Elsevier

Human Movement Science

Volume 67, October 2019, 102516
Human Movement Science

Force and electromyography responses during isometric force release of different rates and step-down magnitudes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.102516Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Ramp duration and step-down magnitude during isometric force control affect motor responses.

  • Force variability increases and overshoot decreases when force is markedly released.

  • Decreased overshoot implies a conservative control strategy against markedly released force.

  • Perceived exertion and muscle co-contraction increase with longer ramp duration.

Abstract

This study investigated motor responses of force release during isometric elbow flexion by comparing effects of different ramp durations and step-down magnitudes. Twelve right-handed participants (age: 23.1 ± 1.1) performed trajectory tracking tasks. Participants were instructed to release their force from the reference magnitude (REF; 40% of maximal voluntary contraction force) to a step-down magnitude of 67% REF or 33% REF and maintain the released magnitude. Force release was guided by ramp durations of either 1 s or 5 s. Electromyography of the biceps brachii and triceps brachii was performed during the experimental task, and the co-contraction ratio was evaluated. Force output was recorded to evaluate the parameters of motor performance, such as force variability and overshoot ratio. Although a longer ramp duration of 5 s decreased the force variability and overshoot ratio than did shorter ramp duration of 1 s, higher perceived exertion and co-contraction ratio were followed. Force variability was greater when force was released to the step-down magnitude of 33% REF than that when the magnitude was 67% REF, however, the overshoot ratio showed opposite results. This study provided evidence proving that motor control strategies adopted for force release were affected by both duration and step-down magnitude. In particular, it implies that different control strategies are required according to the level of step-down magnitude with a relatively short ramp duration.

Introduction

Humans not only increase but also release force to perform activities of daily living. Recent studies have shown that motor unit control for regulating force release is independent from the one for force increase (Andrzejewska et al., 2014, Onushko et al., 2013, Orizio et al., 2010). This difference of motor unit control might emerge as altered behavioral responses, such as increased variability during force release (Park, Kwon, Solis, Lodha, & Christou, 2016).

Force release and muscle relaxation are prerequisites for skillful and precise movements (Sugawara et al., 2016, Suzuki et al., 2015). Nonetheless, several studies regarding sports, playing instruments, and caregiving have indicated that muscle relaxation might be difficult especially when the movements are unfamiliar (Daikoku and Saito, 2008, Kato et al., 2014, Sakurai and Ohtsuki, 2000, Wada and Yoshida, 2016). Similarly, recent studies on human-robot cooperation showed that although assistive force is provided to aid joint movements, robot users might not easily release their muscular force (Muraki et al., 2018, Rosen and Perry, 2007). The common feature of those movements is that muscular force is released to a particular step-down magnitude, rather than complete relaxation to achieve precise and smooth performance. However, few studies have focused on how the force output and corresponding muscle activity are altered under varying conditions of force release to step-down magnitudes.

Several studies showed that varying ramp rates to guide isometric force release were associated with altered force variability and error during joint movements (Naik et al., 2011, Orizio et al., 2010). Additionally, gradual force release increased corticospinal excitability in the antagonist muscle (Yoshida, Yamaguchi, Saitou, Tanabe, & Sugawara, 2015). On the other hand, maintaining varying degrees of step-down magnitude, which follows force release might also affect behavioral responses. There is evidence that force variability and error increased if isometric force was greatly released to lower magnitude (Choi et al., 2018, Masumoto and Inui, 2010). Further, maintaining lower force magnitudes might raise force variability (Galganski et al., 1993, Griffin et al., 2009, Kumar et al., 2017).

Regulation of force release to step-down magnitude can be a type of target-directed aiming movements. Specifically, fast and forceful movements might cause noises such as overshoot, which represents the degree of passing through the target (Elliott, Hansen, Mendoza, & Tremblay, 2004). The overshoot arisen during bottom-up target-directed force control is known to be costlier than the undershoot (Kesar, Chou, & Binder-Macleod, 2008). It is because corrective and time-consuming sub-movement is required to overcome the inertia and recover the target after the overshoot (Elliott et al., 2004, Sparrow and Newell, 1998). Conversely, if overshoot occurs during top-down force control, this might be even costlier as the sub-movement to recover the target level requires force increase with additional muscle contraction. Although previous studies have shown that relatively small and rapid changes in force cause larger overshoot during bottom-up force control (Dideriksen et al., 2017, Hu et al., 2011), it is unclear how top-down force control with varying ramp rates and step-down magnitudes affect the degree of overshoot.

The objective of this study is to examine the force output and muscle activity during the isometric force release and maintenance. Force variability and overshoot ratio are calculated from the force output to evaluate the motor performance. Simple voluntary exertion of isometric elbow flexion is investigated as a basic study, where this exercise excludes various biomechanical factors, such as angle movement and velocity that may affect the sole performance of motor control by agonist and antagonist muscles. Visuomotor tracking tasks are conducted to guide force control with different levels of ramp duration and step-down magnitude, in which the isometric force of elbow flexion and the corresponding muscle activity are simultaneously measured. We hypothesize that different ramp durations and step-down magnitudes would alter the motor performance and muscle activity during isometric elbow flexion.

Section snippets

Participants

Twelve healthy male adults (age: 23.1 ± 1.1 years, height: 173.3 ± 6.3 cm, weight: 67.0 ± 8.6 kg) were recruited. None of the participants reported any history of musculoskeletal disorders or functional upper limb impairment. Hand dominance was determined using the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (Oldfield, 1971). Each participant provided informed consent prior to participating in the experiment. This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Design, Kyushu

Force output and muscle activity

The normalized isometric force (%MVC force) was released in accordance with the four conditions of guided trajectory during the simulation (Fig. 3a). The activities of the BB and TB muscles (%MVC) showed trends similar to those for force output (Fig. 3b & c). The BB was more involved as the agonist muscle during elbow flexion than the TB. The last 3 s of the simulation (12 s–15 s for the conditions involving ramp duration of 1 s; 16 s–19 s for the conditions involving ramp duration of 5 s) were

Discussion

This study aimed to determine whether motor performance and EMG responses were affected by varying ramp durations and by followed step-down magnitudes. The results of the last 3 s of force output indicated that force was released and maintained as it was guided by the experimental task; however, relatively short ramp duration (1 s) increased BB activity in the last seconds of force maintenance. We also found that both force variability and overshoot ratio decreased when ramp duration was

Conclusion

This study focused on the force and EMG responses in the process of force release to a certain magnitude and its maintenance during isometric elbow flexion. Although force release guided by longer ramp duration lowered the force variability and overshoot ratio than that guided by shorter ramp duration, it also accompanied increased RPE and co-contraction ratio. When force was greatly released, force variability increased while overshoot ratio decreased. Specifically, the results of overshoot

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Yuanyuan Wang and Angelie Revilla for their assistance in conducting our experiment. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP17H01454.

References (55)

  • B. Visser et al.

    The effects of precision demands during a low intensity pinching task on muscle activation and load sharing of the fingers

    Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

    (2003)
  • R. Andrzejewska et al.

    Electromyogram features during linear torque decrement and their changes with fatigue

    European Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2014)
  • C.J. Arellano et al.

    Fatigue-induced adjustment in antagonist coactivation by old adults during a steadiness task

    Journal of Applied Physiology

    (2016)
  • A.K. Au et al.

    Interfering effects of multitasking on muscle activity in the upper extremity

    Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology

    (2007)
  • H.S. Baweja et al.

    Removal of visual feedback alters muscle activity and reduces force variability during constant isometric contractions

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2009)
  • G. Borg

    Physiological bases of percieved exertion

    Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

    (1982)
  • A. Buccolieri et al.

    Relaxation from a voluntary contraction is preceded by increased excitability of motor cortical inhibitory circuits

    Journal of Physiology

    (2004)
  • J. Choi et al.

    Simulation study on the effects of adaptive time for assist considering release of isometric force during elbow flexion

    Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association

    (2018)
  • R. Daikoku et al.

    Differences between Novice and Experienced Caregivers in Muscle Activity and Perceived Exertion while Repositioning Bedridden Patients

    Journal of Physiological Anthropology

    (2008)
  • J.L. Dideriksen et al.

    Control of force during rapid visuomotor force-matching tasks can be described by discrete time PID control algorithms

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2017)
  • D. Elliott et al.

    Learning to optimize speed, accuracy, and energy expenditure: A framework for understanding speed-accuracy relations in goal-directed aiming

    Journal of Motor Behavior

    (2004)
  • A.G. Feldman

    Space and time in the context of equilibrium-point theory

    Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science

    (2011)
  • D.W. Franklin et al.

    Adaptation to stable and unstable dynamics achieved by combined impedance control and inverse dynamics model

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2003)
  • M.E. Galganski et al.

    Reduced control of motor output in a human hand muscle of elderly subjects during submaximal contractions

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1993)
  • A.S.C. Gibson et al.

    Neural control of force output during maximal and submaximal exercise

    Sports Medicine

    (2001)
  • L. Griffin et al.

    Motor unit firing variability and synchronization during short-term light-load training in older adults

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2009)
  • Y. Hasegawa et al.

    Further insight into the task-dependent excitability of motor evoked potentials in first dorsal interosseous muscle in humans

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2001)
  • Cited by (5)

    • Decrease in force control among older adults under unpredictable conditions

      2022, Experimental Gerontology
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the possible explanations for this difference may be the different methods used, for example, the joint used. Most previous studies used the pinch, grip, or elbow flexion to assess the force control (Choi et al., 2019; Lindberg et al., 2012; Naik et al., 2011; Ohtaka and Fujiwara, 2016; Park et al., 2016; Voelcker-Rehage and Alberts, 2005). We assessed the force control using the ankle plantar flexion because we were interested in the postural and motor control during standing.

    • Motor performance patterns between unilateral mechanical assistance and bilateral muscle contraction

      2020, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics
      Citation Excerpt :

      A previous study on reaching movement showed that bilateral movement with loading on one arm was slower than unilateral movement due to the altered kinematic strategy for reducing movement error (Chang et al., 2006). Furthermore, our previous study on isometric force control demonstrated that a rapid force change might increase the target overshoot (Choi et al., 2019b), which could be costly and risky due to the additional muscle force required to overcome inertia and recover the target (Elliott et al., 2004). As force variability and error during isometric contraction are affected by a change of force magnitude (Choi et al., 2019a; Masumoto and Inui, 2010), this study considered the homogenous step-down magnitude following force release.

    • Effects of mechanical assistance on muscle activity and motor performance during isometric elbow flexion

      2020, Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      In order to provide 50% assistance for the load applied on the level of the styloid process, an equivalent force was applied to the center of the forearm in the opposite direction. Because our previous study, which examined participants in their twenties, indicated that the averaged force during maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) of the dominant-arm elbow flexion was approximately 157 N (Choi et al., 2019), we used 47 N (30% ×157 N) as a reference load (REF) in the present study. A linear actuator (Takei Scientific Instruments Co., Ltd, Niigata, Japan) was used to apply mechanical assistance (Fig. 1).

    View full text