Effect of cosmetic outcome on quality of life after breast cancer surgery
Introduction
Treatment for breast cancer frequently results in marked changes to the physical appearance of patients. The overall safety of breast conserving surgery (BCS) and reconstruction surgery, as well as improvements in long term outcomes of breast cancer treatment, have enhanced concerns about esthetic results. However, despite efforts to preserve their breasts for cosmetic reasons, a substantial percentage of patients are not satisfied with the esthetic result of surgery. For example, one study reported that 28.3% of patients who underwent BCS were dissatisfied with the cosmetic results.1 Moreover, unlike oncologic outcomes, there are no standard and objective methods for evaluating esthetic outcomes. An objective measure of assessing breast cosmetic results after BCS or reconstruction is needed to improve surgical strategies and to identify factors that affect esthetic outcomes.
The extent to which cosmetic results affect the quality of life (QoL) of breast cancer patients remains unclear. QoL is an important endpoint of breast cancer treatment, and the effects of various interventions on the QoL of these patients are of major interest. However, studies to date of the effects of esthetic outcomes on postoperative QoL have yielded inconsistent results.2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Evaluation using standardized and validated methods may justify efforts to improve cosmetic outcomes of breast cancer surgery, as well as being essential for patients to make an informed choice of surgical options.
The aim of this study was to investigate patient QoL after breast cancer surgery and to correlate these QoL results with subjectively and objectively measured breast cosmesis. We therefore analyzed and compared esthetic results and patient QoL in women who underwent BCS and those who underwent total mastectomy followed by immediate reconstruction (TMIR).
Section snippets
Patients
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Seoul National University Hospital (IRB No. 1206-120-416). We surveyed all women who underwent BCS or TMIR at Seoul University Hospital by a single surgeon (Han W) between January 2007 and September 2011. Women were included if they had: 1) primary, unilateral, histologically proven invasive or in situ breast cancer; 2) clear resection margins at final surgery; 3) no evidence of disease recurrence or metastasis during the
Patient characteristics
The study included 485 women who underwent BCS and 46 who underwent TMIR between January 2007 and September 2011. 86 patients who underwent TM without reconstruction were selected as a control group. Patient characteristics are presented in Table 1. Patients in the TMIR group were significantly younger and had significantly lower BMI than patients in the BCS and TM groups (p = 0.001 each). Cancer stage, however, was similar in the three groups, as were the proportions of patients who received
Discussion
This study attempted to clarify the relationships among esthetic results and patient QoL in women who have undergone breast cancer surgery. The impact of objectively measured breast cosmetic results and patient reported body image on QoL was analyzed a median 2.1 years after BCS or TMIR. We found that breast symmetry, measured objectively by BCCT.core software and panel judgment, did not correlate with patients' general QoL. In contrast, patient self-reported BIS was significantly associated
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea Government (MSIP) (No. 2012M3A9B2028834, No. 2013005540).
References (28)
- et al.
Aesthetic outcomes in breast conservation therapy
Aesthet Surg J
(2008) - et al.
Does cosmetic outcome from treatment of primary breast cancer influence psychosocial morbidity?
Eur J Surg Oncol
(1999) - et al.
Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 1. Comparison of patients' ratings, observers' ratings, and objective assessments
Radiother Oncol
(1992) - et al.
Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning
Radiother Oncol
(1992) Interpreting quality of life data: population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30
Eur J Cancer
(2001)- et al.
The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review
J Psychosom Res
(2002) - et al.
Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment
Artif Intell Med
(2007) - et al.
Modelling ordinal relations with SVMs: an application to objective aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment
Neural Netw
(2005) - et al.
Analysis of cosmetic results following primary radiation therapy for stages I and II carcinoma of the breast
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1979) - et al.
A body image scale for use with cancer patients
Eur J Cancer
(2001)
Factors influencing a woman's choice to undergo breast-conserving surgery versus modified radical mastectomy
Am J Surg
Objectively measured breast symmetry has no influence on quality of life in breast cancer patients
Eur J Surg Oncol
A comparative study of post-operative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy
Eur J Surg Oncol
Depressed mood in breast cancer survivors: associations with physical activity, cancer-related fatigue, quality of life, and fitness level
Eur J Oncol Nurs
Cited by (131)
Reply to letter to the editor: Long-term quality of life and aesthetic outcomes after breast conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer
2022, European Journal of Surgical OncologyLong-term quality of life and aesthetic outcomes after breast conserving surgery in patients with breast cancer
2022, European Journal of Surgical OncologyCitation Excerpt :Chemotherapy has proven to be associated with lower QoL, probably because of side effects and long-term physical effects [28,29]. Some previous studies have shown no influence of hormonal therapy on aesthetic outcome, however others have shown it may have negative impact [16,18,30,31]. Although asymmetry is not associated with aesthetic outcome in this study, other studies that include breast-specific factors in their analysis towards aesthetic outcomes have also been negatively influenced by asymmetry and scar appearances [15,18,22].
Special Considerations in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer and Survivors
2022, Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America
- h
Both authors contributed equally.