Achieving a sustainable shipbuilding supply chain under I4.0 perspective

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118789Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This article defines shipbuilding supply chain according to the performance model established in Industry 4.0.

  • Supply chain paradigms and the I4.0 technologies define a conceptual model of the shipbuilding supply chain.

  • The results obtained imply the implementation of technologies improving economic, energy profitability performance.

  • Second phase, satisfying functional and social requirements, achieve total visibility and connectivity required in 4.0.

Abstract

Industry 4.0 (I4.0) considers a number of changes in enterprises, including business models, to achieve the Smart Factory concept. This implies a complete communication network between different companies, factories, suppliers, resources, etc …, maximize in real time to achieve the highest efficiency of all parties involved. The goal is to improve the performance and sustainability of shipbuilding industry through the supply chain establishing a model that defines how the supply chain should be under the perspective of Industry 4.0. Thus, this article aims to connect each of the key enabling I4.0 technologies with the most significant supply chain paradigms: Lean, Agile, Resilience and Green to define what the Shipbuilding Supply Chain should be. This study shows the Green Supply Chain Paradigm connects the social aspects required at the performance I4.0 model. Likewise, Lean represents the most important paradigm, encompassing the Resilience one, besides considering Agile as an intrinsic property of the shipbuilding. At this form, identifying the key factors in the conceptual model, it is possible to conclude that the Shipbuilding Supply Chain should be Green and Lean.

Introduction

Until the first industrial revolution, production was purely artisanal and the performance model was only on increasing production based in order to generate more economic profit. After this industrial revolution, with the introduction of the steam engine, the performance model changes contemplating energy efficiency. This model of efficiency is again modified with the arrival of the second industrial revolution where mass production and electrical energy were the protagonists, leading the introduction of the environment in addition to economic and energy efficiency (Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie, 2019).

The use of electronics and computing gave rise to consider that a new industry revolution, the third, was established which also introduced a new parameter to the business performance model, functionality. From approximately 2015 it is considered that we can speak of the fourth industrial revolution or Industry 4.0 (I4.0), creating new advanced production models, new technologies that allow the digitalization of processes, products, services and business models (Spanisch Asociation of Normalization, nd, Strategy&PwC, 2016). This fourth industrial revolution introduces the social aspect into the performance (European Factories of The Future Research Association, 2013, Pimenta and Rodrigues, 2020). In summary, Industry 4.0 gives rise to a new definition of the performance model of manufacturing processes that contemplates the following aspects: economic, energy, environmental, functional and social.

However, today it is very common to use distributed manufacturing systems consisting of (Rauch et al., 2017). manufacturing components in different physical locations to then task through the management of the supply chain, bringing them together for the final assembly of a complex product. This could be the case of Shipbuilding where different blocks of the ship are built that will be assembled in dock. However, shipbuilding has the peculiarity that the different physical locations in which each of the parts are made, belong to the same manufacturing center and still can be considered distributed manufacturing. It is, therefore, a complex manufacture, in order to progress, must be followed the line marked by I4.0.

In this way, the supply chain is a key factor improving the efficiency of the shipyard from the five aspects contemplated in the I4.0 performance model. Thus, the digitization -objective of the I4.0- of the Supply Chain, will allow provide it with the agility and efficiency that shipbuilding needs to be more profitable.

Therefore, the aim of this article is to establish a model that defines what the shipbuilding supply chain should look like under the 4.0 perspective, that is, that contemplates all aspects of the i4.0 performance model as well as the technologies that allow it to be achieved (Ket’s).

In order to achieve this objective, it will bn by analysing supply chain definition, studying the main supply chain paradigms and briefly describe the enabling I4.0 technologies. Once contextualized, an analysis will be made of how the enabling technologies affect supply chain, with the result; it will be able to define the conceptual model that relates them and, finally, apply it to the case study of naval construction.

Section snippets

Theoretical background

The concept of smart factory introduced by what is now known as the fourth industrial revolution, Industry 4.0, not only encompasses manufacturing sources, i.e., machines, sensors and robots connected, sharing information, predicting and maintaining by themselves, but also covers products or services, customers and business models (German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy and Standardization Administration of the P.R.C., 2018).

Industry 4.0 implies a complete communication network

Relationships between enabling technologies in I40 and supply chain

Depending on whether it is an organization that wants to enter the market with a digitalized business model or if it is an organization that has to adapt to digitalization, the sector to which the organization belongs and its size, this will have implications for the supply chain 4.0.

According to Raman et al. (2018), Big Data is a key factor in promoting operational excellence, facilitating cost-saving measures and consequently helping to increase customer satisfaction, adding value to the

Shipbuilding Conceptual Model with enabling technologies in I4.0 and supply chain paradigms

Nowadays there are many reference models to evaluate the performance of a company that allow to know better the activities that are carried out in it and thus improve them. In our case, our purpose is not only to improve the performance of a company but also to adapt it to the industry 4.0.

The fourth industrial revolution accumulates the performance models of the previous revolutions, as we will see below. Starting from the initial business model in which only the economic aspect prevailed,

Applying conceptual model to Block Assembly

Once defined the conceptual model, it is ready to apply to a case study. Is necessary to specify exactly to which part of the shipbuilding we are going to apply our model due to the number of possible areas. We can distinguish three major areas within the manufacture within the shipyard: Block Assembly, Painting and Hull Erection. Our model aims to adapt to the assembly of both flat and curved blocks that will then be driven to the dock for final assembly.

Fig. 5 shows that the Lean and Green

Conclusions

This article define the shipbuilding supply chain according to the performance model established in Industry 4.0. The Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green paradigms are established as the most relevant through the study of the supply chain. Twelve enabling technologies have been established as the key to positioning the shipbuilding supply chain due to how they booster the LARG paradigms. Relationships have been established between the selected enabling technologies in the context of the

References (96)

  • M. Christopher

    The agile supply chain competing in volatile markets

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2000)
  • R. De Koster et al.

    Design and control of warehouse order picking: a literature review

    Eur. J. Oper. Res.

    (2007)
  • D. Horváth et al.

    Technological Forecasting & Social Change Driving forces and barriers of Industry 4 . 0 : do multinational and small and medium-sized companies have equal opportunities ?

    Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang.

    (2019)
  • C.C. Huang et al.

    Sharing knowledge in a supply chain using the semantic web

    Expert Syst. Appl.

    (2010)
  • I. Lee et al.

    The Internet of Things (IoT): applications, investments, and challenges for enterprises

    Bus. Horiz.

    (2015)
  • P.J. Martínez-Jurado et al.

    Lean management, supply chain management and sustainability: a literature review

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2014)
  • S. Mellor et al.

    Additive manufacturing: a framework for implementation

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2014)
  • P. Mensah et al.

    Developing a resilient supply chain

    Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci.

    (2014)
  • J. Mula et al.

    The effectiveness of a fuzzy mathematical programming approach for supply chain production planning with fuzzy demand

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2010)
  • S.H.R. Pasandideh et al.

    A genetic algorithm for vendor managed inventory control system of multi-product multi-constraint economic order quantity model

    Expert Syst. Appl.

    (2011)
  • G. Roldán-Molina et al.

    A comparison of cybersecurity risk analysis tools

    Procedia Comput. Sci.

    (2017)
  • S. Terzi et al.

    Simulation in the supply chain context: a survey

    Comput. Ind.

    (2004)
  • S. Thomassey

    Sales forecasts in clothing industry: the key success factor of the supply chain management

    Int. J. Prod. Econ.

    (2010)
  • G. Xie et al.

    Energy efficiency decision and selection of main engines in a sustainable shipbuilding supply chain

    Transp. Res. Part D

    (2017)
  • K. Xing et al.

    Development of a cloud-based platform for footprint assessment in green supply chain management

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2016)
  • Strategy&PwC

    Strategy&:Industry 4.0: how digitization makes the supply chain more efficient, agile, and customer-focused

    Strategy

    (2016)
  • A. Adamik

    Preparedness of companies for digital transformation and creating a competitive advantage in the age of Industry 4 . 0

  • Airbus Defense

    Airbus and Spanish Air Force to develop drone and augmented reality inspections for military aircraft

  • G. Anand et al.

    A conceptual framework for lean supply chain and its implementation

    Int. J. Value Chain Manag.

    (2008)
  • M.E. Arjestan et al.

    The relationship of lean production and sustainable supply chain by using group TOPSIS method

    J. Eng. Appl. Sci.

    (2017)
  • ATKearny

    Digital Supply Chains: Increasingly Critical for Competitive Edge

    (2015)
  • R.H. Ballou

    The evolution and future of logistics and supply chain management

    Eur. Bus. Rev.

    (2007)
  • M. Baramichai et al.

    Agile supply chain transformation matrix: an integrated tool for creating an agile enterprise

    Supply Chain Manag.

    (2007)
  • H. Bhoir et al.

    Cloud Computing for Green Supply Chain Management

    (2016)
  • J. Boyens

    Integrating cybersecurity into supply chain risk management

    Natl. CIbersecurity Cent. Excell.

    (2016)
  • Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie

    Plattform industrie 4.0. Was ist ind. 4.0?

  • H. Carvalho et al.

    Lean, agile, resilient and green: divergencies and synergies

    Int. J. Lean Six Sigma

    (2011)
  • S. Chopra et al.

    Administración de la cadena de suministro, Estrata, planeación y operación

  • M. Christopher

    Logestics and supply cain mangement

  • M. Christopher et al.

    Building the resilient supply chain

  • A. Criado García-Legaz et al.

    Una visión del astillero 4.0 de navantia

    Rev. Gen. Mar.

    (2018)
  • L. Daling et al.

    Advances in Usability and User Experience

    (2018)
  • G. Dalmarco et al.

    Innovation and Supply Chain Management

    (2018)
  • D.G.L. Dg et al.

    Supply Chain Improvement in LARG ( Lean , Agile

    (2017)
  • L.M. Ellram et al.

    Supply chain management: it’s all about the journey, not the destination

    J. Supply Chain Manag.

    (2014)
  • European Factories of The Future Research Association
  • J. Fitzgerald

    Using Autonomous Robots to Drive Supply Chain Innovation

    (2018)
  • Á. García et al.

    Introducción a la Simulación de Sistemas Discretos

    (2006)
  • Cited by (102)

    • An inspection network with dynamic feature extractor and task alignment head for steel surface defect

      2024, Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text