Elsevier

Hearing Research

Volume 301, July 2013, Pages 183-192
Hearing Research

Review
Perspective of functional magnetic resonance imaging in middle ear research

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heares.2012.12.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies have frequently been applied to study sensory system such as vision, language, and cognition, but have proceeded at a considerably slower speed in investigating middle ear and central auditory processing. This is due to several factors, including the intrinsic anatomy of the middle ear system and inherent acoustic noise during acquisition of MRI data. However, accumulating evidences have demonstrated that clarification of some fundamental neural underpinnings of audition associated with middle ear mechanics can be achieved using functional MRI methods. This mini review attempted to take a narrow snapshot of the currently available functional MRI procedures and gave examples of what may be learned about hearing from their application. It is hoped that with these technical advancements, many new high impact applications in audition would follow. In particular, because the fMRI can be used in humans and in animals, fMRI may represent a unique tool that should promote translational research by enabling parallel analyses of physiological and pathological processes in the human and animal auditory system.

This article is part of a Special Issue entitled “MEMRO 2012”.

Highlights

► Clarification of neural underpinnings of audition can be achieved using fMRI. ► Several recent fMRI approaches in auditory system were reviewed. ► Technical limitations of fMRI in the study of auditory system were reviewed.

Introduction

Mechanically, sound is the vibration of air and is transmitted as a vibration through the tympanic membrane, via the auditory ossicles to the oval window. Mechanical conduction of sound is then converted to electrochemical impulses in the organ of Corti of the cochlea, which acts as a neural transducer (Farris et al., 2006; Kitajiri et al., 2010). Sound evoked neuronal activity then propagates through the auditory pathway, which is composed of the cochlea, cochlear nucleus, superior olivary complex, lateral lemniscus, inferior colliculus, and medial geniculate body, to the auditory cortex (Muller-Preuss and Mitzdorf, 1984; Nieuwenhuys, 1984). Therefore, changes in mechanical conduction of sound originating from the middle ear would affect neuronal activity in the central auditory system. For example, middle ear sensitivity, such as sound pressure variations on the tympanic membrane, resulted in pressure dependent cortical representation (Job et al., 2011).

Functional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique, which is relatively new in middle ear research, has mainly been used to address two questions; (1) tonotopic organization of the central auditory pathway in response to frequency and intensity of sound stimuli and (2) auditory cortical mapping in response to other features of sound stimuli, such as complex stimuli. Regarding tonotopic organization, much of our current understanding of tonotopic organization has been attained primarily through use of invasive techniques, such as electrophysiology (Merzenich et al., 1975; Recanzone et al., 2000; Malmierca et al., 2008), immunohistochemical assay (Ehret and Fischer, 1991; Pierson and Snyder-Keller, 1994), and 2-deoxyglucose labeling (Huang and Fex, 1986). However, electrophysiological recordings cannot achieve the continuous spatial coverage and large field of view (FOV) required for thorough study of tonotopic organization. Immunohistochemical study would require use of a large number of animals in order to cover a broad frequency range and is difficult to use in longitudinal investigations. In contrast to these techniques, non-invasive functional MR imaging has a large field of view and can allow for simultaneous examination of multiple auditory structures (Jancke et al., 1998; Sigalovsky and Melcher, 2006). In auditory cortical mapping in response to complex stimuli, a number of studies using fMRI have examined the pitch representation in the auditory cortex. In addition, a recent connectivity study using fMRI challenged the traditional view that sound is processed almost exclusively in the auditory pathway unless sound is imbued with behavioral significance. Obviously, vocalization, musical experience, and stimuli with cognitive context are a type of complex sound stimuli. However, a detailed discussion of these issues is beyond the scope of this mini-review.

In this mini review, we focused on the possible applications of functional MR imaging for investigation of the relationship between sound stimuli (simple and complex stimuli) in the middle ear and its central neural processing. Among functional MR imaging techniques, neuro-functional MRI (fMRI) is a method used in brain mapping. In addition, manganese enhanced MRI (MEMRI) has recently been introduced as an important functional imaging tool for the study of neural signal conduction from the middle ear to the central auditory pathway with very high spatial resolution. We also discussed the intrinsic limitation of fMRI (acoustic MR scanner noise) and possible solutions. It is not the purpose of this paper to provide a complete description of the physics and mathematical algorithms associated with functional MR imaging. Other reports have addressed these issues in detail (references). However, it is appropriate to provide brief descriptions of the functional MR imaging techniques that, to date, have been applied to the study of hearing, or that offer potential for such applications. In addition, it is not the purpose of this report to provide a critical evaluation of the clinical applications of functional MR imaging. Clinical applications of functional MR imaging are still in their infancy.

Section snippets

Tonotopic organization in the auditory system

Topographic encoding of sound frequency, tonotopy, is a fundamental property of the auditory system. While much of topographic representation in the auditory pathway has been established, there are still unanswered questions. For example, is topographic representation of frequency, which is well established in the cochlea and subcortical nuclei, also maintained in the auditory cortex? Two recent studies using in vivo two-photon microscopy reported (1) that frequency is not the most prominent

Task-evoked functional MRI (fMRI)

Earlier BOLD fMRI studies of cortical pitch responses demonstrated maximal responses to regular-interval noise in lateral Heschl's gyrus (HG), which have been interpreted as pitch mappings (Patterson et al., 2002; Hall et al., 2006). Similar findings in lateral HG were demonstrated in an experiment comparing high pitch salience and low pitch salience in the same pass band (Penagos et al., 2004). Other studies with binaural pitch, in which the imposition of a phase shift between the ears in a

Technical limitation of fMRI

In the study of the auditory system using fMRI, specific difficulties arise primarily from loud acoustic noise due to rapid magnetic field gradient switching during echo-planar imaging (EPI) and other BOLD-sensitive functional image acquisition (Belin et al., 1999; Hall et al., 1999). During EPI scan, vibration of the gradient coil structure, due to a pulsed Lorenz force, generates air compression that is perceived as the sound noise reaching sound pressure levels (SPLs) in the range of

Summary

This mini review has been an attempt to introduce a narrow snapshot of the possible applications of fMRI in hearing research. In middle ear and central auditory processing, fMRI is gaining support as the functional imaging tool of preference, because of its non-invasiveness and large field of view. The non-invasiveness of MRI enables repeated longitudinal measures on the same subjects and the large field of view enables simultaneous examination of multiple auditory structures. Until recently,

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea (A092106).

References (112)

  • C.K. Henkel et al.

    Development of banded afferent compartments in the inferior colliculus before onset of hearing in ferrets

    Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • C. Humphries et al.

    Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • A. Hyvärinen et al.

    Independent component analysis: algorithms and applications

    Neural Netw.

    (2000)
  • M.A. Izquierdo et al.

    Nonplastic reorganization of frequency coding in the inferior colliculus of the rat following noise-induced hearing loss

    Neuroscience

    (2008)
  • L. Jancke et al.

    Intensity coding of auditory stimuli: an fMRI study

    Neuropsychologia

    (1998)
  • A. Job et al.

    DPOAEs in young normal-hearing subjects with histories of otitis media: evidence of sub-clinical impairments

    Hear. Res.

    (2002)
  • S. Kitajiri et al.

    Actin-bundling protein TRIOBP forms resilient rootlets of hair cell stereocilia essential for hearing

    Cell

    (2010)
  • D.R. Langers et al.

    Representation of lateralization and tonotopy in primary versus secondary human auditory cortex

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • D.R.M. Langers et al.

    fMRI activation in relation to sound intensity and loudness

    NeuroImage

    (2007)
  • D.R.M. Langers

    Blind source separation of fMRI data by means of factor analytic transformations

    NeuroImage

    (2009)
  • J.W. Lee et al.

    Manganese-enhanced auditory tract-tracing MRI with cochlear injection

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (2007)
  • H.J. Lee et al.

    Functional activity mapping of rat auditory pathway after intratympanic manganese administration

    NeuroImage

    (2012)
  • P. Muller-Preuss et al.

    Functional anatomy of the inferior colliculus and the auditory cortex: current source density analyses of click-evoked potentials

    Hear. Res.

    (1984)
  • O. Natt et al.

    High-resolution 3D MRI of mouse brain reveals small cerebral structures in vivo

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (2002)
  • R.D. Patterson et al.

    The processing of temporal pitch and melody information in auditory cortex

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • R.G. Pautler et al.

    Tracing odor-induced activation in the olfactory bulbs of mice using manganese-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • M. Pierson et al.

    Development of frequency-selective domains in inferior colliculus of normal and neonatally noise-exposed rats

    Brain Res.

    (1994)
  • S. Puschmann et al.

    Dichotic pitch activates pitch processing centre in Heschl’s gyrus

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • J.P. Rauschecker et al.

    Tuning out the noise: limbic-auditory interactions in tinnitus

    Neuron

    (2010)
  • K.S. Saleem et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of neuronal connections in the macaque monkey

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • E. Seifritz et al.

    Enhancing BOLD response in the auditory system by neurophysiologically tuned fMRI sequence

    NeuroImage

    (2006)
  • I.S. Sigalovsky et al.

    Effects of sound level on fMRI activation in human brainstem, thalamic and cortical centers

    Hear. Res.

    (2006)
  • T.M. Talavage et al.

    Frequencydependent responses exhibited by multiple regions in human auditory cortex

    Hear. Res.

    (2000)
  • K. Tanji et al.

    Effect of sound intensity on tonotopic fMRI maps in the unanesthetized monkey

    NeuroImage

    (2010)
  • L. Aitkin et al.

    The responses of neurons in subdivisions of the inferior colliculus of cats to tonal, noise and vocal stimuli

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1994)
  • P.A. Bandettini

    What’s new in neuroimaging methods?

    Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.

    (2009)
  • S. Bandyopadhyay et al.

    Dichotomy of functional organization in the mouse auditory cortex

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2010)
  • S. Baumann et al.

    Orthogonal representation of sound dimensions in the primate midbrain

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2011)
  • A. Brechmann et al.

    Sound-level-dependent representation of frequency modulations in human auditory cortex: a low-noise fMRI study

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2002)
  • V.D. Calhoun et al.

    Spatial and temporal independent component analysis of functional MRI data containing a pair of task-related waveforms

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2001)
  • J. Chambers et al.

    Active control of the volume acquisition noise in functional magnetic resonance imaging: method and psychoacoustical evaluation

    J. Acoust. Soc. Am.

    (2001)
  • S.V. Chandra et al.

    Role of iron deficiency in inducing susceptibility to manganese toxicity

    Arch. Toxicol.

    (1976)
  • C.K. Chen et al.

    Active cancellation system of acoustic noise in MR imaging

    IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.

    (1999)
  • S.A. Counter et al.

    MRI acoustic noise: sound pressure and frequency analysis

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1997)
  • J. Crossgrove et al.

    Manganese toxicity upon overexposure

    NMR Biomed.

    (2004)
  • T.Q. Duong et al.

    Functional MRI of calcium-dependent synaptic activity: cross correlation with CBF and BOLD measurements

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2000)
  • W.B. Edmister et al.

    Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (1999)
  • M.R. Elliott et al.

    The effect of scanner sound in visual, motor, and auditory functional MRI

    Magn. Reson.

    (1999)
  • H.E. Farris et al.

    Steady-state adaptation of mechanotransduction modulates the resting potential of auditory hair cells, providing an assay for endolymph [Ca2+]

    J. Neurosci.

    (2006)
  • K.K. Glendenning et al.

    Comparative morphometry of mammalian central auditory systems: variation in nuclei and form of the ascending system

    Brain Behav. Evol.

    (1998)
  • View full text