Elsevier

Journal of Controlled Release

Volume 309, 10 September 2019, Pages 244-264
Journal of Controlled Release

Review article
Drug delivery systems based on intrinsically conducting polymers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2019.07.035Get rights and content

Abstract

This work provides an overview of the up to date research related to intrinsically conducting polymers (ICPs) and their function as novel drug delivery systems (DDSs). Drugs administrated to patients do not always reach the targeted organ, which may affect other tissues leading to undesired side-effects. To overcome these problems, DDSs are under development. Nowadays, it is possible to target the administration and, most importantly, to achieve a controlled drug dosage upon external stimuli. Particularly, the attention of this work focuses on the drug release upon electrical stimuli employing ICPs. These are well-known organic polymers with outstanding electrical properties similar to metals but also retaining some advantageous characteristics normally related to polymers, like mechanical stability and easiness of processing. Depending on the redox state, ICPs can incorporate or release anionic or cationic molecules on-demand. Besides, the releasing rate can be finely tuned by the type of electrical stimulation applied. Another interesting feature is that ICPs are capable to sense redox molecules such as dopamine, serotonin or ascorbic acid among others. Therefore, future prospects go towards the design of materials where the releasing rate could be self-adjusted in response to changes in the surrounding environment. This recompilation of ideas and projects provides a critic outline of ICPs synthesis progress related to their use as DDSs. Definitely, ICPs are a very promising branch of DDSs where the dose can be finely tuned by the exertion of an external stimulus, hence optimizing the repercussions of the drug and diminishing its side effects.

Introduction

The understanding of human and animal diseases increases year by year, which results in a greater capacity to design and synthetize new drugs for curing them. However, the efficacy of such drugs becomes less relevant if they are not delivered efficiently with the appropriate dosage for the disease stage, if they not directed to the correct target, and/or if they are left to interact with unwanted targets for a long time, leading to serious side effects.

Rapid developments are also under way in the biomaterials field, which have a great impact on patient care [1]. Although the release and efficacy of a broad variety of drugs, antibodies, enzymes and vaccines have been improved for decades [2,3], the need of drug delivery systems (DDSs) with controlled, localized and efficient drug dosage remains. The principal problems of conventional drug administration methods are the poor solubility and rapid degradation of the drugs, the possible normal tissue damage, the unfavourable pharmacokinetics, the low biodistribution, and the lack of selectivity. DDSs can be used to improve the drugs solubility by incorporating amphiphilic components (e.g. lipids or specially designed polymers). Furthermore, DDSs provide a carrier for the drug, making difficult the accidental extravasation and increasing the protection from early stage degradation. Besides, they can slow down the renal clearance, reduce side effects and increase drug concentrations in the diseased tissue by the enhanced permeability and retention effect or by ligand-mediated targeting.

The first steps aimed at the production of DDSs were done in 1950, when drugs were incorporated into solid polymers to obtain sustained drug release for agricultural purposes. In next decades, those approaches were extended to biomedicine [4] and, since then, this field have not stopped burgeoning. The first patent for controlled drug release, which consisted on the utilization of coatings onto edible tablets, was deposited by Wurster [5]. In 1968 Zaffaroni founded ALZA, the first company dedicated to the commercialization of DDSs, which started releasing low molecular weight drugs, like pilocarpine, using ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer and poly(hydroxyethyl-methacrylate). Later on, many other polymers were used to retain both low and high molecular weight molecules, which were released in a slow fashion manner when exposed to aqueous conditions [6].

In the 1960s, Bangham and Horne studied lipids as units for bilayered structures [7], promoting the research of liposomes as potential drug carriers [8]. Nowadays, some systems based on lipids are commercially used for cancer therapy, as for example DaunoXome (liposomal Daunorubicin), Doxil (liposomal Doxorubicin) and Ara-C liposomal (liposomal Citarabine). Later on, DDSs extended towards many other inorganic materials (e.g. iron oxide [9,10], gold [11,12], and silicon [13,14]) and organic materials [15]. Among the latter, polymers outstand from the rest since they can be modelled and processed into a wide range of forms, such as membranes, fibers, foams, micelles, dendrimers, nanoparticles (NPs) and hydrogels. This adjustable feature, combined with their ease of handling, results in materials that can be accommodated for the treatment of a huge number of medical conditions. Some of these materials are used clinically for a wide range of therapies. For example, Lupron Depot, which consists of poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid (PLGA) microspheres that encapsulate the hormone leuprolide, is used to treat advanced prostate cancer.

Biodegradable polymers, as for example poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and PLGA, are suitable materials for sustained long term release in vivo. However, there is no control when the drug wants to be delivered as a response to a change or on demand. New-born systems are those called stimuli responsive or smart biomaterials. When there is an environment change some materials are designed to exert a response (e.g. pressure, pH, enzymes, level of glucose or temperature) or, alternatively, the responses can be remotely trigged by an external stimuli (e.g. near infrared light, ultrasounds, magnetic fields or electric currents). The former materials respond to localized changes on the ambient of pathological abnormalities and promote the drug release, while the latter ones are stimulated on demand for pulsatile drug delivery. Overall, it has been claimed that the global advanced market for DDSs is expected to grow from roughly $178.8 billion in 2015 to nearly $227.3 billion by 2020 [16].

Section snippets

Intrinsically conducting polymers

Among all the DDSs triggerable by external stimuli, herein we focus on recent advances in intrinsically conducting polymers (ICPs), also known as semiconducting polymers or conductive polymers. In general, ICPs are organic materials with characteristics similar to those encountered in metals (i.e. good electrical, and optical properties) and with the outstanding properties of conventional polymers (i.e. flexibility in processing, lightness of weight, and easiness in synthesis). Within the

Drug loading

It is well-known that DDSs based on ICPs take profit of their capability of reversibly oxidize and reduce to promote the uptake and expulsion of charged molecules form the polymer backbone. Obviously, the methodology employed for the loading process depends on the chemical and physical characteristics of the drug (e.g. molecular weight, charge, chemical composition…). A wide range of medicinal compounds have been explored, including anti-inflammatory [[36], [37], [38]], anti-cancer [[39], [40],

Drug release

Electrostatic forces play a prominent role in the release of drugs from ICP matrices. Moreover, the expansion and contraction movements of ICPs, which are due to their electro-chemo-mechanical response, contribute to the mechanical expulsion of the drug. Since these mechanisms occur simultaneously, it is not possible to separate them to ascertain the predominant release driving force. Drugs loaded as primary or secondary dopants on the ICP matrix can be delivered by cyclic voltammetry (i.e. the

Architecture of ICPs for DDSs

ICPs can be prepared by chemical (using an oxidant agent) or electrochemical (applying an oxidizing potential through electrodes) synthesis. Recurrently, electrochemical methodologies are far more employed since offer a better control over the charge deposition and rate, which are crucial parameters to regulate the final electrochemical and electrical properties of the material.

For their operation, simple ICP films do not provide the most efficient drug loading capacity, while micro- and

Conclusions and outlook

The exponential growth of articles focused in ICPs for biomedical devices appear promising for their implantation in biomedicine, from electrode coatings for deep brain stimulation to scaffolds for tissue regeneration. In spite of being biocompatible when it comes to bioabsorbability there are big limitations because of their inherent inability to degrade naturally. However, more in-depth studies need to be done, such as, in vivo experiments to evaluate degradation kinetics and their

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge MINECO/FEDER (RTI2018-098951-B-I00) and the Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca (2017SGR359). Support for the research of C.A. was received through the prize “ICREA Academia” for excellence in research funded by the Generalitat de Catalunya.

References (143)

  • P. Humpolicek et al.

    Biocompatibility of polyaniline

    Synth. Met.

    (2012)
  • R.A. Green et al.

    Conducting polymers for neural interfaces: challenges in developing an effective long-term implant

    Biomaterials

    (2008)
  • R. Wadhwa et al.

    Electrochemically controlled release of dexamethasone from conducting polymer polypyrrole coated electrode

    J. Control. Release

    (2006)
  • E. Shamaeli et al.

    Kinetic studies of electrochemically controlled release of salicylate from nanostructure conducting molecularly imprinted polymer

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2013)
  • N. Alizadeh et al.

    Electrochemically controlled release of anticancer drug methotrexate using nanostructured polypyrrole modified with cetylpyridinium: release kinetics investigation

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2014)
  • K. Krukiewicz et al.

    Advancing the delivery of anticancer drugs: conjugated polymer/triterpenoid composite

    Acta Biomater.

    (2015)
  • D. Esrafilzadeh et al.

    Multifunctional conducting fibres with electrically controlled release of ciprofloxacin

    J. Control. Release

    (2013)
  • R.A. Green et al.

    Impact of co-incorporating laminin peptide dopants and neurotrophic growth factors on conducting polymer properties

    Acta Biomater.

    (2010)
  • D.V. Bax et al.

    Cell patterning via linker-free protein functionalization of an organic conducting polymer (polypyrrole) electrode

    Acta Biomater.

    (2012)
  • B.C. Thompson et al.

    Optimising the incorporation and release of a neurotrophic factor using conducting polypyrrole

    J. Control. Release

    (2006)
  • K. Krukiewicz et al.

    EQCM verification of the concept of drug immobilization and release from conducting polymer matrix

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2016)
  • K. Krukiewicz et al.

    Two approaches to the model drug immobilization into conjugated polymer matrix

    Mater. Sci. Eng. C

    (2015)
  • M. Hepel et al.

    Application of the electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance for electrochemically controlled binding and release of chlorpromazine from conductive polymer matrix

    Microchem. J.

    (1997)
  • Q.X. Zhou et al.

    Electrochemically controlled binding and release of protonated dimethyldopamine and other cations from poly(N-methyl-pyrrole)/polyanion composite redox polymers

    J. Electroanal. Chem.

    (1989)
  • G. Bidan et al.

    Incorporation of sulphonated cyclodextrins into polypyrrole: an approach for the electro-controlled delivering of neutral drugs

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (1995)
  • S. Jiang et al.

    Enhanced drug loading capacity of polypyrrole nanowire network for controlled drug release

    Synth. Met.

    (2013)
  • V. Syritski et al.

    Ion transport investigations of polypyrroles doped with different anions by EQCM and CER techniques

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2003)
  • R.T. Richardson et al.

    The effect of polypyrrole with incorporated neurotrophin-3 on the promotion of neurite outgrowth from auditory neurons

    Biomaterials

    (2007)
  • C. Boehler et al.

    Actively controlled release of dexamethasone from neural microelectrodes in a chronic in vivo study

    Biomaterials

    (2017)
  • S. Murdan

    Electro-responsive drug delivery from hydrogels

    J. Control. Release

    (2003)
  • D. Uppalapati et al.

    Conducting polymers with defined micro- or nanostructures for drug delivery

    Biomaterials

    (2016)
  • L. Xia et al.

    Conducting polymer nanostructures and their application in biosensors

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (2010)
  • C.R. Martin et al.

    Template synthesis of electronically conductive polymers - a new route for achieving higher electronic conductivities

    Synth. Met.

    (1993)
  • V. Bajpai et al.

    Controlled syntheses of conducting polymer micro- and nano-structures for potential applications

    Synth. Met.

    (2006)
  • P. Dallas et al.

    Interfacial polymerization of conductive polymers: generation of polymeric nanostructures in a 2-D space

    Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • D. Ge et al.

    A polypyrrole-based microchip for controlled drug release

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2009)
  • K. Krukiewicz et al.

    Betulin-loaded PEDOT films for regional chemotherapy

    Mater. Sci. Eng. C

    (2017)
  • S. Carquigny et al.

    Investigation of pharmaceutically active ionic liquids as electrolyte for the electrosynthesis of polypyrrole and active component in controlled drug delivery

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2016)
  • D. Svirskis et al.

    Evaluation of physical properties and performance over time of an actuating polypyrrole based drug delivery system

    Sensors Actuators B Chem.

    (2010)
  • S. Löffler et al.

    Electrochemically triggered release of acetylcholine from scCO2 impregnated conductive polymer films evokes intracellular Ca2+ signaling in neurotypic SH-SY5Y cells

    J. Control. Release

    (2016)
  • Boom time for biomaterials, Editorial

    Nat. Mater.

    (2009)
  • T.M. Allen et al.

    Drug delivery systems: entering the mainstream

    Science

    (2004)
  • D. E. Wurster, Method of applying coatings to edible tablets or the like. US Pat. 2648609...
  • R. Langer et al.

    Polymers for the sustained release of proteins and other macromolecules

    Nature

    (1976)
  • A.D. Bangham et al.

    Negative staining of phospholipids and their structural modification by surface-active agents as observed in the electron microscope

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (1964)
  • V.P. Torchilin

    Recent advances with liposomes as pharmaceutical carriers

    Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2005)
  • Q. Quan et al.

    HSA coated iron oxide nanoparticles as drug delivery vehicles for cancer therapy

    Mol. Pharm.

    (2011)
  • M.U. Farooq et al.

    Gold nanoparticles-enabled efficient dual delivery of anticancer therapeutics to HeLa cells

    Sci. Rep.

    (2018)
  • E.C. Dreaden et al.

    Size matters: gold nanoparticles in targeted cancer drug delivery

    Ther. Deliv.

    (2012)
  • B. Xia et al.

    A novel strategy to fabricate doxorubicin/bovine serum albumin/porous silicon nanocomposites with pH-triggered drug delivery for cancer therapy

    J. Mater. Chem. B

    (2014)
  • Cited by (90)

    • Nanomaterial-based ophthalmic drug delivery

      2023, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews
    • Aqueous alginate/MXene inks for 3D printable biomedical devices

      2023, Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text