Original contributionCD24 is highly useful in differentiating high-grade serous carcinoma from benign and malignant mesothelial cells☆,☆☆
Introduction
Ovarian cancer, consisting predominantly of ovarian carcinoma (OC), is the most lethal gynecological cancer. Efforts directed at improving the outcome of OC patients have been checked by the absence of a robust test for early detection, as well as by chemoresistance that develops in the majority of patients after repeated cycles of chemotherapy. Targeted therapy has to date shown only modest effect in changing this bleak picture [1], [2].
It is widely recognized that small tumor cell populations escape death by chemotherapy and constitute the cellular niche from which recurrence develops in many cancers. The term cancer stem cells (CSC) has been used by some investigators to describe these cells and different markers, including ALDH1A1, CD44, CD117 (c-Kit), CD133 and EpCAM, have been proposed as putative CSC markers in OC (reviewed by Jaggupili et al, Burgos-Ojeda et al, Garson et al [3], [4], [5]).
While the validity of the above-mentioned proteins as CSC markers has been questioned, the case is still more ambiguous for CD24, a cell surface glycoprotein mediating tumor cell adhesion to P-selectin expressed on endothelial cells and platelets, and thus postulated to promote metastasis [5]. CD24 has been described as both positive and negative CSC marker, partly depending on tumor origin, but also in OC itself [3].
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is the most widely used ancillary method in both cytopathology and surgical pathology, and panels which aid in the detection and classification of cancers involving the serosal cavities have been constantly expanding and improving in recent years. The differential diagnosis between serous carcinoma of female genital origin and malignant mesothelioma (MM) is nevertheless difficult in some cases owing to the overlapping morphology and immunomarker expression of these tumors. The majority of antibodies are not 100% sensitive or specific, and the use of several markers is therefore mandated [6].
CD24 was previously identified by our group as a specific marker of ovarian/peritoneal serous carcinoma in the differential diagnosis from diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) using gene expression analysis applied to effusion specimens [7]. Results were not validated at the protein level in the original study, nor has this observation been followed by other investigators to the best of the author's knowledge. The present study analyzed the diagnostic role of CD24 in differentiating OC, primarily high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC), from MM.
Section snippets
Effusion specimens
Effusions consisted of 116 and 36 specimens from patients diagnosed with OC and MM, respectively. Additionally, 54 breast carcinoma (BC) effusions were included for comparative purposes (total = 206). Effusions were submitted to the Department of Pathology at the Norwegian Radium Hospital for routine diagnostic purposes during the period 1998–2008, with the exception of 8 MM specimens from the Department of Pathology in Aalborg, Denmark, used with kind permission from Mr. Søren Nielsen.
Results
CD24 expression results are detailed in the Table and representative specimens are shown in Figure. Staining was localized to the membrane. CD24 was expressed in 105/116 (91%) OC and was present in both HGSC and tumors of other histology, compared to 16/54 (30%) breast carcinomas. CD24 staining was uniformly absent in MM effusions (0/36; 0%). Differences between the 3 tumor types were significant in both 3-tier analysis and in separate comparison of HGSC versus MM and HGSC versus breast
Discussion
An IHC panel applied to the diagnosis of serosal cancers should ideally consist of epithelial and mesothelial markers with high specificity and sensitivity, which allow for a certain diagnosis of carcinoma, MM or RMC using a limited antibody panel. While a large number of markers differentiating MM from metastatic carcinoma have been described, few of them are useful in the differential diagnosis of HGSC from MM. MM-related proteins such as mesothelin, WT1, podoplanin/D2-40 and cytokeratin 5/6
References (25)
- et al.
Ovarian cancer stem cell markers: prognostic and therapeutic implications
Cancer Lett
(2012) - et al.
The clinical role of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and stem cell markers in advanced-stage serous ovarian carcinoma effusions
Hum Pathol
(2015) Application of immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of epithelioid mesothelioma: a review and update
Hum Pathol
(2013)Value of PAX8, PAX2, napsin a, carbonic anhydrase IX, and claudin-4 immunostaining in distinguishing pleural epithelioid mesothelioma from metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Mod Pathol
(2013)Value of PAX8, PAX2, claudin-4, and h-caldesmon immunostaining in distinguishing peritoneal epithelioid mesotheliomas from serous carcinomas
Mod Pathol
(2013)- et al.
Loss of BAP1 expression is very rare in peritoneal and gynecologic serous adenocarcinomas and can be useful in the differential diagnosis with abdominal mesothelioma
Hum Pathol
(2016) - et al.
MMP-7 is a highly specific negative marker for benign and malignant mesothelial cells in serous effusions
Hum Pathol
(2016) - et al.
CD24 is expressed in ovarian cancer and is a new independent prognostic marker of patient survival
Am J Pathol
(2002) - et al.
Malignant ascites-derived exosomes of ovarian carcinoma patients contain CD24 and EpCAM
Gynecol Oncol
(2007) - et al.
Ovarian cancer - diagnostic, biological and prognostic aspects
Womens Health
(2014)
Recently identified drug resistance biomarkers in ovarian cancer
Expert Rev Mol Diagn
Significance of CD44 and CD24 as cancer stem cell markers: an enduring ambiguity
Clin Dev Immunol
Cited by (27)
ALDH1A1+ ovarian cancer stem cells co-expressing surface markers CD24, EPHA1 and CD9 form tumours in vivo
2020, Experimental Cell ResearchCD24-targeted fluorescence imaging in patient-derived xenograft models of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: Fluorescence imaging of PDX models of HGSOC
2020, EBioMedicineCitation Excerpt :The cell surface marker CD24 has been shown to be significantly upregulated in a number of carcinomas compared to their benign counterparts, suggesting it as an ideal target for theranostic applications [44-46]. In our cohort of 30 cases of epithelial ovarian carcinoma we found expression of CD24 present in 90% of tissues, concurring with the observation that CD24 is highly expressed in the vast majority of ovarian cancer cases [47-49] with highest expression levels in the serous subtype [47,48,50,51]. Overdevest et al. reported higher CD24 staining indices in metastases and identified CD24 as the most overexpressed amongst transcripts in metastasising cells of human bladder carcinoma [52].
Expression of CD24 in plasma, exosome and ovarian tissue samples of serous ovarian cancer patients
2019, Journal of BiotechnologySOX2 and SOX9 are markers of clinically aggressive disease in metastatic high-grade serous carcinoma
2019, Gynecologic OncologyCitation Excerpt :However, the clinical relevance of these markers has not been assessed in large series of patients with OC effusions. Two recent studies by a member of our group have failed to identify such role for CD24 and nestin in this anatomic compartment [21,22]. The present study assessed the clinical and biological role of the CSC markers in HGSC.
Ovarian cancer stem cells and their role in drug resistance
2019, International Journal of Biochemistry and Cell BiologyCitation Excerpt :Their relationship to OC chemo-resistance and use as potential targets for therapies is discussed below. CD24 (Cluster of Differentiation 24) is a 27–30 amino acid cell surface protein anchored to the cell membrane by glycosyl-phosphotidyl-inositol, linked to a wide variety of cancers, such as breast, bladder, colorectal and OC (Kristiansen et al., 2004; Nakamura et al., 2017; Davidson, 2016; Jaggupilli and Elkord, 2012). CD24 is thought to increase metastasis by promoting the adhesion of tumour cells to P-selectin, an adhesion receptor found on platelets and endothelial cells.
- ☆
Competing interests: None declared.
- ☆☆
Funding/Support: This work was supported by Inger and John Fredriksen Foundation for Ovarian Cancer Research.