed. Biodegrad.

    (2014)
  • P. De Voogt et al.

    Development of a common priority list of pharmaceuticals relevant for the water cycle

    Water Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • M. Radke et al.

    Fate of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole and its two major human metabolites in a water sediment test

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2009)
  • S. Höltge et al.

    Laboratory testing of sulfamethoxazole and its metabolite acetyl-sulfamethoxazole in soil

    Clean (Weinh)

    (2007)
  • E. Müller et al.

    Aerobic biodegradation of the sulfonamide antibiotic sulfamethoxazole by activated sludge applied as co-substrate and sole carbon and nitrogen source

    Chemosphere

    (2013)
  • H.T. Lai et al.

    Implication of light sources and microbial activities on degradation of sulfonamides in water and sediment from a marine shrimp pond

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • B. Xu et al.

    Sulfamethoxazole biodegradation and biotransformation in the water-sediment system of a natural river

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2011)
  • L. Patrolecco et al.

    Persistence of the antibiotic sulfamethoxazole in river water alone or in the co-presence of ciprofloxacin

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2018)
  • P. Srinivasan et al.

    Dissipation of sulfamethoxazole in pasture soils as affected by soil and environmental factors

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2014)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Degradation kinetics and mechanism of sulfadiazine and sulfamethoxazole in an agricultural soil system with manure application

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2017)
  • H.M. Bialk et al.

    Cross-coupling of sulfonamide antimicrobial agents with model humic constituents

    Environ. Sci. Technol.

    (2005)
  • C. Accinelli et al.

    Environmental fate of two sulfonamide antimicrobial agents in soil

    J. Agric. Food Chem.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Some organic compounds in potable water: the PFASs, EDCs and PPCPs issue

      2023, Current Trends and Future Developments on (Bio-) Membranes: Membrane Technologies in Environmental Protection and Public Health: Challenges and Opportunities
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text