Impaired emotional contagion following severe traumatic brain injury
Introduction
Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI), while heterogeneous in its effects, produces pervasive and chronic social difficulties for the majority of individuals (Cicerone and Tanenbaum, 1997, Hanks et al., 1999). TBI has a propensity to cause damage to the ventral frontal and temporal cortices, due to abrasion of the ventral surfaces of the brain across the rough surfaces of the middle and anterior fossae of the skull during rapid acceleration–deceleration (Bigler and Bigler, 2007), and results in specific neuropsychological deficits in functions and processes linked to these regions (Fujiwaraa et al., 2008). Poor social and emotional functioning is commonly manifested in displays of socially inappropriate behaviour, including emotional lability, insensitivity, and impulsivity (Pettersen, 1991, Tate, 1999).
Increasing evidence in the literature has supported the notion that following TBI there is a reduction in emotional empathy, i.e. a reduction in affective reactions to the emotional displays of others. For example, a large proportion (> 60%) of TBI individuals (compared to 35% or less of healthy control participants) self-report emotional empathy deficits (de Sousa et al., 2012, Williams and Wood, 2009, Wood and Williams, 2008). Despite this, the neuropsychological mechanisms underpinning these deficits remain unclear.
According to previous researchers, ‘emotion contagion’, whereby individuals converge emotionally, or ‘catch’ one another's emotions, is a key component of emotional empathy (e.g. Hatfield et al., 1994). Moreover, physiological changes are consistently found to occur in response to another's emotions — adults typically demonstrate facial mimicry (Dimberg and Lundquist, 1990, Dimberg and Petterson, 2000, Dimberg and Thunberg, 1998), changes in skin conductance (Merckelbach et al., 1989, Vrana and Gross, 2004) and altered subjective experience (Hess and Blairy, 2001, Wild et al., 2001) when viewing facial expressions.
It is also well-established that physiological responses to emotional stimuli are affected by TBI. Affected responses include impaired facial mimicry (McDonald et al., 2011a), skin conductance (Blair and Cipolotti, 2000, de Sousa et al., 2011, Hopkins et al., 2002, McDonald et al., 2011b), startle potentiation (Saunders et al., 2006), and self-reported levels of arousal (de Sousa et al., 2010, Saunders et al., 2006), especially to aversive stimuli (i.e. angry facial expressions and unpleasant pictures). Interestingly, extant preliminary evidence suggests that the loss of emotional responsiveness after TBI may be linked to impairments in emotional empathy. Specifically, low self-reported emotional empathy has been found to be significantly associated with a loss of mimicry and reduced autonomic arousal to angry facial expressions following TBI (de Sousa et al., 2011). This extends previous research that has linked facial mimicry to emotional empathy in healthy adults (Sonnby-Borgström et al., 2003), and suggests an important role for emotional responsivity in the empathy process.
To date, the literature investigating loss of emotional responsiveness following TBI has predominately focused on physiological reactions to static emotional displays. However, in everyday life, emotions are often evoked by extended exposure to dynamic visual and auditory information (for review, see Gross and Levenson, 1995). Film is considered one of the most effective means of eliciting emotions in others (Gerrards-Hesse et al., 1994, Westermann et al., 1996) with higher ecological validity than many other methods (Gross and Levenson, 1995, McHugo et al., 1982, Phillippot, 1993). Film clips can induce specific emotional responses in the observer that are similar to faces and other emotionally salient material. Viewing pleasant films is usually associated with zygomaticus (ZM) electromyographic (EMG) (‘smile’) activity (Hubert and de Jong-Meyer, 1991), whereas viewing unpleasant films elicits corrugator (CR) EMG (‘frown’) activity (Hubert and de Jong-Meyer, 1991, Gomez et al., 2005). Viewing emotionally salient films of either valence produces larger skin conductance compared to neutral films (Codispoti et al., 2008, Gomez et al., 2005, Hubert and de Jong-Meyer, 1991).
de Sousa et al. (2012) recently examined the relationship between self-reported emotional empathy and contagion deficits in adults with TBI, and impaired psychophysiological and subjective reactions to emotionally evocative films lasting 90 s. Paralleling previous findings using static stimuli (de Sousa et al., 2010), de Sousa et al. (2012) reported that TBI participants scored significantly lower than the control group on self-report measures of emotional empathy and also demonstrated reduced contagion (i.e. “catching” the emotion of the film). Unlike the control group, the TBI participants did not show greater frowning (CR activity) to unpleasant films compared to other valence films, and they also demonstrated limited smiling (ZM activity) to pleasant films. Participants with TBI also displayed diminished skin conductance levels (SCLs), a measure of arousal, to emotional films compared to the control group. This lowered contagion and arousal in TBI was reflected in subjective film ratings, with the TBI group rating the pleasant films as significantly less pleasant, and unpleasant films as less unpleasant and less arousing than did the control group.
The use of films also provided the opportunity to observe engagement over time. In de Sousa et al. (2012) the control groups' contagion (facial expressions) generally increased over time; in contrast, arousal increased only to pleasant film clips, while a decrement was observed to the negative films. The TBI group did not show this pattern. As emotion regulation is known to be impaired after TBI, this raises the interesting question as to whether TBI affects normal processes of sensitisation and habituation of contagion to affective material. A potential confound, however, is that TBI is associated with significant loss of cognitive ability and commonly affects processing speed. Consequently, failure to respond normally over time may reflect a failure to efficiently process film content. One way to address this is to show the same films repeatedly, providing increased familiarity with film content as well as the opportunity to observe habituation over an extended paradigm. That was the first aim of the current study.
The second aim of the current study was to determine whether emotional contagion to film was related to empathy. In de Sousa et al. (2012) control participants with higher emotional empathy tended to display greater ZM EMG activity and to give more extreme subjective valence ratings; however, this relationship was not present in the TBI sample. By providing repeated exposure to the same films, we will increase the likelihood that the TBI group is fully aware of the content of the films and is, therefore, demonstrating genuine affective contagion that can then be examined in relation to empathy scores.
In addition to EMG and SCL the current study examined tonic heart-rate (HR) changes. HR deceleration is observed during tasks that involve sensory processing and attention to external events, whereas HR acceleration is observed in tasks requiring mental effort and cognitive processing (Lacey, 1967, Lacey and Lacey, 1978, Porges, 1976). McDonald et al., 2011a, McDonald et al., 2011b compared HR responses during passive and active viewing of repeated happy and angry facial expression stimuli. Both controls and TBI participants showed greater HR deceleration for the active versus passive condition. Control participants also showed a valence effect, such that there was increasing HR deceleration to repetitions of happy faces, and reducing HR deceleration to angry repetitions. Despite showing normal attention, HR responses did not change in response to either repetition or valence in TBI participants, in line with their overall impairment in arousal regulation.
In summary, the present study aimed to extend the findings of de Sousa et al. (2012) by investigating physiological responses to multiple viewings of the same emotional film segments, to determine if emotional contagion response patterns in TBI participants normalise with repetitive exposure. Measures of facial mimicry (EMG), arousal (SCL), and sensory processing (HR) to five repetitions of positive, neutral and negative valence film clips were examined. Self-reported affective empathy was also examined in relation to psychophysiological measures.
Section snippets
Participants
Data collection for this study occurred concurrently with data reported elsewhere (de Sousa et al., 2012), which focused on physiological and behavioural responses to the first viewing of each film clip. The current study examined physiological patterns across five separate viewings of each film. Due to equipment failure, two TBI participants included in the original paper have been excluded from this analysis.
Nineteen individuals with TBI (13 males) participated in the study. They were
Sample characteristics
Clinical information for the 19 adults with TBI, obtained from hospital records and self-report, is summarized in Table 1.
The participants with TBI were aged between 21 and 65 years (M = 41.5, SD = 13.8 years) and had experienced time post-injury ranging from 2 to 40 years (M = 13.21, SD = 10.3). The participants with TBI had an average of 14.4 (SD = 3.1) years of education and an average estimated premorbid IQ of 105.1 (SD = 14.3). Post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) measured prospectively as recorded in medical
Discussion
The present study aimed to determine if physiological measures of affect and arousal normalise after repeated presentations of affective movie clips in participants with severe TBI in comparison to matched control participants. In addition, we examined the relationship between self-reported affective empathy and emotional contagion deficits with physiological response patterns. In order to paint a clear picture of the results, we will first examine the performance of the control participants.
Conflicts of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
Acknowledgements
JAR is supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Postdoctoral Fellowship (Clinical Training; APP1013796). The authors wish to thank all who participated in the study, including the people with traumatic brain injuries, their families and community controls who gave willingly their time.
References (59)
- et al.
Eysenck's P as a modulator of affective and electrodermal responses to violent and comic film
Personality and Individual Differences
(2002) - et al.
Disturbance of social cognition after traumatic orbitofrontal brain injury
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
(1997) - et al.
Watching emotional movies: affective reactions and gender differences
International Journal of Psychophysiology
(2008) - et al.
Why don't you feel how I feel? Insight into the absence of empathy after severe traumatic brain injury
Neuropsychologia
(2010) - et al.
Understanding deficits in empathy after traumatic brain injury: the role of affective responsivity
Cortex
(2011) - et al.
Gender differences in facial reaction to facial expressions
Biological Psychology
(1990) - et al.
Respiratory responses associated with affective processing of film stimuli
Biological Psychology
(2005) - et al.
Emotional and behavioural adjustment after traumatic brain injury
Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
(1999) - et al.
Facial mimicry and emotional contagion to dynamic emotional facial expressions and their influence on decoding accuracy
International Journal of Psychophysiology
(2001) - et al.
Autonomic, neuroendocrine, and subjective responses to emotion-inducing film stimuli
International Journal of Psychophysiology
(1991)