International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
Volume 70, Issue 5, 1 April 2008, Pages 1303-1304
ACR Appropriateness CriteriaACR Appropriateness Criteria
Section snippets
Acknowledgments
I must take this opportunity to recognize the efforts of my predecessors, Drs. Peter Mauch, Steve Leibel, and Lester Peters, who previously led the Appropriateness Criteria expert panels on radiation oncology and to Michael A. Bettmann, M.D., current chair of the ACR Appropriateness Criteria Committee. Finally, thanks are due to Christine Waldrip and David O'Brien, of the American College of Radiology staff, for their unflagging energy and devotion to maintaining the highest quality
References (4)
ACR appropriateness criteria. Expert Panel on Radiation Oncology. American College of Radiology
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1999)- et al.
ACR Appropriateness Criteria on treatment of anal cancer
J Am Coll Radiol
(2007)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
Cited by (3)
Interpretation of American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria
2021, Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging TechnologyMultidetector computed tomography for the assessment of adnexal mass: Is unenhanced CT scan necessary?
2014, Korean Journal of RadiologyManagement of newly diagnosed glioblastoma: Guidelines development, value and application
2009, Journal of Neuro-Oncology
Dr. Johnstone is a Georgia Cancer Coalition Distinguished Cancer Scholar, supported in part by the Georgia Cancer Coalition.
Conflict of interest: none.
Copyright © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.