Radiogenomics: Creating a link between molecular diagnostics and diagnostic imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.01.050Get rights and content

Abstract

Studies employing high-throughput biological techniques have recently contributed to an improved characterization of human cancers, allowing for novel sub-classification, better diagnostic accuracy, and more precise prognostication. However, requirement of surgical procurement of tissue among other things limits the clinical application of such methods in everyday patient care. Radiographic imaging is routine in clinical practice but is currently histopathology based. The use of routine radiographic imaging provides a potential platform for linking specific imaging traits with specific gene expression patterns that inform the underlying cellular pathophysiology; imaging features could then serve as molecular surrogates that contribute to the diagnosis, prognosis, and likely gene-expression-associated treatment response of various forms of human cancer. This review focuses on high-throughput methods such as microarray analysis of gene expression, their role in cancer research, and in particular, on novel methods of associating gene expression patterns with radiographic imaging phenotypes, known as “radiogenomics.” These findings underline a potential future role of both diagnostic and interventional radiologists in genetic assessment of cancer patients with radiographic imaging studies.

Introduction

With the relatively recent advent of high-throughput biological methods, biomedical research has seen many changes. High-throughput tools are able to provide a global snapshot of cellular physiology, allowing massively parallel assessment of thousands of genes and gene products. Gene expression profiling of various human tissues has led to a better understanding of cellular pathways and various pathological conditions on a biomolecular level. Analysis of different cancerous tissues in relation to samples of normal organ tissue has permitted an enhanced understanding of tumorogenic processes and aided in improved staging and sub-classification of various malignancies. Numerous studies have also shown that gene expression signatures, each comprised of dozens to hundreds of genes, can significantly improve diagnostic classification, prognostication, and prediction of therapeutic response in cancer [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6].

However, gene expression profiling is dependent on the surgical procurement of tissue, yielding a host of risks and potential complications, and making it an unrealistic option for every cancer patient. In contrast to genetic profiling studies, radiographic imaging studies are part of routine clinical care. While it is accepted that imaging can provide important anatomical and morphological information, it is not perceived to imply much consequential molecular detail. However, several studies have recently introduced novel methods for correlating unique features of tumor morphology and physiology garnered through non-invasive imaging with specific patterns of gene expression on a genome-wide scale, thereby introducing the field of “radiogenomics” [7], [8], [9]. These researchers propose that specific radiological tumor phenotypes, or “radiophenotypes,” can serve as surrogates for gene expression signatures, informing a non-invasive yet accurate diagnosis of tumor subtype and molecular biology. Further, if imaging traits can be associated with previously determined treatment-response gene-expression patterns, then non-invasive, routine clinical studies can inform the likely response to specific chemotherapeutics and aid in the decision making process towards an optimal form and duration of treatment. Such methods will potentially allow diagnostic imaging to augment or supplant current techniques that utilize surgical biopsy and pathohistologic analysis, and contribute to a shift towards a more fundamental genetic-based and personalized medicine. The following discussion will center on the promise of high-throughput biological techniques and the emerging field of radiogenomics—an emerging technology that has the potential to link high-throughput molecular diagnostics and diagnostic imaging.

Section snippets

High-throughput biology and gene expression profiling of cancer

With the monumental undertaking of the Human Genome Project largely completed, the accessibility of genomic information has over the last decade brought a prodigious transformation to biomedical research. Investigators are now faced with an array of new tools that allow for the simultaneous measurement of thousands of biological molecules. These high-throughput methods (which are in various stages of maturity) include many novel platforms for profiling each fundamental stage in the flow of

Diagnostic imaging as a surrogate for gene expression profiling

Growth in the clinical utility of imaging modalities to non-invasively characterize disease and guide clinical management in parallel with the development of functional genomic tools such as microarrays provides powerful methods for dissecting both the clinical phenotype in vivo and the molecular basis of disease on a genome-wide level. While gene expression profiling can reveal important information related to underlying biology and its relationship to diagnosis, prognosis, and optimal

Conclusion

Over the last decade, high-throughput biological techniques have reshaped the perspective of biomedical research, allowing efficient and rapid assessment of the entire biological and molecular topography of a cell's physiology. These tools have contributed to a better understanding of cellular pathways and the pathophysiology that leads to tumorogenesis. Gene expression profiling of malignant tissue samples has permitted the elucidation of tumor gene expression signatures across a variety of

References (43)

  • M.D. Kuo et al.

    Radiogenomic analysis to identify imaging phenotypes associated with drug response gene expression programs in hepatocellular carcinoma

    J Vasc Interv Radiol

    (2007)
  • E. Segal et al.

    Decoding global gene expression programs in liver cancer by noninvasive imaging

    Nat Biotechnol

    (2007)
  • M. Diehn et al.

    Identification of noninvasive imaging surrogates for brain tumor gene-expression modules

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2008)
  • S.P. Fodor et al.

    Multiplexed biochemical assays with biological chips

    Nature

    (1993)
  • M. Schena et al.

    Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray

    Science

    (1995)
  • T.R. Golub et al.

    Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring

    Science

    (1999)
  • A.A. Alizadeh et al.

    Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling

    Nature

    (2000)
  • J.S. Lee et al.

    Classification and prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma by gene expression profiling

    Hepatology

    (2004)
  • T. Sorlie et al.

    Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2003)
  • Y. Liang et al.

    Gene expression profiling reveals molecularly and clinically distinct subtypes of glioblastoma multiforme

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2005)
  • C.M. Perou et al.

    Molecular portraits of human breast tumours

    Nature

    (2000)
  • Cited by (255)

    • Methodology for Good Machine Learning with Multi-Omics Data

      2024, Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text