Drug release characteristics from chitosan–alginate matrix tablets based on the theory of self-assembled film
Graphical abstract
Introduction
Hydrogels are three-dimensional, hydrophilic, polymeric networks capable of imbibing large amounts of water or biological fluids (Peppas et al., 2000). In recent years, a number of studies have greatly contributed to the understanding of polysaccharide hydrogel networks, with numerous systems of this unique class of materials being proposed. Polysaccharide hydrogels that swell in an aqueous medium have been widely used to formulate extended-release tablets (Coviello et al., 2007). The release of drugs from swellable systems usually depends on one or more of the following processes: wetting of the polymer matrix by the solvent, swelling of the polymer, diffusion of drug through the hydrated polymer, dissolution of drug in the solvent and erosion of polymer (Gupta et al., 2001).
Among the polysaccharide hydrogels reported so far, anionic alginate has been employed to control the release of drugs. Sodium alginate (SA) is a naturally occurring anionic polymer typically obtained from brown seaweed, and is known to be a whole family of linear copolymers containing blocks of (1,4)-linked β-D-mannuronate (M) and α-L-guluronate (G) residues. Alginate has been extensively investigated and used for many biomedical applications due to its biocompatibility, low toxicity, relatively low cost, and mild gelation by addition of divalent cations such as Ca2+. The conventional role of alginate in pharmaceutics includes serving as thickening, gel forming and stabilizing agents. In addition, alginate also plays a significant role in controlled release drug products, especially in oral dosage forms (Lee and Mooney, 2012). However, based on its swelling and erosion characteristics, alginate can only control the release of drug for 8–10 h (Liew et al., 2006, Sriamornsak et al., 2007). Meanwhile, in a matrix tablet, pH-sensitivity of alginate could affect the characteristics of the diffusion barrier, which regulates drug release from such delivery systems. At pH below the pKa of M (3.38) and G (3.65) monomers, soluble sodium alginate is converted to insoluble alginic acid, which induces crack formation or lamination of alginate matrix tablet, leading to burst release of drug in gastric environment. This compromises the integrity of drug diffusion barrier and results in loss of controlled drug release. These problems potentially limit the use of alginate as a single matrix in tablets for oral drug delivery (Ching et al., 2008). Therefore, matrix mixture based on alginate and other polymers are being investigated. Alginate has already been widely exploited in many drug delivery applications in combination with chitosan (George and Abraham, 2006).
Chitosan (CS) is a cationic polymer and has already been the subject of interest for its use as polymeric drug carriers in dosage form design due to its appealing properties such as biocompatibility, biodegradability, low toxicity and relatively low production cost from abundant natural sources (Mao et al., 2010, Rinaudo, 2006). Polyelectrolyte complexation between chitosan and alginate was previously reported and the corresponding polyelectrolyte complex was synthesized by reacting the two polymers in solutions (George and Abraham, 2006). Although polyelectrolyte complex as the matrix of controlled release has some obvious advantages, such as increasing the controlled-release ability, reducing the pH dependence, preparation of polyelectrolyte complex was a lengthy process (Park et al., 2008). The polyelectrolyte complex was freeze-dried for over a 24 h period before utilized as a matrix for controlled drug release (Li et al., 2009). As an alternative for this lengthy process, here we propose in situ chitosan–alginate polyelectrolyte complexation in simulated gastrointestinal fluid as a tool for controlling drug release. Our previous study demonstrated that in situ chitosan–alginate polyelectrolyte complexation happened in gastrointestinal environment when physical mixtures of chitosan–alginate were employed as tablet matrix (Zhang et al., 2010).
However, although in situ polyelectrolyte complex of CS–SA as the matrix of tablets has already been mentioned in our early report, knowledge on the applicability of this approach to different types of drugs is absent. Moreover, the effects of polymer level, drug loading in the formulation on the resulting drug release patterns are still unknown, which are critical in the release of drugs (Maderuelo et al., 2011). In addition, since polyelectrolyte complex was formed upon processing CS–SA matrix tablets in the simulated gastrointestinal fluid, factors affecting polyelectrolyte complex formation should be considered (Sun et al., 2008). Meanwhile, most previous reports about CS–SA as the tablets matrix still treated this system with conventional mechanisms (water uptake, swelling and erosion) (Tapia et al., 2005). Thus, further analysis of drug release mechanisms from CS–SA based systems is required.
Therefore, the main objectives of this study are (i) to better understand the importance of in situ polyelectrolyte complex film for the control of drug release from chitosan–alginate matrix tablets, and (ii) to evaluate the release characteristics and mechanisms based on various factors (type of drugs, polymer level, drug loading, pH).
Section snippets
Materials
Chitosan (400 kDa) was purchased from Weifang Kehai Chitin Co., Ltd. (China) with a degree of deacetylation of 86.5%. Sodium alginate (LF200M) and microcrystalline cellulose (MCC, Avicel PH-101) were kindly provided as a gift by FMC Biopolymer (USA). Theophylline was provided by Yuanhang Company (P.C. Drug, Tianjin, China). Paracetamol and metformin hydrochloride were purchased from Yuanchengtech Company (P.C. Drug, Wuhan, China). Trimetazidine hydrochloride was purchased from Hubei-Sihuan
Formation of in situ self-assembled polyelectrolyte complex film
In our previous study, a coated film was found on the surface of CS–SA matrix tablets by adding 0.5% methyl orange to the formulations for the ease of observation (Zhang et al., 2010). In current research, presence of the coated film was demonstrated by direct observation method. Fig. 1a showed the shape of CS–SA matrix in SGF followed SIF. Visual observation indicated that the matrices started to swell almost from the beginning, and a viscous gel mass was formed when they came into contact
Conclusions
Direct observation and DSC studies demonstrated that in situ self-assembled film could be formed on CS–SA matrix based tablets surface in the simulated gastrointestinal tract, and CS–SA matrix tablets was actually a combination of film coating and hydrophilic gel system. This film coating limited polymer swelling and erosion. Properties of the drugs had no significant effect on the erosion and swelling process of CS–SA based matrix at drug content 33.3%. The release mechanisms of the four types
References (28)
- et al.
Effect of ionic strength and pH of dissolution media on theophylline release from hypromellose matrix tablets—apparatus USP III, simulated fasted and fed conditions
Carbohydr. Polym.
(2011) - et al.
Modifying matrix micro-environmental pH to achieve sustained drug release from highly laminating alginate matrices
Eur. J. Pharm. Sci.
(2008) - et al.
Polysaccharide hydrogels for modified release formulations
J. Control. Release
(2007) - et al.
Prediction of drug release from HPMC matrices: effect of physicochemical properties of drug and polymer concentration
J. Control. Release
(2004) - et al.
Polyionic hydrocolloids for the intestinal delivery of protein drugs: alginate and chitosan—a review
J. Control. Release
(2006) - et al.
Controlled-release tablets from carrageenans: effect of formulation, storage and dissolution factors
Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.
(2001) - et al.
Alginate: properties and biomedical applications
Prog. Polym. Sci.
(2012) - et al.
Characterization and biodegradation of chitosan–alginate polyelectrolyte complexes
Polym. Degrad. Stab.
(2009) - et al.
Evaluation of sodium alginate as drug release modifier in matrix tablets
Int. J. Pharm.
(2006) - et al.
Critical factors in the release of drugs from sustained release hydrophilic matrices
J. Control. Release
(2011)