Elsevier

Food Chemistry

Volume 198, 1 May 2016, Pages 2-11
Food Chemistry

Review
Technologies for the utilisation of biogenic waste in the bioeconomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.11.030Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Explains why it’s important to view the bioeconomy in the light of modern technological expansion.

  • Stresses that old and new technologies need better techno-industrial integration to be sustainable.

  • Numerous recent publications on biogenic waste technologies are drawn together.

Abstract

A brief review has been done of technologies involved in the exploitation of biogenic wastes, in order to provide an introduction to the subject from the technological perspective. Biogenic waste materials and biomass have historically been utilised for thousands of years, but a new conversation is emerging on the role of these materials in modern bioeconomies. Due to the nature of the products and commodities now required, a modern bioeconomy is not simply a rerun of former ones. This new dialogue needs to help us understand how technologies for managing and processing biogenic wastes – both established and novel – should be deployed and integrated (or not) to meet the requirements of the sustainability, closed-loop and resource-security agendas that evidently sit behind the bioeconomy aspirations now being voiced in many countries and regions of the world.

Introduction

Human utilisation of biogenic materials or biomass is not new; indeed, it is a very old practice. Prior to the industrial revolution biomass was the main source of energy and materials. Biomass utilisation declined following the exploitation of fossil fuels during the 1900s, except for in a few cases, e.g., the timber and fibre industries (Gallezot, 2008), during the 1930s agricultural surplus in the USA (Gallo, Bueno, & Schuchardt, 2014) and during World War II petroleum shortages in Europe (Suarez & Meneghetti, 2007). There is now a renewed interest in biomass, sparked by the aim to reduce society’s climate footprint and other environmental burdens, achieve a more secure supply of resources and to encourage the bioeconomy. Activities designed to achieve those aims are already underway, although the recent food versus fuel and deforestation debates reveal that the source of the biomass being exploited is an important consideration. It follows that attention should be paid to the effective exploitation of unavoidable organic wastes that might otherwise go unused or potentially be landfilled or cause disposal problems.

Historically it is likely that some organic wastes have been spread to land since ancient times, often for utilitarian reasons rather than for commercial interests, e.g., the spreading of manure (Golueke & Dias, 1996). The composting of municipal solid waste (MSW) for land-spreading in Europe apparently began through the efforts of the Dutch government in the 1920s, but this was later followed by much wider interest in utilising MSW (Slater & Frederickson, 2001).

More recently, many nations have produced roadmaps or strategies setting out how they plan to approach the bioeconomy in their own country or region. There are undoubtedly new opportunities, exploitation of biogenic wastes being one important prospect. The English and other UK Governments (waste is devolved in the UK) have discussed this question, noting the opportunities likely to arise from utilising waste (HM Government, 2015). A desire to valorise wastes and to move waste treatment (and resources) up the waste hierarchy should contribute to a renewed vitality that is likely to nurture the bioeconomy. The valorisation of waste is an emerging subject going beyond energy applications. For example, there is interest in generating higher value substances and products from biogenic waste, such as pigments, phenolics and nutrients. A good selection of recent ideas may be found in Brar, Soccol, and Dhillon (2014).

One obvious question to ask is – “how much biogenic material and biogenic waste is there?” From one perspective the answer is “a great deal!”. Cellulose, a useful polysaccharide and platform chemical, is the most abundant organic polymer on Earth. Annually the amount of cellulose generated is about 40 times greater than the amount of starch produced by crops for food and feed, and every ton of cereals harvested is usually accompanied by production of 2 or 3 tons of cellulosic crop residues that are often burned or wasted (You et al., 2013). From this standpoint humankind has not exploited biogenic material to “even a fraction of its potential” (Gajalakshmi & Abbasi 2008). In nature cotton fibres show a particularly high concentration of cellulose (>90%). Not surprisingly, cellulose, a prime target substance in the bioeconomy, shows up in a wide range of biogenic materials and wastes, an obvious example being wood. However, biogenic substances for use as feedstocks will be more or less easy to obtain depending on the form of the waste materials or products in which they are found, and depending on how effective we are at collecting and separating them. In a bioeconomy, this latter issue is not just about separate household collections and waste management processes. Detection and separation issues occur in various layers of the bioeconomy. For example, technologies will be required to separate cellulose, anti-oxidants, amino-acids, or any other target substance away from the waste matrix or composite in which it is presented. Indeed, substance-separation processes account for well over half of the process costs for many chemical operations. Whereas distillation delivers substance separation in the petro-refinery, the chemical constituents of biomass are generally less volatile. Therefore, in the cognate biorefinery, appropriate solvent extraction methodologies will have to be developed to provide the chemical separation functions (Ragauskas et al., 2006). Consequently, not all of the large amounts of biogenic material in nature and the waste sector will yet be readily available or extractable using current methods, and this is without factoring in the influence of pricing signals and markets (Howes et al., 2011).

Therefore, it’s not surprising that estimates of the amount of biogenic material vary widely. There may be as much as 60 billion tons of organically bound carbon produced each year (Lew, 2013). This is not of course all available for human use. A recent debate in the UK concluded that although there is no clear source of information on the amount of waste biogenic material available in the UK, the figure could be in the order of about 100 million tonnes each year (House of Lords Science & Technology Select Committee, 2014). Viewed from the bioenergy perspective (modelling only forestry biomass, agri-residues, energy crops and biofuels supply), the UK has been projected to have access to about 1800 PJ (1 petajoule = 106 gigajoules) annually of bioenergy supply (from all possible sources) by 2020 (Howes et al., 2011).

In some respects the amount of available biomass need not be viewed as a fixed value. Biomass for the bioeconomy could be increased through genetic modifications that create bigger plants, change the ratio of lignin and cellulose to favour the latter, enhance plant resistance to diseases and to stressors, minimise plant losses, or modify plant cell walls so that the cellulose is more readily processable (Ragauskas et al., 2006).

What kinds of technological approaches are helping us to exploit this biogenic waste? This review briefly describes many of the key technological ingredients in the bioeconomy that are being explored for the utilisation of biogenic wastes as a resource. Creating a categorical scheme for describing these technologies is increasingly difficult for wastes. Some biotechnologies, such as microbial fermentation processes, are widely deployed into many different technological solutions. Wastes (especially those not source-segregated) are often quite complex matrices, and effective management and processing may entail several technological objectives. Moreover, economic pressure to valorise wastes is intense; due to the relatively low value of many wastes, the premium technologies do more than simply extract materials, or provide energy or treat the waste – there’s not much room in a waste bioeconomy for one-trick ponies. Concepts such as the ‘biorefinery’ create stretching aspirations towards increasingly integrated technologies. There is a major research need to integrate unit-processes to give a much more holistic outcome than would be possible through an outdated ‘material versus energy’ economy. Therefore, this article introduces material recovery technologies as far as possible but, for energy technologies in particular, links these endeavours to the integrated multi- and by-product objectives that often accompany them.

Analytical procedures, necessary for various process control and management activities in the bioeconomy, are not covered, since they are not centrally involved in any bulk processing. However, reviews of relevant analytical chemistry procedures, e.g., chromatographic techniques for analytical separation of biomass reaction products, have been done (Murzin & Holmbom, 2013, chap. 7). Also not covered is bioremediation, wherein plants and microbes in particular are used to remove pollutants from contaminated sites or from contaminated material removed from polluted sites, although such technologies are sometimes used to recover or clean up biogenic wastes.

This is not a critical review, since unravelling the detailed strengths and weaknesses of such a wide range of technologies cannot be done in the form of a single article. However, many of the key challenges associated with the various technologies are indicated. One departure from the technology message is an initial section on the bioeconomy, which explains what is meant by that term and introduces some of the widespread strategic and planning work that has been happening globally. Renewed interest in the bioeconomy would be expected to drive considerable technology development.

This article arose from the Total Food 2014 Conference, at which the wider subject of waste was discussed to encourage a mostly food and food waste processing audience to consider other ways in which waste biogenic material could be explored in the bioeconomy. The aim is to provide an introductory review article showing the general technological approaches being applied to biogenic wastes. It may also be of some use to students and others considering for the first time the technological shape of a bioeconomy. Many references have been included to enable the reader hopefully to use this paper as a platform from which to explore the role of waste process and treatment technologies in the bioeconomy.

Section snippets

The bioeconomy

A ‘bioeconomy’ shares some conceptual alignment with the aims of ‘sustainability’ and the use of biomass and renewables, and could be understood as an economy in which food, chemicals, energy and materials largely come from plants and animals – essentially bio-based. An economy established on biomass instead of fossil fuels could signal a significant shift in socio-economic, agricultural, energy and technological systems. Consequently a bioeconomy may be able to create new directions and

Composting

Composting is an aerobic biological degradation technology in which organic matter (e.g., garden waste) is processed to produce a relatively stabilised material which no longer consumes oxygen or generates toxic metabolites. A comprehensive description of the composting process and its microbiology can be found in Hubbe, Nazhad, and Sánchez (2010). A substantial review of the history, operation and benefits of composting solid waste, with numerous references, has been produced (Gajalakshmi &

Concluding remarks

A wide range of technologies have historically been used and continue to be explored in the bioeconomy, with good signs that many applications are being made in the waste area. There are still issues to consider further with respect to individual technologies, for example, additional enhancements to AD would be welcome. One also needs to recognise the risks. One worry is that a bioeconomy drawing heavily on waste materials may create a strong demand for the recycling of waste materials that

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the UK Department for the Environment, Food & Rural Affairs for freeing up my time to participate in the Total Food 2014 Conference.

References (115)

  • A. Galadima et al.

    Biodiesel production from algae by using heterogeneous catalysts: A critical review

    Energy

    (2014)
  • K. Giannakopoulou et al.

    Low pressure catalytic co-conversion of biogenic waste (Rapeseed Cake) and vegetable oil

    Bioresource Technology

    (2010)
  • J. Greenman et al.

    Electricity from landfill leachate using microbial fuel cells: Comparison with a biological aerated filter

    Enzyme and Microbial Technology

    (2009)
  • J.C. Hargreaves et al.

    A review of the use of composted municipal solid waste in agriculture

    Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment

    (2008)
  • J. Horiuchi

    Biorefinery for effective utilization of agricultural wastes

    Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

    (2009)
  • T. Hua et al.

    Status of hydrogen fuel cell electric buses worldwide

    Journal of Power Sources

    (2014)
  • R. Kajaste

    Chemicals from biomass – Managing greenhouse gas emissions n biorefinery production chains: A review

    Journal of Cleaner Production

    (2014)
  • A. Koutinas et al.

    Development of an advanced biorefinery concept based on valorisation of pulp and paper industry waste streams

    New Biotechnology

    (2014)
  • C.C.J. Leung et al.

    Utilisation of waste bread for fermentative succinic acid production

    Biochemical Engineering Journal

    (2012)
  • J. Lindmark et al.

    Effects of mixing on the result of anaerobic digestion: Review

    Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

    (2014)
  • S.K. Maity

    Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part I

    Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

    (2015)
  • C. Martin et al.

    Combination of water extraction with dilute-sulphuric acid pretreatment for enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis of Jatropha curcas shells

    Industrial Crops & Products

    (2015)
  • J. Mata-Alvarez et al.

    A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013

    Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews

    (2014)
  • C.M. Mehta et al.

    Compost: Its role, mechanism and impact on reducing soil-borne plant diseases

    Waste Management

    (2014)
  • M. Miyahara et al.

    Use of cassette-electrode microbial fuel cell for wastewater treatment

    Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

    (2013)
  • S.N. Naik et al.

    Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review

    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

    (2010)
  • J. Niessen et al.

    Exploiting complex carbohydrates for microbial electricity generation – A bacterial fuel cell operating on starch

    Electrochemistry Communications

    (2004)
  • D. Pant et al.

    A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells for sustainable energy production

    Bioresource Technology

    (2010)
  • R. Parajuli et al.

    Biorefining in the prevailing energy and materials crisis: A review of sustainable pathways for biorefinery value chains and sustainability assessment methodologies

    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

    (2015)
  • J.C. Philp et al.

    Biobased plastics in a bioeconomy

    Trends in Biotechnology

    (2013)
  • J. Poudel et al.

    A study on torrefaction of food waste

    Fuel

    (2015)
  • M. Probst et al.

    A closed loop for municipal organic solid waste by lactic acid fermentation

    Bioresource Technology

    (2015)
  • K. Rabaey et al.

    Microbial fuel cells: Novel biotechnology for energy generation

    Trends in Biotechnology

    (2005)
  • M.S. Romero-Guiza et al.

    Implementation of a prototypal optical sorter as core of the new pre-treatment configuration of a mechanical-biological treatment plant treating OFMSW through anaerobic digestion

    Applied Energy

    (2014)
  • R.A. Slater et al.

    Composting Municipal Waste in the UK: Some Lessons from Europe

    Resources, Conservation and Recycling

    (2001)
  • J.M. Agnew et al.

    The physical properties of compost

    Compost Science & Utilisation

    (2013)
  • A. Albihn

    Recycling biowaste – Human and animal health problems

    Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica (Supplement)

    (2001)
  • J. Alvarez-Gallego et al.

    Thermochemical pretreatments of organic fraction of municipal solid waste from a mechanical-biological treatment plant

    International Journal of Molecular Sciences

    (2015)
  • Arvela

    Recent progress in synthesis of fine and specialty chemicals from wood and other biomass by heterogeneous catalytic processes

    Catalysis Reviews, Science & Engineering

    (2007)
  • BC Committee on Bio-economy. BC Bio-economy. Published by the British Columbia Committee on the Bio-economy. (2011)....
  • G.S. Bezanson et al.

    Effect of composting on microbial contamination and quality of fresh fruits and vegetables – A mini-review

    Acta Horticulturae

    (2014)
  • P. Binod et al.

    Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production

    Biofuels, alternative feedstocks & conversion processes

    (2011)
  • Bioeconomy Council. Bio-economy Innovation. Bio-economy council report 2010. (2010)....
  • A. Bosio et al.

    A new method to inertize incinerator toxic fly ash with silica from rice husk ash

    Environmental Chemistry Letters

    (2013)
  • J.J. Bozell et al.

    Technology development for the production of biobased products from biorefinery carbohydrates – The US Department of Energy’s “Top 10” revisited

    Green Chemistry

    (2010)
  • T.R. Cavagnaro

    Biologically regulated nutrient supply systems: compost and arbuscular mycorrhizas – A review

    Advances in Agronomy

    (2015)
  • F. Cherubini et al.

    Toward a common classification approach for biorefinery systems

    Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefineries

    (2009)
  • B.S. Choudri et al.

    Bioenergy from biofuel residues and wastes

    Water Environment Research

    (2014)
  • N. Das et al.

    Biosorption of heavy metals – An overview

    Indian Journal of Biotechnology

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text