Elsevier

Environmental Research

Volume 192, January 2021, 110283
Environmental Research

Characterization of graphene/pine wood biochar hybrids: Potential to remove aqueous Cu2+

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.110283Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Cu2+ removal capacities of graphene-biochar hybrids were assessed.

  • All hybrids have higher surface areas than raw biochar.

  • The hybrid with the lowest graphene surface area had the highest sorption capacity.

  • Larger graphene surface areas resulted in lower surface area hybrids.

  • Evidence for enhanced Cu2+ adsorption by thick graphene sheets is presented.

Abstract

Biochar-based hybrid composites containing added nano-sized phases are emerging adsorbents. Biochar, when functionalized with nanomaterials, can enhance pollutant removal when both the nanophase and the biochar surface act as adsorbents. Three different pine wood wastes (particle size < 0.5 mm, 10 g) were preblended with 1 wt% of three different graphenes in aqueous suspensions, designated as G1, G2, and G3. G1 (SBET, 8.1 m2/g) was prepared by sonicating graphite made from commercial synthetic graphite powder (particle size 7–11 μm). G2 (312.0 m2/g) and G3 (712.0 m2/g) were purchased commercial graphene nanoplatelets (100 mg in 100 mL deionized water). These three pine wood-graphene mixtures were pyrolyzed at 600 °C for 1 h to generate three graphene-biochar adsorbents, GPBC-1, GPBC-2, and GPBC-3 containing 4.4, 4.9, and 5.0 wt% of G1, G2, and G3 respectively. Aqueous Cu2+ adsorption capacities were 10.6 mg/g (GPBC-1), 4.7 mg/g (GPBC-2), and 5.5 mg/g (GPBC-3) versus 7.2 mg/g for raw pine wood biochar (PBC) (0.05 g adsorbent dose, Cu2+ 75 mg/L, 25 mL, pH 6, 24 h, 25 ± 0.5 °C). Increased graphene surface areas did not result in adsorption increases. GPBC-1, containing the lowest nanophase surface area with the highest Cu2+ capacity, was chosen to evaluate its Cu2+ adsorption characteristics further. Results from XPS showed that the surface concentration of oxygenated functional groups on the GPBC-1 is greater than that on the PBC, possibly contributing to its greater Cu2+ removal versus PBC. GPBC-1 and PBC uptake of Cu2+ followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. Langmuir maximum adsorption capacities and BET surface areas were 18.4 mg/g, 484.0 m2/g (GPBC-1) and 9.2 mg/g, 378.0 m2/g (PBC). This corresponds to 3.8 × 10−2 versus 2.4 × 10−2 mg/m2 of Cu2+ removed on GPBC-1 (58% more Cu2+ per m2) versus PBC. Cu2+ adsorption on both these adsorbents was spontaneous and endothermic.

Introduction

Industry releases large amounts of toxic inorganic and organic substances into the environment worldwide, driving the need for remediation (Kim et al., 2016). Heavy metals discharged in industrial effluents pose serious health threats since they persist and bioaccumulate in nature (Agrafioti et al., 2014). Many metals have critical biological roles at low concentrations but cause acute and chronic illness at higher concentrations. Toxicity and carcinogenic effects caused the USEPA to establish limits for 13 heavy metal priority pollutants (Ag, As, Cu, Pd, Zn, Hg, Cd, Be, Cr, Ni, Sb, Se, and Tl) (Hsieh et al., 2004). The permissible limit for Cu2+ in industrial effluents is 1.3 mg/L (US EPA, 2015). The World Health Organization has announced that drinking water Cu2+ concentrations should be less than 2 mg/L (WHO, 2011).

Of the metals with EPA effluent limits, copper is produced in the greatest quantity (US EPA, 2015; BGS, 2019; World Steel Association, 2019). World copper production increased by 29% from 2007 to 2017 (15.5–20 million metric tonnes) (ICSG, 2018). Copper contributes more to water pollution than Cd, Pb, Cr, and Hg because of its widespread use in plumbing, electrical wiring, air conditioning, tubing, and roofing (Aksu and İşoğlu, 2005). Wastewater from these industries contains high copper concentrations (ICSG, 2019; Selvanathan et al., 2017), and industrial process waters have copper ion concentrations as high as 2000 mg/L (Cséfalvay et al., 2009). Copper is an essential trace element (adult daily dietary uptake of copper, 1–2 mg). It regulates many enzyme functions involving cell respiration, melanin synthesis, protection against free radicals, and formation of connective tissues. Nevertheless, high copper concentrations may cause human liver damage (LD50, 220.5 ± 23.8 μg/mL copper sulfate, upon 48 h exposure) (Tchounwou et al., 2008), nausea, abdominal pain, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal symptoms (≥3 mg/L, as copper sulfate) (Nancharaiah et al., 2015; Pizarro et al., 1999). Copper can inhibit the metabolic activity of denitrifying bacteria when concentrations reach up to 0.95 mg/L (IC50) (Ochoa-Herrera et al., 2011) and can also be carcinogenic (Lowndes and Harris, 2005). Higher serum copper levels were reported for advanced breast cancer versus early breast cancer patients (177.9 μg/dL vs. 130.4 μg/dL) (Gupta et al., 1991). Therefore, monitoring and controlling of wastewater copper concentrations is essential.

Traditionally, copper remediation from water employs chemical precipitation (Mirbagheri and Hosseini, 2005), reduction (Gómez-Lahoz et al., 1992), filtration (Aziz et al., 2001), flotation (Rubio and Tessele, 1997), coagulation (Hargreaves et al., 2018), adsorption (Chen et al., 2011), ion exchange (Doula and Dimirkou, 2008), or reverse osmosis (Cséfalvay et al., 2009). However, these methods can be expensive and/or ineffective when treating copper ion concentrations below 100 mg/L. Chemical-mechanical polishing effluents can contain dissolved copper at 5–100 mg/L (Pérez-Marín et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2017). Lime precipitation effectively removes copper only if metal concentrations exceed 1000 mg/L (Kurniawan et al., 2006), and requires large quantities of precipitating agents. High coagulation-flocculation costs hinder its widespread use in wastewater plants (Kurniawan et al., 2006). Ion exchange is a good option for treating metals as low as 10 mg/L; however, finding a suitable ion exchanger can be problematic (Keane, 1995).

Smooth operation and low cost make adsorption an option for removing copper from wastewater (Chen et al., 2011; Inyang et al., 2011; Karunanayake et al., 2018; Navarathna et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2015). Adsorbents can provide excellent Cu2+ binding capacities (qmax of 53.2 mg/g by chitosan-cellulose hydrogel-beads) (Li and Bai, 2005). Recently, biological materials (Yang et al., 2017), clay minerals (Sarı et al., 2007), layered double hydroxides (Kameda et al., 2005), synthetic nanomaterials (Dave and Chopda, 2014), activated carbon (Imamoglu and Tekir, 2008; Rao et al., 2009) and biomass (Acar and Eren, 2006) have been employed and optimized to adsorb copper ions in water streams. High capital and regeneration costs of many commercially available adsorbents limit large-scale applications, so growing efforts seek novel low-cost adsorbents. A large sorbent surface area and an abundance of active functional groups on adsorbent surfaces improve heavy metal ion adsorption (Mosa et al., 2016; Yin et al., 2019). The low-cost, efficient Cu2+ removal from wastewater with environmental-friendly adsorbents is of great interest to the wastewater treatment community.

Biochar produced by pyrolysis under oxygen-limited conditions can adsorb Cu2+ ions from water (Chen et al., 2011). Partial biomass carbonization leaves oxygenated functions, –COOH, phenolic, keto, ether, and hydroxyl groups on biochar surfaces. These bind or ion exchange with metal cations (Tong et al., 2011). Fast pyrolysis (400–500 °C for 1–40 s) (Lima et al., 2010) biochar surface areas (10–100 m2/g) are substantially lower than those of activated carbon (1000–2500 m2/g) (Imamoglu and Tekir, 2008; Mohan et al., 2014a; Mohan and Pittman, 2006). Biochar is produced for decontamination applications at low cost from abundant and cheap agricultural and forestry biomass wastes but is often overlooked (Chen et al., 2018; Mohan and Singh, 2002; Qian et al., 2015; Tong et al., 2011). Biochar has been used as a support for zeolites to remove aqueous phosphates and humates (Mosa et al., 2020). Additionally, oxidized biochar has been employed to scavenge the phytotoxicity caused by excessive Pb2+ accumulated on plants (El-Banna et al., 2019).

Graphene has a theoretical surface area of 2630 m2/g for a completely exfoliated single-layered sample (Lloyd-Hughes and Jeon, 2012). Graphene-based biochar hybrids with increased surface functional groups, surface areas, micro, and mesopore volumes, adsorbed higher amounts of Pb2+, Cu2+, and methylene blue (Ren et al., 2012, 2011; Tang et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2012). Introducing a graphene/pyrene derivative onto cottonwood at 600 °C for 1 h generated a biochar hybrid with a methylene blue 174 mg/g removal capacity, 20 times greater than unmodified cottonwood biochar (Zhang et al., 2012). Graphene-pretreated wheat straw biochar's surface became increasingly negatively charged with graphene's addition (Tang et al., 2015). No previous work has been published regarding copper adsorption with graphene-biochar hybrids.

This paper presents the synthesis and comparison of three graphene-biochar hybrids to remove Cu2+ from aqueous suspensions. A sample of thick graphene stacks, G1 (8.1 ± 0.7 m2/g), was produced by a 1 h ultrasonication of synthetic graphite dispersed in DI water. G1 and two commercial graphene samples, G2 (312.0 ± 4.0 m2/g), and G3 (712.0 ± 7.0 m2/g), were employed to modify the biochar. These graphene type samples G1, G2, and G3 were mixed and co-pyrolyzed with pine wood under N2 at 600 °C for 1 h to produce three hybrid adsorbents (GPBC-1, GPBC-2, and GPBC-3) to evaluate their Cu2+ sorptions against pine biochar (PBC) pyrolyzed identically. Higher adsorption capacity was reported for GPBC-1 compared to other hybrids. The Cu2+ sorption behavior of GPBC-1 over PBC was characterized using different analytical techniques.

Section snippets

Chemicals

All chemicals used were Analytical Reagent (AR) grade (Sigma Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO). Dry southern yellow pine wood chips (~15 mm × 1 mm x 1 mm) were obtained from the Department of Sustainable Bioproducts, Mississippi State University. These were oven-dried (1 atm) at 70 °C for one month to a moisture content less than 5%, and then ground (<0.5 mm) and stored in a desiccator over CaCl2, before modification.

Preparation of three different graphene suspensions, G1, G2, and G3

A suspension of synthetic graphite powder (0.1 g, particle size 7–11 μm, 99%, VWR

Yields, surface areas, graphene percentages, and initial sorption experiment

The overall hybrid (biochar containing graphene) yields on pyrolysis were 22.4% (GPBC-1), 20.3% (GPBC-2), and 19.3% (GPBC-3) versus a 15.1% yield for PBC (Table 1). The initial weight of the graphene used for the biochar production (0.1 g) was divided by the final weight of the adsorbent (after pyrolysis) to calculate the graphene weight fractions (%) (Table 1). The higher biochar yields of GPBC-1, GPBC-2, and GPBC-3 over PBC are due to the graphene additives in the hybrids (graphene weight

Conclusion

Three different graphene-biochar adsorbents were synthesized via co-pyrolysis of graphene additives with pine wood powder at 600 °C (graphene: biomass mass ratio = ~1%), to assess their Cu2+ removal capacities in aqueous solutions. Cu2+ sorption capacities for the three hybrids were 10.6 mg/g (GPBC-1), 4.7 mg/g (GPBC-2), and 5.5 mg/g (GPBC-3) versus 7.2 mg/g for raw pine wood biochar (PBC). All three hybrids' surface areas are greater than PBC. Surprisingly, the lowest graphene (G1) surface

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Hasara Samaraweera: Conceptualization, Writing - original draft, Investigation. Charles U. Pittman: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing - review & editing. Rooban Venkatesh K.G. Thirumalai: Data curation, Software. El Barbary Hassan: Data curation, Resources. Felio Perez: Data curation, Software, Formal analysis, Validation. Todd Mlsna: Supervision, Project administration.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge financial support of this work by the Department of Chemistry, Mississippi State University, USA. We thank Iwei Chu from the Institute for Imaging & Analytical Technologies (Mississippi State University, Starkville, Mississippi 39762, USA) and Xuefeng Zhang from the Department of sustainable bioproducts provided research assistance.

References (85)

  • M.K. Doula et al.

    Use of an iron-overexchanged clinoptilolite for the removal of Cu2+ ions from heavily contaminated drinking water samples

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2008)
  • M.F. El-Banna et al.

    Scavenging effect of oxidized biochar against the phytotoxicity of lead ions on hydroponically grown chicory: an anatomical and ultrastructural investigation

    Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf.

    (2019)
  • M.L. Farquhar et al.

    Adsorption of Cu(II) on the (0001) plane of mica: a REFLEXAFS and XPS study

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1996)
  • K.Y. Foo et al.

    Insights into the modeling of adsorption isotherm systems

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2010)
  • R.N. Goyal et al.

    A comparison of edge- and basal-plane pyrolytic graphite electrodes towards the sensitive determination of hydrocortisone

    Talanta

    (2010)
  • M. Guerrero et al.

    Pyrolysis of eucalyptus at different heating rates: studies of char characterization and oxidative reactivity

    J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, Pyrolysis

    (2005)
  • C.-Y. Hsieh et al.

    Toxicity of the 13 priority pollutant metals to Vibrio fisheri in the Microtox® chronic toxicity test

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2004)
  • X. Hu et al.

    Batch and column sorption of arsenic onto iron-impregnated biochar synthesized through hydrolysis

    Water Res.

    (2015)
  • M. Imamoglu et al.

    Removal of copper (II) and lead (II) ions from aqueous solutions by adsorption on activated carbon from a new precursor hazelnut husks

    Desalination

    (2008)
  • F.T. Johra et al.

    Facile and safe graphene preparation on solution based platform

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2014)
  • T. Kameda et al.

    Mg-Al layered double hydroxide intercalated with ethylene-diaminetetraacetate anion: synthesis and application to the uptake of heavy metal ions from an aqueous solution

    Separ. Purif. Technol.

    (2005)
  • A.G. Karunanayake et al.

    Lead and cadmium remediation using magnetized and nonmagnetized biochar from Douglas fir

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2018)
  • M.A. Keane

    Role of the alkali metal co-cation in the ion exchange of Y zeolites II. Copper ion-exchange equilibria

    Microporous Mater.

    (1995)
  • E. Kim et al.

    Sorptive removal of selected emerging contaminants using biochar in aqueous solution

    J. Ind. Eng. Chem.

    (2016)
  • D. Kołodyńska et al.

    Comparison of sorption and desorption studies of heavy metal ions from biochar and commercial active carbon

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2017)
  • T.A. Kurniawan et al.

    Physico–chemical treatment techniques for wastewater laden with heavy metals

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2006)
  • N. Li et al.

    Copper adsorption on chitosan–cellulose hydrogel beads: behaviors and mechanisms

    Separ. Purif. Technol.

    (2005)
  • Z. Liu et al.

    Characterization and application of chars produced from pinewood pyrolysis and hydrothermal treatment

    Fuel

    (2010)
  • P. Liu et al.

    Modification of bio-char derived from fast pyrolysis of biomass and its application in removal of tetracycline from aqueous solution

    Bioresour. Technol.

    (2012)
  • S.A. Mirbagheri et al.

    Pilot plant investigation on petrochemical wastewater treatment for the removal of copper and chromium with the objective of reuse

    Desalination

    (2005)
  • D. Mohan et al.

    Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2006)
  • D. Mohan et al.

    Single- and multi-component adsorption of cadmium and zinc using activated carbon derived from bagasse—an agricultural waste

    Water Res.

    (2002)
  • D. Mohan et al.

    Cadmium and lead remediation using magnetic oak wood and oak bark fast pyrolysis bio-chars

    Chem. Eng. J.

    (2014)
  • D. Mohan et al.

    Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent – a critical review

    Bioresour. Technol., Special Issue on Biosorption

    (2014)
  • A. Mosa et al.

    Chemo-mechanical modification of cottonwood for Pb2+ removal from aqueous solutions: sorption mechanisms and potential application as biofilter in drip-irrigation

    Chemosphere

    (2016)
  • A. Mosa et al.

    Biochar-supported natural zeolite composite for recovery and reuse of aqueous phosphate and humate: batch sorption–desorption and bioassay investigations

    Environ. Technol. Innov.

    (2020)
  • Y.V. Nancharaiah et al.

    Metals removal and recovery in bioelectrochemical systems: a review

    Bioresour. Technol., Microbial Fuel Cells

    (2015)
  • C.M. Navarathna et al.

    Removal of Arsenic(III) from water using magnetite precipitated onto Douglas fir biochar

    J. Environ. Manag.

    (2019)
  • V. Ochoa-Herrera et al.

    Toxicity of copper(II) ions to microorganisms in biological wastewater treatment systems

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2011)
  • A.B. Pérez-Marín et al.

    Removal of cadmium from aqueous solutions by adsorption onto orange waste

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2007)
  • K. Qian et al.

    Recent advances in utilization of biochar

    Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.

    (2015)
  • M.M. Rao et al.

    Removal of some metal ions by activated carbon prepared from Phaseolus aureus hulls

    J. Hazard Mater.

    (2009)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text