Decision Support
Modelling Efficiency in Regional Innovation Systems: A Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Problem with Shared Outputs within Groups of Decision-Making Units

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.052Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A methodology is developed for evaluating efficiencies in a regional innovation system (RIS)

  • The RIS is viewed as a two-stage process where R&D projects are proposed in stage 1, and then implemented in stage 2

  • In conventional efficiency situations firms are assumed to operate independently of one another

  • In our situation there are shared outputs among the firms in each of a set of industries

Abstract

Regional Innovation Systems (RISs) literature usually focuses on the comparative performance of different regions and analyzes how each region is utilizing its own dedicated resources. The available resources can be shared by many firms which are grouped by industry, just as universities collaborate with many firms in many industries. This paper studies a region in Mexico and the firms within that region with the aim being to identify which of those firms are using the available resources in the best way. We use Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) as a methodology for evaluating the relative efficiencies of the firms, based on their multiple inputs and outputs, and considering their processes as being divided into two stages. An important problem in this setting is that the two-stage process exhibits the characteristic of having outputs being shared among the firms in each industry; this makes it more challenging to determine independent efficiency scores for each firm in each industry, where we need to cater for this phenomenon. To address this, the current article presents a methodology for measuring efficiency in situations where Decision Making Units (DMUs) share outputs with other units within the same group. By solving this problem, we can identify the best-performers and their strategies regarding how they use the available resources in the region.

Introduction

In the current paper, we examine the dynamics of a Regional Innovation System (RIS) in one state in Mexico. A RIS can be defined as “a system of interconnected institutions that create, store and transfer knowledge, skills and artifacts which define new technologies” (Metcalfe, 1995a). Due to their economic importance, RISs have been actively studied in the past few decades and have been identified as the development engines in the new knowledge economies. The various perspectives from which RISs have been studied, including comparing the roles of the actors, identifying best practices, examining the roles of the demand in the system, across political systems, among others, have been aimed at identifying the key elements of the system. Other studies that have attempted to uncover the performance of each of the participating members of a RIS are those based on Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), first presented in Charnes, Cooper & Rhodes (1978). DEA is a method for identifying best practices among peer Decision Making Units (DMUs) in the presence of multiple inputs and outputs (Cook & Zhu, 2014). Cruz-Cázares, Bayona-Sáez, & García-Marco (2013) investigated previous studies that analyzed innovation systems using DEA. (Charnes, Cooper, & Rhodes, 1978) (Cruz-Cázares, Bayona-Sáez, & García-Marco, 2013)

The current research examines a particular RIS and its constituent elements, where industries and their respective firms are using the region's available resources (universities, R&D Centres, and capital) to be more productive. DEA is used to examine the dynamics of the RIS, at the firm level, to guide strategies for improvement. One interesting feature of previous studies of RISs is that most compare regions and try to identify the best performers among the chosen set of regions; in contrast, our research looks at industries and their respective firms within one region of a country. As well, unlike previous applications that utilize conventional DEA structures wherein each DMU has its own independent set of input/output factors, the current application involves a situation where some of the inputs and outputs in an industry are shared among the firms that make up that industry. That being the case, DMUs are thus not completely independent of one another. This latter feature means that the conventional DEA model must be modified.

The structure of the current paper is as follows. Section 2 presents a brief literature review of RIS and DEA and discusses the pertinent factors and data that have been used previously to study RISs. Section 3 presents the new model structure discussed above and specifically caters to the presence of shared factors among the firms within each industry. We emphasize that we restrict our investigation herein to the firm level, as opposed to the level of the industries containing those firms. This is because, for some industries, only a subset of participating firms is available. In Section 4, we use this new methodology to investigate the performance of each of the corresponding firms within the selected region. Conclusions, limitations, and recommended future research are presented in Section 5.

Section snippets

Elements of an Innovation System

Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) have attracted considerable attention in recent decades due to their economic importance and have been identified as the development engines in the new knowledge economies. RIS can be defined as “a system of interconnected institutions to create, store and transfer knowledge, skills, and artifacts which define new technologies” (Metcalfe, 1995a). The systemic vision of regional innovation allows us to understand the articulation of the network of public and

Methodology

The current paper proposes a two-stage DEA model considering sharing outputs. This study provides a methodological framework that addresses situations involving the sharing of inputs and outputs among DMUs in various groups. Consider the situation wherein each of n DMUs, j=1,…n is to be evaluated in terms of I inputs xij, i=1,…,I, D intermediate inputs zdj d=1,…,D, and R outputs yrj j, r=1,…,R.

Findings and Discussion: Evaluating the RIS in Monterrey, Mexico

Table 1 provides data on relevant information in a set of 52 firms grouped by industry. We point out that the number of DMUs in this data set is somewhat smaller than the original set (Originally there were 62 DMUs, and the final data set has 52 units), due to some key data missing from some firms. The data was obtained from CONACyT (the National Science and Technology Council), INEGI (the National Institute of Statistics and Geography in Mexico), and the Ranking report of the 500 best firms in

Conclusions and Future Directions

In this paper we have developed a new DEA methodology for those settings where there is interdependence among the DMUs in subgroups of the full set of the DMUs. This interdependence arises due to the fact that DMUs share certain outputs and inputs in those subgroups. Furthermore, as discussed above, the DMUs exhibit a two-stage structure. As a result of the need to derive efficiencies in the presence of shared factors, the required model is non-linear, unlike the conventional DEA structure with

Acknowledgements

Sonia Valeria Avilés-Sacoto acknowledges financial support from the Poligrant No.12366 at the College of Sciences and Engineering at Universidad San Francisco de Quito, USFQ. Joe Zhu acknowledges support from the National Natural Science Funds of China (No. 71828101), Wade Cook was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (No. A8966), and David Güemes-Castorena was partially funded by the Tec de Monterrey and the MIT Nanotechnology Program. We also thank the

References (55)

  • D. Doloreux et al.

    Regional innovation systems: Current discourse and unresolved issues

    Technology in Society

    (2005)
  • L. Erdal et al.

    The effects of foreign direct investment on R&D and innovations: panel Data Analysis for developing Asian countries

    Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences

    (2015)
  • J. Fagerberg et al.

    National innovation systems, capabilities and economic development

    Research Policy

    (2008)
  • J. Guan et al.

    Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems

    Research Policy

    (2012)
  • N. Islam et al.

    Nanotechnology innovation system: Understanding hidden dynamics of nanoscience fusion trajectories

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    (2009)
  • M. Izadikhah et al.

    A novel two-stage DEA production model with freely distributed initial inputs and shared intermediate outputs

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2018)
  • S. Kwon et al.

    How institutional arrangements in the national innovation system affect industrial competitiveness: A study of Japan and the U.S. with multiagent simulation

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    (2017)
  • J. Ma

    A two-stage DEA model considering shared inputs and free intermediate measures

    Expert Systems with Applications

    (2015)
  • J. Meuer et al.

    Layers of co-existing innovation systems

    Research Policy

    (2015)
  • P.F. Tsai et al.

    A variable returns to scale data envelopment analysis model for the joint determination of efficiencies with an example of the UK health services

    European Journal of Operational Research

    (2002)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    Exploring the impact of open innovation on national systems of innovation — A theoretical analysis

    Technological Forecasting and Social Change

    (2012)
  • A. Watkins et al.

    National innovation systems and the intermediary role of industry associations in building institutional capacities for innovation in developing countries: A critical review of the literature

    Research Policy

    (2015)
  • E.S. Andersen

    Approaching national systems of innovation from the production and linkage structure

  • S.V. Avilés-Sacoto et al.

    Measuring efficiency in DEA in the presence of common inputs

    Journal of the Operational Research Society

    (2019)
  • R. Banker et al.

    Some models for estimating technical and scale efficiencies in data envelopment analysis

    Management Science

    (1984)
  • J. Beasley

    Determining teaching and research efficiencies

    Journal of the Operational Research Society

    (1995)
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia

    (2019)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text