Short communicationCyclic cryopreservation affects the nanoscale material properties of trabecular bone
Introduction
Bone tissue is frequently used in research studies. Many laboratories store bone specimens via freezing, often at the −18 °C to −20 °C range typical of industrial freezers (Langton and Njeh, 2004, Repositories, 2005). These specimens frequently undergo more than one freeze. The effect of freezing on bone material properties has been previously investigated (Borchers et al., 1995, Jung et al., 2011, Linde and Sørensen, 1993, Moreno and Forriol, 2002, Reikerås et al., 2010, Shaw et al., 2012) and has shown that changes in properties after a single freeze are not statistically significant in whole bone or cancellous bone cores. Whether additional freezing and thawing alters the tissue is unclear: a significant decrease in material properties subsequent to freeze-thaw cycling has been reported (Boutros et al., 2000, McElderry et al., 2011), while others have indicated insignificant changes (Borchers et al., 1995, Jung et al., 2011, Linde and Sørensen, 1993). Previous studies on freeze-thawing bone have been quasi-static and at the macro-scale; thus, significant changes in small-scale properties may adversely affect results of small-scale tests (e.g. Pathak et al., 2011, Polly et al., 2012).
Nanoindentation has been used to evaluate, material-scale characteristics of bone such as inter-trabecular variation (Giambini et al., 2012, Oyen, 2010), differences between cortical and cancellous structures (Bayraktar et al., 2004), and osteonal and lamellar differences (Faingold et al., 2012, Rho et al., 1997, Zysset et al., 1999). The micro-scale viscoelastic characteristics of bone have been measured via dynamic nanoindentation (Polly et al., 2012, Rodriguez-Florez et al., 2013, Shepherd et al., 2011), in which a contact stiffness measurement method (Asif et al., 1999) is employed to calculate the material elasticity, damping, and viscoelasticity.
Given the dependence on intrinsic variables of bone material properties (Lewis and Nyman, 2008), the fundamental differences between structural and material properties of cancellous bone (Rho et al., 1998), and the impact of freeze-thawing on soft tissue, the associated damage mechanics may change at the material scale. Thus, the purpose of this work is to quantify and compare the material-scale viscoelastic properties of cancellous bone following 0 (fresh bone) to 10 freeze-thaw cycles, under the hypothesis that no significant change will be discernible between any two cycles.
Section snippets
Specimen preparation
Five fresh male cervine (Odocoileus virginianus, white-tailed deer) spines (T2-L6 vertebrae, aged ~1.5 years as estimated by the meat processor) were obtained locally (Nolt’s Custom Meat Cutting, Lowville, NY, and Twiss’ Custom Meat Cutting, Potsdam, NY). All were immediately dissected into single vertebra sections. Three vertebrae were randomly selected from one spine (“donor A”) and promptly prepared for nanoindentation. Vertebrae from another spine (“donor B”) were then randomly assigned to
Material properties
The roughness over the entire set of specimens was 103.7±14.6 nm. The mean storage moduli are shown in Fig. 4(A). Although most cycles are significantly different, there is no meaningful trend in elasticity with cycle. Fig. 4(B) shows this in a plot of modulus against cycle at a single representative frequency of 105 Hz. Fig. 5, Fig. 6 gives similar results for damping and viscoelasticity.
Statistical analysis
At α=0.05, the storage modulus changed significantly subsequent to most cycles. The univariate ANOVA and
Discussion
The results show that freezing and thawing has a statistically significant effect on the elastic, damping, and viscoelastic properties of cancellous bone at the small-scale. There was little trend in storage modulus with added cycles. For loss modulus and loss tangent a slight increasing trend was found, potentially linked to cumulative damage that may increase damping and viscoelasticity. The results are similar those previously reported for dehydrated bone, i.e. storage modulus ~15 GPa, loss
Conflicts of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Joshua Gale and Nimitt Patel for their assistance with nanoindentation. This work was partially supported by the Clarkson University Honors Program and a SEED Grant from The Coulter School of Engineering at Clarkson University.
References (33)
- et al.
Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue
J. Biomech.
(2004) - et al.
Effects of selected thermal variables on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone
Biomaterials
(1995) - et al.
Microindentation can discriminate between damaged and intact human bone tissue
Bone
(2012) - et al.
Nanoindentation of osteonal bone lamellae
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
(2012) - et al.
Precision of nanoindentation protocols for measurement of viscoelasticity in cortical and trabecular bone
J. Biomech.
(2010) - et al.
The effect of different storage methods on the mechanical properties of trabecular bone
J. Biomech.
(1993) - et al.
Effects of preservation on the mechanical strength and chemical composition of cortical bone: an experimental study in sheep femora
Biomaterials
(2002) - et al.
A practical guide for analysis of nanoindentation data
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
(2009) - et al.
Measuring the dynamic mechanical response of hydrated mouse bone by nanoindentation
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
(2011) - et al.
Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone
Med. Eng. Phys.
(1998)
Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation
Biomaterials
Insight into differences in nanoindentation properties of bone
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
Direct comparison of nanoindentation and macroscopic measurements of bone viscoelasticity
J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater.
Effects of postmortem storage by freezing on ligament tensile behavior
J. Biomech.
Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur
J. Biomech.
Nanoindentation and contact stiffness measurement using force modulation with a capacitive load–displacement transducer
Rev. Sci. Instrum.
Cited by (2)
The effect of trabecular bone storage method on its elastic properties
2018, Acta of Bioengineering and Biomechanics